Abstract
-
Background
This study investigated the relationship between job type and the risk for spontaneous abortion to assess the reproductive toxicity of female workers in the semiconductor industry.
-
Methods
A questionnaire survey was administered to current female workers of two semiconductor manufacturing plants in Korea. We included female workers who became pregnant at least 6 months after the start of their employment with the company. The pregnancy outcomes of 2,242 female workers who experienced 4,037 pregnancies were investigated. Personnel records were used to assign the subjects to one of three groups: fabrication process workers, packaging process workers, and clerical workers. To adjust for within-person correlations between pregnancies, a generalized estimating equation was used. The logistic regression analysis was limited to the first pregnancy after joining the company to satisfy the assumption of independence among pregnancies. Moreover, we stratified the analysis by time period (pregnancy in the years prior to 2008 vs. after 2009) to reflect differences in occupational exposure based on semiconductor production periods.
-
Results
The risk for spontaneous abortion in female semiconductor workers was not significantly higher for fabrication and packaging process workers than for clerical workers. However, when we stratified by time period, the odds ratio for spontaneous abortion was significantly higher for packaging process workers who became pregnant prior to 2008 when compared with clerical workers (odds ratio: 2.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.01–4.81).
-
Conclusions
When examining the pregnancies of female semiconductor workers that occurred prior to 2008, packaging process workers showed a significantly higher risk for spontaneous abortions than did clerical workers. The two semiconductor production periods in our study (prior to 2008 vs. after 2009) had different automated processes, chemical exposure levels, and working environments. Thus, the conditions prior to 2008 may have increased the risk for spontaneous abortions in packaging process workers in the semiconductor industry.
-
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s40557-017-0204-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
-
Keywords:
Keywords
Semiconductor industry; Occupational exposure; Spontaneous abortion; Women; Korea; Reproductive toxicity
Background
The semiconductor industry began in the 1960s in England and the United States as a sector of the microelectronics industry; it was fully introduced in Korea during the 1970s [
1]. Today, the semiconductor industry in Korea has a world-class production capacity with a high growth rate [
2]. The current working population of the Korean semiconductor industry is about 107,000, accounting for 0.7% of the entire working population [
3]. The percentage of female workers in this industry is 30.8%, which is higher than in other manufacturing industries [
4]. In 2007, a woman working in a Korean semiconductor factory who was responsible for cleaning semiconductors died of leukemia. As a result, discussions on working environments in the semiconductor industry and occupational diseases began taking place. In 2011, the courts ruled that leukemia was related to semiconductor work. Meanwhile, 18 other workers whose jobs involved semiconductor processes were diagnosed with leukemia, aplastic anemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer; these conditions were subsequently recognized as occupational diseases by the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service (KWCWS) and the courts. Currently, not only cancers but also diseases related to reproductive toxicity, such as infertility, are included in the list of occupational diseases in semiconductor workers by KWCWS [
5]. Therefore, efforts to protect and improve the health of women in the semiconductor industry are needed.
In the semiconductor industry, the process of producing semiconductors involves the use of various chemicals and produces various by-products [
6]. During this process, female workers might be exposed to chemicals that can affect their health [
7]. The semiconductor industry experiences rapid technological advancements and hazardous materials used in the process change frequently [
8]. Risk factors for reproductive toxicity in the semiconductor industry include physical factors, such as exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation; ergonomic factors, such as heavy lifting, a work posture that requires standing for long durations; shift work; and work-related stress [
9]. Moreover, interactions between these factors might occur. Therefore, when conducting an exposure assessment in the semiconductor industry, it is difficult to limit the exposure to specific risk factors; thus, an assessment of occupational exposure in the semiconductor industry should include production periods [
7].
Previous studies on factors that affect the health of workers in the semiconductor industry focused on cancers and reproductive toxicity [
10]. Reproductive toxicity (including spontaneous abortion, infertility, menstrual irregularities, low birth weight, preterm delivery, and congenital anomalies) affects women of childbearing age who are exposed to occupational hazards from production work. Spontaneous abortion can reveal occupational risks more quickly than post-delivery pregnancy outcomes, such as congenital anomalies or stillbirth; thus, it is an important criterion for examining reproductive toxicity in the semiconductor industry [
11]. A study of female workers in the Korean electronics industries showed that they had a higher risk of spontaneous abortion than the control groups (women who were not exposed to occupational hazards, such as economically inactive women, the female working population as a whole, and female workers employed in the banking industry) [
12]. This was the first study to examine reproductive toxicity in female workers who produced semiconductors and circuit boards in the Korean electronics industries. However, because this study examined female workers in the electronics industry, reproductive toxicity in female semiconductor workers could not be accurately assessed. Furthermore, the study used claims data from the National Health Insurance rather than data collected for the study objectives.
Reproductive toxicity in female semiconductor workers is an important issue that has received increasing attention. Thus, our study aimed to investigate the risk for spontaneous abortion in female semiconductor workers to assess reproductive toxicity in the semiconductor industry. We analyzed differences in the risk for spontaneous abortion by job type and year of pregnancy.
