Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Ann Occup Environ Med > Volume 29; 2017 > Article
Research Article The impact of body armor on physical performance of law enforcement personnel: a systematic review
Colin Tomes1,2, Robin Marc Orr2, Rodney Pope2
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2017;29:14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-017-0169-9
Published online: May 16, 2017

1Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Science, Messiah College, Grantham, PA USAJFIFddDuckydqhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ Adobed     ! 1AQa"q 2#w8B36v7XRr$9bCt%u&Ws'(xy4T5fH  !1AQaq"2B Rbr#u67Ѳ3sTt5v8Sc$4ĂCÔ%UӅFV ?_Aנj- H>>,m*>fzp"TrKkr^r.|_&]|*vPuܶvoQ1mwVJUhu-I"=LniAƕ8"۲ k*ҿ[yu:.vUQ+)%F DHyVBk>Hy8jݹ q~9D4KRmzQ)^ʔ.J%k_tVi5NTjg!'ky|5asOȻ)R۸ߩFMԿ3L4j6dڜ#NIwUF]JqB/(FafJRzq3\G՛ ?~\ 6)6W4m[O^L0E&rRMض*C .]Unl-1 1r#Rj/&QɈ׉˩s6Rj=5Tg.y.·Pӡ:JJS:C8-2u]d&vUz;7p9 5VnL֢"y)">iי(IDDd| Yj0; LRfS:ktYK%*N2^m|&dğth":ey)uPQZW)gcC3Pv&MMWd&Ŵ۲mvTRoժM03*F3Yd6\8,\hݻ kߔi<k NTwSԪmljj[>->ptU%'LR>&EBH$MQAUx[$Z6vi&_a.KIQ{hyƒ j"JOC9eFҝfj;˚Ω<[3_m% lQ@4g=5$(J]Yc-OMq<Ǎ wSzڗ)k$7VIP붾ͯnV+卵*t]iЎD31~SA1éC2u)ʼnQn-Uoi3:grI8ؓWm*G zܕ)ZקJ}Y YlGeJ6cB2I NS3Q>k=KTBT]W6+SOXQgGR? telˊ%-Re\hѯ2TF"C/OJΩ6r[N.0{SpljjX1“jOsӥ;ҭhe}xu`Ք&.)yO̒ Fߑ.$Qw;9Iw2o+RVJMSOj[SoҌZ%;`d$blQ{Ro{Imڌ>3egf\O֝Uzx"䢸g+mv%Gʆ:|V[N'&ס-ޝ'kfE|K,G&˳98Juin/\\Qݿ̋v~Ǩ!rtWU d|E߫R4d}.qPw*Ӭv5YEcn~f5c%MTMkb-F>5JT,})QHg%{("ӔȸWMsYyWNRrkkJr0XドnͫT}r-jj,Ŕʍ\Q2Ri>v$5!]"JB2WɅ)]VԜUc8i|.jeRO6^V.¸ Q&#|ܶ-*uOG%JAtRZRr]FFG\۩w+?'zչSѧt jz>KW&ot{7P&2D;&\\>Q2JzܗAKSfeNn[jRrԕf6,q,F1tRfԗ>vֶևj-&R'Zi2=xv~Elbsvm8=ӛ"ū񕜈BȩlWau[]ٷBߨF~J!|Ipr3R̴#Yp)={7:G{+:\W}n|Q#%)7^-h"Ƒq:M*%J&$T軨I333׎g_- ucBwwjp[6i25$̏bU’ٱRv?G\~#Iͪb7<<}Ezt" q_Inw,7-d,G÷%T* Wg1"䥱kq/A.,_KhqŒxwvo u2ۥۧ.bQ}XκA$֣ +K״ZUNmڸII{.v{5z5ѮRme[moyƾd~cRݾK'j.\i&/S6f|b=5: p!6i_ 4j6=.si˧eƾtS^c.Y^RJVS-Vi3,esi08?H$GvZgg?gi䤟2adw릿:"۪lkSN>q-4kI܋ێe̊qۅgDoѨ9; #T.Q;7#~_Ufstb_'w~Xw1Xk,vcOt._}v}8"(4Z\ۘgk?J?bm_c!g{HZV]Fkk%~gEt)b秴vΰB|꽸}mp~E6ݹv;7P٤v+ri*3Ԣ|'O14_~7nP{7ZU\Vű[ +7󖱅o#:ǥŬ\|3r%TJX]V7ez¨Y]lc|O3V! R zbJ'PnGqVJ"19WVeOF埜EaEJωqCN5Z g-9[S<$sUK5b|7sn\7x qmv##FF\ w[=-43$^ooVSiXօv7iB۴yg>]Vf"r$J3""32!Zh[K%7GvNLs+4nB/B{vlsobJaҺJR:0g%&zR\ S3T[&ִor*ⷳc3ʊO[iozW٨%$gn:ܶWwFBԹjHP&z u&F2\f;ipW73 [; '_̽b;vib!oec dC-tS__$Xs]l9&z$2/N>%'[}b{h/{`{Ji׉׏ YJB/X%}.|+{(S:qz]4_Kѵo`^tY_4S#* ^zvݾMr+TrkQ g.8Ͽ^i>ӈǙvix>$o( ^qt*&t1oJVu-ql5U6jCЉmĻ*"?JT=K'O/|=Vo}l0b}}f?X[?/\JSBe,kP8ETJ==?.p5ފgbU9}ǶdNKk—_$8̸͓ۍ8Di\BԿ-1v{FF]|.^ۅ{vl12׏z7-R7wE?\nh\jN/Kձr_oBw"N QMBZqe-m:ӨSn6j4%!hQ;sv'm4kcM=!8\m[M4{SMliۇ%eֽR&N:{2A8)THLK3Zj[jPBx#BگMf:G1\`edcʮ?|w(-̮vXt,bW2;.ιNHRR#YwTM"<;mk\.foIDjmlJ;vxy7o7i\,KQŊ9d^Mmgc L*.T6tLeIuOH3SJQ3=F/ʿ<9\JM6mN6=<{xkP!F1QR[I$6ُimXu2An2yԒMU q f[IB-'䤯jYm52&JG\zд\~vdg QtHGXw&1Lw+nDEdC1w|YJmvP)HZ>i0BPβә?R:QO["]I_Jʏۍ>QKyu^bycBq4lXF~l [\*N>-J6,Gq(Zr5h]CwYӤU~ʶߑ u*SIv%ZfJ7)! FS*s_\|IŸZ)J ]ܜi4"z[+Z,MOZ))}|Ʀ(RUNIII.S'ˍO~˨rn}M)xxӕ0 eyҵ7YMAB]ӣU:/ѭ*6bcwP͵ "+qēVjŹO|GtY4V j[mLV M -m>",B$ GD1~j6O4|LxnNmqATNR3ε|DŽa[fmn-ڭ+FiK7Pcm;r5 l8r{#-]'nrFh2ruycb;pW=njRqRJ(d mnpckNnʹ+6]tz~E=ʕ l ZZ5jSi3#47.Lcfe`9؏v囜.F\-UZ:*0_<Νu9Lӵm&)_3\^ҹ3"1n1v_|uRʞͫr'iȧN_kH׺8xXrj=\МH)V\ˬ.Xʸ oVRC}ySU9/OBY먌5 ٿwޞ)rw8Ӫi5*5ZΗcGƱ !ZۄlmpjJ -l <R̵/JAպZuq\IdUS 48wXJJtcg4cI~aqߓwŷrm-v)G7yS^7H^-\mŌAq|"m9IBnF㏉9[N+mmy/!KKۉ%n +BdddfFF6FQRN-U5;Sv'm4kcM=Mn)\qιqUd9F%",6MGdT%-+~ f%+y֛^3SrF>6lc(֪vۊN;g._0Sѧ]ETWرkQKzGe9ʨsKA"yC y2\[5 rԭ7Gk5Mzw_4sM3hxЊ'oÍ5jsub )ͪ~tR2H]R͍>̋m6=%(˿(Wrr-܅y5(ܔJ޺YunW̹븹NsqK ]/QR#"ZMDfD|43Qw|._ԡSqTZBg??O Ϥ)/E_U|i}2 9Z?¹0:x'3,whǣ?C y-A~=daJј&M?D1_PS+Oi&;a @;Dž7[ zZC"bv:jjMQk$M RԸ3uA\=wI.AwC"^.{?-\NSiˏ"b}T/}q/ o.1M}R%:-ZniʒL$SgrBW*,Mw'N\ɇ{s\j]VryG'8f`}'N<*/`U숻z CwHq18J+vԕKss4R53/&XTt1bZƟo\=%nO)h$rBi-nKĪ^ ջڜlwkYm[̑+/QrZo%TQ;TLs($2C:s.%+eoNttq۰kK7O0m_t_pZ1SsSM7"mevFZ[w -FJ*T*jФQRg BSu|]g:ɵzjqwmltL.e3sRMچkSmjkmWœިm++¦'tILk*բQ D,PB\lI[9{%Gb R6öۍmX-MaʉA931cs..G4CujQտ[9 }G-xwl)IQz j Ó"rqe&=]꾧֎c)<kӳ+0JrRR3'TnXi^xMF Bު*tIL.[h"2"nKzZe'ZV/RrNYz]8죝n]Ķܩ>^Ժ]u-7^\mZjܣ9+Rmn ߑv?oꋘ?&ƪy^N4o=3-ؔ̿*`}V݁ ƒPu8%$ ݗ]wt;\y\>='OjPIp/nJU8{϶FNMsf"ίNqƹ(+ ݮF2Km |jܴZs%zf*eȫ?]4)I۵nR&FX + [jDh(#哑9q9Eծj8noǕZf\J-l&Z˫}`ӎhyrΉn\űn]9pʌӣ"׮Wt?N4_I_~54#/my1Xr*척aS#DT >q ssΛW;3oUaJSRMDgQnt:Ql,/ ܷfRqiM Ȼ>Cob;A>ڦWقM9X~/!'MW.}Vrߔꔵ!5|iB(0-zF=}okڢE$^wW~nokY߮\6՜̌{i-AF*9)\t9IV6۸5ZUF6R$ŨQIq砳YUZ]eyv >hI櫥N )&l JulwE1GDOuFN2| }馥uC1rޫV+^gdb&W[4<^e4YW,d|htͮsUM)۸8:{3d{AѢ)~ \#J=NdƮꮓ90 |1K$v*?мS ]i$J,C,SG?/_՜pMSƯM|mG1V1$~K>CSvkuj=&) -,yLjuFHK{c駗.SOua;BrSqj-ۍZ#'Jys7[g2z/.u4+XV2VQ.ޕ)$"(%)#Z7suZ%j }BǬݕe)Jvz8zJf:hIN|svO1O#IEcۍjݽ:SdὮvu^@:o^5cs>i/VqmVm]ؔܢn6'vޑ̗J4Wn@OlKbX ;n:hgJ9ŻyǑz8f܌q&Y fN0N;[69 rbׅC2/#kE l&2~èMR.*%g=Ft.%؝e8<.e=Uv{~㻏"EˑnvDѭ͜Lu3u0:U֝$[M5<:oi+V4V9 6nXvx&_ q Qqw3W:uϔ2yb/(ɳ|5zQiJ#r|Hw#.W?4aDŲ\ugWG;Cw鐢K|xg)##=O.dF˟jMUvWĻsr.z]kPc9"]R)mkfOd*uYf١RsB Aîh=k]ʳUrrZsq`d#r$/Ը3o^&lRWȍyuW̦Y4QDUMJ65ƒ[+ygk XK_±k#y:8(TJOSQhJt2.DR}"5[) r)6V6u5k:eXZmv𭤔!푊Q[qQ}ҹLE- 8qIZG|UM4j}Mܕ[Vwm{} Naqµ"ԈM zOpKѰ?IAD3Ir0'/q1itoB5{%wkOBn-ۜduqIzYK60{+DʕܞqIt";r1mG/\/ym[6JƫR \L=S=OT@Ix[TMm{>ݾտ֒ݸӉLYIx>+"JVNzx||5rI?C{oz8۹e\R-^\A2F R+N9 vlT]"ۭ d)t֞i #E2jB@׵=#/N+!ĕhx}I!cM`ąZ*ŻɄҒ߮Y.Z}='/oۙ3IpW̮hT7cTSuz9>B}΄&h!>lӵn~j˅IvU.'v'CSZw8QK3G> ,J59ٷ+HSg䧎hJdzvwv-cvxS5[̊n~ؿ%ַX?O0\6ne 6kn9.ϯ} *h 8_QhLݣ7q +=XBҲ5?[[)+F`=4 }B,sNg==u*Nj9k_GJ)+R~GSPBȒZ:(K]heL=vKPӢwq(NrG^ثϣ?#tC?.ͼ[ۅo؞y#%ǛjVyLSw%T*s92JTM%"YkQО.q)gCͲn8cgi6j1MѾ[{9h^vƘǚםidfi.^RHmg&rׇz:}݃}xT$ضk'5s-狶,\vpbPD،=Okf.c#cdz2FK5T!&)|ntD<+OŹU i-G[EE*FDfeaf2QƤM\UG_{ǹm%\yrGy:.\4wjPGUJޕUV7Do\7Vy_13w;[?c]H\$IJ,*L]3b%L{y.JRKG2sq,B6T}(#nW|km+q5] r㪍bJ@y{byz,b踊3ϻJ,'^xd،)JVw#.Vټc''ÝպWtbRؒJz۠8!o9IۄS95E9ؔ-e9JR{dmnｯ<[~n${~Њ$W?&ՐY_? #a.ߑv?oꋘ?&ơ|y^N4o=3t=~7!/M3>n8W홎2M`Qx+ z qy8%]7_~540ۦ彷]Wq CѡwkďyF5Dum_}~P(5.(X,K9vᯐ?leB9;Jhm#3{CxGE-S{;@Fz˙]=O'!ɿ]' r`:7'2bЖ>Iy,/eTy/V<.H?UYY{\^#ѣr9^7?xoRȆ7EoS_&??zϾM?(~Q-K&>"~aߨ t7Emsϛ+?;fCr)fY+>z$tIkjn_>vnrֳki-˹l= t;'EyC¥|/BLwBJdgjۛ$s S1|ɍV%JI6KvəhzIlBYɒ|0"Sy0F>eo5W)O+X˻u';v)2vVq۳kۮws?UʑBǴYO漪e2MIjPAک\b1)DDؚKm6ZWΨgȕ۶yjڳ 2ضN[C[|r@9Jfo<_eI7q.|cÊV߷:i.:$ȋ)1%%)ADZCEBxJ0MJۥy(bNsKM9k43IwNt.\%N簤I'.j|ƃ2$grBEٌ\}9:v*!n7M(ɽ]7c@XxƱԨ37īf62cTTfFK]9wntQHͮvٱI/f|j=7}\_V5U^+:uljSȃY(XI.ȱmo1甅jڎIZ2>#\*:gY|4k\8ZwSqtyA!+];бޞKծË¥e)#5ap.QK^8VdU{*ѽL\=qmjnB5>{ Ӟ`v±5 ^k&O~Oshɷ,;6nOW>u6{RqS`)S%jp\ipdEBLfTWy$GIYw~䲭J.1vSY5z.V>^+Ǎvc.I[R{QsNR3ӎfhd>y?UJ*}~[e\i5U^͛E]G_FS(Iɿ]i8:4zj~շsW,ˆsy:%O}iur]iF5~3M:Ӟ#N06)4ߧgdawIotiz:1r5YDZLHBSi;NQc44la=Y kQIT*ըl:tq2(է9VO4뒳܂~2rq'nrVZŦ[t7\oլfb/mlpc.I8콚q^1iE~䰳mi[dۧw֤ICfdFeCsg:i| 6擣׋* 96lust^{%99UNRvaMܽo ammi$em4D6DD\nA%$$#}۷/ݕr99JMն[oT޲E"KTaP+HGkŴj5TM5xƱOS-k`ۛkٝWz;{kS}F;~q|~^_|euwnE'pSupUP)V]vE+t =ZRaVdG6= *.ϼnj9:UɷbېmF_tޫgHjVS'śǕًdkkѻ_]Kv?nT>)^e=Ar1'3ԔILyD?:-^in):{7.؂\.:V }#뺾.3r̸*xbFM aȵz 6SQ:ײj[ 8nn iFMw rR"5M5I旘35f^j='j:nNW.ʭocZvZKV^ɚJ.cM1ZI7E'6rg탸5oZ=[m Z`\hbMUR١Ȗĉ):Jin!_7Dй+f̷eKҷvͨBPR(V`y6tw*MRΝcB.ڭTnc;P$8nFvm4(D(R#R-L -2:FP lxZKQc6I("Km%$E, 78uXIFA$RQI$JbInG]c[ֹ:ZM+n^')JmJMJRu{e)7jQDw~%yQl}BZujSSf۩QZ+Dzhd5o%BIc'GZ?}΍:>Ɵivז-%݌J5MqGWTVʦh݇ܟ~Օ_6 n'{3~mϬj'J11OȻn߃r Qr\3y٘+WӍ'WxEs^O3 o~[|7>]]H9݇ZomT@]?5B:Z߂'`V_+/MSKX߆ޠk3?o7y:4R/7þ] iG߬aBRU&?r&/} cQߥGj2?C5Yśe7hU=?+ x龳f-܈czW^7p%-(\D4h{UK&ӡn^m]Fݢ:`δvj俜F+) y[{{ 7 tu>gvrěOj'5 iRg[ͶFjGe n~qT$ci ۚ0oԹc*jL[sVWqj\ݻ&6"WoK:cnWmrv)o>66(F>=W^bf#c zzʞtپy%mՉPël e}J.\Zk4ttt>oEM=q)hJjI=ͥ(%]脼_88ф;͛gWG;Cw~˘$4=uWdĜTثNDkiQL9U*O"4XP`02,Ge-k5$h>ܼ]3vr6!9RQPIVSnM(ۓ{>;/Qͱv{3&-[rc)ܚI$n{Sv3[j00)-D3z}MRzVQпj,T[uVs0\}Sid;r(ݝJ>æʺL&c[jPK0~d(FKÝW\m]GTcF|Iׁ)I3~#oX%vҦEݑؼ5Żv2qAZTE^..M{ʐfȏ2##.R}*KʛZz^ӞN*lPťLf\G6[WVQquV]XAi)5J!,$iJ6o$tPZc;Kjx_n3`qIelV~vLy{fn匋Ѿn%;zV.n'-ұdd2߽1bZksPe3TI9)$ԩIN9Vơ\=2885N\ p)/a柛w9g_lױo8ݷ iixJV& ғRi{N^_oAŮE6Y7I$Nk$|Q)-*4Z)^¸%4Qm [I%.c-OV+C֧R#%ѨCe3i;w$G+_dy| Fzj$DI(=OA gj%v/]8qԯNIS*֩',Q%\44ZZ%D|Ǧʴ6&vֵI$%8(ԬƾS&#Z. }6z?b/|Jl{ץv&mpx4Z$”ڝ4-H%dGKfM:sKSRWeJAn]>s6应-W9'H]'uȫYvgK^\czp|My\鏩w/ËQ.)]\QiS`8uL뚛̸=J"ܻi\å'-)54Ue]:K\퓡vK xwBqrH\*֕TnzC.mT=t-H]SČ~Nu╏NÅ3f|͡G~B+Xm[Q7U{9"~jgK Zoʰ7"qJ,ekSeNGgϳ] ^.6:s}_,%eRg<5⿨z{ZPun#jRІ.6g T.!]xa c#jN$Zpl̋H WZu8WmMRýsĮ?Mco~sx TU҆Q :KDG4n42.<3/'^?6/ܠڒ^yrrÿr2\D}}B]^E~^T cɛ7϶Y[<֞[7d}2%QPqOLEQR\CIsj1?\}%tJ0e~ *sk"*)&ۓEi#{1J8Hrt|'ܝRr8)=ƔN'RVz:cf]F7bZyZUȘ4x8,#JG̒?.W9XnO]KO]%]ƻ O5Γ/3qÓj؍/r̺rƵ 5\&m6h.xoeX[=<3%< lZ"2h\Z[&jW3ejm?k&[]ųj+{N{66leu_+lj]q* 7g*knأYv= q ەdxЬZ|%GUrQ3jLŒqET]1% qkXYūYc[7Ś]QY\jko\</Lc7+'hMSUc6qXyؙ~6#ѯv.0$BQi5YyIhɍiy=KD!n3Vm[V%W-B%swa97ajۗ m+9~]fKq|Ddaˑ0A]_v޺mM5* F-BYHJ5}q>ʉ.6hyDmpD׬'-_v5;5[8K[viJ.3dR:oYHHh9I7:۽fi+wm^ [)odPѱ52CZUJicSw\&_s0uBȍh32džzQflcd^m|7GѹE!fO5]]H9݇ZomT@]?5B:Z߂'`V_+/MSKX߆ޠk3?o7y:4R/7þ] iG߬aBRU&?r&/} cQߥGj2?C5Yśe7hU=?+ x龳f-܈czW^7p%5|Y:SJE\U-(a_cƣUǽXXKiȞNlmۊڭڄR!**ܤMeȽ$|X5(Ź\rJ~ܮ]>'HB0cp XFr_c?f?7<ukSgov¥iG>>䙗i.+t+bOjIܶ . i^:nm}s}(3>NZ$2Qg([".>i.ƾ)B̋M8+"- >eE6DݥJnJˣt׻ 5.˅nJGwZD~!i۶a,Db3ZQ3O#KO5/֍ozuK'GbRi᝘NV_ҝcvם ZoX}F6z 7e5_e:ۓj=AB+iܔERadMBq*ԯ DwI/Gy*mĥiRKg6skY/#SN4e$-yXM YL?^ĸNNӪ{$r1JJRSLO]Aqm>V/s[~i/j+m>z}eI"Qvp]{ZԼ:{vPAG2=T͡@ڐ#u"E*>C;o$~C#_d/HBq^YRٽzIKbOm\~żjFFGdiQ(*/i*#.FF]©m=BmpQQQSP&Ҫ!T&^>:y)$ˑÐFčI Bӡ-t!bM WҦŶ'UZ=}zvn~oT/\ǒ'nr8 AJIӆz<^uߖ4eFC1i+v!3qNyߕni?4JZlmYFXFۼO0B\m[ tʄU3s"Sr(NJ;SKW72L4̏BVdf^Ҹj\]ȱ۪(ӷm?J-KEmWڽ^4<8qu%9pŹW~877ܾeVгS(յe^C]yX͹! םm4FGȋ\y'Z FX7e)|Gjt߹#gb\ŧq_([R8[qU$Z (ʻezV2V!iQ,i$JE˂٩ a(GK'O{vnBvryRd-RK4=qxZJMl_CuuIz @Rt㮽޳!|68\-l[џ84-2Pu" RJ_^OL>G1~XnBŬw6J0*Uvlږ1N G1q9IUm*'oWu][&UyYZbBZRZNfEJf"+2nF~Eû7n1xv.RUM$6 lAxSQJ&n5ܞwlEói"#>4׿Q.nEq7Oko[1wg8ZQwZYiqtm&~">Bo?w͡ni2峋NCEy Ҕ+%ZJ ʩq*fpˤl,~^Mχk1+:ݕ z&Y`KLӪУDr3[*Z :(SL&ݻ۬Vqsyԭs x|iI߽zZrg.:mp%6ԜvgmpIUt;QbS.Է) ǨKSV,*lڌ|5Jt3#NP.=+OZ~/G سIgbꥹJnl_DUM\iM!֔wVZuԺ,yV.Q>f v:݇WiaŸN5Ҕ[M7SsrvǣrMW= \8ZW-jsnڕ.ZnF2qt ً[ٻޘY۷Zm"Jxr&NAfA-݌to9s359݆mZ+N1-qS$D=17 x׵+%_ ve4ir6Z$FDڗnFtOr'7'{9C˨ꤡaYoace{Refnft RR"4%ʌm:Sj3)OdInTO>X'vxV#jܮw9Fog;5.~Y5\~18YQܹvj4+~t7S ﬕs %^۵ڴDZV69R^Y+rj$ԇoJKR5wB9C>Y:l+EǎS{ʲ{T6Wi* ^^9k/y/Cs\g*qڵgn4T8mERr|Ti+iPe;;.i\EBEJ 丬i9ɧM-ԼsGDrZ>r#R>~X9y4b棇9JwV۔%m(b[Tjvl}۩~nDԺ{Zo-YuK1vx.nWuO+jN [ٮ0%"΢CdTJK-RަH"$I(*ve &҉FzB,_Vpqp9m8werv')E;o&QE׵^d9˦j\_,ڵugZȻ̧8k+jK{wmr@3ӭ2 wFkzFVqs1؛.v'I%$[iT]D5Dl2 nk7qUxԫLS+sا3/ΖeZYK<["%-g/kRs:f3;*E ت wJ%)5&+&rw*霣i|sMҴ|;R+fm䡩.!**dӶ-6s6,]zAXMWjmnz%SJߴm2UXw7MQ%<!tKys#P,W>s;3IYwx<+i_\\\U6 u7P|xbn_k&ӓVOe䦒 VUr,-㘘"-LZeOSҠթrEvq8Kf%5%&K"#%vD/.ZYYŏ+p$nZkvއuW9㓱Z G wYIFyf)?ƎUm5ԉ/'k84{KO:rQI}XRuԪ|*lu)3qZ[mSm5R3".Xcَ5c®ࢫI*۳~wRϿQWޝ(EJrri&ۥ^ʶ齲Im|[yb;mnm֩uiܘq>E+Ikx߄3r33-5𹻖09ϖ9[Tz~mr5NsWl$oPusޛ^{Z;);sڹf\3oٹZmԉ/'k84{NO:rQIBø8Bݱ3n֤DiK4u& ofSȒܩx<˘|N0Fչ]qsp"}! QWw@t4ӭ+cO5%]'*{eM߲DRO1y*q8w++e!c߶ܪlZWّM欼 CQ̼빶lX{vib/V/ ai;x6~]+z]MWB>re-:lgk}պ!#9?%܋V-c[z!W?c7YNm/jRr[HOzԻefճ0q15Zp#rkQQ0tU-AmڵP/cȕ?0cZYj;:0ZM=D6g ?'UN+ձ[K ܖB2'xq9{|۫N0ku 7xaj;n\ 2[VznMlWiKbSk))f..)Km)&bGZ=>OR܍W:j'rM'wYz&/鶧{Sʵb"vջq[I-ՌZH._x*BagC'T(Q:$ͳQcMCKy?3g'ߝqnT);qs #ؤZ}OOI:cfnc8W~qy.;^pVl]Hԓ>^H^@7-AA܃nmL(uWܻS߿ Td95Bdh4t6*dDh!EhI[iŨ\L.&Nc ܮf^;$R)\rip9I|ٺ?#R.ZDZ;/]nݻqs\QE9M&Bd ]N mN*D>tgbK>+ˏ.!23]BȔR1ɝ^j'k2ƮqBQq[$di]icV/e`޵B.FIIJqbi>Ӥ|p; 6${)RU>_e}^dzdfzi %ekRVUS?6'hׂ)5.\+qUgzE2C˷ecŏ^֔ibk shesFWJ#~> Wk~ݨ}ڶ>ơǚ)׽ZƉo~B-ڼrvoE:Ʃ3ۣK7+Y`WirS):{>ڛ}:wԨ(J_";6R%[u&ƫdZ_\'np| RJwNeTW,=rrbnkڄ[M3ܴz)3- R.?:okۼ0TU'w{6&w7j1z3ON'fGoO?)S_bQ_¿R(^ԴԴG.EtMڇ&RUiW uQjU> Kiu1d<ѥIQ'RQ1:O/lŗᏩiʂv&Jc{D5 Tt)1.n[n۶X}RjqnOʽ(~[Ns{ސ⛌uO,kgo֢dRNQȄ .'6W!׌P朼tdZjFGE"]K@'i۪N;sI[{SOzk>`rRR+!σj8&TjlvA̷Q?HyjyLHNտJMjܶT۽lG?SnKN%<‘ nq[N0Sq[Ta(&t(|HGO~gvkݻTR4&Z$#ViOY1r$6YF?e4U/Mvxų:zbU^gQQ+NW_'4jfz^c'#`rvrڡ(IJ/J ݦ6 ]-CW |_{v*_q3^DZ}Ic6Uڌ8p7{crZq5ki`)mU6|-Z5^iEz3P=:Cu7DF'k%}<C-޹ֲ̱#\,(f88%X-N(ck0VLR~} G"-8ӏ/ϰKq?(#nrVTmZ;zióM4 m |UT'C^_1X.gXM{%ʤd 4\ovN":"y-,T)fLQgۢr=/CƹǨJVr[a+!rT|%Y\ٱzsS>jͱ.oOc6f$q% ǒGo;n[];ߎjrk{~\VۓNIGn:iqxo |~t5)Rxעri{Vi&NUOl_ѮMfsޕkЄay.0P{7N((BaIP$ K"U6Gl ݙqJRu+qN$ m#*p<|{:>-Ev=86N*MM긭U*uѾ?/^o7;'u,h4݌xښRM:5.(/ \իU.{F^rmF-Jɷ.>Q"[4xT^OZ~mK}T0ݛ^SAo9u?lX(' qj%=X}"^e4wˠ|rܫ 6I\Ķ;Ӻw!'ڍWg{ i U_9Avhۣƾ+:vs/MK[ɭīe{`Zgb}r[i'GE2J7Nez579wRq+Un ]J.cJ4M:h箽Wxxm^ pc\wcN%'My $$| :$Fqɏ¾^қP9J6Wxvu}ݵP>Z'FFdg"-; [¢cmWkÎT8nG%ݣ7*\խCLRYZͤiD&J#'ehbSyXK|y*ӞpS̍R`[pTr/Eg)K+92{_ n3zwz'oŸۤ+sOj J:`T>Cf*lwd\fYOP"R E֢̔L4ɥ :;.b(B02rJ蠟9>V'9M%)IqnhP<%,r'P/vNSwr#w"ݨaqc(|{kd=^0jTMR2ULNz|.<|^PfY22##!,K~E BEJۜ&jRNsHަޛg\r,v؜.jK3)[EJ2ii{KEiHP^&]Gn8x=K}Wx/KI9-ϵwQ%spܾ[^R}S3$qvq8M[ ozKxcqmJ/ӿ{_}7&ݨ\f6ZSyQz& 7ۉ[8~UNn|nkiTB+4RI8'Nc%tn{!]Ȋo.nEmʱn𵵥J A+wy#+ikǒڂ;՛s85'KmE:Ђu""Iģ5p=БbTY-ͽڔ詻ngL2Q}$de# fs^o{DUUsfwӶ;s1T,ǤtޒQ\෼J=.tKU,7čJ5 N$y3kdSMQU~mO[03 $zAڟsF5^뜞"Կ QHmrR"ӳηer+ҔZ]hE-6Jmt'ޒ=O[sQj)6K}?e4v_KfZheޓ=BV[bY}lݒTTЬ{ȫvO_qpRApVŗ 6ju=*BR)g "O1yhb=tqJ gtm\b3RY+JQ^Ō֍\յ\>+uSi{=x ^w;uӘ#ĸzLn*$anok߷CBӷ}5Yqvdž<( "_OWit5:EZj2 B ρ1̊fi[n!HQF82q1牙nqnEpT(2RMoM4ϳOu ':֧_Xjsg jP^(ڙ{2%E͖j^}ZU[Q$'U) <܂%!s"m R'G5M0<+zM6qYm$ڕ$3ǧH]?o2N<8F1̻r_my[Rf59NjpzBnl7*{.QP 3N&^BLJPjAHCK2Q}$#~YMq8 k(MFMU)8MEqTy+Tʞ-ar5yܕOXw!e;q-Jqܶ䓊Y:LC UE{/t>r"lI9)3KJjϤA 6SEE$d߇3KG*En|P\ԭTn6I-ƍKTj<1H_zwGr19wF N8ݝ+a9ɫM6mhePi%mmD! """"""*1bRKrD"vnrM۫mmĽm]ӡiG~e"˩ lhRTMk^MX["Jݱk7_ޕ*DqĒ&flՒ}`W}~SմZ{ĕ~wm*/{{ѹ_-0ط#P]xlڱ~Tn5wi*lڪ (JxioϏbqKYR|!|KN53 OS222$jzww%i}>N)E+rۥ7c$Ofl/LNث\6H9: FY󡈾I)fB֔JI_ ֣^: 9mY{66㒢7Uj]:.-os[R&gMF3˸#໹kmjq^8W"PΦURjʄWa˧T!