Methods
Study population
A structured questionnaire survey was administered to current female workers of two semiconductor manufacturing plants (A and B plants) by a trained surveyor between April 9 and May 21, 2015. Prior to the survey, researchers explained the objectives and methods of the study. Of 21,969 employees registered in the personnel records, 14,241 (64.8%) participated in the survey and 14,226 (99.9%) consented to the use of the survey data. Of the 6879 female workers who participated in the survey, 2438 women experienced 4552 pregnancies. We included female workers currently working in the semiconductor manufacturing industry who experienced a pregnancy at least 6 months after the start of their employment with the company. We excluded cases in which the timing or outcome of the pregnancy (e.g., nulligravida, current pregnancy) could not be confirmed and cases in which the pregnancy occurred while working somewhere other than the two plants included in this study. Ultimately, 2242 female workers and 4037 pregnancies were analyzed (Fig.
1).
Fig. 1Selection of study population
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Korea National Open University (ABN01–201502–11-02). Informed consent was received from the subjects prior to administering the questionnaire survey.
Exposure assessment
Since June 1996, the semiconductor company in this study has electronically recorded personnel data. We classified exposure based on job information contained in these personnel records. Subjects were classified into 18 groups according to their job characteristics based on professional guidance from the company’s department of environmental safety. After determining the intensity and duration of exposure to harmful factors for each group, we estimated the potential risk according to job type. We then categorized the subjects into three groups based on the characteristics of exposure as follows.
First, personnel records were used to divide the subjects into clerical workers (who worked weekdays in the office) and production workers (who worked shifts on the production floor). The production workers were further divided into fabrication (FAB) and packaging (PKG) process workers. Most of the female production workers were operators. To increase the specificity of the workers’ exposure, field engineers and office-based engineers were included in the group of clerical workers.
The semiconductor industry tends to hire workers who are capable of performing specific work and are likely to remain in their jobs. However, some workers may be required to perform more than one job during their employment. In these instances, we determined which position was held the longest, which is the most common method for job classification and best represents the worker’s occupational experience [
13]. The last job and the job held longest were the same for all pregnancy cases, and the concordance rate for the first job and the job held longest was 91.5%.
For an assessment of reproductive toxicity, it is important to determine the time window of exposure. Short-term exposure before pregnancy is critical, but long-term exposure can also cause irreversible changes in germ cells [
14]. However, it is difficult to independently evaluate the exposure to each chemical because workers are simultaneously exposed to a number of different chemicals during the semiconductor production process [
7]. Accordingly, the job held longest was used as the independent variable.
We investigated pregnancy outcomes and end-points. Pregnancy outcomes were classified as full-term delivery, preterm delivery, stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, and induced abortion. Spontaneous abortion was defined as a pregnancy being terminated before 20 weeks; in these cases, the gestational age (GA) was assessed in weeks. Full-term and preterm deliveries were defined as delivery at GAs of ≥37 and <37 weeks, respectively, whereas stillbirth was defined as infant death at a GA of ≥20 weeks. Because the end-points of the pregnancies were surveyed in date format (year and month), pregnancy duration was converted to months to estimate the start of pregnancy. Consequently, the GA of spontaneous abortion cases was converted to months. The GAs of full-term delivery, preterm delivery, stillbirth, and induced abortion were assumed to be 10, 9, 5, and 3 months, respectively.
The questionnaire was designed by the researchers for the purpose of this study. The questionnaire included information on demographic characteristics, environmental and occupational characteristics, medical history, mental health, safety and health systems, compensation, reproductive toxicity, and women’s health. Data on the women’s demographic characteristics (age at conception, body mass index [BMI] at interview, educational level at interview, and smoking status at interview) and occupational characteristics (duration of employment at conception, year of conception, study plant employed at conception, and work schedule at conception) were used for analysis in the survey. Smoking status was categorized as current/former or never smokers. Pregnancy-related survey data were used to derive the obstetric history. Gravidity was calculated as the number of pregnancies, including the current pregnancy. The obstetric history was classified according to pregnancy outcome prior to pregnancy, including full-term delivery, preterm delivery, spontaneous abortion, induced abortion, and stillbirth.
Statistical analysis
Demographic and occupational characteristics as well as obstetric history were compared by job type. To compare ages at conception as continuous variables, a Welch’s analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. Because the duration of employment did not show a normal distribution, a Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted. For all other categorical variables, the chi-square test was used.
A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risk of spontaneous abortion in female semiconductor workers according to their job type. Model 1 was adjusted for the confounding variables of age at conception, BMI, educational level, and smoking status; model 2 was adjusted for all variables in Model 1 plus pregnancy outcome prior to pregnancy; and model 3 was adjusted for all variables in Model 2 plus duration of employment at pregnancy, year of conception, work location, and shift work.
Two different methods were used to compare the risks for spontaneous abortion associated with the occupational exposure of female semiconductor workers. First, the odds ratios (OR) of spontaneous abortion in relation to the job held longest were estimated using log-binomial regression. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) with exchangeable working correlation structures were used to account for within-person correlations between pregnancies [
15]. Second, logistic regression analysis was limited to the first pregnancies of the female workers after they joined the company to satisfy the assumption of independence among pregnancies [
16,
17]. Moreover, we stratified the analysis by time period of conception (prior to 2008 vs. after 2009) to analyze the differences in exposure based on semiconductor production periods. To select subjects who had no job changes after joining the company for the sensitivity analysis, the analysis was limited to women whose first job, last job, and job held longest were identical.
SPSS version 23 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. A p-value of <0.05 in a two-tailed test was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
The mean age during pregnancy was lower for FAB workers (27.7 ± 3.5 years) and PKG workers (27.8 ± 3.5 years) than for clerical workers (29.6 ± 3.1 years). FAB and PKG workers were more likely to be obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m
2), have lower educational levels, and be a current or former smokers than were clerical workers. PKG workers had longer durations of employment at conception than FAB and clerical workers. The A plant had a higher percentage of clerical workers than the B plant. Regarding the women’s work schedules, FAB and PKG workers mostly worked rotating shifts, whereas clerical workers mostly worked fixed daytime hours. We found no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes prior to pregnancy or year of conception between the three types of workers (Table
1).
Table 1Characteristics of 4037 pregnancies of female workers in the semiconductor industry
|
The job held longest |
|
|
FAB (N = 2314) |
PKG (N = 1372) |
Clerical worker (N = 351) |
Total (N = 4037) |
P-value |
|
Age at conception (years) |
|
Mean ± SD |
27.7 ± 3.5 |
27.8 ± 3.5 |
29.6 ± 3.1 |
27.8 ± 3.5 |
<0.001a
|
|
Post hoc testb
|
b |
b |
a |
|
|
|
≤29 |
1747 (75.5) |
1023 (74.6) |
195 (55.6) |
2965 (73.4) |
<0.001 |
|
30–34 |
506 (21.9) |
304 (22.2) |
141 (40.2) |
951 (23.6) |
|
|
≥35 |
61 (2.6) |
45 (3.3) |
15 (4.3) |
121 (3.0) |
|
|
BMI at interview (kg/m2) |
|
≤24.9 |
1911 (82.6) |
1104 (80.5) |
320 (91.2) |
3335 (82.6) |
<0.001 |
|
≥25.0 |
403 (17.4) |
268 (19.5) |
31 (8.8) |
702 (17.4) |
|
|
Level of education at interview |
|
High school |
1521 (65.7) |
1000 (72.9) |
81 (23.1) |
2602 (64.5) |
<0.001 |
|
College/university |
793 (34.3) |
372 (27.1) |
270 (76.9) |
1435 (35.5) |
|
|
Smoking status at interview |
|
Non smoker |
1843 (79.6) |
1114 (81.2) |
341 (97.2) |
3298 (81.7) |
<0.001 |
|
Smoker |
471 (20.4) |
258 (18.8) |
10 (2.8) |
739 (18.3) |
|
|
Pregnancy outcome prior to pregnancy |
|
Primigravida |
1232 (53.2) |
744 (54.2) |
180 (51.3) |
2156 (53.4) |
0.358 |
|
Full term delivery |
784 (33.9) |
426 (31.0) |
124 (35.3) |
1334 (33.0) |
|
|
Preterm delivery |
32 (1.4) |
18 (1.3) |
7 (2.0) |
57 (1.4) |
|
|
Spontaneous abortion |
200 (8.6) |
137 (10.0) |
24 (6.8) |
361 (8.9) |
|
|
Induced abortion |
52 (2.2) |
38 (2.8) |
13 (3.7) |
103 (2.6) |
|
|
Stillbirth |
14 (0.6) |
9 (0.7) |
3 (0.9) |
26 (0.6) |
|
|
Duration of employment at conception (years) |
|
Median (IQR) |
7.6 (5.3–10.5) |
8.0 (5.6–10.9) |
7.3 (4.9–10.5) |
7.8 (5.3–10.7) |
0.009c
|
|
Post hoc testd
|
a |
b |
a |
|
|
|
≤4 |
523 (22.6) |
255 (18.6) |
94 (26.8) |
872 (21.6) |
0.004 |
|
5–9 |
1123 (48.5) |
685 (49.9) |
154 (43.9) |
1962 (48.6) |
|
|
≥10 |
668 (28.9) |
432 (31.5) |
103 (29.3) |
1203 (29.8) |
|
|
Year of conception |
|
≥2009 |
1466 (63.4) |
867 (63.2) |
212 (60.4) |
2545 (63.0) |
0.559 |
|
≤2008 |
848 (36.6) |
505 (36.8) |
139 (39.6) |
1492 (37.0) |
|
|
Study plant |
|
A plant |
1369 (59.2) |
740 (53.9) |
274 (78.1) |
2383 (59.0) |
<0.001 |
|
B plant |
945 (40.8) |
632 (46.1) |
77 (21.9) |
1654 (41.0) |
|
|
Work schedule |
|
Days only |
235 (10.2) |
125 (9.1) |
299 (85.2) |
659 (16.3) |
<0.001 |
|
Rotating shift |
2079 (89.8) |
1247 (90.9) |
52 (14.8) |
3378 (83.7) |
|
In the regression analysis, the job type and risk for spontaneous abortion were not significantly different in the unadjusted and adjusted regression models. However, age at conception of ≥30 years, a history of smoking, and spontaneous abortion prior to pregnancy were associated with higher odds for spontaneous abortion (Table
2).