͋ lW48JB2ko+ /Nw QwQzQ ے%$ޓ7^YL|r7!v%Trܥ &|M8~ybrn[RV gSn{{*#2#ԽᢏӴHak" ӌcwҜw&RJ07ױ>Ļ =^ BɆ)v32.M1=#6%̠tҤnzqMwԣ~s*%-j|_m*.Yx9Sz=)qE4 3pk+,`=kNRڥ=B=nŔNAx)Q$ԩȧ4z3t#Z2lҮYn$S%y- JzGpu|LBV7ZW#;Wwipܷ%(6jFG5#{$D"uۭ~]֫SrD܃fҎӾ+Tu>-ZTQ& N|$沸ii>eRWݳu'[O̻j8JۻEѩ[]vni= ڒ,[_%kC7I3Nv$4ɎЈeٸoUu:[}Do5|zNq=Tre%ɧ6&~DȍF]ƞG5q m]/w/ \ʲr8=oʔe9U(W"|S]uZd#?Se[W"ֿh][-7Nu:T=)R}.;ml*5Dlf $fF(̏T hiIUU4Szɕ t(%_|2 ~6eM;TƗK[f&]LK^CE2[ȏBOd;Mi|cx,^6;sیGpQ\NuJIFTJ~đArh* B"$H쉩eXPRj?sl"ԥ)su]xpԴY%VESH"ЋJǰ K&5^Ukzׄ8kEgS2h&Se\ Yl]WҶp-ZUvi7QS:4byqOo+[̺腋[6-_Fo.6[7$p&^ _GZԸߍkc.qqoI[9m߸YxOZЦ1uoiSH)P9Uʄjcq= S>֙NeR><;+ڌk%_qT].srNO?s[=vH[]RZHRMtᩗVؾ:/~u)ԍdg%=edVrISb{6vSu=(ܥ)mTv/J}̇8 S3ad:^hBSf؉OɔLhI_1d8,L><_A0y3rXq"'(۱;mFNII.v5_(^q~X>y{3צ I*Vܛv/jW' T'NR'j%ꔩ:mJ3SB}΋!-H-RJBТQoedi9tjENenPpke.%4]#{:>mkEɱdYWl\\\'nRM4&U>?Ќˉk÷!𴪛]]5}UqG~ݏI"O~s6(Ļ)qO~h}uԕd}Q~G,oE!&G&/]_H-O=o{k\̭bkv.Ô܈+;arZx)m?M\3lU$mk-CFXjTv6u' g:Vn_*qk:VC A%'4JV%EY)#BғO4<e׿jQQ]yUr4=wm[K1r׵%Iũ-O}|kC;/VcݩWZ)EHdžTru]8hgĵ-;=>U_ InvTm_jBM+QiF"9*{DI/iuo(=TzϖmPQl_v4z>T*ȴ>YF;ε\t]EH4ꌇ[VrLzef 2T^V>g2~kg5~Nק;{~Z~W}&ŒBӿS2$J?~(Yœ"˲ߩ\O]: J׉ښT{mmIѩn3˧)4LdFZ/zUG>U> n 5& ϴ-KJi2o]uKljvK3$bԔҚV旧iY5.ίfi96v7!v))FJM4{jG~Jt/lUE%pTAFe4qQk\ve۽/u/Im+W')v{\-E|Pms7߮DZRr۞/mu*1ՙaB܆ -xg3#6ۥtRogʌU)׎]ZҞNnŞr}F1Nnޞ;cZ{N}ۿMiuxʉ*3qi'9KHQ$WJxXyرŔe~[v5~/jN9Q4o6rJv FrdxM*iRjMzUinHdн7ᾞS=S'7 } ̽zt7K|_g J=Lq+/Bw_\ۧx\HJUPzQ<hqF[V0x==CsU7q|^ {)Iq38$_A(VgcKu06Ƅ"%i~_ˉk QCܣB8Ku/񋇵u([w}$F|8TՠI.E !;RJ^}MɒD_q2];Ɖ{5}*n7nEInO{Mwv}&q+v [V}Ĝ@%>#dXQ$f;iep.GquixVt x6bj͵mlKقQ[T]zs/&yەnM'W}!Fp_d^Tu N{ɻ'l{խ2.sTu{W^H&;1s)Pӛ6>$mě;Łnj= fLT)>׸+qReɴ[UR\L*P/!$Ӊ3Q 'K=m~6XqW3^W+ųO_[F$rR*u"T%@O +%# ]˽!aܽz{ͷvQh쩎]hGތ5ɇ*DzJDRNLi 4:{~2FmXY-zzĽ^f=]uū{/+&c:Ma{ĝDp2m܍kHș/(--m_vݮK(V{R}.k&yƴ7i^4@3f sK3^Ř˸B=]?gt5KbZB<e;kQLpxuWC}n 5ҴepB##~q= `x]KWF {GfŲ}?G.I9pjWkU]>={7q{kO/^I3==f1ɏ%nnʫ/Zu_yXN<57ۍ'vy/"8넭M2eԷ&Y,в33%IkjMr7xf nmQkX4踼>a-GcIeތw&U=-:qnW)z¥j :WqSZvԒ#j"KrIU)%qrmRoDGQ~SYRsu*V)  ,/x)MFD6O#]z 96[Ui(JRfw'y$GeUީkdMF-ݻ98F2d[o{Rn0n-xsV6Dh|Eb2E:KCOӪv4SJCr"J!!m,hRLD| ZYFm/X~ΧfrN&4Ƒ=Z9Mh.Mܵw/BdrܥniŪ8ɧ|y%œ[M=_tj?F!z5\evM:\ ~F-sg钬OWq“iiȍ<Gi%%n2rqͻllƑ)okw7}\Uk-:&fj솘XerV9yZuʼşdFC=rmo%~ZN78X(N)_7.Εn1MpJ}62jjJdI";R5&iLԸc:jmqiQj$ujp\{;v5B񥍪Xn Ą4qOERjzN(Ga٠䌡)p*v(J7#ZۻZ8O W uONb+^Qipv9GvֽƼϯrYƖKGJQDNPhRJjᡧC"21"9ѓS1;R_O7/WGz)8fE%F2ukmvSov/iZ&/]~KmI[:^~ͤ\kMi稜\ywJt3W7 8Ʒ~ݥeFgѼw"8VVSج\뻆}ݭ/J6Q)d|)zU3>k\L=;ow֯gN3pKѫ|wmkZ$z^2R:E)f>ς нd|#׆?\ǔpV{;\$ƵE%-ͪm0S6[n< kE[}mvE4DDZ^$OZ0*$~XUv҅B@^?]so#%ojw;Y#SxxueBگy v^i-)s)zV jC{7Gt.w3v,ygg8s]aE_,*E tY5k٨h=o"m泏:\6w噓aiL׎n^c\75AGkЯ0Lf46َ`egZ˓p/k;̛]kq!ݸzpԭG"}R9Ve>ˏHUjJ-&7nrnwG*Xv\˱/vN}O)ʼn&CV͍f̵]r\PMB-6Du-#RͰtRN^)mT _}nSȕC*_xBuTkJW[`ɩ`ejvsngP ڻ.-WUtܑqԹQj)t;vN&RNũT+8%IXӃ5fK՛-d9 ]CƑm|nZ-6=Hz,*aEm W3VzRšdY~Xf׀Xx"]s;)5u*ُHB BRGS6bݶؿ 9j[1*jױga7oX CUI%0v#~\-O-Ꙛuɷ쏪&5mY٦M`LJ2qK~HZbr =N'YobI. (^ ׾{_ ?OJ`S`3BN[}5w6:ǵ/iSlt=4F*d&T4y/#. ɵim5Uֲf 眕6Y7 fơ=3dϕq뚩$qTM-%r!$@A? ޾V0c~{[{;򥧅a~ڵ»&ڄv1ek=wb MLkNAԬw-x>~/r=e73VeVN)K%Sښe"+3uXuچrn ֺVzscJ峻m}vb㶓n\YbIUBT%*,0nov=;z꣓S/nSXSpl##k9mXGrZv^Gde!ŷRԠzQyjC]`gToPov{j~KRBMY}i[߶9KL2ԉO0K#m>wB[ٍ+n[[b٦DX ݲpo] [\m5qdT()mo4Oy9Ie b][wղmM~vmi۱~t \}$яimRk(L c Cvk7r9_r1 ;zv|F@KyZ[&jEji/"6$69ml#e]9s\{ScL}Ȣؿ0q/nZ*t,CLoD߉Njǚy=Pgmu6^]l-["çUʖMlʍp-"qmU>۷uFOJ%Ǔkx 'g=睋k[3u,{³WɘݪF]ՍeFX"Oy\,cچ=w/gn Ļ]#2? vqy-gXnR.^}ݺFs{ŝG]}e|#0mjx"ƬWكm?rgU^xVB":Dt>@LRbun~ݭ,w+v⪕;\U(RYa61>#Jm˞Μ9g9XKaG='u8gf}'qy#ɉw J]We.ʲ-<+&q%s?2dњztҼn`cΤmmqMdz O[-ߩӲ&;[tmܝVnr">{x<8U+p:Ig]zjGkt,uzf}dؠoJaکqEq -(:d<պ=eKy[˗^%ZXkX[C2߱\ITTLGzANM￵i]K>UsOGDDD.ZF6* ҃V Zhz{'xp^`wo8r0h ZmJ5"jb[l=yUu7-;7IT%:jFjߖm0tzU'K)څNۧYJ)4IQ}^KWm7kSP>q;ނ#)'n7&׊r?óM{IwR\j2Qn[v pe#/tAF\ϵ225q֒om6z})6҅*oqDsMf CNIN=T S2t,_ѧ}kveMF0J\Rnnݙܹy[rUc-j{yGtkQ%s]5qB.Nw.JN1LvR Ui5J ZESQԙr):MJ+g}χ!2;q([jAud][ljVK3$ײSJI=/|&tl'*n۽f.frܥ jQO8>&Z];.|7T/C}$ڋUmP2Reҭ8hFF\L 3~e v\۫]ݝNmrnB%*]Z«hKc=BTLG :V74$=Ǘy+EX'4tn(I:Ѝ;Df8c,k1%dJ6.j6ź{N~l6&*fœI7 WAlGOu-ҢH,,(ǔe뿋쩨kM܍ZſgRvQ' 9)?n|er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE&ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ>=F)2[nk؆?훐M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag%qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖CpruZ6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p\̅S?㭻;t~R߁)^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;²~+ߔ_ YW~|o]?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4lp+$D̢1l|ȨF%-}.9[}w~ ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW!s?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu?v3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw=/7ovuk+\V;lDgն<[A+rX~d;m!_s8ݖ׷;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\–q ul8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS- DКw=Tv@f'6|YlD͓Y%׵-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~ &f# }o!muH;ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{ m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezWqUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>Fn|Q[{pRO17ƕ~._I''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-uܾw!`?1Whn|gzUo[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1 עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1? 6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFw–s*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* PRaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ ^˒4kƓmzDx \ 'NqamP7nyN݅=j7%McSڵj%STy qXymvCg{w/w=wSW5r̹u erծˊsOm=DhEҚRb#n)QOxtվQwe]I}wCa'"[ۂ-z}2UuKP$㜉ԧ:mc<Ý>RoL?wu|%ҷ&K y_!y9 ??:tq3(UU-lkS'ɸ@jdzQˬR] EVPW1DJq2n:,c|ǻ̑;y{X,ۂ.u.b˕u.tKBjQ"[S園S`ٮdNبeJ&9Ơ ~0a(Vm٘L+Jr*vڑE( x0+tp˕ n';wm-ޜMOxX>{#2%jgb2M[`K*\5@8l'e=0u+w ֘鳾{y܀:R*Ya]"Ӧ%ktynlۣ65,3gU}{GYrb;ge'TKwǘ.,rpܚV]Tr,!dp /ԺU,xՉ>s׽~W5oTh yx?xrrx?)?ilbT׬,z$Ԏ.UH٠\U1pU:]JwSrGZq8àd驐,N67QYBӢD㏙W!Q25ϸo9ms-7-%3CihO.J鯽-;MZM8ku-7k9S$8]q2E(}bۏI[DKOK}3KUB^u %Y,u.-&f#]'܆o$x`Yu,dzwM;#oKxn;\[d7}Rb+*Y䛂ZuBӱl{j0O̓}LhK;[aֶaGL{Cb#S.T[>߃F]NK"u^LUʐ_ykW?!GRj29͖qa'0[npcDvV)qz9R)PۨM^aJx W] r>];eN3vxdmĘ(5W2K1䪖weF{mE/QP6\u54x5[hۮ-Nk”i[lUgL]J}5 S:EhiUrgHl!ŒJ$pe=q^b͵Q' ?6|R\,JA ڵ"TDꈭ:ymg`B5t%M] <N_zv2_Ortٵ/i/ReӮ*7[qүqEG* m"[I:6e^p"I$jԴęh!m)]GZkcjS!{e^z}+Cѥ9;R|/ֱeiUԏCNu2Zhcٗg$ݭwvr P8*7/Lk~I'Km1+MW%Bk|oOm>-#qj*|Dbѱkn|n{v#jĮqNpMIUm(7Liz;{ҜݞڝVƚVϬ+sO!OstGvxӉ']uӎ4g_ 1^-8ۦ k!)Ύ5O;YSB#2Zzχ;<.ֵOtge~.(RC#wFZeGZٸ6FFJ4e2ˇpJT$[wgV)q6muDGJ56q\I!̗ y/I~RtJ9kJ]Iy*'FN0s.[l!fw'y(7$œ WƫgyΙdMEU JQJv̋vmrۖ.jWR_M֨djYgSj0^\y'EoECjm$ IƩK>Z28J2TiJ2N#}.s cArl嫶nB.FIJ.)۔\ZiM>/hLĸ=C1s[?YMqp|94- 鮝𦔽/k^#NT(Y LS$6˩}{;5 )B۷W$qpN)qqoot}ZDVә;7TiK|6f3h$dԄ}fqݡ>Nb򗉉+ͶO]>ߡ_VtYf79ڰիF sq~prս|QM)g%l0ocJȨHz V;Bb/kLAcfPJ,ԭ{ƍgpjNR6VSI*$!yV足jᇑ.](EܣqM\qJ2eZT).<9UB/(B0j)mtKEj#׿fDI-=rZړj|'Nڤ]k*i$5qt"ݙPM6E4ke^Z8ۏhz$Q(R Ay2zfRñnpnkbkI:=j &ΝșW?׵d{+ύM'??XqeeĽ.[o=UxFS=ӷdZwenՄ]_X=ĭVa* pKs0ބۍfJ3 gz̚i|wnxtjc¼5${(1fXQ65ȼb̶Zkn>%FQMJXӡ{TZEVNᖣimT/37cNJUPnP҂ZOE~"-Rc4^b- FEͧtf5[)S!OZIښݲ͑;tvܡ+N)AR=hCNn;wL16-:特7M$=Tҕ-.R[HٷnXk sn[ҞD-0WS9p9:-Ϸ-jѬNu{ҹfv)[Ľvwfg(ٷfe+0mYj8Q1\ݧg]Eǎvڿc!4#j5̋C2"}BRriFp7=ô\TZ:\BLfj#I22װ<;صZl j 6:l"6]۸ K'6RTѯ^ئOԓV\?$x7s#r:Oh{ց=MmuHԷd{pN /܅:UE#Yy+(SgQ(Щ)RHzw>^Ѿݻ>mK&^ '$Jۻ&w%F|xfz%˳ L~3N?Cy9 v w/{ƿ kz3x> sXv}vP"@WyC z`'톽Dw%-tt yVY\wmuPYQA0iG-2JP,6/gˢ]u.-n!Zw.N7Q]Df}Q0({a\@=i_X7gFǘ8^⻲}G MZ1)WEfO12G+=-B@z\`||w6ċj߬m}UwRox֢I &c~XGP6Qndpvܻul'V7^FJt^{b^B(L~sѣ6@߿^xqU!ڙ5|Vpvef-uӥ^3  FSDɯKD%0r}FF穛r7 +o"V8tv̖NQU!5uFd"bCr^bJ=֤fM#ʳԷP0O-9xRBm\=`r-:;~3Tl(nXtXi%2Vٛ#vwqƴ`L@"H‹qW.j,JM5B[)WܺUeZFqc'V˷1W7V̾-MHФwn8N;HPSdݷC7&2j.W\τGŎ'Vb]c.x+Rx1%C2T{myg[qU|+m:M:շ8҉yWd)ՋWS%%:iqlʹmGwݹ WnNŤѩ5(9hTٵDdGUi-)vSs2 2{OnT$Xck n:¶(lASLeȔBjμPpTb2~N2~%^k[ܗ[Jzs0ӓHBKq[}JَA-$dFQgjxxFv4r/x*Rm% `4J(&iv7SkԲmSH1YWmx 8n.k']:Z˭_W >ڃXЩ. jTq%Aā[E}amc]D:rmHRiu:uӚӢ\p(5-q%e)(۬ҖȽIf<߽pr&ݫVfY91q2ĭEQgYbTGQ&,yL+N$[q*RVۉQ=FuTܻ>f>f㋳8N6$܌n)9&»iˤsX,݅܍ȩv+sRTpO}d?Wn/Inpȸ%O]StQO|v5\}7Zwb.AIVK^:wb{[uݯcytO߶S<{8KSRׁH̏N7ۚ[xkwYy_'ZӵF+>쌛ZUĦreE9F[24De{}@:ExWs-\ǻ7K-\JNvEk%:s˙#κ].oͳ;լ7wB6nwu:$L; DkI#Wz.:Xp(˅v$Sq,wn\qIN-e<5Oe+vuYTpcojUI_ާP8 O 7&VL8z$_B-H-[uh]T{|8=qVRN-:Ij:7PUtXϷmy鉿:RIM~33ӸS2#׳GdŲ5+/Bx{(WzȨ5Y㞎#|˖+ ط.|e<o/rߔX>7s}VE.OVti׽ .5nNJO"95{#q}Ay9do]R"M6z\tnNS-D!@3N_jicWsy*5uٮRcWv/.,j}=S)j5C^> Ie =gu9ӛqjtz]۪TMoߧI!Ǧ¶m:,"[L!{qAv-o 3{"KʼnrIkfٶj2ƙ؄S`7` k6jzޞ?e5G&6uʷ2%ԒRKE*G\Npom F/V |C0.q_eenƣ<5Oh'67ɪn[SĽ{ڔjǘzs;~׌(ۂ`ܢ1ƣ` _l9Va6%UQWh~P~\F^ZHR@:ۧCJ{ôGeBh;~ۧnU J\O+n2 RҠ)ng}Kh{5+S×ܛ.1ZjG)iRȤIN 4%{oΜ/eO[Nffd ĹK?nnԼMqX'܌nZvq<ķbFnͪaQ`5 s,M_լ?-@_{w{ӺձJ}GF[%v\5[ŒGkOw/ΜM9rjË%2+rd~+󲕛C9U۳r[aJǭm|˒LAʨSCq[XMۺoubfp:t+ΤĻo ][ zt-*67kvS7D·MMCQXm;)܎n_h%]4ܙnRk!]ڵsDUF"`R, &#R_*[z*ZqFXɻ]7|۵w+'pFDەs=r./ᐚm3Hשy yD"jHCr':sA65نѮ^o1V/ f;nFr3VM)e*- s D'H݅fӧ\*޷[k<7u<-]֍Q8R h|p=WlW3s%Q %3l}@U-K6f-NϿu|ڴmWN׮[׸F*mW\%r! C78:޳vBG7ŵ.JթԚ2x)ST!řn~9 W:Wpܢ件{xf8ٳwKE ҰWxVB\qBZ 2wMb[lGSnyԚ~z9ZmያvoN2Afnݽjf>)j3 !;gOYʹK" Wftڎ+׭b*2ϻK>ۢӱeyԪXISUm[z+ugX%0lϏnvg!;t{BqPj>PyvR7Cj]O%+ݲ :qiMj6W}3vC/R=4Som]ŗ=ю, TF6U_-\6MyskwMr&Q\wjKܩyMϣUj0*}RZܷSdY3>Zjqj6TgzpA/M`/Cmл,޻feE[/+uk^Vs1W$G(JsW2ٰu*߻q*Y޵.Wi:ur5T),=0uRmho.twܖiYwrWHntvEj8qhf`Ͻpf(R&>Ki%I7$QӖm-2 ~yߗQ-앑/ x[k8nw.c㩵k}]FkbJl:{.(˩n0Hqvαp7 귎.Gupx[N`Yq'+ruU7[ү+>!xrȫoSo]OC# d^Q]\>!ƛGw^Mx"-+%vdX-:M2UR%d>%l ioSu6lsj7D P>XxHz Ukà(n^Q V>5cVtWj SEiJdznyej[lE' 3kuٌNn4JW)gB {4 j6&]' m-(ZMEz8cz>WZ6#7+[,MR-Z!4ܓtCyE|umj1ƽvƷV\;%>Q :#Le(iVz5 4ũۤUWxX ^(ҔsլB2w-V ^R+; ˂M\z+Uwr+RWY⺧~ Q*JcYSNSλUd8in=v K낫k\IRרSUaCFmϿ5̗P|u ZTԕ}>oYѲ1sfP+sQkX8Gb~6r,s>^\,mGL+7[n-E\.Fqḕcl*Jmjb5 ,m]c}NXfeVlǸJ5eˡ$4%g~N p4Y*WwW٧<8v#;qԩTut,m"#Y D\5V`\\Lȋ];LȇiS6ϝZ l>LruR\v=ǘϔDg=ԈdFZ+M{=|,[;0>RiSi4,S5}yxw&(E7&fݙ4UՕ! ~'Id)]ǽu2K-fޭ \08Vڅ쓬=Vy^^ IhyKR-B#Ըr=]mܻӾ'*Umkoy rTqT_i,/8Q^<ݤ|4ԻO(܄"'5N~#m.(Ҿ2i6Uev&I*<}҄$eNtÛzyWJubW^iBW.܅Wڮg]irO6Ve90sgv.+sV޿aޔ[p?3q*FutUo*eL\KM'EG*ZcAFfG5J 5jj=MJ3OK:k˝'NMB7m3uFҕ\-Ywg%PRqMIyZGY9|μvn߻5cWݷa^+X֥vnݘ\v7m>Fgzv"-;Ew֝}1|RjN𿊀7g#֟*GQQ|#/bo]p$>_Un9гUbn9׃ErQBU-^vDmVh'<R[fdHT]*~}3j;nvjc7s-rӳ Y8[n[1pJx kX[Jk9Mn!_Nю6x:iZ˦U |߉^Ԛ݃hYxk &U^bwKk.[jE+P(˞=9j@snCv7%c_7=xǁ<l {t'酚+1F‹l׭:ݻILruǶkL-L(K0L1&>wXB(pm;1fpnlp֓%Skidkt(U +xulo'/ڕeN r=^pZZ:Pnj8Hf"48ijY[ N[yZٻ+=  ø:3 ?^ܷ^Sr#YK[UF?CuhC b]GM')mڏsNrܗI]ljq6VB. W,UK"YX5{c >Iqā> T:n!,5l2VzCl|+I[*SrjnS6٨y+x,@>П.g+!rn9>N|W>OZT_ut Y""v7|sfި;Pclm EùN,{'fNT%U&LfH8~1v>Il}统u6P˗c(WV~H^bMU.o*oOF0N:_:6Smr_.b+|ݶYY غF,mwjv>f*>QM뭱Sd:`N{l/⎱;n-z~"Gze퇎J5S KG9!Gn;N1 ݎ h6m|S?ɂ5'WOÞ 7|7^ao @mxGmi^jϽ>01Mf0լD3-2T. VXR"ɥV Kl J O7|u?bvа;6.eߓ|[1bmRr,eRz`z 6܎-ͨku͹Fː dPhYgZUj}nvX;z=gVեTv_J }\1n7w2J?ޘγc\E 1Aޑzq;\r]]\Y&[nsNei\uURje*Qk2CSl*xJz-xٶlm+|UjUؓ`Ladqiĩ!Gd\W~fz;Tn*PdRM&T4`չSWq5k훶(N"Ӎ% V]֦wb.nUO!u*J&Oӕ2e|Z=eV쫚΅g#+/RW:طnbi*Wyo)p{:ETKؚR(RY+r웓r(IF) VmȵNB:h Q1ғ|u8E]{,'$-TR[j49l*3"I鯴zhd>Q+\BkNF=.$ZR4Nwհ(IpNi.(Gi33#33e$FXK*NdWrud[r{xnk$v2ıh+J1TQ[#JQl[tRO]LHKٮ NӍnF񨔤֞Em'MILB"ԋ%dBŋ+p̿_17jzT~4pc Vo\ƹb9Rq-'1j;8ܗ)hE%DZKS<璸Bu*%*Yw5ڻ9ۣ^z4U; Ñk\U(o~G?VUĎ:?P?_F_Kߤ~ᓾI |pr.Ok\SklRhҪz{­P .}SktZ7UQ4ڌIM8̈eaӊJZ%FFZu,KZvln廐SNFIVtuNi?CM5]+Ph,{jN JSR$IS^tSUVrORYu.9WyP6 [Kiu m!X|]Y79ӄ)\ģ)pbڳr%*&ꑶ_-H*dzk)1 V3')UAϹٶWRxe'պn۫h7AR9 EAJeGLms!%D| A 5]/Q3eb̄vnVn%za\m kZnv([emqrIҕij|""><hjJשvvǕ|Pޟs}V~2&Z?+2N&Z4w@)4iSڪ_>/JN9Hiۏuf8'It[ȲR.hZ$ȋ_Y ~U<UUO*6b)Ovzڜj\R̋.$FsQuҊj^נ䈈y<zZIuP[}Qm=C?zN(Exqu/kn S-FzKZzOסӽjJ\)F3b!r5ٝ|;6 o=-3*λ]αb\abqRi-w޵⦪~b8Kpo)Z=>)ғ"5/GTZLE-輵f7ݘ۹~+&+w/7GFI:l33fg.N~۲\2|*cnermnnM+Fq"ѪIz%j =YW8@~gc/~?N'?)«qȸs➟n=k" X“m֮VreMh2[uݖ] *FܖN)MȐ`f0 g,C9̑o;ddudJ=In13:ݒvvdMUEJLp^,6t-@͐9'{7m{-3,>hnF;ѰM)->>+Ěz!R* :`e--m7nB\u{b U>[8֪]6^ߤLʦ\DFNo$$dͶlgno8OrsQ\l̯hRo8tuNo+ CTxu!2[>ctFpeޓƻֶR"3QrQuOѳgwQr;S~)6HhZw/GgVTmUf_yt7%$];zLWF̰xy2Ʉu!MCmš_0[W6jf#a-KLi+3Q7c^qg%s<1aYIQeZf+}>;S6L0]Yu_h9߻<ƅpmiM$AVvŚ,*#t2.8Y)-Zhshü97/#Oro"u^/uFgWɺ,p:6a,^x%$Yve^3PƗMnTP&yS}OJ '덫MH^:rXԴJۋ/rI;S*,+yz1hv)Qw^ڍJ2oL׊q(\fDj:^T%vOadɂnS}ZO)N*λdaȜkG_PIEO}нa(^iQX᯦-7^)%g'SJx(.S9zVɴZ{E ))ۅi/s7 VIV-|sj0*UBTHIqRf>FP$KqN0 R̻8j\GcC}IUz\i 6F)Q{Gҧ3qSzKj-Az VЛS-zy:8*mNk|D鿓ND2u+0Yŝ7kqm·?8Ib]u>˗^_>(]vӋzv+ݩ){vZrJ2RQ몋C$z [,pp,8mڊbR]Il .f~d/ݓs㓓mͶ{mgjQwn=Oic9ܚm4Q/6ݨ[TƧ?nԶoytf{@AzT{e{[O'ZRZt~AGD?s3􌿂ՉIw'|~U\ w~di:Kޱ)U/sU%njѩ&GSP^ǝd)..!^U` 1wX[aԇSxoFV6_扐)T 2Mfd=ۖͭiZ7KK Bi9%7@<3<ճԻU,},a}FRqɛr i@ONJvK KLN M, ʖv0n-]DwlI-X6ܶ$Jʴh5O+mOI+Ra瞠\ MG7BفjYo1#͖0V`Ѱ2M?c8>-Crt*JkIGS:e#hPKx[鱼>{5m;wcն&>j-M֥^َ) 6yȜl_w{-ō̱r> U=]iw3)r*]:K]6BdCTZ|>gf}LW}[$'Y5 &c -j.z6R 67MԷFMnÌwI7w5E}o޽+K ֵy4܌ȥW"COyR[q5Ӱ͙f[v"_#q{MV6܍3"u9BK(41ӯqˇc${ߝCi6I(OmθzҜ5k^:>Jzw.>qV8{vU[ڶEm|DžBz].KHjI]x;Mɗ{m,qZXr忇2u^RO2Z}ZێS[2Jen!*NDcrBUً4<ǼMҲs1Zw57c3&ĖڻzmP*FuJG1-dN:|OU}ҵgi2t~F^^Z.VxjvŧnNNh<:]^~NN+ge^g.SԔGFe߯'[vn'(ScJ]kܗ7eJOlRrfziݮq̋S"\*U<*W]k$FջV}? 7g#֟*GQQ|#/bo]p$>_Un9;l S VvQU%OLU{οmU6bZ1MTx%!֙Q7, J=!3 ;Q,ڌ;6ͱ݅q^&ߔ·n #WbwӖX.HtG)N&d̵zpI,n cu ޖUj+VXUp[w]N o.J6Z8Ts&utxln;~HPHS/xw`G\ʡ¿rj Z^vt"[L:SD\h0sUwR,}[x^X,R2Vn< ]2YDr[SRKs8tXb̷G?Ps Tv 3be,zVz D[/I.KOEQrm'$7|[J>r S`5յwT#\w1FTz\Ԛ &"ׅhSHrD\'r]~/>p;:Piuu:"9ő=tTaS7V2rӷk7mb[^WmPp*[y.Þ6f]cizJCgRR@UVl큝.WJP1N{/\whZ ػϧӱE7|E֫Sί.x-Y&pi%v''-x6r'Ws*6=DwwUu]=C?MK [yrtܒG$!WGqJ*%SAz ED[^)/tė/g=#Omd.|^n/sl׉g DZqemqowݮRzUܜ=ڽ-o/Iۖ;qVʘgPp|mm;6zGl9.8pwWgsJ2qPbe}}UpNjٯ}7TMQKrؽtEx%v w߾8%|j;~|}pK]ơ/ w߾8%|j;~|}pK]ơ/ w&~e_H 8PL7:%ʭ5Kw&U2vwR_+rm'}C7#rWoO&HoG?M$UR7{FU]u ;# !Wk`|W>׹潇9Vn)6)*ҹ{%qV4q>W1vi#T"Qk&GwxcJBJ- Ϸ^ˁxkU}ԣ/3.;]J=<*)cS)ROK9H=,r zX @)cS)Da^ԽQ gxJI=w֣gf*TRj