Table 2Crude and adjusted odds ratios of spontaneous abortion by risk factors of female workers employed in the semiconductor industry
|
Pregnancy |
SA |
Crude |
Adjusted |
|
Model 1a
|
Model 2b
|
Model 3c
|
|
(N = 4037) |
(N = 529) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
|
The job held longest |
|
FAB |
2314 |
291 (12.6) |
1.15 |
0.81–1.64 |
1.09 |
0.71–1.67 |
1.08 |
0.70–1.66 |
1.08 |
0.64–1.81 |
|
PKG |
1372 |
199 (14.5) |
1.36 |
0.94–1.96 |
1.28 |
0.82–1.99 |
1.26 |
0.81–1.97 |
1.24 |
0.72–2.12 |
|
Clerical worker |
351 |
39 (11.1) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Age at conception (years) |
|
≤29 |
2965 |
354 (11.9) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
30–34 |
951 |
141 (14.8) |
1.28
|
1.04–1.58
|
1.35
|
1.08–1.69
|
1.34
|
1.06–1.70
|
1.34
|
1.01–1.78
|
|
≥35 |
121 |
34 (28.1) |
2.88
|
1.91–4.35
|
2.98
|
1.94–4.59
|
2.93
|
1.88–4.55
|
2.95
|
1.79–4.85
|
|
BMI at interview (kg/m2) |
|
≤24.9 |
3335 |
421 (12.6) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
≥25.0 |
702 |
108 (15.4) |
1.26
|
1.00–1.58
|
1.16 |
0.91–1.48 |
1.15 |
0.90–1.48 |
1.16 |
0.91–1.48 |
|
Level of education at interview |
|
High school |
1435 |
185 (12.9) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
College/university |
2602 |
344 (13.2) |
1.03 |
0.85–1.25 |
1.04 |
0.84–1.29 |
1.03 |
0.84–1.28 |
1.08 |
0.87–1.34 |
|
Smoking status at interview |
|
Non smoker |
3298 |
410 (12.4) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Smoker |
739 |
119 (16.1) |
1.35
|
1.08–1.69
|
1.44
|
1.14–1.81
|
1.42
|
1.13–1.80
|
1.37
|
1.08–1.73
|
|
Pregnancy outcome prior to pregnancy |
|
Primigravida |
2156 |
267 (12.4) |
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Full term delivery |
1334 |
166 (12.4) |
1.01 |
0.82–1.24 |
|
|
0.95 |
0.76–1.20 |
0.92 |
0.73–1.16 |
|
Preterm delivery |
57 |
6 (10.5) |
0.83 |
0.35–1.96 |
|
|
0.87 |
0.36–2.09 |
0.84 |
0.35–2.01 |
|
Spontaneous abortion |
361 |
69 (19.1) |
1.67
|
1.25–2.24
|
|
|
1.58
|
1.16–2.15
|
1.53
|
1.12–2.08
|
|
Induced abortion |
103 |
15 (14.6) |
1.21 |
0.69–2.12 |
|
|
0.79 |
0.40–1.56 |
0.81 |
0.41–1.59 |
|
Stillbirth |
26 |
6 (23.1) |
2.12 |
0.84–5.33 |
|
|
1.63 |
0.59–4.49 |
1.70 |
0.62–4.70 |
|
Duration of employment at conception (years) |
|
≤4 |
872 |
93 (10.7) |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
5–9 |
1962 |
268 (13.7) |
1.33
|
1.03–1.70
|
|
|
|
|
1.26 |
0.97–1.65 |
|
≥10 |
1203 |
168 (14.0) |
1.36
|
1.04–1.78
|
|
|
|
|
1.08 |
0.76–1.52 |
|
Year of conception |
|
≥2009 |
2545 |
372 (14.6) |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
≤2008 |
1492 |
157 (10.5) |
0.69
|
0.56–0.84
|
|
|
|
|
0.80 |
0.64–1.00 |
|
Study plant |
|
A plant |
2383 |
313 (13.1) |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
B plant |
1654 |
216 (13.1) |
0.99 |
0.82–1.20 |
|
|
|
|
1.01 |
0.82–1.23 |
|
Work schedule |
|
Days only |
659 |
82 (12.4) |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Rotating shift |
3378 |
447 (13.2) |
1.07 |
0.83–1.38 |
|
|
|
|
0.97 |
0.69–1.38 |
When analyses were performed using a GEE and limited to first pregnancies after joining the company, the risks for spontaneous abortion were not significantly different among job types. When the analysis was limited to first pregnancies after joining the company, the OR for spontaneous abortion was higher than that in the GEE analysis (Tables
3 and
4).
Table 3Odds ratios of spontaneous abortion among generalised estimate equation of all pregnancies
|
Pregnancy |
SA |
Crude GEE |
Adjusted GEEa
|
|
(N = 4037) |
(N = 529) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
|
The job held longest |
|
FAB |
2314 |
291 (12.6) |
1.12 |
0.81–1.57 |
1.12 |
0.79–1.58 |
|
PKG |
1372 |
199 (14.5) |
1.28 |
0.91–1.81 |
1.26 |
0.88–1.79 |
|
Clerical worker |
351 |
39 (11.1) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Age at conception (years) |
|
≤29 |
2965 |
354 (11.9) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
30–34 |
951 |
141 (14.8) |
1.25
|
1.03–1.50
|
1.28
|
1.02–1.60
|
|
≥35 |
121 |
34 (28.1) |
2.41
|
1.75–3.33
|
2.48
|
1.69–3.64
|
|
Duration of employment (years) |
|
≤4 |
872 |
93 (10.7) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
5–9 |
1962 |
268 (13.7) |
1.29
|
1.02–1.63
|
1.22 |
0.96–1.54 |
|
≥10 |
1203 |
168 (14.0) |
1.37
|
1.06–1.78
|
1.06 |
0.78–1.43 |
|
Year of conception |
|
≥2009 |
2545 |
372 (14.6) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
≤2008 |
1492 |
157 (10.5) |
0.73
|
0.60–0.88
|
0.84 |
0.68–1.02 |
Table 4Odds ratios of spontaneous abortion among logistic regression model of first pregnancies
|
Pregnancy |
SA |
Crude logistic |
Adjusted logistica
|
|
(N = 2242) |
(N = 98) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
|
The job held longest |
|
FAB |
1285 |
54 (4.2) |
1.40 |
0.60–3.31 |
1.15 |
0.46–2.85 |
|
PKG |
759 |
38 (5.0) |
1.69 |
0.70–4.05 |
1.34 |
0.52–3.41 |
|
Clerical worker |
198 |
6 (3.0) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
Age at conception (years) |
|
≤29 |
1886 |
71 (3.8) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
30–34 |
326 |
21 (6.4) |
1.76
|
1.07–2.91
|
1.31 |
0.70–2.47 |
|
≥35 |
30 |
6 (20.0) |
6.39
|
2.53–16.12
|
4.18
|
1.40–12.43
|
|
Duration of employment (years) |
|
≤4 |
664 |
24 (3.6) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
5–9 |
1167 |
48 (4.1) |
1.14 |
0.69–1.89 |
0.95 |
0.56–1.58 |
|
≥10 |
411 |
26 (6.3) |
1.80
|
1.02–3.18
|
1.30 |
0.63–2.67 |
|
Year of conception |
|
≥2009 |
1275 |
82 (6.4) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
≤2008 |
967 |
16 (1.7) |
0.24
|
0.14–0.42
|
0.32
|
0.18–0.55
|
Among women who conceived prior to 2008, the risk of spontaneous abortion was significantly higher for PKG workers than for clerical workers (OR 2.21, 95% CI: 1.01–4.81). In contrast, among women who conceived after 2009, there were no differences in the risk for spontaneous abortion according to job type (Table
5). The association between job type and the risk for spontaneous abortion was also analyzed in a sensitivity analysis that was limited to women whose first job, last job, and job held longest were identical; no significant differences in the OR for spontaneous abortion by job type were found in this analysis (Table
6).
Table 5Odds ratios of spontaneous abortion among generalised estimate equation of all pregnancies stratified by year of conception
|
Year of conception |
The job held longest |
Pregnancy |
SA |
Crude GEE |
Adjusted GEEa
|
|
(N = 4037) |
(N = 529) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
|
≤2008 |
FAB |
848 |
80 (9.4) |
1.62 |
0.75–3.49 |
1.54 |
0.71–3.32 |
|
PKG |
505 |
69 (13.7) |
2.31
|
1.06–5.02
|
2.21
|
1.01–4.81
|
|
Clerical worker |
139 |
8 (5.8) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
≥2009 |
FAB |
1466 |
211 (14.4) |
0.98 |
0.68–1.40 |
1.01 |
0.69–1.48 |
|
PKG |
867 |
130 (15.0) |
1.03 |
0.71–1.49 |
1.05 |
0.71–1.55 |
|
Clerical worker |
212 |
31 (14.6) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
Table 6Odds ratios of spontaneous abortion among generalized estimate equation of all pregnancies, limited to female workers whose first, last, and job held longest were the same
|
Category |
The job matching |
Pregnancy |
SA |
Crude GEE |
Adjusted GEEa
|
|
(N = 3692) |
(N = 489) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
OR |
(95% CI) |
|
3 category |
FAB |
2244 |
285 (12.7) |
1.12 |
0.76–1.64 |
1.07 |
0.71–1.60 |
|
PKG |
1193 |
175 (14.7) |
1.28 |
0.86–1.91 |
1.19 |
0.79–1.81 |
|
Clerical worker |
255 |
29 (11.4) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
2 category |
Process workerb
|
3437 |
460 (13.4) |
1.18 |
0.81–1.72 |
1.11 |
0.75–1.65 |
|
Clerical worker |
255 |
29 (11.4) |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
Discussion
This study investigated the association between the risk for spontaneous abortions and the job type of female semiconductor workers to assess their reproductive health. The risk for spontaneous abortion for female semiconductor workers was not significantly higher for FAB and PKG workers than for clerical workers according to their job held longest. However, when the analysis was stratified for the year of conception, we found significantly higher odds for spontaneous abortions (OR 2.21, 95% CI: 1.01–4.81) in PKG workers than clerical workers when the pregnancy occurred prior to 2008.
In this study, the spontaneous abortion rates for FAB and PKG workers were 12.6% and 14.5%, respectively; these were higher than the rate of 11.1% found in clerical workers. These spontaneous abortion rates for female workers involved in semiconductor production were higher than the spontaneous abortion rate of 11.1% reported for Korean domestic 15- to 44-year-old married women [
18]. In 1988, Pastides et al. first reported data on reproductive toxicity in the semiconductor industry using a questionnaire survey. They showed that the risk for spontaneous abortion was higher for diffusion and photolithographic process workers than for non-FAB workers [
19]. Later, the University of California conducted two cohort studies with support from the Semiconductor Industry Association in the United States. The first study—a retrospective cohort study using questionnaire data and medical records—showed that FAB workers had higher odds for experiencing a spontaneous abortion than did non-FAB workers (OR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.95–2.09). Women working in masking and etching-related processes, in particular, had a significantly higher risk for spontaneous abortion [
20]. In the second study (a prospective cohort study using urine samples that were collected daily for 6 months), FAB workers again had a higher risk for spontaneous abortion than did non-FAB workers (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.63–1.76) [
21]. An epidemiological study on reproductive toxicity in the semiconductor industry revealed that the risk for spontaneous abortions tended to be higher for FAB workers; in particular, when the analysis was broken down by sub-processes, job types, and level of exposure to hazards, the risk for reproductive toxicity was significantly increased [
7].