2Tactical Research Unit, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226 AustraliaJFIFddDuckydqhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ Adobed     ! 1AQa"q 2#w8B36v7XRr$9bCt%u&Ws'(xy4T5fH  !1AQaq"2B Rbr#u67Ѳ3sTt5v8Sc$4ĂCÔ%UӅFV ?_Aנj- H>>,m*>fzp"TrKkr^r.|_&]|*vPuܶvoQ1mwVJUhu-I"=LniAƕ8"۲ k*ҿ[yu:.vUQ+)%F DHyVBk>Hy8jݹ q~9D4KRmzQ)^ʔ.J%k_tVi5NTjg!'ky|5asOȻ)R۸ߩFMԿ3L4j6dڜ#NIwUF]JqB/(FafJRzq3\G՛ ?~\ 6)6W4m[O^L0E&rRMض*C .]Unl-1 1r#Rj/&QɈ׉˩s6Rj=5Tg.y.·Pӡ:JJS:C8-2u]d&vUz;7p9 5VnL֢"y)">iי(IDDd| Yj0; LRfS:ktYK%*N2^m|&dğth":ey)uPQZW)gcC3Pv&MMWd&Ŵ۲mvTRoժM03*F3Yd6\8,\hݻ kߔi<k NTwSԪmljj[>->ptU%'LR>&EBH$MQAUx[$Z6vi&_a.KIQ{hyƒ j"JOC9eFҝfj;˚Ω<[3_m% lQ@4g=5$(J]Yc-OMq<Ǎ wSzڗ)k$7VIP붾ͯnV+卵*t]iЎD31~SA1éC2u)ʼnQn-Uoi3:grI8ؓWm*G zܕ)ZקJ}Y YlGeJ6cB2I NS3Q>k=KTBT]W6+SOXQgGR? telˊ%-Re\hѯ2TF"C/OJΩ6r[N.0{SpljjX1“jOsӥ;ҭhe}xu`Ք&.)yO̒ Fߑ.$Qw;9Iw2o+RVJMSOj[SoҌZ%;`d$blQ{Ro{Imڌ>3egf\O֝Uzx"䢸g+mv%Gʆ:|V[N'&ס-ޝ'kfE|K,G&˳98Juin/\\Qݿ̋v~Ǩ!rtWU d|E߫R4d}.qPw*Ӭv5YEcn~f5c%MTMkb-F>5JT,})QHg%{("ӔȸWMsYyWNRrkkJr0XドnͫT}r-jj,Ŕʍ\Q2Ri>v$5!]"JB2WɅ)]VԜUc8i|.jeRO6^V.¸ Q&#|ܶ-*uOG%JAtRZRr]FFG\۩w+?'zչSѧt jz>KW&ot{7P&2D;&\\>Q2JzܗAKSfeNn[jRrԕf6,q,F1tRfԗ>vֶևj-&R'Zi2=xv~Elbsvm8=ӛ"ū񕜈BȩlWau[]ٷBߨF~J!|Ipr3R̴#Yp)={7:G{+:\W}n|Q#%)7^-h"Ƒq:M*%J&$T軨I333׎g_- ucBwwjp[6i25$̏bU’ٱRv?G\~#Iͪb7<<}Ezt" q_Inw,7-d,G÷%T* Wg1"䥱kq/A.,_KhqŒxwvo u2ۥۧ.bQ}XκA$֣ +K״ZUNmڸII{.v{5z5ѮRme[moyƾd~cRݾK'j.\i&/S6f|b=5: p!6i_ 4j6=.si˧eƾtS^c.Y^RJVS-Vi3,esi08?H$GvZgg?gi䤟2adw릿:"۪lkSN>q-4kI܋ێe̊qۅgDoѨ9; #T.Q;7#~_Ufstb_'w~Xw1Xk,vcOt._}v}8"(4Z\ۘgk?J?bm_c!g{HZV]Fkk%~gEt)b秴vΰB|꽸}mp~E6ݹv;7P٤v+ri*3Ԣ|'O14_~7nP{7ZU\Vű[ +7󖱅o#:ǥŬ\|3r%TJX]V7ez¨Y]lc|O3V! R zbJ'PnGqVJ"19WVeOF埜EaEJωqCN5Z g-9[S<$sUK5b|7sn\7x qmv##FF\ w[=-43$^ooVSiXօv7iB۴yg>]Vf"r$J3""32!Zh[K%7GvNLs+4nB/B{vlsobJaҺJR:0g%&zR\ S3T[&ִor*ⷳc3ʊO[iozW٨%$gn:ܶWwFBԹjHP&z u&F2\f;ipW73 [; '_̽b;vib!oec dC-tS__$Xs]l9&z$2/N>%'[}b{h/{`{Ji׉׏ YJB/X%}.|+{(S:qz]4_Kѵo`^tY_4S#* ^zvݾMr+TrkQ g.8Ͽ^i>ӈǙvix>$o( ^qt*&t1oJVu-ql5U6jCЉmĻ*"?JT=K'O/|=Vo}l0b}}f?X[?/\JSBe,kP8ETJ==?.p5ފgbU9}ǶdNKk—_$8̸͓ۍ8Di\BԿ-1v{FF]|.^ۅ{vl12׏z7-R7wE?\nh\jN/Kձr_oBw"N QMBZqe-m:ӨSn6j4%!hQ;sv'm4kcM=!8\m[M4{SMliۇ%eֽR&N:{2A8)THLK3Zj[jPBx#BگMf:G1\`edcʮ?|w(-̮vXt,bW2;.ιNHRR#YwTM"<;mk\.foIDjmlJ;vxy7o7i\,KQŊ9d^Mmgc L*.T6tLeIuOH3SJQ3=F/ʿ<9\JM6mN6=<{xkP!F1QR[I$6ُimXu2An2yԒMU q f[IB-'䤯jYm52&JG\zд\~vdg QtHGXw&1Lw+nDEdC1w|YJmvP)HZ>i0BPβә?R:QO["]I_Jʏۍ>QKyu^bycBq4lXF~l [\*N>-J6,Gq(Zr5h]CwYӤU~ʶߑ u*SIv%ZfJ7)! FS*s_\|IŸZ)J ]ܜi4"z[+Z,MOZ))}|Ʀ(RUNIII.S'ˍO~˨rn}M)xxӕ0 eyҵ7YMAB]ӣU:/ѭ*6bcwP͵ "+qēVjŹO|GtY4V j[mLV M -m>",B$ GD1~j6O4|LxnNmqATNR3ε|DŽa[fmn-ڭ+FiK7Pcm;r5 l8r{#-]'nrFh2ruycb;pW=njRqRJ(d mnpckNnʹ+6]tz~E=ʕ l ZZ5jSi3#47.Lcfe`9؏v囜.F\-UZ:*0_<Νu9Lӵm&)_3\^ҹ3"1n1v_|uRʞͫr'iȧN_kH׺8xXrj=\МH)V\ˬ.Xʸ oVRC}ySU9/OBY먌5 ٿwޞ)rw8Ӫi5*5ZΗcGƱ !ZۄlmpjJ -l <R̵/JAպZuq\IdUS 48wXJJtcg4cI~aqߓwŷrm-v)G7yS^7H^-\mŌAq|"m9IBnF㏉9[N+mmy/!KKۉ%n +BdddfFF6FQRN-U5;Sv'm4kcM=Mn)\qιqUd9F%",6MGdT%-+~ f%+y֛^3SrF>6lc(֪vۊN;g._0Sѧ]ETWرkQKzGe9ʨsKA"yC y2\[5 rԭ7Gk5Mzw_4sM3hxЊ'oÍ5jsub )ͪ~tR2H]R͍>̋m6=%(˿(Wrr-܅y5(ܔJ޺YunW̹븹NsqK ]/QR#"ZMDfD|43Qw|._ԡSqTZBg??O Ϥ)/E_U|i}2 9Z?¹0:x'3,whǣ?C y-A~=daJј&M?D1_PS+Oi&;a @;Dž7[ zZC"bv:jjMQk$M RԸ3uA\=wI.AwC"^.{?-\NSiˏ"b}T/}q/ o.1M}R%:-ZniʒL$SgrBW*,Mw'N\ɇ{s\j]VryG'8f`}'N<*/`U숻z CwHq18J+vԕKss4R53/&XTt1bZƟo\=%nO)h$rBi-nKĪ^ ջڜlwkYm[̑+/QrZo%TQ;TLs($2C:s.%+eoNttq۰kK7O0m_t_pZ1SsSM7"mevFZ[w -FJ*T*jФQRg BSu|]g:ɵzjqwmltL.e3sRMچkSmjkmWœިm++¦'tILk*բQ D,PB\lI[9{%Gb R6öۍmX-MaʉA931cs..G4CujQտ[9 }G-xwl)IQz j Ó"rqe&=]꾧֎c)<kӳ+0JrRR3'TnXi^xMF Bު*tIL.[h"2"nKzZe'ZV/RrNYz]8죝n]Ķܩ>^Ժ]u-7^\mZjܣ9+Rmn ߑv?oꋘ?&ƪy^N4o=3-ؔ̿*`}V݁ ƒPu8%$ ݗ]wt;\y\>='OjPIp/nJU8{϶FNMsf"ίNqƹ(+ ݮF2Km |jܴZs%zf*eȫ?]4)I۵nR&FX + [jDh(#哑9q9Eծj8noǕZf\J-l&Z˫}`ӎhyrΉn\űn]9pʌӣ"׮Wt?N4_I_~54#/my1Xr*척aS#DT >q ssΛW;3oUaJSRMDgQnt:Ql,/ ܷfRqiM Ȼ>Cob;A>ڦWقM9X~/!'MW.}Vrߔꔵ!5|iB(0-zF=}okڢE$^wW~nokY߮\6՜̌{i-AF*9)\t9IV6۸5ZUF6R$ŨQIq砳YUZ]eyv >hI櫥N )&l JulwE1GDOuFN2| }馥uC1rޫV+^gdb&W[4<^e4YW,d|htͮsUM)۸8:{3d{AѢ)~ \#J=NdƮꮓ90 |1K$v*?мS ]i$J,C,SG?/_՜pMSƯM|mG1V1$~K>CSvkuj=&) -,yLjuFHK{c駗.SOua;BrSqj-ۍZ#'Jys7[g2z/.u4+XV2VQ.ޕ)$"(%)#Z7suZ%j }BǬݕe)Jvz8zJf:hIN|svO1O#IEcۍjݽ:SdὮvu^@:o^5cs>i/VqmVm]ؔܢn6'vޑ̗J4Wn@OlKbX ;n:hgJ9ŻyǑz8f܌q&Y fN0N;[69 rbׅC2/#kE l&2~èMR.*%g=Ft.%؝e8<.e=Uv{~㻏"EˑnvDѭ͜Lu3u0:U֝$[M5<:oi+V4V9 6nXvx&_ q Qqw3W:uϔ2yb/(ɳ|5zQiJ#r|Hw#.W?4aDŲ\ugWG;Cw鐢K|xg)##=O.dF˟jMUvWĻsr.z]kPc9"]R)mkfOd*uYf١RsB Aîh=k]ʳUrrZsq`d#r$/Ը3o^&lRWȍyuW̦Y4QDUMJ65ƒ[+ygk XK_±k#y:8(TJOSQhJt2.DR}"5[) r)6V6u5k:eXZmv𭤔!푊Q[qQ}ҹLE- 8qIZG|UM4j}Mܕ[Vwm{} Naqµ"ԈM zOpKѰ?IAD3Ir0'/q1itoB5{%wkOBn-ۜduqIzYK60{+DʕܞqIt";r1mG/\/ym[6JƫR \L=S=OT@Ix[TMm{>ݾտ֒ݸӉLYIx>+"JVNzx||5rI?C{oz8۹e\R-^\A2F R+N9 vlT]"ۭ d)t֞i #E2jB@׵=#/N+!ĕhx}I!cM`ąZ*ŻɄҒ߮Y.Z}='/oۙ3IpW̮hT7cTSuz9>B}΄&h!>lӵn~j˅IvU.'v'CSZw8QK3G> ,J59ٷ+HSg䧎hJdzvwv-cvxS5[̊n~ؿ%ַX?O0\6ne 6kn9.ϯ} *h 8_QhLݣ7q +=XBҲ5?[[)+F`=4 }B,sNg==u*Nj9k_GJ)+R~GSPBȒZ:(K]heL=vKPӢwq(NrG^ثϣ?#tC?.ͼ[ۅo؞y#%ǛjVyLSw%T*s92JTM%"YkQО.q)gCͲn8cgi6j1MѾ[{9h^vƘǚםidfi.^RHmg&rׇz:}݃}xT$ضk'5s-狶,\vpbPD،=Okf.c#cdz2FK5T!&)|ntD<+OŹU i-G[EE*FDfeaf2QƤM\UG_{ǹm%\yrGy:.\4wjPGUJޕUV7Do\7Vy_13w;[?c]H\$IJ,*L]3b%L{y.JRKG2sq,B6T}(#nW|km+q5] r㪍bJ@y{byz,b踊3ϻJ,'^xd،)JVw#.Vټc''ÝպWtbRؒJz۠8!o9IۄS95E9ؔ-e9JR{dmnｯ<[~n${~Њ$W?&ՐY_? #a.ߑv?oꋘ?&ơ|y^N4o=3t=~7!/M3>n8W홎2M`Qx+ z qy8%]7_~540ۦ彷]Wq CѡwkďyF5Dum_}~P(5.(X,K9vᯐ?leB9;Jhm#3{CxGE-S{;@Fz˙]=O'!ɿ]' r`:7'2bЖ>Iy,/eTy/V<.H?UYY{\^#ѣr9^7?xoRȆ7EoS_&??zϾM?(~Q-K&>"~aߨ t7Emsϛ+?;fCr)fY+>z$tIkjn_>vnrֳki-˹l= t;'EyC¥|/BLwBJdgjۛ$s S1|ɍV%JI6KvəhzIlBYɒ|0"Sy0F>eo5W)O+X˻u';v)2vVq۳kۮws?UʑBǴYO漪e2MIjPAک\b1)DDؚKm6ZWΨgȕ۶yjڳ 2ضN[C[|r@9Jfo<_eI7q.|cÊV߷:i.:$ȋ)1%%)ADZCEBxJ0MJۥy(bNsKM9k43IwNt.\%N簤I'.j|ƃ2$grBEٌ\}9:v*!n7M(ɽ]7c@XxƱԨ37īf62cTTfFK]9wntQHͮvٱI/f|j=7}\_V5U^+:uljSȃY(XI.ȱmo1甅jڎIZ2>#\*:gY|4k\8ZwSqtyA!+];бޞKծË¥e)#5ap.QK^8VdU{*ѽL\=qmjnB5>{ Ӟ`v±5 ^k&O~Oshɷ,;6nOW>u6{RqS`)S%jp\ipdEBLfTWy$GIYw~䲭J.1vSY5z.V>^+Ǎvc.I[R{QsNR3ӎfhd>y?UJ*}~[e\i5U^͛E]G_FS(Iɿ]i8:4zj~շsW,ˆsy:%O}iur]iF5~3M:Ӟ#N06)4ߧgdawIotiz:1r5YDZLHBSi;NQc44la=Y kQIT*ըl:tq2(է9VO4뒳܂~2rq'nrVZŦ[t7\oլfb/mlpc.I8콚q^1iE~䰳mi[dۧw֤ICfdFeCsg:i| 6擣׋* 96lust^{%99UNRvaMܽo ammi$em4D6DD\nA%$$#}۷/ݕr99JMն[oT޲E"KTaP+HGkŴj5TM5xƱOS-k`ۛkٝWz;{kS}F;~q|~^_|euwnE'pSupUP)V]vE+t =ZRaVdG6= *.ϼnj9:UɷbېmF_tޫgHjVS'śǕًdkkѻ_]Kv?nT>)^e=Ar1'3ԔILyD?:-^in):{7.؂\.:V }#뺾.3r̸*xbFM aȵz 6SQ:ײj[ 8nn iFMw rR"5M5I旘35f^j='j:nNW.ʭocZvZKV^ɚJ.cM1ZI7E'6rg탸5oZ=[m Z`\hbMUR١Ȗĉ):Jin!_7Dй+f̷eKҷvͨBPR(V`y6tw*MRΝcB.ڭTnc;P$8nFvm4(D(R#R-L -2:FP lxZKQc6I("Km%$E, 78uXIFA$RQI$JbInG]c[ֹ:ZM+n^')JmJMJRu{e)7jQDw~%yQl}BZujSSf۩QZ+Dzhd5o%BIc'GZ?}΍:>Ɵivז-%݌J5MqGWTVʦh݇ܟ~Օ_6 n'{3~mϬj'J11OȻn߃r Qr\3y٘+WӍ'WxEs^O3 o~[|7>]]H9݇ZomT@]?5B:Z߂'`V_+/MSKX߆ޠk3?o7y:4R/7þ] iG߬aBRU&?r&/} cQߥGj2?C5Yśe7hU=?+ x龳f-܈czW^7p%-(\D4h{UK&ӡn^m]Fݢ:`δvj俜F+) y[{{ 7 tu>gvrěOj'5 iRg[ͶFjGe n~qT$ci ۚ0oԹc*jL[sVWqj\ݻ&6"WoK:cnWmrv)o>66(F>=W^bf#c zzʞtپy%mՉPël e}J.\Zk4ttt>oEM=q)hJjI=ͥ(%]脼_88ф;͛gWG;Cw~˘$4=uWdĜTثNDkiQL9U*O"4XP`02,Ge-k5$h>ܼ]3vr6!9RQPIVSnM(ۓ{>;/Qͱv{3&-[rc)ܚI$n{Sv3[j00)-D3z}MRzVQпj,T[uVs0\}Sid;r(ݝJ>æʺL&c[jPK0~d(FKÝW\m]GTcF|Iׁ)I3~#oX%vҦEݑؼ5Żv2qAZTE^..M{ʐfȏ2##.R}*KʛZz^ӞN*lPťLf\G6[WVQquV]XAi)5J!,$iJ6o$tPZc;Kjx_n3`qIelV~vLy{fn匋Ѿn%;zV.n'-ұdd2߽1bZksPe3TI9)$ԩIN9Vơ\=2885N\ p)/a柛w9g_lױo8ݷ iixJV& ғRi{N^_oAŮE6Y7I$Nk$|Q)-*4Z)^¸%4Qm [I%.c-OV+C֧R#%ѨCe3i;w$G+_dy| Fzj$DI(=OA gj%v/]8qԯNIS*֩',Q%\44ZZ%D|Ǧʴ6&vֵI$%8(ԬƾS&#Z. }6z?b/|Jl{ץv&mpx4Z$”ڝ4-H%dGKfM:sKSRWeJAn]>s6应-W9'H]'uȫYvgK^\czp|My\鏩w/ËQ.)]\QiS`8uL뚛̸=J"ܻi\å'-)54Ue]:K\퓡vK xwBqrH\*֕TnzC.mT=t-H]SČ~Nu╏NÅ3f|͡G~B+Xm[Q7U{9"~jgK Zoʰ7"qJ,ekSeNGgϳ] ^.6:s}_,%eRg<5⿨z{ZPun#jRІ.6g T.!]xa c#jN$Zpl̋H WZu8WmMRýsĮ?Mco~sx TU҆Q :KDG4n42.<3/'^?6/ܠڒ^yrrÿr2\D}}B]^E~^T cɛ7϶Y[<֞[7d}2%QPqOLEQR\CIsj1?\}%tJ0e~ *sk"*)&ۓEi#{1J8Hrt|'ܝRr8)=ƔN'RVz:cf]F7bZyZUȘ4x8,#JG̒?.W9XnO]KO]%]ƻ O5Γ/3qÓj؍/r̺rƵ 5\&m6h.xoeX[=<3%< lZ"2h\Z[&jW3ejm?k&[]ųj+{N{66leu_+lj]q* 7g*knأYv= q ەdxЬZ|%GUrQ3jLŒqET]1% qkXYūYc[7Ś]QY\jko\</Lc7+'hMSUc6qXyؙ~6#ѯv.0$BQi5YyIhɍiy=KD!n3Vm[V%W-B%swa97ajۗ m+9~]fKq|Ddaˑ0A]_v޺mM5* F-BYHJ5}q>ʉ.6hyDmpD׬'-_v5;5[8K[viJ.3dR:oYHHh9I7:۽fi+wm^ [)odPѱ52CZUJicSw\&_s0uBȍh32džzQflcd^m|7GѹE!fO5]]H9݇ZomT@]?5B:Z߂'`V_+/MSKX߆ޠk3?o7y:4R/7þ] iG߬aBRU&?r&/} cQߥGj2?C5Yśe7hU=?+ x龳f-܈czW^7p%5|Y:SJE\U-(a_cƣUǽXXKiȞNlmۊڭڄR!**ܤMeȽ$|X5(Ź\rJ~ܮ]>'HB0cp XFr_c?f?7<ukSgov¥iG>>䙗i.+t+bOjIܶ . i^:nm}s}(3>NZ$2Qg([".>i.ƾ)B̋M8+"- >eE6DݥJnJˣt׻ 5.˅nJGwZD~!i۶a,Db3ZQ3O#KO5/֍ozuK'GbRi᝘NV_ҝcvם ZoX}F6z 7e5_e:ۓj=AB+iܔERadMBq*ԯ DwI/Gy*mĥiRKg6skY/#SN4e$-yXM YL?^ĸNNӪ{$r1JJRSLO]Aqm>V/s[~i/j+m>z}eI"Qvp]{ZԼ:{vPAG2=T͡@ڐ#u"E*>C;o$~C#_d/HBq^YRٽzIKbOm\~żjFFGdiQ(*/i*#.FF]©m=BmpQQQSP&Ҫ!T&^>:y)$ˑÐFčI Bӡ-t!bM WҦŶ'UZ=}zvn~oT/\ǒ'nr8 AJIӆz<^uߖ4eFC1i+v!3qNyߕni?4JZlmYFXFۼO0B\m[ tʄU3s"Sr(NJ;SKW72L4̏BVdf^Ҹj\]ȱ۪(ӷm?J-KEmWڽ^4<8qu%9pŹW~877ܾeVгS(յe^C]yX͹! םm4FGȋ\y'Z FX7e)|Gjt߹#gb\ŧq_([R8[qU$Z (ʻezV2V!iQ,i$JE˂٩ a(GK'O{vnBvryRd-RK4=qxZJMl_CuuIz @Rt㮽޳!|68\-l[џ84-2Pu" RJ_^OL>G1~XnBŬw6J0*Uvlږ1N G1q9IUm*'oWu][&UyYZbBZRZNfEJf"+2nF~Eû7n1xv.RUM$6 lAxSQJ&n5ܞwlEói"#>4׿Q.nEq7Oko[1wg8ZQwZYiqtm&~">Bo?w͡ni2峋NCEy Ҕ+%ZJ ʩq*fpˤl,~^Mχk1+:ݕ z&Y`KLӪУDr3[*Z :(SL&ݻ۬Vqsyԭs x|iI߽zZrg.:mp%6ԜvgmpIUt;QbS.Է) ǨKSV,*lڌ|5Jt3#NP.=+OZ~/G سIgbꥹJnl_DUM\iM!֔wVZuԺ,yV.Q>f v:݇WiaŸN5Ҕ[M7SsrvǣrMW= \8ZW-jsnڕ.ZnF2qt ً[ٻޘY۷Zm"Jxr&NAfA-݌to9s359݆mZ+N1-qS$D=17 x׵+%_ ve4ir6Z$FDڗnFtOr'7'{9C˨ꤡaYoace{Refnft RR"4%ʌm:Sj3)OdInTO>X'vxV#jܮw9Fog;5.~Y5\~18YQܹvj4+~t7S ﬕs %^۵ڴDZV69R^Y+rj$ԇoJKR5wB9C>Y:l+EǎS{ʲ{T6Wi* ^^9k/y/Cs\g*qڵgn4T8mERr|Ti+iPe;;.i\EBEJ 丬i9ɧM-ԼsGDrZ>r#R>~X9y4b棇9JwV۔%m(b[Tjvl}۩~nDԺ{Zo-YuK1vx.nWuO+jN [ٮ0%"΢CdTJK-RަH"$I(*ve &҉FzB,_Vpqp9m8werv')E;o&QE׵^d9˦j\_,ڵugZȻ̧8k+jK{wmr@3ӭ2 wFkzFVqs1؛.v'I%$[iT]D5Dl2 nk7qUxԫLS+sا3/ΖeZYK<["%-g/kRs:f3;*E ت wJ%)5&+&rw*霣i|sMҴ|;R+fm䡩.!**dӶ-6s6,]zAXMWjmnz%SJߴm2UXw7MQ%<!tKys#P,W>s;3IYwx<+i_\\\U6 u7P|xbn_k&ӓVOe䦒 VUr,-㘘"-LZeOSҠթrEvq8Kf%5%&K"#%vD/.ZYYŏ+p$nZkvއuW9㓱Z G wYIFyf)?ƎUm5ԉ/'k84{KO:rQI}XRuԪ|*lu)3qZ[mSm5R3".Xcَ5c®ࢫI*۳~wRϿQWޝ(EJrri&ۥ^ʶ齲Im|[yb;mnm֩uiܘq>E+Ikx߄3r33-5𹻖09ϖ9[Tz~mr5NsWl$oPusޛ^{Z;);sڹf\3oٹZmԉ/'k84{NO:rQIBø8Bݱ3n֤DiK4u& ofSȒܩx<˘|N0Fչ]qsp"}! QWw@t4ӭ+cO5%]'*{eM߲DRO1y*q8w++e!c߶ܪlZWّM欼 CQ̼빶lX{vib/V/ ai;x6~]+z]MWB>re-:lgk}պ!#9?%܋V-c[z!W?c7YNm/jRr[HOzԻefճ0q15Zp#rkQQ0tU-AmڵP/cȕ?0cZYj;:0ZM=D6g ?'UN+ձ[K ܖB2'xq9{|۫N0ku 7xaj;n\ 2[VznMlWiKbSk))f..)Km)&bGZ=>OR܍W:j'rM'wYz&/鶧{Sʵb"vջq[I-ՌZH._x*BagC'T(Q:$ͳQcMCKy?3g'ߝqnT);qs #ؤZ}OOI:cfnc8W~qy.;^pVl]Hԓ>^H^@7-AA܃nmL(uWܻS߿ Td95Bdh4t6*dDh!EhI[iŨ\L.&Nc ܮf^;$R)\rip9I|ٺ?#R.ZDZ;/]nݻqs\QE9M&Bd ]N mN*D>tgbK>+ˏ.!23]BȔR1ɝ^j'k2ƮqBQq[$di]icV/e`޵B.FIIJqbi>Ӥ|p; 6${)RU>_e}^dzdfzi %ekRVUS?6'hׂ)5.\+qUgzE2C˷ecŏ^֔ibk shesFWJ#~> Wk~ݨ}ڶ>ơǚ)׽ZƉo~B-ڼrvoE:Ʃ3ۣK7+Y`WirS):{>ڛ}:wԨ(J_";6R%[u&ƫdZ_\'np| RJwNeTW,=rrbnkڄ[M3ܴz)3- R.?:okۼ0TU'w{6&w7j1z3ON'fGoO?)S_bQ_¿R(^ԴԴG.EtMڇ&RUiW uQjU> Kiu1d<ѥIQ'RQ1:O/lŗᏩiʂv&Jc{D5 Tt)1.n[n۶X}RjqnOʽ(~[Ns{ސ⛌uO,kgo֢dRNQȄ .'6W!׌P朼tdZjFGE"]K@'i۪N;sI[{SOzk>`rRR+!σj8&TjlvA̷Q?HyjyLHNտJMjܶT۽lG?SnKN%<‘ nq[N0Sq[Ta(&t(|HGO~gvkݻTR4&Z$#ViOY1r$6YF?e4U/Mvxų:zbU^gQQ+NW_'4jfz^c'#`rvrڡ(IJ/J ݦ6 ]-CW |_{v*_q3^DZ}Ic6Uڌ8p7{crZq5ki`)mU6|-Z5^iEz3P=:Cu7DF'k%}<C-޹ֲ̱#\,(f88%X-N(ck0VLR~} G"-8ӏ/ϰKq?(#nrVTmZ;zióM4 m |UT'C^_1X.gXM{%ʤd 4\ovN":"y-,T)fLQgۢr=/CƹǨJVr[a+!rT|%Y\ٱzsS>jͱ.oOc6f$q% ǒGo;n[];ߎjrk{~\VۓNIGn:iqxo |~t5)Rxעri{Vi&NUOl_ѮMfsޕkЄay.0P{7N((BaIP$ K"U6Gl ݙqJRu+qN$ m#*p<|{:>-Ev=86N*MM긭U*uѾ?/^o7;'u,h4݌xښRM:5.(/ \իU.{F^rmF-Jɷ.>Q"[4xT^OZ~mK}T0ݛ^SAo9u?lX(' qj%=X}"^e4wˠ|rܫ 6I\Ķ;Ӻw!'ڍWg{ i U_9Avhۣƾ+:vs/MK[ɭīe{`Zgb}r[i'GE2J7Nez579wRq+Un ]J.cJ4M:h箽Wxxm^ pc\wcN%'My $$| :$Fqɏ¾^қP9J6Wxvu}ݵP>Z'FFdg"-; [¢cmWkÎT8nG%ݣ7*\խCLRYZͤiD&J#'ehbSyXK|y*ӞpS̍R`[pTr/Eg)K+92{_ n3zwz'oŸۤ+sOj J:`T>Cf*lwd\fYOP"R E֢̔L4ɥ :;.b(B02rJ蠟9>V'9M%)IqnhP<%,r'P/vNSwr#w"ݨaqc(|{kd=^0jTMR2ULNz|.<|^PfY22##!,K~E BEJۜ&jRNsHަޛg\r,v؜.jK3)[EJ2ii{KEiHP^&]Gn8x=K}Wx/KI9-ϵwQ%spܾ[^R}S3$qvq8M[ ozKxcqmJ/ӿ{_}7&ݨ\f6ZSyQz& 7ۉ[8~UNn|nkiTB+4RI8'Nc%tn{!]Ȋo.nEmʱn𵵥J A+wy#+ikǒڂ;՛s85'KmE:Ђu""Iģ5p=БbTY-ͽڔ詻ngL2Q}$de# fs^o{DUUsfwӶ;s1T,ǤtޒQ\෼J=.tKU,7čJ5 N$y3kdSMQU~mO[03 $zAڟsF5^뜞"Կ QHmrR"ӳηer+ҔZ]hE-6Jmt'ޒ=O[sQj)6K}?e4v_KfZheޓ=BV[bY}lݒTTЬ{ȫvO_qpRApVŗ 6ju=*BR)g "O1yhb=tqJ gtm\b3RY+JQ^Ō֍\յ\>+uSi{=x ^w;uӘ#ĸzLn*$anok߷CBӷ}5Yqvdž<( "_OWit5:EZj2 B ρ1̊fi[n!HQF82q1牙nqnEpT(2RMoM4ϳOu ':֧_Xjsg jP^(ڙ{2%E͖j^}ZU[Q$'U) <܂%!s"m R'G5M0<+zM6qYm$ڕ$3ǧH]?o2N<8F1̻r_my[Rf59NjpzBnl7*{.QP 3N&^BLJPjAHCK2Q}$#~YMq8 k(MFMU)8MEqTy+Tʞ-ar5yܕOXw!e;q-Jqܶ䓊Y:LC UE{/t>r"lI9)3KJjϤA 6SEE$d߇3KG*En|P\ԭTn6I-ƍKTj<1H_zwGr19wF N8ݝ+a9ɫM6mhePi%mmD! """"""*1bRKrD"vnrM۫mmĽm]ӡiG~e"˩ lhRTMk^MX["Jݱk7_ޕ*DqĒ&flՒ}`W}~SմZ{ĕ~wm*/{{ѹ_-0ط#P]xlڱ~Tn5wi*lڪ (JxioϏbqKYR|!|KN53 OS222$jzww%i}>N)E+rۥ7c$Ofl/LNث\6H9: FY󡈾I)fB֔JI_ ֣^: 9mY{66㒢7Uj]:.-os[R&gMF3˸#໹kmjq^8W"PΦURjʄWa˧T!