Other studies reported that the work processes of the semiconductor industry were not associated with an increased risk for spontaneous abortions. In a case-control study including patients diagnosed with intrauterine spontaneous abortions based on pathologic results, FAB workers did not have an increased risk for spontaneous abortions when compared with non-FAB workers (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.45–1.60) [
22]. A nested case-control study on current and former female semiconductor workers showed an increased risk for spontaneous abortions in FAB workers (OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.26–1.30) compared with non-FAB workers [
23]. These conflicting results might be caused by the relatively low numbers of pregnancies among the FAB workers in the studies (15 and 36, respectively).
In previous studies, exposure classification of the subjects consisted mainly of FAB versus non-FAB workers or different FAB sub-processes or hazards [
7]. Workers may be exposed to a number of substances associated with reproductive toxicity during the FAB process in the semiconductor industry, including carbon monoxide, N,N-dimethylacetamide, 2-ethoxyethanol, ethylbenzene, ethylene glycol, 2-methoxy-1-propanol, 2-methoxy-1-propylacetate, nitrous oxide, and xylene. During the PKG process, workers may be exposed to antimony trioxide, N,N-dimethylformamide, ethylbenzene, ethylene oxide, methanol, phenol, trichloroethylene, and xylene (Additional file
1: Table S1) [
24]. Previous studies have shown that ethylene glycol ether, isopropyl alcohol, xylene, and butyl acetate are significantly associated with an increased risk for spontaneous abortions in FAB workers. Among the FAB sub-processes, photolithography, diffusion, masking, dopant application, thin film application, and etching are known to increase the risk for spontaneous abortions [
7].
The PKG process consists of wafer dicing, where the wafer is cut into chips; die bonding, where the chips are connected to the circuit board; wire bonding, where the chips are connected to the circuit board with a gold wire; molding, where the chips are wrapped with resin; and testing, where electrical and thermal stress are applied to the chips. During molding, which is performed to protect the semiconductor chips from the environment, an epoxy molding compound (EMC) is used under high-temperature conditions (180 °C). Although the EMC is a high-molecular-weight polymer, volatile organic compounds (VOCs; in particular, benzene and methylisobutylketone) and formaldehyde can be generated under heat. In the FAB and PKG processes, general ventilation is implemented based on particle number concentration, but mixing of indoor air occurs between the sub-processes. Therefore, VOCs and formaldehyde that are PKG-generated by-products can affect other nearby sub-processes [
6]. Moreover, the testing process can include ionizing radiation exposure. Because semiconductor equipment is densely arranged, continued exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) may occur [
25]. In a previous study on the association between exposure to petrochemicals as an occupational hazard and the risk for spontaneous abortions, the risk for spontaneous abortion was significantly increased by exposure to benzene, gasoline, and hydrogen sulfide [
26]. In a systematic review using a meta-analysis, women who were exposed to formaldehyde showed a significantly increased risk for spontaneous abortions [
27]. Future studies on the relationship between reproductive toxicity and exposure to VOCs, formaldehyde, ionizing radiation, and ELF-MF in the semiconductor industry are needed.
The weight of the wafer increases along with its diameter, which makes manual handling of wafers difficult. To overcome this issue, many processes have become automated and older processes, chemicals, and operational methods that had been used to produce smaller wafers are being phased out [
28,
29]. Therefore, differences in occupational exposure based on the semiconductor production period must be considered. In the late 2000s, semiconductor production infrastructure changed from a wafer diameter of 8 in. to one of 12 in. [
30]. It is likely that the level of exposure to occupational hazards differed depending on the semiconductor production period; consequently, the risk for spontaneous abortions would be higher during the PKG process used in the past. In this study, when female semiconductor workers became pregnant prior to 2008, the risk for spontaneous abortions in PKG workers was significantly higher than that in clerical workers. When female workers who entered the company before 2008 experienced repetitive pregnancies, the age and gravidity of pregnancy prior to 2008 was lower than those for pregnancies after 2009. This may result in an increase in the average age of pregnancy after 2009 (Additional file
1: Table S2). The average age of the first pregnancy for women who entered the company after 2009 was also higher than for women who began their employment prior to 2008 (Additional file
1: Table S3). Thus, the age at which female workers begin to experience a pregnancy is now higher than in the past. Therefore, pregnancies that occurred after 2009 are more likely to be at high risk for spontaneous abortions.
There is a critical period of reproductive toxicity determined by occupational hazards. Reproductive toxicity can manifest as various features depending on which hazard the worker was exposed to and when. Therefore, it is critical to identify an adequate exposure assessment period for determining reproductive toxicity in women. Maternal exposure in the few months before conception is important for infertility, and teratogenic effects may arise during the organogenesis phase during the first 3–8 weeks of pregnancy. Long-term exposure may cause irreversible changes to the DNA of germ cells, and certain substances may persist and concentrate in body fat [
14]. Reproductive toxicity can be the result of chronic or acute exposure. In the assessment of the cumulative effects of hazards, we found no differences in the risk for spontaneous abortions according to the duration of employment. In this study, the time window of occupational exposure was assumed to be 6 months or longer [
17,
31].
When comparing the first job and the job held longest, we found few cases in which the employee changed from a clerical worker to a production worker (Additional file
1: Table S4). When the classification of exposure was selected as the job held longest, there may be misclassification bias due to the inclusion of some production workers as clerical workers, which might underestimate the risk of spontaneous abortion for PKG workers. The median duration of employment at pregnancy was 7.8 years (interquartile range: 5.3–10.7). Female workers were likely to become pregnant after working at the company for some time. Therefore, this study classified the exposure according to the job held longest.
The risk factors for spontaneous abortion have been shown to include the mother’s age of ≥35 years, a history of spontaneous abortions, gravidity, smoking, BMI, and educational level [
32–
37]. In this study, the risk for spontaneous abortion was significantly higher for mothers who were ≥35 years old, had a history of spontaneous abortions, and were current and former smokers. However, BMI and educational level were not significantly associated with the risk for spontaneous abortions. In this study, BMI and educational level were assessed at the time of the survey and not during pregnancy. Therefore, misclassification bias might have affected the results.
The limitations in studying the health impact of working in the semiconductor industry include the healthy worker and infertile worker effects [
7,
12,
23]. The
healthy worker effect refers to the concept that healthy people have a higher probability of being hired and of remaining at their workplace, whereas those who are not healthy are more likely to quit their jobs. The
infertile worker effect refers to the phenomenon of infertile women or those without children remaining at work or female workers leaving their jobs during their pregnancy. These effects can be compensated for by selecting an external control group with similar forms of employment or an internal control group with a lower occupational exposure level, rather than selecting from the general population. In this study, the healthy and infertile worker effects were minimized by adjusting for age at the time of pregnancy and work period; moreover, we selected clerical workers who were employed in the semiconductor industry as the control group [
38].
When studying reproductive toxicity in semiconductor processes, it is necessary to define pregnancy. This study confirmed pregnancies and pregnancy outcomes based on data from the questionnaire survey. Because a spontaneous abortion is a traumatic event, the subjects might have found it difficult to respond to questions about spontaneous abortion. The possibility of such a recall bias occurring in only one group among the production and clerical worker groups is very low; this can underestimate the effects of occupational hazards on the risk for spontaneous abortions by non-differential misclassification bias [
23].
A surveillance system of reproductive health is needed to assess and monitor the risks, working conditions, and hazardous materials to which future childbearing-age female workers may be exposed. Moreover, individuals who were employed during periods when working conditions were poor and not managed properly should be followed up to further assess reproductive toxicity according to semiconductor production periods.
Conclusions
In this study, we administered a reproductive health-related questionnaire survey to current female workers in the semiconductor industry. We found that female PKG workers who worked in the semiconductor industry prior to 2008 had an increased risk for spontaneous abortions. In previous studies investigating reproductive toxicity, the focus was placed on FAB and its sub-processes; however, our data indicate that an assessment of reproductive toxicity associated with PKG processes is needed. These results could be used as a basis for future maternity protection policies.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the verification committee of industrial health.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Authors do not wish to share data. The dataset generated by the verification committee of industrial health. The dataset were used under IRB approval for the current study and so are not publicly available.
NOTES
-
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s40557-017-0204-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Abbreviations
Low-frequency magnetic field
Generalized estimating equation
Korea workers’ compensation and welfare service
Volatile organic compound
References
- 1. http://www.ksia.or.kr/renewal/semi/semi1.jsp.
- 2. http://www.kiet.re.kr/kiet_web/main/.
- 3. https://www.keis.or.kr/user/extra/main/2102/publication/publicationList/jsp/LayOutPage.do?categoryIdx=131&pubIdx=2341&onlyList=N.
- 4. https://www.keis.or.kr/user/extra/main/2107/publication/publicationList/jsp/LayOutPage.do?categoryIdx=126&pubIdx=2481&spage=1&onlyList=N.
- 5. http://cafe354.daum.net/_c21_/home?grpid=1C6KM.
- 6. Park SH, Shin JA, Park HD. Exposure possibility to by-products during the processes of semiconductor manufacture. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;22:52–59.
- 7. Park DU, Lee KM. Critical review of retrospective exposure assessment methods used to associate the reproductive and cancer risks of wafer fabrication workers. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2012;22:9–19.
- 8. Kong JO. Working environment and experiences of diseases in semiconductor industry. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;22:32–41.
- 9. Figa-Talamanca I. Occupational risk factors and reproductive health of women. Occup Med (Lond) 2006;56:521–531. 10.1093/occmed/kql114. 17151388.ArticlePubMed
- 10. Kim MH, Kim H, Paek D. The health impacts of semiconductor production: an epidemiologic review. Int J Occup Environ Health 2014;20:95–114. 10.1179/2049396713Y.0000000050. 24999845.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 11. Park JS, Na MC, Paek DM, Moon OR. Industry of employment and spontaneous abortion of female workers. J Prev Med Public Health 1994;27:242–257.
- 12. Kim I, Kim MH, Lim S. Reproductive hazards still persist in the microelectronics industry: increased risk of spontaneous abortion and menstrual aberration among female workers in the microelectronics industry in South Korea. PLoS One 2015;10:e0123679. 10.1371/journal.pone.0123679. 25938673.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 13. Checkoway H, Pearce N, Kriebel D. Research methods in occupational epidemiology: Oxford University Press. 2004.