͋ lW48JB2ko+ /Nw QwQzQ ے%$ޓ7^YL|r7!v%Trܥ &|M8~ybrn[RV gSn{{*#2#ԽᢏӴHak" ӌcwҜw&RJ07ױ>Ļ =^ BɆ)v32.M1=#6%̠tҤnzqMwԣ~s*%-j|_m*.Yx9Sz=)qE4 3pk+,`=kNRڥ=B=nŔNAx)Q$ԩȧ4z3t#Z2lҮYn$S%y- JzGpu|LBV7ZW#;Wwipܷ%(6jFG5#{$D"uۭ~]֫SrD܃fҎӾ+Tu>-ZTQ& N|$沸ii>eRWݳu'[O̻j8JۻEѩ[]vni= ڒ,[_%kC7I3Nv$4ɎЈeٸoUu:[}Do5|zNq=Tre%ɧ6&~DȍF]ƞG5q m]/w/ \ʲr8=oʔe9U(W"|S]uZd#?Se[W"ֿh][-7Nu:T=)R}.;ml*5Dlf $fF(̏T hiIUU4Szɕ t(%_|2 ~6eM;TƗK[f&]LK^CE2[ȏBOd;Mi|cx,^6;sیGpQ\NuJIFTJ~đArh* B"$H쉩eXPRj?sl"ԥ)su]xpԴY%VESH"ЋJǰ K&5^Ukzׄ8kEgS2h&Se\ Yl]WҶp-ZUvi7QS:4byqOo+[̺腋[6-_Fo.6[7$p&^ _GZԸߍkc.qqoI[9m߸YxOZЦ1uoiSH)P9Uʄjcq= S>֙NeR><;+ڌk%_qT].srNO?s[=vH[]RZHRMtᩗVؾ:/~u)ԍdg%=edVrISb{6vSu=(ܥ)mTv/J}̇8 S3ad:^hBSf؉OɔLhI_1d8,L><_A0y3rXq"'(۱;mFNII.v5_(^q~X>y{3צ I*Vܛv/jW' T'NR'j%ꔩ:mJ3SB}΋!-H-RJBТQoedi9tjENenPpke.%4]#{:>mkEɱdYWl\\\'nRM4&U>?Ќˉk÷!𴪛]]5}UqG~ݏI"O~s6(Ļ)qO~h}uԕd}Q~G,oE!&G&/]_H-O=o{k\̭bkv.Ô܈+;arZx)m?M\3lU$mk-CFXjTv6u' g:Vn_*qk:VC A%'4JV%EY)#BғO4<e׿jQQ]yUr4=wm[K1r׵%Iũ-O}|kC;/VcݩWZ)EHdžTru]8hgĵ-;=>U_ InvTm_jBM+QiF"9*{DI/iuo(=TzϖmPQl_v4z>T*ȴ>YF;ε\t]EH4ꌇ[VrLzef 2T^V>g2~kg5~Nק;{~Z~W}&ŒBӿS2$J?~(Yœ"˲ߩ\O]: J׉ښT{mmIѩn3˧)4LdFZ/zUG>U> n 5& ϴ-KJi2o]uKljvK3$bԔҚV旧iY5.ίfi96v7!v))FJM4{jG~Jt/lUE%pTAFe4qQk\ve۽/u/Im+W')v{\-E|Pms7߮DZRr۞/mu*1ՙaB܆ -xg3#6ۥtRogʌU)׎]ZҞNnŞr}F1Nnޞ;cZ{N}ۿMiuxʉ*3qi'9KHQ$WJxXyرŔe~[v5~/jN9Q4o6rJv FrdxM*iRjMzUinHdн7ᾞS=S'7 } ̽zt7K|_g J=Lq+/Bw_\ۧx\HJUPzQ<hqF[V0x==CsU7q|^ {)Iq38$_A(VgcKu06Ƅ"%i~_ˉk QCܣB8Ku/񋇵u([w}$F|8TՠI.E !;RJ^}MɒD_q2];Ɖ{5}*n7nEInO{Mwv}&q+v [V}Ĝ@%>#dXQ$f;iep.GquixVt x6bj͵mlKقQ[T]zs/&yەnM'W}!Fp_d^Tu N{ɻ'l{խ2.sTu{W^H&;1s)Pӛ6>$mě;Łnj= fLT)>׸+qReɴ[UR\L*P/!$Ӊ3Q 'K=m~6XqW3^W+ųO_[F$rR*u"T%@O +%# ]˽!aܽz{ͷvQh쩎]hGތ5ɇ*DzJDRNLi 4:{~2FmXY-zzĽ^f=]uū{/+&c:Ma{ĝDp2m܍kHș/(--m_vݮK(V{R}.k&yƴ7i^4@3f sK3^Ř˸B=]?gt5KbZB<e;kQLpxuWC}n 5ҴepB##~q= `x]KWF {GfŲ}?G.I9pjWkU]>={7q{kO/^I3==f1ɏ%nnʫ/Zu_yXN<57ۍ'vy/"8넭M2eԷ&Y,в33%IkjMr7xf nmQkX4踼>a-GcIeތw&U=-:qnW)z¥j :WqSZvԒ#j"KrIU)%qrmRoDGQ~SYRsu*V)  ,/x)MFD6O#]z 96[Ui(JRfw'y$GeUީkdMF-ݻ98F2d[o{Rn0n-xsV6Dh|Eb2E:KCOӪv4SJCr"J!!m,hRLD| ZYFm/X~ΧfrN&4Ƒ=Z9Mh.Mܵw/BdrܥniŪ8ɧ|y%œ[M=_tj?F!z5\evM:\ ~F-sg钬OWq“iiȍ<Gi%%n2rqͻllƑ)okw7}\Uk-:&fj솘XerV9yZuʼşdFC=rmo%~ZN78X(N)_7.Εn1MpJ}62jjJdI";R5&iLԸc:jmqiQj$ujp\{;v5B񥍪Xn Ą4qOERjzN(Ga٠䌡)p*v(J7#ZۻZ8O W uONb+^Qipv9GvֽƼϯrYƖKGJQDNPhRJjᡧC"21"9ѓS1;R_O7/WGz)8fE%F2ukmvSov/iZ&/]~KmI[:^~ͤ\kMi稜\ywJt3W7 8Ʒ~ݥeFgѼw"8VVSج\뻆}ݭ/J6Q)d|)zU3>k\L=;ow֯gN3pKѫ|wmkZ$z^2R:E)f>ς нd|#׆?\ǔpV{;\$ƵE%-ͪm0S6[n< kE[}mvE4DDZ^$OZ0*$~XUv҅B@^?]so#%ojw;Y#SxxueBگy v^i-)s)zV jC{7Gt.w3v,ygg8s]aE_,*E tY5k٨h=o"m泏:\6w噓aiL׎n^c\75AGkЯ0Lf46َ`egZ˓p/k;̛]kq!ݸzpԭG"}R9Ve>ˏHUjJ-&7nrnwG*Xv\˱/vN}O)ʼn&CV͍f̵]r\PMB-6Du-#RͰtRN^)mT _}nSȕC*_xBuTkJW[`ɩ`ejvsngP ڻ.-WUtܑqԹQj)t;vN&RNũT+8%IXӃ5fK՛-d9 ]CƑm|nZ-6=Hz,*aEm W3VzRšdY~Xf׀Xx"]s;)5u*ُHB BRGS6bݶؿ 9j[1*jױga7oX CUI%0v#~\-O-Ꙛuɷ쏪&5mY٦M`LJ2qK~HZbr =N'YobI. (^ ׾{_ ?OJ`S`3BN[}5w6:ǵ/iSlt=4F*d&T4y/#. ɵim5Uֲf 眕6Y7 fơ=3dϕq뚩$qTM-%r!$@A? ޾V0c~{[{;򥧅a~ڵ»&ڄv1ek=wb MLkNAԬw-x>~/r=e73VeVN)K%Sښe"+3uXuچrn ֺVzscJ峻m}vb㶓n\YbIUBT%*,0nov=;z꣓S/nSXSpl##k9mXGrZv^Gde!ŷRԠzQyjC]`gToPov{j~KRBMY}i[߶9KL2ԉO0K#m>wB[ٍ+n[[b٦DX ݲpo] [\m5qdT()mo4Oy9Ie b][wղmM~vmi۱~t \}$яimRk(L c Cvk7r9_r1 ;zv|F@KyZ[&jEji/"6$69ml#e]9s\{ScL}Ȣؿ0q/nZ*t,CLoD߉Njǚy=Pgmu6^]l-["çUʖMlʍp-"qmU>۷uFOJ%Ǔkx 'g=睋k[3u,{³WɘݪF]ՍeFX"Oy\,cچ=w/gn Ļ]#2? vqy-gXnR.^}ݺFs{ŝG]}e|#0mjx"ƬWكm?rgU^xVB":Dt>@LRbun~ݭ,w+v⪕;\U(RYa61>#Jm˞Μ9g9XKaG='u8gf}'qy#ɉw J]We.ʲ-<+&q%s?2dњztҼn`cΤmmqMdz O[-ߩӲ&;[tmܝVnr">{x<8U+p:Ig]zjGkt,uzf}dؠoJaکqEq -(:d<պ=eKy[˗^%ZXkX[C2߱\ITTLGzANM￵i]K>UsOGDDD.ZF6* ҃V Zhz{'xp^`wo8r0h ZmJ5"jb[l=yUu7-;7IT%:jFjߖm0tzU'K)څNۧYJ)4IQ}^KWm7kSP>q;ނ#)'n7&׊r?óM{IwR\j2Qn[v pe#/tAF\ϵ225q֒om6z})6҅*oqDsMf CNIN=T S2t,_ѧ}kveMF0J\Rnnݙܹy[rUc-j{yGtkQ%s]5qB.Nw.JN1LvR Ui5J ZESQԙr):MJ+g}χ!2;q([jAud][ljVK3$ײSJI=/|&tl'*n۽f.frܥ jQO8>&Z];.|7T/C}$ڋUmP2Reҭ8hFF\L 3~e v\۫]ݝNmrnB%*]Z«hKc=BTLG :V74$=Ǘy+EX'4tn(I:Ѝ;Df8c,k1%dJ6.j6ź{N~l6&*fœI7 WAlGOu-ҢH,,(ǔe뿋쩨kM܍ZſgRvQ' 9)?n|er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE&ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ>=F)2[nk؆?훐M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag%qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖CpruZ6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p\̅S?㭻;t~R߁)^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;²~+ߔ_ YW~|o]?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4lp+$D̢1l|ȨF%-}.9[}w~ ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW!s?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu?v3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw=/7ovuk+\V;lDgն<[A+rX~d;m!_s8ݖ׷;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\–q ul8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS- DКw=Tv@f'6|YlD͓Y%׵-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~ &f# }o!muH;ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{ m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezWqUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>Fn|Q[{pRO17ƕ~._I''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-uܾw!`?1Whn|gzUo[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1 עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1? 6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFw–s*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* PRaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ ^˒4kƓmzDx \ 'NqamP7nyN݅=j7%McSڵj%STy qXymvCg{w/w=wSW5r̹u erծˊsOm=DhEҚRb#n)QOxtվQwe]I}wCa'"[ۂ-z}2UuKP$㜉ԧ:mc<Ý>RoL?wu|%ҷ&K y_!y9 ??:tq3(UU-lkS'ɸ@jdzQˬR] EVPW1DJq2n:,c|ǻ̑;y{X,ۂ.u.b˕u.tKBjQ"[S園S`ٮdNبeJ&9Ơ ~0a(Vm٘L+Jr*vڑE( x0+tp˕ n';wm-ޜMOxX>{#2%jgb2M[`K*\5@8l'e=0u+w ֘鳾{y܀:R*Ya]"Ӧ%ktynlۣ65,3gU}{GYrb;ge'TKwǘ.,rpܚV]Tr,!dp /ԺU,xՉ>s׽~W5oTh yx?xrrx?)?ilbT׬,z$Ԏ.UH٠\U1pU:]JwSrGZq8àd驐,N67QYBӢD㏙W!Q25ϸo9ms-7-%3CihO.J鯽-;MZM8ku-7k9S$8]q2E(}bۏI[DKOK}3KUB^u %Y,u.-&f#]'܆o$x`Yu,dzwM;#oKxn;\[d7}Rb+*Y䛂ZuBӱl{j0O̓}LhK;[aֶaGL{Cb#S.T[>߃F]NK"u^LUʐ_ykW?!GRj29͖qa'0[npcDvV)qz9R)PۨM^aJx W] r>];eN3vxdmĘ(5W2K1䪖weF{mE/QP6\u54x5[hۮ-Nk”i[lUgL]J}5 S:EhiUrgHl!ŒJ$pe=q^b͵Q' ?6|R\,JA ڵ"TDꈭ:ymg`B5t%M] <N_zv2_Ortٵ/i/ReӮ*7[qүqEG* m"[I:6e^p"I$jԴęh!m)]GZkcjS!{e^z}+Cѥ9;R|/ֱeiUԏCNu2Zhcٗg$ݭwvr P8*7/Lk~I'Km1+MW%Bk|oOm>-#qj*|Dbѱkn|n{v#jĮqNpMIUm(7Liz;{ҜݞڝVƚVϬ+sO!OstGvxӉ']uӎ4g_ 1^-8ۦ k!)Ύ5O;YSB#2Zzχ;<.ֵOtge~.(RC#wFZeGZٸ6FFJ4e2ˇpJT$[wgV)q6muDGJ56q\I!̗ y/I~RtJ9kJ]Iy*'FN0s.[l!fw'y(7$œ WƫgyΙdMEU JQJv̋vmrۖ.jWR_M֨djYgSj0^\y'EoECjm$ IƩK>Z28J2TiJ2N#}.s cArl嫶nB.FIJ.)۔\ZiM>/hLĸ=C1s[?YMqp|94- 鮝𦔽/k^#NT(Y LS$6˩}{;5 )B۷W$qpN)qqoot}ZDVә;7TiK|6f3h$dԄ}fqݡ>Nb򗉉+ͶO]>ߡ_VtYf79ڰիF sq~prս|QM)g%l0ocJȨHz V;Bb/kLAcfPJ,ԭ{ƍgpjNR6VSI*$!yV足jᇑ.](EܣqM\qJ2eZT).<9UB/(B0j)mtKEj#׿fDI-=rZړj|'Nڤ]k*i$5qt"ݙPM6E4ke^Z8ۏhz$Q(R Ay2zfRñnpnkbkI:=j &ΝșW?׵d{+ύM'??XqeeĽ.[o=UxFS=ӷdZwenՄ]_X=ĭVa* pKs0ބۍfJ3 gz̚i|wnxtjc¼5${(1fXQ65ȼb̶Zkn>%FQMJXӡ{TZEVNᖣimT/37cNJUPnP҂ZOE~"-Rc4^b- FEͧtf5[)S!OZIښݲ͑;tvܡ+N)AR=hCNn;wL16-:特7M$=Tҕ-.R[HٷnXk sn[ҞD-0WS9p9:-Ϸ-jѬNu{ҹfv)[Ľvwfg(ٷfe+0mYj8Q1\ݧg]Eǎvڿc!4#j5̋C2"}BRriFp7=ô\TZ:\BLfj#I22װ<;صZl j 6:l"6]۸ K'6RTѯ^ئOԓV\?$x7s#r:Oh{ց=MmuHԷd{pN /܅:UE#Yy+(SgQ(Щ)RHzw>^Ѿݻ>mK&^ '$Jۻ&w%F|xfz%˳ L~3N?Cy9 v w/{ƿ kz3x> sXv}vP"@WyC z`'톽Dw%-tt yVY\wmuPYQA0iG-2JP,6/gˢ]u.-n!Zw.N7Q]Df}Q0({a\@=i_X7gFǘ8^⻲}G MZ1)WEfO12G+=-B@z\`||w6ċj߬m}UwRox֢I &c~XGP6Qndpvܻul'V7^FJt^{b^B(L~sѣ6@߿^xqU!ڙ5|Vpvef-uӥ^3  FSDɯKD%0r}FF穛r7 +o"V8tv̖NQU!5uFd"bCr^bJ=֤fM#ʳԷP0O-9xRBm\=`r-:;~3Tl(nXtXi%2Vٛ#vwqƴ`L@"H‹qW.j,JM5B[)WܺUeZFqc'V˷1W7V̾-MHФwn8N;HPSdݷC7&2j.W\τGŎ'Vb]c.x+Rx1%C2T{myg[qU|+m:M:շ8҉yWd)ՋWS%%:iqlʹmGwݹ WnNŤѩ5(9hTٵDdGUi-)vSs2 2{OnT$Xck n:¶(lASLeȔBjμPpTb2~N2~%^k[ܗ[Jzs0ӓHBKq[}JَA-$dFQgjxxFv4r/x*Rm% `4J(&iv7SkԲmSH1YWmx 8n.k']:Z˭_W >ڃXЩ. jTq%Aā[E}amc]D:rmHRiu:uӚӢ\p(5-q%e)(۬ҖȽIf<߽pr&ݫVfY91q2ĭEQgYbTGQ&,yL+N$[q*RVۉQ=FuTܻ>f>f㋳8N6$܌n)9&»iˤsX,݅܍ȩv+sRTpO}d?Wn/Inpȸ%O]StQO|v5\}7Zwb.AIVK^:wb{[uݯcytO߶S<{8KSRׁH̏N7ۚ[xkwYy_'ZӵF+>쌛ZUĦreE9F[24De{}@:ExWs-\ǻ7K-\JNvEk%:s˙#κ].oͳ;լ7wB6nwu:$L; DkI#Wz.:Xp(˅v$Sq,wn\qIN-e<5Oe+vuYTpcojUI_ާP8 O 7&VL8z$_B-H-[uh]T{|8=qVRN-:Ij:7PUtXϷmy鉿:RIM~33ӸS2#׳GdŲ5+/Bx{(WzȨ5Y㞎#|˖+ ط.|e<o/rߔX>7s}VE.OVti׽ .5nNJO"95{#q}Ay9do]R"M6z\tnNS-D!@3N_jicWsy*5uٮRcWv/.,j}=S)j5C^> Ie =gu9ӛqjtz]۪TMoߧI!Ǧ¶m:,"[L!{qAv-o 3{"KʼnrIkfٶj2ƙ؄S`7` k6jzޞ?e5G&6uʷ2%ԒRKE*G\Npom F/V |C0.q_eenƣ<5Oh'67ɪn[SĽ{ڔjǘzs;~׌(ۂ`ܢ1ƣ` _l9Va6%UQWh~P~\F^ZHR@:ۧCJ{ôGeBh;~ۧnU J\O+n2 RҠ)ng}Kh{5+S×ܛ.1ZjG)iRȤIN 4%{oΜ/eO[Nffd ĹK?nnԼMqX'܌nZvq<ķbFnͪaQ`5 s,M_լ?-@_{w{ӺձJ}GF[%v\5[ŒGkOw/ΜM9rjË%2+rd~+󲕛C9U۳r[aJǭm|˒LAʨSCq[XMۺoubfp:t+ΤĻo ][ zt-*67kvS7D·MMCQXm;)܎n_h%]4ܙnRk!]ڵsDUF"`R, &#R_*[z*ZqFXɻ]7|۵w+'pFDەs=r./ᐚm3Hשy yD"jHCr':sA65نѮ^o1V/ f;nFr3VM)e*- s D'H݅fӧ\*޷[k<7u<-]֍Q8R h|p=WlW3s%Q %3l}@U-K6f-NϿu|ڴmWN׮[׸F*mW\%r! C78:޳vBG7ŵ.JթԚ2x)ST!řn~9 W:Wpܢ件{xf8ٳwKE ҰWxVB\qBZ 2wMb[lGSnyԚ~z9ZmያvoN2Afnݽjf>)j3 !;gOYʹK" Wftڎ+׭b*2ϻK>ۢӱeyԪXISUm[z+ugX%0lϏnvg!;t{BqPj>PyvR7Cj]O%+ݲ :qiMj6W}3vC/R=4Som]ŗ=ю, TF6U_-\6MyskwMr&Q\wjKܩyMϣUj0*}RZܷSdY3>Zjqj6TgzpA/M`/Cmл,޻feE[/+uk^Vs1W$G(JsW2ٰu*߻q*Y޵.Wi:ur5T),=0uRmho.twܖiYwrWHntvEj8qhf`Ͻpf(R&>Ki%I7$QӖm-2 ~yߗQ-앑/ x[k8nw.c㩵k}]FkbJl:{.(˩n0Hqvαp7 귎.Gupx[N`Yq'+ruU7[ү+>!xrȫoSo]OC# d^Q]\>!ƛGw^Mx"-+%vdX-:M2UR%d>%l ioSu6lsj7D P>XxHz Ukà(n^Q V>5cVtWj SEiJdznyej[lE' 3kuٌNn4JW)gB {4 j6&]' m-(ZMEz8cz>WZ6#7+[,MR-Z!4ܓtCyE|umj1ƽvƷV\;%>Q :#Le(iVz5 4ũۤUWxX ^(ҔsլB2w-V ^R+; ˂M\z+Uwr+RWY⺧~ Q*JcYSNSλUd8in=v K낫k\IRרSUaCFmϿ5̗P|u ZTԕ}>oYѲ1sfP+sQkX8Gb~6r,s>^\,mGL+7[n-E\.Fqḕcl*Jmjb5 ,m]c}NXfeVlǸJ5eˡ$4%g~N p4Y*WwW٧<8v#;qԩTut,m"#Y D\5V`\\Lȋ];LȇiS6ϝZ l>LruR\v=ǘϔDg=ԈdFZ+M{=|,[;0>RiSi4,S5}yxw&(E7&fݙ4UՕ! ~'Id)]ǽu2K-fޭ \08Vڅ쓬=Vy^^ IhyKR-B#Ըr=]mܻӾ'*Umkoy rTqT_i,/8Q^<ݤ|4ԻO(܄"'5N~#m.(Ҿ2i6Uev&I*<}҄$eNtÛzyWJubW^iBW.܅Wڮg]irO6Ve90sgv.+sV޿aޔ[p?3q*FutUo*eL\KM'EG*ZcAFfG5J 5jj=MJ3OK:k˝'NMB7m3uFҕ\-Ywg%PRqMIyZGY9|μvn߻5cWݷa^+X֥vnݘ\v7m>Fgzv"-;Ew֝}1|RjN𿊀7g#֟*GQQ|#/bo]p$>_Un9гUbn9׃ErQBU-^vDmVh'<R[fdHT]*~}3j;nvjc7s-rӳ Y8[n[1pJx kX[Jk9Mn!_Nю6x:iZ˦U |߉^Ԛ݃hYxk &U^bwKk.[jE+P(˞=9j@snCv7%c_7=xǁ<l {t'酚+1F‹l׭:ݻILruǶkL-L(K0L1&>wXB(pm;1fpnlp֓%Skidkt(U +xulo'/ڕeN r=^pZZ:Pnj8Hf"48ijY[ N[yZٻ+=  ø:3 ?^ܷ^Sr#YK[UF?CuhC b]GM')mڏsNrܗI]ljq6VB. W,UK"YX5{c >Iqā> T:n!,5l2VzCl|+I[*SrjnS6٨y+x,@>П.g+!rn9>N|W>OZT_ut Y""v7|sfި;Pclm EùN,{'fNT%U&LfH8~1v>Il}统u6P˗c(WV~H^bMU.o*oOF0N:_:6Smr_.b+|ݶYY غF,mwjv>f*>QM뭱Sd:`N{l/⎱;n-z~"Gze퇎J5S KG9!Gn;N1 ݎ h6m|S?ɂ5'WOÞ 7|7^ao @mxGmi^jϽ>01Mf0լD3-2T. VXR"ɥV Kl J O7|u?bvа;6.eߓ|[1bmRr,eRz`z 6܎-ͨku͹Fː dPhYgZUj}nvX;z=gVեTv_J }\1n7w2J?ޘγc\E 1Aޑzq;\r]]\Y&[nsNei\uURje*Qk2CSl*xJz-xٶlm+|UjUؓ`Ladqiĩ!Gd\W~fz;Tn*PdRM&T4`չSWq5k훶(N"Ӎ% V]֦wb.nUO!u*J&Oӕ2e|Z=eV쫚΅g#+/RW:طnbi*Wyo)p{:ETKؚR(RY+r웓r(IF) VmȵNB:h Q1ғ|u8E]{,'$-TR[j49l*3"I鯴zhd>Q+\BkNF=.$ZR4Nwհ(IpNi.(Gi33#33e$FXK*NdWrud[r{xnk$v2ıh+J1TQ[#JQl[tRO]LHKٮ NӍnF񨔤֞Em'MILB"ԋ%dBŋ+p̿_17jzT~4pc Vo\ƹb9Rq-'1j;8ܗ)hE%DZKS<璸Bu*%*Yw5ڻ9ۣ^z4U; Ñk\U(o~G?VUĎ:?P?_F_Kߤ~ᓾI |pr.Ok\SklRhҪz{­P .}SktZ7UQ4ڌIM8̈eaӊJZ%FFZu,KZvln廐SNFIVtuNi?CM5]+Ph,{jN JSR$IS^tSUVrORYu.9WyP6 [Kiu m!X|]Y79ӄ)\ģ)pbڳr%*&ꑶ_-H*dzk)1 V3')UAϹٶWRxe'պn۫h7AR9 EAJeGLms!%D| A 5]/Q3eb̄vnVn%za\m kZnv([emqrIҕij|""><hjJשvvǕ|Pޟs}V~2&Z?+2N&Z4w@)4iSڪ_>/JN9Hiۏuf8'It[ȲR.hZ$ȋ_Y ~U<UUO*6b)Ovzڜj\R̋.$FsQuҊj^נ䈈y<zZIuP[}Qm=C?zN(Exqu/kn S-FzKZzOסӽjJ\)F3b!r5ٝ|;6 o=-3*λ]αb\abqRi-w޵⦪~b8Kpo)Z=>)ғ"5/GTZLE-輵f7ݘ۹~+&+w/7GFI:l33fg.N~۲\2|*cnermnnM+Fq"ѪIz%j =YW8@~gc/~?N'?)«qȸs➟n=k" X“m֮VreMh2[uݖ] *FܖN)MȐ`f0 g,C9̑o;ddudJ=In13:ݒvvdMUEJLp^,6t-@͐9'{7m{-3,>hnF;ѰM)->>+Ěz!R* :`e--m7nB\u{b U>[8֪]6^ߤLʦ\DFNo$$dͶlgno8OrsQ\l̯hRo8tuNo+ CTxu!2[>ctFpeޓƻֶR"3QrQuOѳgwQr;S~)6HhZw/GgVTmUf_yt7%$];zLWF̰xy2Ʉu!MCmš_0[W6jf#a-KLi+3Q7c^qg%s<1aYIQeZf+}>;S6L0]Yu_h9߻<ƅpmiM$AVvŚ,*#t2.8Y)-Zhshü97/#Oro"u^/uFgWɺ,p:6a,^x%$Yve^3PƗMnTP&yS}OJ '덫MH^:rXԴJۋ/rI;S*,+yz1hv)Qw^ڍJ2oL׊q(\fDj:^T%vOadɂnS}ZO)N*λdaȜkG_PIEO}нa(^iQX᯦-7^)%g'SJx(.S9zVɴZ{E ))ۅi/s7 VIV-|sj0*UBTHIqRf>FP$KqN0 R̻8j\GcC}IUz\i 6F)Q{Gҧ3qSzKj-Az VЛS-zy:8*mNk|D鿓ND2u+0Yŝ7kqm·?8Ib]u>˗^_>(]vӋzv+ݩ){vZrJ2RQ몋C$z [,pp,8mڊbR]Il .f~d/ݓs㓓mͶ{mgjQwn=Oic9ܚm4Q/6ݨ[TƧ?nԶoytf{@AzT{e{[O'ZRZt~AGD?s3􌿂ՉIw'|~U\ w~di:Kޱ)U/sU%njѩ&GSP^ǝd)..!^U` 1wX[aԇSxoFV6_扐)T 2Mfd=ۖͭiZ7KK Bi9%7@<3<ճԻU,},a}FRqɛr i@ONJvK KLN M, ʖv0n-]DwlI-X6ܶ$Jʴh5O+mOI+Ra瞠\ MG7BفjYo1#͖0V`Ѱ2M?c8>-Crt*JkIGS:e#hPKx[鱼>{5m;wcն&>j-M֥^َ) 6yȜl_w{-ō̱r> U=]iw3)r*]:K]6BdCTZ|>gf}LW}[$'Y5 &c -j.z6R 67MԷFMnÌwI7w5E}o޽+K ֵy4܌ȥW"COyR[q5Ӱ͙f[v"_#q{MV6܍3"u9BK(41ӯqˇc${ߝCi6I(OmθzҜ5k^:>Jzw.>qV8{vU[ڶEm|DžBz].KHjI]x;Mɗ{m,qZXr忇2u^RO2Z}ZێS[2Jen!*NDcrBUً4<ǼMҲs1Zw57c3&ĖڻzmP*FuJG1-dN:|OU}ҵgi2t~F^^Z.VxjvŧnNNh<:]^~NN+ge^g.SԔGFe߯'[vn'(ScJ]kܗ7eJOlRrfziݮq̋S"\*U<*W]k$FջV}? 7g#֟*GQQ|#/bo]p$>_Un9;l S VvQU%OLU{οmU6bZ1MTx%!֙Q7, J=!3 ;Q,ڌ;6ͱ݅q^&ߔ·n #WbwӖX.HtG)N&d̵zpI,n cu ޖUj+VXUp[w]N o.J6Z8Ts&utxln;~HPHS/xw`G\ʡ¿rj Z^vt"[L:SD\h0sUwR,}[x^X,R2Vn< ]2YDr[SRKs8tXb̷G?Ps Tv 3be,zVz D[/I.KOEQrm'$7|[J>r S`5յwT#\w1FTz\Ԛ &"ׅhSHrD\'r]~/>p;:Piuu:"9ő=tTaS7V2rӷk7mb[^WmPp*[y.Þ6f]cizJCgRR@UVl큝.WJP1N{/\whZ ػϧӱE7|E֫Sί.x-Y&pi%v''-x6r'Ws*6=DwwUu]=C?MK [yrtܒG$!WGqJ*%SAz ED[^)/tė/g=#Omd.|^n/sl׉g DZqemqowݮRzUܜ=ڽ-o/Iۖ;qVʘgPp|mm;6zGl9.8pwWgsJ2qPbe}}UpNjٯ}7TMQKrؽtEx%v w߾8%|j;~|}pK]ơ/ w߾8%|j;~|}pK]ơ/ w&~e_H 8PL7:%ʭ5Kw&U2vwR_+rm'}C7#rWoO&HoG?M$UR7{FU]u ;# !Wk`|W>׹潇9Vn)6)*ҹ{%qV4q>W1vi#T"Qk&GwxcJBJ- Ϸ^ˁxkU}ԣ/3.;]J=<*)cS)ROK9H=,r zX @)cS)Da^ԽQ gxJI=w֣gf*TRj