- 14. Burdorf A, Figa-Talamanca I, Jensen TK, Thulstrup AM. Effects of occupational exposure on the reproductive system: core evidence and practical implications. Occup Med (Lond) 2006;56:516–520. 10.1093/occmed/kql113. 17151386.ArticlePubMed
- 15. Gaskins AJ, Rich-Edwards JW, Hauser R, Williams PL, Gillman MW, Ginsburg ES, et al. Maternal prepregnancy folate intake and risk of spontaneous abortion and stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:23–31. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000343. 24901281.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 16. Small CM, Cheslack-Postava K, Terrell M, Blanck HM, Tolbert P, Rubin C, et al. Risk of spontaneous abortion among women exposed to polybrominated biphenyls. Environ Res 2007;105:247–255. 10.1016/j.envres.2006.11.010. 17239850.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 17. Settimi L, Spinelli A, Lauria L, Miceli G, Pupp N, Angotzi G, et al. Spontaneous abortion and maternal work in greenhouses. Am J Ind Med 2008;51:290–295. 10.1002/ajim.20556. 18247322.ArticlePubMed
- 18. http://www.kihasa.re.kr.
- 19. Pastides H, Calabrese EJ, Hosmer DW Jr, Harris DR Jr. Spontaneous abortion and general illness symptoms among semiconductor manufacturers. J Occup Med 1988;30:543–551. 3397779.PubMed
- 20. Beaumont JJ, Swan SH, Hammond SK, Samuels SJ, Green RS, Hallock MF, et al. Historical cohort investigation of spontaneous abortion in the Semiconductor Health Study: epidemiologic methods and analyses of risk in fabrication overall and in fabrication work groups. Am J Ind Med 1995;28:735–750. 10.1002/ajim.4700280609. 8588561.ArticlePubMed
- 21. Eskenazi B, Gold EB, Lasley BL, Samuels SJ, Hammond SK, Wight S, et al. Prospective monitoring of early fetal loss and clinical spontaneous abortion among female semiconductor workers. Am J Ind Med 1995;28:833–846. 10.1002/ajim.4700280615. 8588567.ArticlePubMed
- 22. Shusterman D, Windham GC, Fenster L. Employment in electronics manufacturing and risk of spontaneous abortion. J Occup Med. 1993;35:381–386. 8487115.PubMed
- 23. Elliott RC, Jones JR, McElvenny DM, Pennington MJ, Northage C, Clegg TA, et al. Spontaneous abortion in the British semiconductor industry: An HSE investigation. Health and Safety Executive. Am J Ind Med 1999;36:557–572. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199911)36:5<557::AID-AJIM8>3.0.CO;2-Q. 10506738.ArticlePubMed
- 24. http://oshri.kosha.or.kr/main.
- 25. http://oshri.kosha.or.kr.
- 26. Xu X, Cho SI, Sammel M, You L, Cui S, Huang Y, et al. Association of petrochemical exposure with spontaneous abortion. Occup Environ Med 1998;55:31–36. 10.1136/oem.55.1.31. 9536160.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 27. Duong A, Steinmaus C, McHale CM, Vaughan CP, Zhang L. Reproductive and developmental toxicity of formaldehyde: a systematic review. Mutat Res 2011;728:118–138. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.07.003. 21787879.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 28. http://www.iloencyclopaedia.org/part-xiii-12343/microelectronics-and-semiconductors/83/silicon-semiconductor-manufacturing.
- 29. Park DU. Review article : review of hazardous agent level in wafer fabrication operation focusing on exposure to chemicals and radiation. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;26:1–10. 10.15269/JKSOEH.2016.26.1.1.Article
- 30. http://www.kistep.re.kr/index.jsp.
- 31. Shirangi A, Fritschi L, Holman CD. Maternal occupational exposures and risk of spontaneous abortion in veterinary practice. Occup Environ Med 2008;65:719–725. 10.1136/oem.2007.035246. 18388114.ArticlePubMed
- 32. Jung SJ, Park SK, Shin A, Lee SA, Choi JY, Hong YC, et al. Body mass index at age 18-20 and later risk of spontaneous abortion in the Health Examinees Study (HEXA). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:228. 10.1186/s12884-015-0665-2. 26403183.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 33. Rasch V. Cigarette, alcohol, and caffeine consumption: risk factors for spontaneous abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:182–188. 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00078.x. 12648183.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 34. Zheng D, Li C, Wu T, Tang K. Factors associated with spontaneous abortion: a cross-sectional study of Chinese populations. Reprod Health 2017;14:33. 10.1186/s12978-017-0297-2. 28259178.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 35. Regan L, Braude PR, Trembath PL. Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion. BMJ 1989;299:541–545. 10.1136/bmj.299.6698.541. 2507063.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 36. Nybo AA, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Is maternal age an independent risk factor for fetal loss? West J Med 2000;173:331. 10.1136/ewjm.173.5.331. 11069871.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 37. Osborn JF, Cattaruzza MS, Spinelli A. Risk of spontaneous abortion in Italy, 1978-1995, and the effect of maternal age, gravidity, marital status, and education. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:98–105. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010128. 10625179.ArticlePubMed
- 38. Lee KM, Chun JB, Park DG, Lee WJ. Methods to minimize or adjust for healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology. J Environ Health Sci 2011;37:342–347.Article
Appendix
Notes
Notes
KSOEM
PubReader
ePub Link
Cite
XML Download