• Received: December 13, 2016   • Accepted: May 10, 2017

© The Author(s). 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

  • 4,306 Views
  • 35 Download
  • 54 Web of Science
  • 55 Crossref
  • 63 Scopus
prev next
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • Background
    The law enforcement officer profession requires performance of arduous occupational tasks while carrying an external load, consisting of, at minimum, a chest rig, a communication system, weaponry, handcuffs, personal protective equipment and a torch. The aim of this systematic review of the literature was to identify and critically appraise the methodological quality of published studies that have investigated the impacts of body armour on task performance and to synthesize and report key findings from these studies to inform law enforcement organizations.
  • Methods
    Several literature databases (Medline, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, EMBAS) were searched using key search words and terms to identify appropriate studies. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critically evaluated using the Downs and Black protocol with inter-rater agreement determined by Cohen’s Kappa.
  • Results
    Sixteen articles were retained for evaluation with a mean Downs and Black score of 73.2 ± 6.8% (k = 0.841). Based on the research quality and findings across the included studies, this review determined that while effects of body armour on marksmanship and physiological responses have not yet been adequately ascertained, body armour does have significant physical performance and biomechanical impacts on the wearer, including: a) increased ratings of perceived exertion and increased time to complete functional tasks, b) decreased work capability (indicated by deterioration in fitness test scores), c) decreased balance and stability, and d) increased ground reaction forces.
  • Conclusions
    Given the physical performance and biomechanical impacts on the wearer, body armour should be carefully selected, with consideration of the physical fitness of the wearers and the degree to which the armour systems can be ergonomically optimized for the specific population in question.
  • Keywords:

    Keywords

    Officer; Police; Body armour; Personal protective equipment
While a large percentage of a Law Enforcement Officer’s (LEO) time on duty is spent in sedentary activities, a high level of physical fitness remains necessary to effectively respond to many incidents [1]. Although incident responses are sporadic, a LEO will inevitably be required to run, jump, crawl, balance while moving quickly, engage in combat, climb, lift, and push or pull significant weights in the execution of their duties, often without warning [1, 2]. Additionally, the LEO profession requires performance of these arduous occupational tasks while carrying an external load, consisting of, at minimum, a chest rig, a communication system, weaponry, handcuffs, personal protective equipment (PPE) and a torch [3].
With an increasing focus on minimizing the risks associated with the performance of these demanding tasks in unpredictable and potentially hostile environments, the weight of these external loads carried by LEO has been steadily increasing [4]. Total weight of external loads can range from approximately 3.5 kg [3] for the general duty officer to 22 kg in specialist police [5] and may even exceed 40 kg in certain circumstances [6]. This upward trend in carried loads is due not only to the increasing complexity of modern tactical engagements [7], but also to the increased emphasis on improving survival without reducing unit mobility [8]. Given that additional load in the form of body armour is known to be effective in reducing fatalities in military environments, use of body armour is becoming more widespread amongst LEO. For example, one Police Force in New Zealand is citing the escalation of violent crimes as evidence of the need to regularly equip LEOs with body armour, particularly for protection against stab threats [3].
While increasing numbers of law enforcement organizations have been making the decision to issue body armour systems, the additional external load associated with this equipment has been associated with increased rates of injury and reduced operational capabilities in tactical populations [9, 10]. In research, primarily on military personnel, load carriage has been found to cause musculoskeletal injuries (e.g. back pain, lower limb stress fractures), neurological injuries (e.g. brachial plexus palsy) and integumentary injuries (e.g. chaffing, blisters) [11]. Chronic increases in levels of physical exertion due to additional occupational load carriage may even be a causative factor in illness, as a result of depressed immune function [12], especially in LEO with a lower body mass or lower level of physical fitness [13]. Impairments to mission capability and performance can also result from load carriage, due to reduced carrier mobility [14] and an increase in time required to complete functional tasks [3, 15]. These impairments can impact on aspects of marksmanship [5, 16–20] and attention-to-task [21, 22] and increase the physiological cost to complete a task [23] when on duty. Essentially, while body armour provides protection to the wearer, it will, like other types of loads, also impart both risks and physiological costs.
With the majority of body armour research having been conducted in military populations, and despite the increasing use of body armour systems by LEO, published research that has examined the extent to which body armour can impact the performance capabilities of LEO during physically demanding occupational tasks has not been comprehensively and critically reviewed. The aim of this systematic review of the literature was therefore to identify and critically appraise the methodological quality of published studies that have investigated the impacts of body armour on task performance in tactical populations, and to synthesize and report key findings from these studies to inform law enforcement organizations.
In order to identify and obtain relevant original research for review, key literature databases were systematically searched using specific keywords of relevance to the topic. The selection of keywords to be used in the systematic search was guided by review of keywords used in a sample of relevant articles. The databases searched, specific key words, and search strategies employed are detailed in Table 1. To improve the relevance of search results, filters that reflected study eligibility criteria were applied in each database, where available. In databases where these filters were unavailable or were only partially available, the study eligibility criteria were applied manually through screening of study titles and abstracts. The eligibility criteria were subsequently applied to the full-text of identified articles that were not excluded during the screening of titles and abstracts, to select a final set of eligible articles for inclusion in the literature review. The results of the search, screening and selection processes were documented in a PRISMA flow diagram [24].
Table 1
Keywords, subject headings and arrangement of terms searched by database
Database Terms
body armour Population Outcome measures
Medline Complete (armour OR armor OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bulletproof vest” OR “ballistic vests” OR “tactical vests” OR “bulletproof vests” OR “protective clothing”) AND (“Police”[Mesh] OR “Military Personnel”[Mesh] OR “Military Science”[Mesh] OR “Military Medicine”[Mesh] OR military OR soldier OR officer OR police OR law enforcement OR Army OR Navy OR naval OR “Armed Forces” OR security OR Guard* OR tactic* OR combat OR “special forces” OR “special operations” or defense OR defence) AND (“Exercise”[Mesh] OR “Physical Exertion”[Mesh] OR “Physical Fitness”[Mesh] OR “Work Performance”[Mesh] OR “Task Performance and Analysis”[Mesh] OR “Biomechanical Phenomena”[Mesh] OR exercise OR exertion OR performance OR biomechanic* OR endurance OR fitness OR strength OR conditioning OR “movement analysis” OR kinematic* OR mechanic* OR task* OR training)
CINAHL (armour OR armor OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bulletproof vest” “ballistic vests” OR “tactical vests” OR “bulletproof vests” OR “protective clothing”) AND ((MH “Police”) OR (MH “Military Personnel”) OR (MH “Military Recruits”) OR (MH “Research, Military”) OR (MH “Military Training”) OR (MH “Military Services”) OR (MH “Military Medicine”) OR military OR soldier OR officer OR police OR law enforcement OR Army OR Navy OR “Armed Forces” OR security OR Guard* OR tactic* OR combat OR “special forces” OR “special operations” or defense OR defence)) AND ((MH “Exercise”) OR (MH “Resistance Training”) OR (MH “Physical Fitness”) OR performance OR tactic* OR biomechanic* OR exertion OR endurance OR fitness OR strength OR conditioning OR “movement analysis” OR kinematic* OR mechanic* OR task* OR training)
SPORTDiscus (armour OR armor OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bulletproof vest” OR “ballistic vests” OR “tactical vests” OR “bulletproof vests” OR “protective clothing”) AND (military OR soldier OR officer OR police OR law enforcement OR Army OR Navy OR naval OR “Armed Forces” OR security OR Guard* OR tactic* OR combat OR ”special forces” OR “special operations” or defense OR defence) AND (exercise OR exertion OR performance OR biomechanic* OR endurance OR fitness OR strength OR conditioning OR “movement analysis” OR kinematic* OR mechanic* OR task* OR training)
EMBASE (‘body armor’/exp OR armour OR armor OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bullet proof vest” OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bulletproof vest” OR “protective clothing”) AND (‘military phenomena’/exp OR ‘police’/exp OR military OR soldier OR officer OR police OR law enforcement OR Army OR Navy OR naval OR “Armed Forces” OR security OR Guard* OR tactic* OR combat OR “special forces” OR “special operations” or defense OR defence) AND (‘exercise’/exp OR ‘physical performance’/exp OR ‘athletic performance’/exp OR ‘biomechanics’/exp OR ‘kinematics’/exp OR ‘training’/exp OR exercise OR exertion OR performance OR biomechanic* OR endurance OR fitness OR strength OR conditioning OR “movement analysis” OR kinematic* OR mechanic* OR task* OR training)
The specific inclusion criteria applied for this review were: a) human subjects, b) English language availability, c) peer reviewed publications reporting original research for the first time; d) publication date between 1 January 1991 and 17 June 2016; and e) investigated effects of body armour on at least one of the following outcomes of direct relevance to LEO: occupationally-relevant physical performance; levels of task-related physical exertion; mobility; balance; biomechanics; cognitive performance; or marksmanship. Subject matter experts were consulted in determining the date range. Studies published prior to 1991 were excluded because they preceded the Gulf War (having commenced in 1991) which substantially changed individual combat systems (increased use of body armour) and changed operating conditions from those of previous conflicts. Identified publications that fell outside the date range of the review were excluded from the critical review but used to provide context, where useful. The exclusion criteria employed in assessing eligibility of individual studies for inclusion in the literature review were: a) studies that did not measure at least one aspect of human performance; b) studies that involved testing personal protective equipment (PPE) used in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and high-yield Explosive (CBRNE) environments, concealable or soft body armour only, or a complete load carriage or fighting load; c) studies in extreme environments (high altitude, very cold, etc); and d) studies in which use of body armour was not a primary independent variable.
Eligible publications identified through the literature search, screening and selection processes were then critically appraised to assess methodological quality using the Downs and Black scoring system [25]. This approach to critical appraisal was chosen for the following reasons: a) it was initially developed using psychometrics, b) repeated testing has demonstrated good reliability and validity of this approach, and c) its results are amenable to translation into a methodological quality rating such as the Kennelly grading system used in this review [26], as detailed below. To assess each article with the Downs and Black protocol, 25 of 27 questions, covering statistical methods, validity, bias, data reporting, power analysis, and organization were scored as either ‘0’ points (if the methodological details requested in the question were absent or undeterminable, or ‘1’ point (if the methodological details were reported correctly). Two further questions, Question 5 (relating to potential confounding variables) and Question 27 (relating to sample size calculations and statistical power analysis), are typically scored across a range. Question 5 is scored on a scale from ‘0’ points to ‘2’ points (based on the quality of reporting of confounding factors) while Question 27 is scored on a scale from ‘0’ points to ‘5’ points (based on the extent to which statistical power analyses have informed sample size decisions). While the ‘0’ to ‘2’ scale was retained in this review for Question 5, the review utilized a modification to Question 27 of the Downs and Black protocol first proposed by Eng, et al. [27]. Eng, et al. [27] suggest that Question 27 is ambiguously worded, and so recommend scoring this question regarding statistical power calculations dichotomously, as a correction. This modification ensures the impact this question can have on a publication’s final total raw score is reduced, limiting the impact of subjectivity in the assessment. For comparison purposes and to improve reporting, the critical appraisal score (CAS) for each included study was converted to a percentage score and reported to one decimal place. The CAS was calculated by dividing the actual raw modified Downs and Black score by the highest possible raw score (modified to 28 points) and then multiplying this figure by 100 to convert this proportion to a percentage.
To obtain a quality grade for each research paper, the CAS was then compared to the grading system for methodological quality proposed by Kennelly [26]. Kennelly’s grades are categorized as ‘poor’, ‘fair’ and ‘good’, with the methodological quality rating determined by the scores assigned in the modified Downs and Black protocol. The grade categories and associated ranges of raw Downs and Black scores employed by Kennelly are: 14 or fewer points, classified as ‘poor’ quality research, 15–19 points, classified as ‘fair’ quality research, and 20 or more points, classified as ‘good’ quality research. However, as the Kennelly system was based on the original Downs and Black protocol (which had a maximum possible score of 32 points), in this review (in which the total possible score from the modified Downs and Black protocol was 28 points) the Downs and Black scores associated with each of Kennelly’s grades were converted to percentages. On this basis, the final grading system employed in this review for grading methodological quality of each of the included studies was as follows: Downs and Black score <45.4% - study classified as being of ‘poor’ methodological quality, score of 45.4–61.0% - study classified as being of ‘fair’ methodological quality, and score >61.0% - study classified as being of ‘good’ methodological quality.
All studies were independently critically appraised using the Downs and Black protocol by two authors (CT, RO), with the level of agreement between the appraisers measured using a Cohen’s Kappa (k) analysis of all raw scores (27 scores per paper). For final scores, any disagreements between the two authors (CT, RO) in scores awarded were settled by consensus or, if necessary, adjudication by the third author (RP).
Following the critical appraisal process, key data were extracted from the included papers and compiled in tables to provide a concise and systematic overview of key attributes of, and findings from, included studies. The key table headings were a) title, lead author and publication date, b) demographics of the participants, c) the equipment used and worn, d) key independent and dependent variables, e) the occupational task or test employed to assess performance and f) the CAS, expressed as a percentage. Key outcomes were also extracted and compiled, although only those outcomes which reached statistical significance were included, for brevity, in the table, as indicators of significant impacts of the body armour on the occupationally-relevant task performance of the wearer. Study findings from across the included studies were then critically synthesized to generate a clear summary of key findings and identify the strength of evidence supporting these key findings.
The PRISMA diagram (Fig. 1) details the results of the literature search, screening, and selection processes. In total, the initial search yielded 704 publications, from which 24 duplicates were removed. Of the remaining 680 publications, 37 were considered to be of potential relevance following initial screening and were examined in full text to further assess eligibility. Ultimately, 16 eligible studies were retained and formed the basis for this review.
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram detailing search process
40557_2017_169_Fig1_HTML.jpg
The research reported in this review originated from six countries. Specifically, six studies were from the US [23, 28–32], five publications were from Australia [5, 14, 33–35], two from New Zealand [3, 36], one from India [37], one from Poland [38], and one from the UK [39]. Three distinct subject populations were represented, consisting of university students (n = 7) [29, 31–35, 39], LEO (n = 4) [3, 5, 14, 36], and military personnel (n = 5) [23, 28, 30, 37, 38]. Additionally, ten of the publications studied only males [3, 5, 14, 33–39] and six included both males and females [23, 28–32]. The mean ± SD age across all studies was determined to be 28.85 ± 2.32 years, ranging from 21.9 ± 2.4 years [29] to 37 ± 9.16 years [3, 36].
The mean ± SD CAS, derived from critical appraisal of the methodological quality of each included study, was 73.2 ± 6.8%, ranging from 60.7% [35] to 85.7% [36]. This mean indicates that most studies were of at least ‘good’ (62.5%) methodological quality. The kappa statistic for inter-tester agreement of the methodological quality of the studies indicated an ‘almost perfect’ agreement (k = 0.841) [40]. When applying the Downs and Black protocol for critical appraisal of each publication, Questions 1–14, concerning how data was reported, generally scored highly across all studies. Low external validity scores (Questions 11–13) were attributed to those studies which did not recruit participants from a tactical population [29, 31–35, 39]. Additionally, one study recruited subjects from a population of military personnel (US Airborne Infantry Soldiers) that had been trained at a level substantially beyond their peers (US Infantry Soldiers). Questions 15–19, relating to internal validity of the study results, showed overall poor scores with respect to blinding, because in most cases, the test condition was a loaded state and was compared to an unloaded control state. The fact that these conditions did not allow for blinding of either the participants or the researchers who conducted and recorded measurements, accounts for the low scores in this area. However, those studies using within-subject measures were able to eliminate selection bias. Scores relating to whether there was adequate consideration of statistical power were generally low across the included studies, due either to insufficient reporting of power or sample size analyses, or low participant numbers.
The key data extracted from the included study reports are summarized in Table 2. All but one included study compared outcomes from a loaded condition with those from an unloaded control condition [38]. The anomalous study, by Majchrzycka et. al.[38], used the current Polish military armour plate as a control for comparison with new alternative plates. Additional independent variables were also incorporated in some of the included studies, including a fatigued test subject state [3, 36, 39] and the comparison of different armour configurations [35, 38]. Seven unique categories were identified among included studies based on the outcomes they assessed. These categories were: Physiological measures (n = 8) [23, 28, 29, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39], marksmanship measures (n = 1) [5], mobility measures (n = 2) [3, 14], kinetic and kinematic measures (n = 6) [3, 31, 32, 36], cognitive measures (n = 3) [33, 38, 39], subjective measures (n = 4) [28, 33, 34, 36], and thermal measures (n = 2) [33, 34]. Because some studies reported multiple outcome measures, they fitted into multiple categories and thus are referenced more than once in the categorized results presented on the page following.
Table 2
Summary of critically reviewed literature by author and title
Title/Author Participants Equipment Variables Intervention Main Findings CAS a (%)
Caldwell, et. al. 2011 [33]
The interaction of body armour, low-intensity exercise, and hot-humid conditions on physiological strain and cognitive function		 n = 9
Mean ± SD Age: 27.3 ± 5.43 years
Mean ± SD Height: 180.3 ± 5.11 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 79.4 ± 11.3 kg
Healthy, Active Male University students (AU b)		 AU standard issue kevlar vest with ceramic plate inserts (6.07 kg)
Rabintex industries ballistic helmet (1.29 kg)		 IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, environmental conditions (Hot-Humid)
DEP e: Body temp, HR k, RPEf, vigilance, reaction time		 2.5 h simulated patrol in hot-humid conditions • Loaded condition did not induce heat illness (no core temp. >39.5 °C)
• Progressive divergence between loaded and unloaded cardiovascular strain (p = 0.01)
• Armour significantly increases RPE f (p = 0.02)
• No significant change in cognitive function between loaded &unloaded conditions (p > 0.05)		 67.9
Carbone, et. al. 2014 [5]
The impact of load carriage on the marksmanship of the tactical police officer: a pilot study		 n = 6
Mean ± SD Age: 33.3 ± 4.13 years
Mean ± SD Height: 177.0 ± 11.8 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 89.2 ± 13.2 kg
Mean ± SD years of experience in the police force: 10.9 ± 5.1 year
Active male officers of a police Tactical Operations Unit (AU b)		 Body armour, helmet, primary (M4) and secondary (9 mm Glock) weapons
(22.8 ± 1.8 kg)		 IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
DEP e: Marksmanship accuracy		 Police marksmanship test: one static shoot, and one tactical mobile shoot • No significant difference in shooting results between loaded and unloaded conditions (p > 0.05) 71.4
Carlton, et. al. 2014 [14]
The Impact of Occupational Load Carriage on the Mobility of the Tactical Police Officer		 n = 6
Mean ± SD Age: 33.3 ± 4.13 years
Mean ± SD Height: 177.0 ± 11.8 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 89.2 ± 13.2 kg
Mean ± SD years of experience in the police force: 10.9 ± 5.1 year
Active male officers of a police Tactical Operations Unit (AU b)		 Body armour, helmet, primary (M4) and secondary (9 mm Glock) weapons
(22.8 ± 1.8 kg)		 IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
DEP e: Speed and mobility during test course		 10 m in line sprint
25 m simulated patrol
Two 10 m dummy (70 kg) drags		 • Time to complete the tactical movement task increased with load (mean ± SD time unloaded = 18.59 ± 2.44 s: loaded = 19.89 ± 1.61 s) and officers were significantly slower (p < 0.01) during the dummy drag mobility task when loaded (mean ± SD time unloaded = 9.29 ± 0.53 s: loaded = 10.25 ± 0.77 s) 71.4
Dempsey, et. al. 2013 [3]
Impact of police body armour and equipment on mobility		 n = 52
Mean ± SD Age: 37 ± 9.16 years
Mean ± SD Height: 180.68 ± 6.12 years
Mean ± SD Weight: 90.21 ± 11.59
Mean ± SD BMI v: 27.61 SD 3.09
Healthy Male Police Officers (NZ c)		 Fitted stab-resistant body armour and simulated duty gear (7.65 ± 0.73 kg) IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, fatigued or unfatigued state
DEP e: Balance, grappling, functional mobility task performance, chin up repetitions		 Timed stabilometer balance task
Simulated vehicle exit/sprint
Grappling bag exercise
Max rep. Of chin-ups		 • Time off balance increased 2.42 s on average when loaded (p < 0.001)
• Average acceleration time increased 0.28 s on average when loaded (p < 0.001)
• Average TTC h for grappling bag exercise increased 1.89 s on average when loaded (p < 0.001)
• 2.86 Fewer chin-ups were completed when loaded (p < 0.001)		 78.6
Dempsey, et.al 2014 [36]
Body Armour: the effect of load exercise and distraction on landing forces		 n = 52
Mean ± SD Age: 37 ± 9.16 years
Mean ± SD Height: 180.68 ± 6.12 years
Mean ± SD Weight: 90.21 ± 11.59
Mean ± SD BMI v: 27.61 SD 3.09
Healthy Male Police Officers (NZ c)		 Fitted stab-resistant body armour and simulated duty gear (7.65 ± 0.73 kg) IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, fatigued or unfatigued state
DEP e: Ground reaction force, jump height		 Fatigued and non-fatigued force plate measurements of a max vertical jump, drop landing, predictable and unpredictable jump tasks following drop landing • Jump height reduced when loaded (p < 0.001)
• GRF increased when loaded (p < 0.001)
• Fatigue contributes additional GRF and jump height loss (p < 0.001)		 85.7
Larsen, et. al. 2012 [34]
Body Armour, Performance, and Physiology During Repeated High-Intensity Work Tasks		 n = 11
Mean ± SD Age: 22 ± 2 years
Mean ± SD Height: 185 ± 10 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 77 ± 14 kg
Healthy, recreationally active males University Students (US p)		 Protective chest plate with integral extremity protection (16.98 ± 1 kg)
Military helmet (0.5 kg)		 IND d: Armoured or unarmoured condition
DEP e: Shooting accuracy, vaulting, crawling, box lifting, body temperature		 Timed trial of military task circuit course • Body Temperature increased in the armoured condition (0.50 ± 0.41 °C) (p = 0.02)
• RPE f was 1 ± 0 higher in the armoured condition (p < 0.01)
• No other test variables reached statistical significance (p > 0.05)		 75.0
Lenton, et. al. 2015 [35]
The effects of military body armour on trunk and hip kinematics during performance of manual handling tasks		 n = 16
Mean ± SD Age: 22 ± 1
Mean ± SD Height: 180 ± 8 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 74.9 ± 7.5 kg
Healthy, active male University students (AU b)		 Modular Combat Armour System (8.6 kg)
Tiered Body Armour System 1(7.0 kg)
Tiered Body Armour System 2(7.3 kg)
Tiered Body Armour System 3(6.4 kg)		 IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, body armour configuration worn
DEP e: Average flexion angle, trunk rotation ROM w 		Ammunition box lift and place
Ammunition box Lower and place
Sandbag lift and place
Each task assessed with a 12 camera motion capture system		 • No significant differences between armour configuration (p > 0.05)
• Any loaded condition significantly decreased trunk rotation ROM w (p < 0.001)
• Any loaded condition increased flexion (p < 0.001)		 60.7
Majchrzycka, et. al. 2013 [28]
Ergonomics Assessment of Composite Ballistic Inserts for Bullet- and Fragment-Proof Vests		 n = 10
Mean ± SD Age: 32.07 ± 2.1 year
Mean ± SD Height: 183.0 ± 6.8 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 85.5 ± 9.8 kg
Healthy, military males (Poland)		 One of three front ballistic plate inserts only within a standard tactical vest
Plate WKP x 112(2.10 kg)
Plate WKP x 14(3.18 kg)
Standard Plate (2.40 kg)		 IND d: Which of 3 unique ballistic plates was being worn
DEP e: Subjective ergonomics, Grandjean scale, attention/perceptiveness, complex reaction time		 Battery of questions, assessment of cognitive function, completion of functional tasks • Although inconclusive, the lightest plate was rated the highest in subjective scoring
• No conclusive changes in cognitive function across the tested plates		 75
Majumdar, et. al. 1997 [37]
Physiological Effects of Wearing Body Armour on Male Soldiers		 Studies I, II:
n = 6
Mean ± SD Age: 29.3 ± 4.08 years
Mean ± SD Height: 166 ± 5.9 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 58.5 ± 6.92 kg
Healthy male Soldiers (India)
Study III:
n = 16
Mean ± SD Age: 31.5 ± 5.24 years
Mean ± SD Height: 167.9 ± 6.15 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 62.8 ± 6.92
Healthy male Soldiers (India)		 11.0 kg metallic plate vest with foam backing (Indian Standard Issue) IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
DEP e: Treadmill test performance, hot-humid exposure step test performance and pulmonary function		 2.22 m/s, 10 m flat treadmill walk
20 m resting followed by 40 m light exercise in 34 °C, 60% humidity conditions
Measurement of FE j, FVC g and max voluntary ventilation		 • Physiological values of HR k, and VO2 l all showed significantly greater exertion in the loaded state (p < 0.01)
• Pulmonary function deteriorated in the loaded condition (p < 0.001)		 71.4
Phillips, et. al. 2015 [31]
The Effects of Military Body Armour on the Lower Back and Knee Kinematics During Toe-Touch and Two-Legged Squat Tasks		 Males: n = 12
Mean ± SD Age: 26.67 ± 5.47 years
Mean ± SD Height: 179 ± 5 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 78.77 ± 9.41 kg
Females: n = 12
Mean ± SD Age: 24 ± 5.02
Mean ± SD Height: 166 ± 10 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 61.54 ± 7.38 kg
Healthy University Students (US p)		 10.81 kg armour setup consisting of front and back ceramic plates only in a military vest IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, fatigued or non-fatigued state
DEP e: Lower back and Knee kinematics		 Kinematic motion capture examinations of Toe-touch and 2-legged squat tasks both before and after 45 m treadmill walking at 1.65 m/s Pre Exercise:
• duration of self-paced motion capture tests increased (p ≤ 0.02)
• Increased time spent in flexion at both joints (p ≤ 0.02)
Post-Exercise:
• Small but significant effects on duration of motion capture tests (p = 0.03)
• Increased time spent in flexion at both joints (p ≤ 0.04)		 78.6
Phillips, et. al. 2016 [32]
The Effects of Military Body Armour on the Lower Back and Knee Mechanics During Box Drop and Prone to Standing Tasks		 Males: n = 12
Mean ± SD Age: 26.67 ± 5.47 years
Mean ± SD Height: 179 ± 5 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 78.77 ± 9.41 kg
Females: n = 12
Mean ± SD Age: 24 ± 5.02
Mean ± SD Height: 166 ± 10 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 61.54 ± 7.38 kg		 10.81 kg armour setup consisting of front and back ceramic plates only in a military vest IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, fatigued or non-fatigued state
DEP e: Lower back and Knee kinematics		 Kinematic motion capture examinations of box drop and prone-to-standing tasks both before and after 45 m treadmill walking at 1.65 m/s Pre-Exercise:
• The loaded state increased GRF i, time to completion and time spent in flexion (p ≤ 0.02)
Post-Exercise:
• Thorax posture was at an increased angle for females and a reduced angle for males (p = 0.05)		 78.6
Ricciardi, et. al. 2007 [28]
Effects of Gender and Body Adiposity on Physiological Responses to Physical Work While Wearing Body Armour		 Males: n = 17
Mean ± SD Age: 31.9 ± 4.1 year
Mean ± SD Height: 173.6 ± 4.8 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 78.5 ± 14.9 kg
Females: n = 17
Mean ± SD Age: 30.4 ± 4.8 years
Mean ± SD Height: 163.8 ± 5.1 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 62.1 ± 9.4 kg
Healthy, active, military personnel (US p)		 Interceptor Outer Tactical Vest (7.8–11 kg) IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
DEP e: Graded treadmill test performance, blood lactate levels, physical performance battery outcome		 Measurement of physiological metrics and recorded perceived exertion of each subject when performing a graded treadmill & military PT m test • All subjects showed decreased performance and increased physiological strain when equipped with body armour (p ≤ 0.04)
• No significant effect of gender on physiological parameters (p > 0.05)
• Women reported a higher RPE f than men (p = 0.018)		 64.3
Ricciardi, et. al. 2008 [23]
Metabolic Demands of Body Armour on Physical Performance in Simulated Stress Conditions		 Males: n = 17
Mean ± SD Age: 31.9 ± 4.1 year
Mean ± SD Height: 173.6 ± 4.8 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 78.5 ± 14.9 kg
Females: n = 17
Mean ± SD Age: 30.4 ± 4.8 years
Mean ± SD Height: 163.8 ± 5.1 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 62.1 ± 9.4 kg
Healthy, active, military personnel (US p)		 Interceptor Outer Tactical Vest (7.8–11 kg) IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
DEP e: Treadmill test performance, hand grip strength, stair step test performance and pull-ups/hang-time		 Subjects participated in 2 test sessions, either with or without body armour and completed the physical performance battery • Significantly increased physiological strain during treadmill testing (p < 0.001)
• Stair stepping and pull-ups/hang time were decreased in the loaded state (p < .0025), and no change in handgrip strength was noted		 75.0
Roberts, et. al. 2013 [39]
The Effect of Exercise and Body Armour on Cognitive Function in Healthy Volunteers		 Study 1:
n = 40
Mean ± SD Age: 20.8 ± 1.7 years
Healthy male University Students (US p)
Study 2:
n = 20
Mean ± SD Age: 26.6 ± 6.2 years
Healthy male University students (US p)		 S203 Tactical Vest
F6 PASGT n Helmet		 IND d: Brief or extended exercise, loaded or unloaded condition
DEP e: Heart rate, oral temp, cognitive function		 Study 1: Determine the level of exercise necessary to observe a change in cognitive function
Study 2: Physiological variables and cognitive function		 • No effect on oral temperature
• Loaded condition significantly increased HR k (p < 0.05)
• Time, but not loaded condition affected cognitive performance (p < 0.05)		 64.3
Sell, et. al. 2013 [30]
The Addition of Body Armour Diminishes Dynamic Postural Stability in Military Soldiers		 n = 36 (4 females, 32 males)
Mean ± SD Age: 29 ± 6.6 years
Mean ± SD Height: 174.49 ± 8.84 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 82.38 ± 13.93 kg
Healthy, active Airborne Infantry Soldiers (US p)		 Standard US Army ACU q Uniform
Standard issue US Army Body Armour (Mean ± SD weight 12.47 ± 2.56 kg)		 IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
DEP e: Dynamic postural stability		 Force plate analysis of a single leg jumping task • The loaded condition resulted in significantly less dynamic postural stability (p < 0.001) 71.4
Swain, et. al. 2010 [29]
Effects of Training on Physical Performance Wearing Personal Protective Equipment		 Vest Group:
n = 17 (9 females, 8 males)
Mean ± SD Age: 22.8 ± 2.5 years
Mean ± SD Height: 171 ± 7 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 72.6 ± 12.9
Mean ± SD BMI: 24.7 ± 3.6
Healthy, active, male university students (US p)
Control Group:
n = 20 (9 females 11 males)
Mean ± SD Age: 21.9 ± 2.4 years
Mean ± SD Height: 174 ± 8 cm
Mean ± SD Weight: 74.8 ± 14.2 kg
Mean ± SD BMI: 24.6 ± 3.4
Healthy, active female university students (US p)		 Small, medium or large ballistic vest with inserts (US p standard issue)
US p standard issue ballistic helmet
Total ensemble mean ± SD mass: 11.7 ± 2.8 kg		 IND d: Training with or without the ballistic vest/helmet
DEP e: FEV j, VO2max s, RER t, HRmax u, USMC r PRT o values		 6 week USMC r-styled physical training regimen either with or without armour • HRmax u decreased slightly but significantly (p = 0.01) in both groups
• VO2max s increased ~2× for the vest group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.16)
• No changes in FEV j
• Slight but significant (p = 0.01) decrease in RER t in both groups
• Both groups significantly improved PRT scores (push-ups, sit-ups, pull-ups, and 3-mile run) following training (p < 0.001)		 82.1
Legend by order of appearance
a CAS: Critical Appraisal Score
b AU: Australia
c NZ: New Zealand
d IND: Independent
e DEP: Dependent
f RPE: Rating of Perceived Exertion
g FVC: Forced Vital Capacity
h TTC: Time to Completion
i GRF: Ground Reaction Forces
j FEV: Forced Expiratory Volume
k HR: Heart Rate
l VO2: Volume of Oxygen
m PT: Physical Training
n PASGT: Personnel Armour System for Ground Troops
o PRT: Physical Readiness Test
p US: United States of America
q ACU: Army Combat Uniform
r USMC: United States Marine Corps
s VO2max: Maximal Volume of Oxygen
t RER: Respiratory Exchange Ratio
u HRmax: Heart Rate Maximum
v BMI: Body Mass Index
w ROM: Range of Motion
x WKP: A brand of ballistic armour inserts
Physiological studies
For those studies investigating the physiological effects of wearing body armour, no clear consensus on the independent impacts of wearing body armour emerged from the quantitative data presented in the reports of these studies, as no objective measures were uniformly utilized across all six studies. Nevertheless, the related measures of cardiovascular strain [33], pulmonary strain [37] and heart rate [36, 37] were all reported as elevated beyond control levels in participants wearing body armour suggesting that workload increased when wearing body armour. The study by Swain, et. al. [29] was unique from the others, in that it considered the potential for wearing body armour during training to increase the benefit of training. After 6 weeks of an United States Marine Corps (USMC) style program, the study showed small improvements to the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (p = 0.01), and maximal heart rate (HRmax) (p = 0.01) in both the experimental group, which wore body armour during training, and the control group. Likewise, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) increased in both groups, however, whilst mean VO2max increased approximately twice as much in the vest group as in the control group, this difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.16).
Marksmanship studies
Carbone et. al. [5] found no statistically significant difference in marksmanship scores between participants in a body armour condition and those in a minimally loaded control condition, during various marksmanship trials. This study tested specialist police officers in both tactically-loaded condition (ballistic vest, helmet, and primary (M4) and secondary (Glock) weapons of approximately 22 kgs) and an unloaded condition (dressed in fatigues only). Although no statistically significant differences were found in marksmanship measures (5-bullet impact distance from centre of target, on the vertical and horizontal axis), the authors did report that there was a trend towards horizontal target groupings being superior in the loaded condition, during both the static and mobile shooting (25 m pursuit) tasks. While this result did not reach statistical significance, the authors hypothesize that because the participants train primarily in the loaded state, their accuracy may be better when loaded due to a practice effect and the potential stabilizing effect of the body armour.
Mobility studies
Of the two studies [3, 14] investigating changes in mobility associated with wearing body armour, one [14] reported a statistically significant difference between a group wearing a tactically loaded specialist police officer body armour configuration (mean ± SD: 22.8 ± 1.8 kg total equipment weight) and an unloaded control group when testing participants on a 10 m sprint, 25 m simulated patrol, and dummy drags [14]. Loads that exceeded 25% of body weight resulted in a significantly greater effect than lower loads. With respect to task completion, the dummy drag was most severely impacted by load (unloaded mean ± SD time to complete = 9.29 ± 0.53 s: loaded = 10.25 ± 0.77 s). In the other study [3], the researchers found that a stab resistant body armour configuration (mean ± SD weight: 7.65 ± 0.73 kg,) when compared to no load, significantly increased time off balance (mean time 8.12 s loaded, 5.7 s unloaded, when using the stabiliometer, p < 0.001), time to completion during a simulated vehicle exit/sprint (mean time 1.95 s loaded, 1.67 s unloaded, p < 0.001), and time to completion of a mobility battery (mean time 18.16 s loaded, 15.85 s unloaded, P < 0.001).
Kinematic and kinetic studies
Five Studies [3, 30–32, 35] reporting on trunk mechanics found that wearing body armour either compromised trunk posture [32] (by increasing flexion or extension during the test activities) [31, 32, 35], reduced range of motion [35], or reduced stability [3, 30]. These impacts of wearing body armour (total weight ranging from 6.4–12.5 kg) reached statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05). Additional observed kinematic impacts of wearing body armour included: increased time to occupational task completion, ranging from 1.89 s extra for grappling tasks (p < 0.001) [3] to 0.5 s extra for both box drop and prone to standing tasks (p = 0.03) [32]; reduced jump height (p < 0.001) [36]; and increased ground reaction forces (GRF) (6–19% over control figures) (p ≤ 0.02) [32, 36].
Cognition
Of the three included studies that considered the impacts of wearing body armour on cognitive function [33, 38, 39], only the study by Roberts, et. al. [39] found a loss in cognitive function when wearing body armour. In that study, the researchers used a verbal fluency task and a controlled order word association task as outcome measures, and observed changes in cognitive strategy. As participants became fatigued, executive function decreased and non-executive function increased (p < 0.05). For this reason, the authors attributed cognitive function decline to fatigue over time, and stated that body armour (S203 Tactical vest and PASGT helmet) did not mediate cognitive impairment, even though clearly it may have contributed to fatigue. Majchrzycka, et. al. [38], found no statistically significant differences between body armour and no-armour groups when comparing the effects of a variety of ballistic chest plates only (2.1–3.2 kg) on cognitive performance, measured via the Grandjean scale, tests of attention and perceptiveness and complex reaction time tests for cognition assessment,. Caldwell et. al. [33] also found no statistically significant relationship between cognitive performance (assessed using the Mini-Cog rapid assessment battery) and wearing body armour (7.36 kg, vest and helmet) (p > 0.05).
Subjective outcomes
All studies considering the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) [28, 33, 34, 36] observed statistically significant increases in RPE during activities undertaken by participants when they were wearing body armour (with loads ranging from 7.8 to 17.48 kg) while performing tasks including shooting accuracy, vaulting, crawling, box lifting and graded exercise testing. One study, using a 7.8–11 kg interceptor plate vest, noted that females reported a higher RPE (1 level of perceived exertion higher on average) than males for the same given tasks [28].
Thermal outcomes
Two studies [33, 34] found that the loaded state (7.36 kg [33] to 19.48 kg [34]) elevated body temperature during activity (by 0.41 to 0.50 °C), beyond control levels in an environment of 21.3 °C (no relative humidity provided) to 36 °C (60% relative humidity) [33]. Body temperature data were obtained either via the auditory canal [33] and from the rectum or an ingested radio-telemetry pill [34]. Another study [39] found that body temperature was not affected by body armour, but used oral temperature, rather than temperature in the gastro-intestinal tract or temperature assessed via the auditory canal. In this study the weight of the body armour, environmental temperature and humidity were not provided.
The aim of this systematic review of the literature was to identify and critically appraise the methodological quality of published studies that have investigated the impacts of body armour on task performance in tactical populations, and to synthesize and report key findings from these studies to inform law enforcement organizations. In total, 16 publications were critically reviewed, achieving a mean ± SD critical appraisal score of 73.2 ± 6.8% (range 60.7 to 85.7%). Seven emerging categories, based on reported outcome measures, emerged to form the basis of the themes reported in the preceding results section and now discussed in the context of findings from the broader tactical research literature. These seven themes, discussed below, are physiological effects, marksmanship effects, mobility effects, kinetic and kinematic effects, cognitive effects, subjective measures, and thermal effects.
Physiological effects of wearing body armour
The wide variety of loads (ranging from 7.36 kg [33] to 17.48 kg [34]) and test conditions (e.g., hot/humid exercise conditions [33, 37], simulated functional task circuit [34], graded treadmill testing [28], physical fitness testing [23, 28] and running tasks [39]) resulted in heterogeneous results across studies considered in the physiological study category. Additionally, the available studies in this category did not always use comparable outcome measures – for example, studies used related but distinct measures of cardiovascular strain [33], pulmonary strain [37], body temperature and heart rate [36, 37]. With this variability in outcome measures likely contributing to the observed variability in study findings, specific conclusions that can be drawn from this review about physiological effects of wearing body armour are limited. Nevertheless, the included studies, which analyzed HR, pulmonary function, blood lactate levels, VO2max, and RER, did indicate overall that workload increased when wearing body armour, and this is not surprising since body armour adds load. This finding is consistent with findings of military studies, such as the article by Polcyn, et. al. [41], which found increased energy expenditure in female soldiers during a loaded (12–50 kg) 3.2 km land navigation course. Therefore, the physiological data reported in this review, as well as the subjective data (discussed later in this report) and related outcome measures including mobility, balance, time to complete tasks and other occupationally relevant measures reported in the included studies all indicate that wearing body armour results in additional increases in exertion when LEO perform physically demanding tasks, and this finding is consistent with findings in military populations.
Marksmanship effects of wearing body armour
Only one study in the marksmanship category assessed the effects of body armour on marksmanship of tactical populations [5]. In this study, using an M4 rifle and Glock handgun, no significant effect of wearing the body armour was found. The authors cited low numbers of participants (n = 6) and limited marksmanship data as major contributors to the inconclusive result. Similar challenges were reported by Orr, et. al. [42], who also considered tactical police officers in their research. A further study investigated participants drawn from a military population performing exercise (repetitive 20.5 kg/1.55 m box lift) while wearing a combat load (29.9 kg) [43] and found that while the load did not decrease rifle accuracy, an increase in the time to engage targets occurred. This increase in time to engage targets could impact fighting effectiveness and survivability in a combat environment, regardless of occupation. In other military load carriage studies, such as two investigations by Knapik et. al., [20] and Hanlon [44], a decrease in M16 rifle shooting performance was found after a 20 km road march under loads up to 61 kg, and after a 2 mile run for time. These findings, when taken together, suggest that the independent effect of load carriage on marksmanship is likely to be negative but is also still not well understood, especially when different weapon systems are used (e.g. rifle versus hand gun), warranting further research in this area.
Mobility effects of wearing body armour
This review found that balance is decreased and time to complete functional tasks is increased as a result of wearing body armour. Additionally, some occupationally relevant tasks may be significantly impaired by body armour. These findings are further supported by the results of previous military research [45] showing increased road march time on completion of a functional task (US Army obstacle course) by subjects wearing a full fighting load (14–27kgs). Additional military-focused research showed significant effects of body armour on road march time and the incidence of load-incited blisters [44]. Moreover, a study investigating body armour and full fighting loads also reported biomechanical disadvantage (decreased trunk range of motion) resulted from increasing the external load. Body armour may contribute to development of musculoskeletal injury and chronic low back pain, both of which are reported as being substantial factors in lost time on duty in tactical settings [10, 46].
Kinematic and kinetic effects of wearing body armour
The type of body armour selected for use is characterised by three primary factors: level of protection, actuarial concerns, and degree of functional impairment exerted by the system [47, 48]. Since neither level of protection nor cost are enhanced by systems with potential to improve mobility [49], effective body armour has been repeatedly shown to be ergonomically detrimental, specifically with respect to trunk posture [3, 30–32, 35]. GRF [3, 32, 36] universally deteriorated when participants in the included studies were wearing body armour. That is to say, that both fatigue and being in a loaded condition elevated GRF, with the combination of the two resulting in the most impact. With this in mind, a survey of 863 US Soldiers in Iraq [50] found a significant positive correlation between the duration for which Soldiers wore body armour each day and rates of musculoskeletal complaints, such that those who wore the body armour for four hours or more per day were at significantly greater risk. The musculoskeletal complaints ranged from neck and back to upper extremity musculoskeletal pain. For this reason, the weight and ergonomics of body armour systems should be closely evaluated when making equipment decisions.
Cognitive effects of wearing body armour
Heterogeneity limits cross-study comparisons of cognitive effects of wearing body armour in the broad tactical literature and across the studies included in this review. The studies included in this review used a variety of body armour types and configurations and measures of cognitive performance (e.g., unique word association tests, a variety of measures of fatigue levels, and wide-ranging equipment and loads). Nevertheless, one key finding from the included cognition studies is the finding that time and fatigue induced deteriorations in cognitive performance when personnel were carrying loads, including body armour [39]. If an armoured state can bring about fatigue more rapidly than a control state, as has been suggested by several pertinent studies included in this review [3, 23, 28, 36], then relationships between the armoured state, fatigue and cognition can be established. Other research, such as one study of ROTC cadets carrying an external load in the form of all-purpose, lightweight, individual, carrying equipment (ALICE) backpacks [51], has reported significant deterioration in executive, higher-level, mental processing when carrying load (examining tests of situational awareness wearing 30% of body weight). This finding, in conjunction with the aforementioned findings of this review, could be significant for both LEO and military populations, where critical thinking and decision making skills are vital, often for extended periods of time and under significant levels of stress.
Perceived impacts of body armour
Increases in RPE reported by participants when wearing body armour, when compared to their unloaded peers or unloaded time periods, revealed that even in the absence of quantitative measurement of physiological effects, individuals equipped with armour perceived more required effort in completing a task when wearing body armour, regardless of whether or not the subjects recruited were from a tactical background. These results were consistent with other research within the general field of load carriage where increased loading increase subjective ratings of effort [52]. In contrast, one review by Larsen, et. al. [53] found no consensus across reviewed study reports regarding exertion effects of wearing body armour, but this is likely because research considering non-tactical (Emergency Medical Services, firefighting) populations was included in the search strategy.
Thermal effects of wearing body armour
While increases observed in the included studies in core temperature due to wearing body armour were mild (0.5 °C), it should be emphasized that these outcomes were assessed independently of the physical activities within the study protocol. Specifically, time exposed to the hot-humid test condition and loaded state proved to be the variables most strongly associated with temperature deviation from the control values [33]. Therefore, although core temperatures associated with heat illness were not found in data obtained through this review, personnel operating in high heat and high humidity environments should receive special consideration with respect to exertional heat illness and limits on time on duty when equipped with body armour.
Limitations
One notable limitation of this review was the generally small number of participants in each study (ranging from 6 to 52 subjects, mean = 22.16, median = 17). Furthermore, when each sub field was considered in isolation, the relative participant size decreased further (e.g. thermal effects participant sizes of 9 [33] and 11 [34]). On this basis, the results should be considered with caution until larger studies (or a greater summation of smaller studies) can provide further supporting evidence.
Based on research quality and agreement across studies, this review determined that while effects of wearing body armour on marksmanship and various physiological parameters are still uncertain and deserving of further research, body armour does have significant biomechanical and physical performance impacts on the wearer, including: a) increased workload as assessed by a range of different physiological measures, b) decreased work capacity (measured as fitness test score deterioration), b) increased time to complete functional tasks, c) decreased balance and stability, d) increased GRF, e) increased RPE, and f) mild elevation of core temperatures. These occupationally-relevant performance decrements may also lead to decreased cognitive capability and increased injury risk. For this reason, body armour should be carefully selected, with consideration of the levels of physical conditioning of the wearers and the degree to which the armour system can be ergonomically optimized for the individual wearer.
We have no acknowledgements to add.
Funding
This critical review formed part of a larger scope of work which was partially funded by an Australian state law enforcement agency.
Availability of data and materials
The data is available from the corresponding author.
Authors’ contributions
Author’s contributions are as follows: All authors contributed to the conceptualisation and planning of the review and to the development of the search strategy. CT carried out the systematic search, study selection, data extraction, critical appraisal and drafted the manuscript. RO participated in the study selection, critical appraisal, cross checked data extraction and contributed to drafting the manuscript. RP settled any disagreements in critical appraisal and contributed to drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ALICE

All-purpose, lightweight, individual, carrying equipment

CAS

Critical appraisal score

CBRNE

Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive

GRF

Ground reaction forces

HRmax

Heart rate maximum

LEO

Law enforcement officer

PPE

Personal protective equipment

RER

Respiratory exchange ratio

ROTC

Reserve officer training corps

RPE

Rate/Rating of perceived exertion
  • 1. Bonneau J, Brown J. Physical ability, fitness and police work. J Clin Forensic Med 1995;2:157–64. 10.1016/1353-1131(95)90085-3. 15335647.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Bock C, Stierli M, Hinton B, Orr R. The Functional Movement Screen as a predictor of police recruit occupational task performance. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2016;20:310–5. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.11.006. 27210848.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Dempsey PC, Handcock PJ, Rehrer NJ. Impact of police body armour and equipment on mobility. Appl Ergon 2013;44:957–61. 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.011. 23668780.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Stubbs D, David G, Woods V, Beards S. Problems associated with police equipment carriage with body armour, including driving. Contemp Ergon 2008;2008:23.
  • 5. Carbone PD, Carlton SD, Stierli M, Orr RM. The impact of load carriage on the marksmanship of the tactical police officer: a pilot study. J Aust Strength and Cond 2014;22:50–7.
  • 6. Pryor RR, Colburn D, Crill MT, Hostler DP, Suyama J. Fitness characteristics of a suburban special weapons and tactics team. J Strength Cond Res 2012;26:752–7. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225f177. 22289693.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Orr R. The history of the soldier’s load. Aust Army J 2010;7:67–88.
  • 8. Gawande A. Casualties of war — military care for the wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2471–5. 10.1056/NEJMp048317. 15590948.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Orr RM, Pope R, Johnston V, Coyle J. Soldier occupational load carriage: a narrative review of associated injuries. Int J Inj Control Saf Promot 2014;21:388–96. 10.1080/17457300.2013.833944.Article
  • 10. Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Mil Med 2004;169:45–56. 10.7205/MILMED.169.1.45. 14964502.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Orr R, Pope R, Johnston V, Coyle J. Soldier self-reported reductions in task performance associated with operational load carriage. J Aust Strength Cond 2013;21:39–46.
  • 12. Gleeson M. Immune function in sport and exercise. J Appl Psychol 2007;103:693–9.Article
  • 13. Orr R, Pope R, Peterson S, Hinton B, Stierli M. Leg power as an indicator for risk of injury or illness in police recruits. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13:237–47. 10.3390/ijerph13020237. 26907311.PubMedPMC
  • 14. Carlton SD, Carbone PD, Stierli M, Orr RM. The impact of occupational load carriage on the mobility of the tactical police officer. J Aust Strength Cond 2014;22:32–7.
  • 15. Carlton SD, Orr RM. The impact of occupational load carriage on carrier mobility: a critical review of the literature. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2014;20:33–41. 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077025. 24629868.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Knapik JJ, Staab J, Bahrke M, Reynolds KL, Vogel JA, O’Connor J. Soldier performance and mood states following a strenuous road march. Mil Med 1991;156:197–200. 2030843.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Knapik JJ, Ang P, Meiselman H, et al. Soldier performance and strenuous road marching: influence of load mass and load distribution. Mil Med 1997;162:62–7. 9002707.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Rice VJ, Sharp M, Tharion WJ, Williamson T. Effects of a shoulder harness on litter carriage performance and post-carry fatigue of men and women. 1999, Natick: Military Performance Division US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine; 76.
  • 19. Knapik JJ, Bahrke M, Staab J, Reynolds KL, Vogel JA, O'Connor J. Frequency of loaded road march training and performance on a loaded road march. T13-90. 1990, Natick: Military Performance Division US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine; 52.
  • 20. Knapik J, Johnson R, Ang P, Meiselman H, Bensel C. Road march performance of special operations soldiers carrying various loads and load distributions. T14-93. 1993, Natick: Military Performance Division US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine; 136.
  • 21. Johnson RF, Knapik JJ, Merullo DJ. Symptoms during load carrying: effects of mass and load distribution during a 20-km road march. Percept Mot Skills 1995;81:331–8. 10.2466/pms.1995.81.1.331. 8532476.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 22. Mahoney CR, Hirsch E, Hasselquist L, Lesher LL, Lieberman HR. The effects of movement and physical exertion on soldier vigilance. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007;78:B51–7. 17547304.PubMed
  • 23. Ricciardi R, Deuster PA, Talbot LA. Metabolic demands of body armor on physical performance in simulated conditions. Mil Med 2008;173:817–24. 10.7205/MILMED.173.9.817. 18816920.ArticlePubMed
  • 24.
  • 25. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:377–84. 10.1136/jech.52.6.377. 9764259.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 26.
  • 27. Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Aubut J-A, et al. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence: method of the SCIRE systematic review. Aust J Phys 2002;48:43–9.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 28. Ricciardi R, Deuster PA, Talbot LA. Effects of gender and body adiposity on physiological responses to physical work while wearing body armor. Mil Med 2007;172:743–8. 10.7205/MILMED.172.7.743. 17691688.ArticlePubMed
  • 29. Swain DP, Onate JA, Ringleb SI, Naik DN, DeMaio M. Effects of training on physical performance wearing personal protective equipment. Mil Med 2010;175:664–70. 10.7205/MILMED-D-09-00198. 20882929.ArticlePubMed
  • 30. Sell TC, Pederson JJ, Abt JP, et al. The addition of body armor diminishes dynamic postural stability in military soldiers. Mil Med 2013;178:76–81. 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00185. 23356123.
  • 31. Phillips M, Bazrgari B, Shapiro R. The effects of military body armour on the lower back and knee mechanics during toe-touch and two-legged squat tasks. Ergonomics 2015;58:492–503. 10.1080/00140139.2014.970589. 25343226.ArticlePubMed
  • 32. Phillips MP, Shapiro R, Bazrgari B. The effects of military body armour on the lower back and knee mechanics during box drop and prone to standing tasks. Ergonomics 2016;59:682–91. 10.1080/00140139.2015.1081413. 26269149.ArticlePubMed
  • 33. Caldwell JN, Engelen L, van der Henst C, Patterson MJ, Taylor NAS. The interaction of body armor, low-intensity exercise, and hot-humid conditions on physiological strain and cognitive function. Mil Med 2011;176:488–93. 10.7205/MILMED-D-10-00010. 21634291.ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Larsen B, Netto K, Skovli D, Vincs K, Vu S, Aisbett B. Body armor, performance, and physiology during repeated high-intensity work tasks. Mil Med 2012;177:1308–15. 10.7205/MILMED-D-11-00435. 23198506.ArticlePubMed
  • 35. Lenton G, Aisbett B, Neesham-Smith D, Carvajal A, Netto K. The effects of military body armour on trunk and hip kinematics during performance of manual handling tasks. Ergonomics 2015;59(6):808–16.Article
  • 36. Dempsey PC, Handcock PJ, Rehrer NJ. Body armour: the effect of load, exercise and distraction on landing forces. J Sports Sci 2014;32:301–6. 10.1080/02640414.2013.823226. 24050682.ArticlePubMed
  • 37. Majumdar D, Srivastava KK, Purkayastha SS, Pichan G, Selvamurthy W. Physiological effects of wearing heavy body armour on male soldiers. Int J Ind Ergon 1997;20:155–61. 10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00057-1.Article
  • 38. Majchrzycka K, Brochocka A, Luczak A, Lężak K. Ergonomics assessment of composite ballistic inserts for bullet- and fragment-proof vests. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2013;19:387–96. 10.1080/10803548.2013.11076995. 24034881.ArticlePubMed
  • 39. Roberts APJ, Cole JC. The effects of exercise and body armor on cognitive function in healthy volunteers. Mil Med 2013;178:479–86. 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00385. 23756004.ArticlePubMed
  • 40. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;1:159–74. 10.2307/2529310.Article
  • 41.
  • 42. Orr R, Poke D, Stierli M, Hinton B. The perceived effect of load carriage on marksmanship in the tactical athlete. J Sci Med Sport 2015;18(6):98. 24485803.ArticlePubMed
  • 43. Frykman PN, Merullo DJ, Banderet LE, Gregorczyk K, Hasselquist L. Marksmanship deficits caused by an exhaustive whole-body lifting task with and without torso-borne loads. J Strength Cond Res 2012;26:S30–6. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825cedfa. 22614225.ArticlePubMed
  • 44. Hanlon W. Soldier performance and strenuous road marching: influence of load mass and load distribution. Mil Med 1997;162:62–7. 9002707.ArticlePubMed
  • 45. Frykman PN, Harman E, Pandorf CE. Correlates of obstacle course performance among female soldiers carrying two different loads, in: RTO meeting proceedings 56: soldier mobility: innovations in load carriage system design and evaluation. 2000, Research and Technology Organisation/North Atlantic Treaty Organization: Kingston.
  • 46. Roy TC, Knapik JJ, Ritland BM, Murphy N, Sharp MA. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries for soldiers deployed to Afghanistan. Aviat Space Environ Med 2012;83:1060–6. 10.3357/ASEM.3341.2012. 23156094.ArticlePubMed
  • 47. MacLeish KT. Armor and anesthesia: exposure, feeling, and the soldier’s body. Med Anthropol Q 2012;26:49–68. 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2011.01196.x. 22574391.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 48. Taylor NAS, Burdon CA, van den Heuvel AMJ, et al. Balancing ballistic protection against physiological strain: evidence from laboratory and field trials.. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016;41:117–24. 10.1139/apnm-2015-0386. 26771198.ArticlePubMed
  • 49. Wells J, Rupert N, Neal M. Impact damage analysis in a level III flexible body armor vest using XCT diagnostics. Ceram Eng Sci Proc 2009;30(5):171. 10.1002/9780470584330.ch16.Article
  • 50. Konitzer LN, Fargo MV, Brininger TL, Lim RM. Association between back, neck, and upper extremity musculoskeletal pain and the individual body armor. J Hand Ther 2008;21:143–8. 10.1197/j.jht.2007.10.017. 18436136.ArticlePubMed
  • 51. May B, Tomporowski PD, Ferrara M. Effects of backpack load on balance and decisional processes. Mil Med 2009;174:1308–12. 10.7205/MILMED-D-00-0809. 20055073.ArticlePubMed
  • 52. Vaananen M. The effects of a 4-day march on the lower extremities and hormone balance. Mil Med 1997;162:118–22. 9038031.PubMed
  • 53. Larsen B, Netto K, Aisbett B. The effect of body armor on performance, thermal stress, and exertion: a critical review. Mil Med 2011;176:1265–73. 10.7205/MILMED-D-10-00470. 22165654.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • U.S. Law Enforcement Officers’ Stress, Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Resilience: A National Sample
      Elizabeth A. Mumford, Weiwei Liu, Meghan S. O’Leary
      Police Quarterly.2025; 28(1): 104.     CrossRef
    • Sex-specific differences in fit between two different types of body armour: A pilot study
      Claire Buttner, Sharne-Louise Tiller, Nash Vollenweider, Elisa Canetti, Ben Schram, Jay Dawes, Robert Lockie, Robin Orr
      Nauka bezbednost policija.2025; 30(1): 64.     CrossRef
    • Exploring Damage and Penetration in Soft Armors Under Ballistic Impact Through a Novel and Efficient 3D Peridynamic Model
      Daud Ali Abdoh
      Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures.2025; 48(4): 1697.     CrossRef
    • Isometric muscle endurance, linear acceleration, and change–of–direction ability: What are the effects of the personal protective equipment used by special military forces?
      Francine De Oliveira, Haroldo Gualter Sant'Ana, Fábio Henrique de Freitas, Victor Gonçalves Corrêa Neto, Gabriel Andrade Paz, Geison Alves dos Santos, Jeff Chandler Velemem Alves, e Humberto Miranda
      Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2025; 44: 745.     CrossRef
    • Lightweight Textile and Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Soft Body Armor (SBA): Advances in Panel Design, Materials, and Testing Standards
      Mohammed Islam Tamjid, Mulat Alubel Abtew, Caroline Kopot
      Journal of Composites Science.2025; 9(7): 337.     CrossRef
    • Comparative studies of different fibre reinforced high-performance thermoplastic composite for ballistic application
      Kumbhar Avinash Suresh, Jithin Joshi, Sombit Mandal, Shantanu Bhowmik
      Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Protective Gear Negatively Impacts Police Officer Mobility, Stability, and Power Generation
      Katherine A. Frick, Philip J. Agostinelli, Frances K. Neal, Nicholas C. Bordonie, C. Brooks Mobley, JoEllen M. Sefton
      Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology.2025; 10(3): 344.     CrossRef
    • Exploring Law Enforcement Officers’ Experiences with Athletic Trainers and Work-Related Injury
      Stephanie Clines, Rubie Gaudette, Amanda Wheeler, Jennifer Ostrowski
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2025; 22(12): 1769.     CrossRef
    • Analysis of physical fitness tests for police officers in various countries: a scoping review
      Zhaohua Zhang, Jian He, Xiaohui Zhang, Liru Zhao, Yujian Deng
      Frontiers in Physiology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Women’s body armor: A comprehensive review of design, performance, and ergonomics
      Dinesh Bhatia, Priya Jaswal, SK Sinha
      Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • When Peace Officers Are Killed: Profile of Fatal Felonious Law Enforcement Traffic Stop Encounters in the United States
      Summer M. Jackson, Michelle Rippy
      American Journal of Criminal Justice.2024; 49(1): 100.     CrossRef
    • Evaluating the Variability Between 20-m Multistage Fitness Test Estimating Equations in Law Enforcement Recruits
      Patrick Campbell, Danny Maupin, Robert G. Lockie, J. Jay Dawes, Vinicius Simas, Elisa Canetti, Ben Schram, Robin Orr
      Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research.2024; 38(4): 742.     CrossRef
    • The comfort and functional performance of personal protective equipment for police officers: a systematic scoping review
      Sean Hudson, Leanne Ridland, Joanna Blackburn, Leanne Monchuk, Karen Ousey
      Ergonomics.2024; 67(10): 1317.     CrossRef
    • Relationships Between Strength and Power With the 74.84-kg (165-lb) and 90.72-kg (200-lb) Body Drags
      Matthew R. Moreno, J. Jay Dawes, Robin M. Orr, Joseph M. Dulla, Robert G. Lockie
      Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research.2024; 38(7): 1305.     CrossRef
    • Paramento Policial: uma revisão
      Mara Luiza Gonçalves Freias
      Revista Brasileira de Criminalística.2024; 13(1): 17.     CrossRef
    • Biomotor Abilities for Law Enforcement Officer Readiness
      Luís Monteiro, Vanessa Santos, Mark G. Abel, Emily L. Langford, Gabriel J. Martinez, Luís Miguel Massuça
      Applied Sciences.2024; 14(7): 3004.     CrossRef
    • Exploring the life contexts of patrolling police officers in the European Union – A scoping review
      Elin Granholm Valmari, Mehdi Ghazinour, Ulla Nygren, Kajsa Gilenstam
      Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy.2023; 30(5): 585.     CrossRef
    • Occupational injuries and illnesses among law enforcement officers, 2001−2019: Findings from the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
      Hope M. Tiesman, Srinivas Konda, Steven J. Wurzelbacher, Steven J. Naber, Wesley R. Attwood
      American Journal of Industrial Medicine.2023; 66(12): 1079.     CrossRef
    • Wearable Safeguarding Leather Composite with Excellent Sensing, Thermal Management, and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding
      Ziyang Fan, Liang Lu, Min Sang, Jianpeng Wu, Xinyi Wang, Feng Xu, Xinglong Gong, Tianzhi Luo, Ken Cham‐Fai Leung, Shouhu Xuan
      Advanced Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Effect of the Law Enforcement Duty Belt on Muscle Activation during Hip Hinging Movements in Young, Healthy Adults
      James W. Kearney, Megan N. Sax van der Weyden, Nelson Cortes, Orlando Fernandes, Joel R. Martin
      Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology.2023; 8(3): 99.     CrossRef
    • Preliminary Study of 3-D Dynamic Interactions Between Backpack and Bearer for Health Monitoring Using a Multiple Sensor Method
      Kunyang Wang, Lei Ren, Richard Jones, Chris Nester, David Howard, Guowu Wei, Zhihui Qian, Xuewei Lu, Di Zhao, Luquan Ren
      IEEE Sensors Journal.2023; 23(24): 31098.     CrossRef
    • Kevlar®, Nomex®, and VAR Modification by Small Organic Molecules Anchoring: Transfusing Antibacterial Properties and Improving Water Repellency
      Efrosyni Frousiou, Efstathios Tonis, Georgios Rotas, Anna Pantelia, Savvas G. Chalkidis, Nikolaos S. Heliopoulos, Antonia Kagkoura, Dionysios Siamidis, Angeliki Galeou, Anastasia Prombona, Kostas Stamatakis, Nikos Boukos, Georgios C. Vougioukalakis
      Molecules.2023; 28(14): 5465.     CrossRef
    • Physical Fitness and Psychosocial Profiles of Policewomen from Professional Training Courses and Bodyguard Special Police Sub-Unit
      Mariana Carrilho, Vanessa Santos, André Rasteiro, Luís Miguel Massuça
      European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education.2023; 13(9): 1880.     CrossRef
    • Effects of load carriage on measures of postural sway in healthy, young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
      Joel Martin, James Kearney, Sara Nestrowitz, Adam Burke, Megan Sax van der Weyden
      Applied Ergonomics.2023; 106: 103893.     CrossRef
    • Evaluation of physical health, mental wellbeing, and injury in a UK Police Firearms unit
      Eddie Bradley, Saeed Fayaz, Chris Farish, Morc Coulson
      Police Practice and Research.2023; 24(2): 232.     CrossRef
    • Ergonomic impact of prehospital clinicians using body armour: A qualitative study
      Duncan T. Ritchie, Christopher Doyle
      Applied Ergonomics.2023; 108: 103947.     CrossRef
    • Life contexts among patrolling police officers in the European Union, investigating environmental characteristics and health – A protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review
      Elin Granholm Valmari, Mehdi Ghazinour, Ulla Nygren, Kajsa Gilenstam
      Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy.2023; 30(7): 1135.     CrossRef
    • The effects of equipment carriage on functional movement quality among law enforcement officers
      Brandy Ramaj Jewett, Colin Tomes, Kristin Voigt, G. Monique Mokha
      Ergonomics.2023; 66(12): 2277.     CrossRef
    • Profiling the Typical Training Load of a Law Enforcement Recruit Class
      Danny Maupin, Ben Schram, Elisa F. D. Canetti, Joseph M. Dulla, J. Jay Dawes, Robert G. Lockie, Robin M. Orr
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(20): 13457.     CrossRef
    • Physiological Demands of Common Occupational Tasks among Australian Police Officers: A Descriptive Analysis
      Amy Decker, Benjamin Hilton, Jay Dawes, Robert Lockie, Robin M Orr
      Annals of Work Exposures and Health.2022; 66(7): 960.     CrossRef
    • Auxetic Materials for Personal Protection: A Review
      Danish Tahir, Minglonghai Zhang, Hong Hu
      physica status solidi (b).2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Identifying the Physical Fitness and Health Evaluations for Police Officers: Brief Systematic Review with an Emphasis on the Portuguese Research
      Luís M. Massuça, Vanessa Santos, Luís F. Monteiro
      Biology.2022; 11(7): 1061.     CrossRef
    • Profiling the New Zealand Police Trainee Physical Competency Test
      J. Jay Dawes, Jordan Scott, Elisa F. D. Canetti, Robert G. Lockie, Ben Schram, Robin M. Orr
      Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The current nature of police officer fatalities in Australia and opportunities for prevention
      Kelly A. Hine, Samantha Carey
      Current Issues in Criminal Justice.2021; 33(2): 191.     CrossRef
    • Relationship Between Metabolic Fitness and Performance in Police Occupational Tasks
      Elisa F. D. Canetti, J. Jay Dawes, Phoebe H. Drysdale, Robert Lockie, Charlie Kornhauser, Ryan Holmes, Ben Schram, Robin M. Orr
      Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise.2021; 3(2): 179.     CrossRef
    • Skeletal Muscle Mass and Fat Mass Relationships With Physical Fitness Test Performance in Law Enforcement Recruits Before Academy
      Robert G. Lockie, Blake N. Carlock, Tomas J. Ruvalcaba, Joseph M. Dulla, Robin M. Orr, J. Jay Dawes, Megan B. McGuire
      Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research.2021; 35(5): 1287.     CrossRef
    • Influence of Wearing Ballistic Vests on Physical Performance of Danish Police Officers: A Cross-Over Study
      Henrik Koblauch, Mette K. Zebis, Mikkel H. Jacobsen, Bjarki T. Haraldsson, Klaus P. Klinge, Tine Alkjær, Jesper Bencke, Lars L. Andersen
      Sensors.2021; 21(5): 1795.     CrossRef
    • The effects of fatiguing exercise and load carriage on the perception and initiation of movement
      Caleb D. Johnson, Shawn R. Eagle, Bradley C. Nindl, Mita T. Lovalekar, Shawn D. Flanagan, Gert‐Jan Pepping, Christopher Connaboy
      European Journal of Sport Science.2021; 21(1): 36.     CrossRef
    • Relationships Between Heart Rate Variability, Occupational Performance, and Fitness for Tactical Personnel: A Systematic Review
      Colin Tomes, Ben Schram, Robin Orr
      Frontiers in Public Health.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Developing the Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits during Academy Training
      Danny J. Maupin, Ben Schram, Elisa F. D. Canetti, Jay J. Dawes, Robert Lockie, Robin M. Orr
      Sustainability.2020; 12(19): 7944.     CrossRef
    • Methods for improving thermal tolerance in military personnel prior to deployment
      Edward Tom Ashworth, James David Cotter, Andrew Edward Kilding
      Military Medical Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The physical competence test of the Dutch National Police: The effects of wearing a police uniform on test performance
      Matthijs Koedijk, Hessel F. Stuurman, Peter G. Renden, R.I. (Vana) Hutter, Marian Strating, Raôul R. D. Oudejans
      Police Practice and Research.2020; 21(3): 264.     CrossRef
    • Sustainable solutions to mitigate occupational heat strain – an umbrella review of physiological effects and global health perspectives
      Nathan B. Morris, Ollie Jay, Andreas D. Flouris, Ana Casanueva, Chuansi Gao, Josh Foster, George Havenith, Lars Nybo
      Environmental Health.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The Interaction Between Physical and Psychosocial Stressors
      Esraa S. Abdelall, Zoe Eagle, Tor Finseth, Ahmad A. Mumani, Zhonglun Wang, Michael C. Dorneich, Richard T. Stone
      Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Ability of fitness testing to predict injury risk during initial tactical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
      Colin D Tomes, Sally Sawyer, Robin Orr, Ben Schram
      Injury Prevention.2020; 26(1): 67.     CrossRef
    • Association between Body Fat Percentage and Physical Performance in Male Korean Police Officers
      Jooyoung Kim, Wi-Young So, Sangwoon Kim
      Sustainability.2020; 12(9): 3868.     CrossRef
    • The effects of body armour on mobility and postural control of police officers
      Ben Schram, Robin Orr, Ben Hinton, Geoff Norris, Rodney Pope
      Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2020; 24(3): 190.     CrossRef
    • Effects of Personal Protective Equipment on the Performance of Federal Highway Policemen in Physical Fitness Tests
      Eduardo F. Marins, Leo Cabistany, Charles Bartel, Jay Dawes, Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio
      Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research.2020; 34(1): 11.     CrossRef
    • A Comparative Analysis of Physical Fitness in Korean Police Officers: Focus on Results between 2014 to 2019
      Sangwoon Kim, Jooyoung Kim
      Exercise Science.2019; 28(4): 396.     CrossRef
    • The effects of body armour on the power development and agility of police officers
      Ben Schram, Robin Orr, Ben Hinton, Rodney Pope, Geoff Norris
      Ergonomics.2019; 62(10): 1349.     CrossRef
    • Underwater space suit performance assessments part 2: Reach envelopes as a comparative performance metric
      K. Han Kim, Yaritza Hernandez, Elizabeth Benson, Sarah Jarvis, Ian Meginnis, Sudhakar Rajulu
      International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.2019; 73: 102832.     CrossRef
    • The Impact of Backpack Loads on School Children: A Critical Narrative Review
      Michelle Perrone, Robin Orr, Wayne Hing, Nikki Milne, Rodney Pope
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2018; 15(11): 2529.     CrossRef
    • Effect of Load Carriage on Tactical Performance in Special Weapons and Tactics Operators
      Matthew Thomas, Michael B. Pohl, Robert Shapiro, Jason Keeler, Mark G. Abel
      Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research.2018; 32(2): 554.     CrossRef
    • Comparing the Effects of Different Body Armor Systems on the Occupational Performance of Police Officers
      Ben Schram, Robin Orr, Rodney Pope, Ben Hinton, Geoff Norris
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2018; 15(5): 893.     CrossRef
    • The perceived effects and comfort of various body armour systems on police officers while performing occupational tasks
      B. Schram, B. Hinton, R. Orr, R. Pope, G. Norris
      Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      The impact of body armor on physical performance of law enforcement personnel: a systematic review
      Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017;29:14  Published online May 16, 2017
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-017-0169-9
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    Related articles
    The impact of body armor on physical performance of law enforcement personnel: a systematic review
    Image
    Fig. 1 PRISMA diagram detailing search process

    Fig. 1

    The impact of body armor on physical performance of law enforcement personnel: a systematic review
    DatabaseTerms
    body armourPopulationOutcome measures
    Medline Complete(armour OR armor OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bulletproof vest” OR “ballistic vests” OR “tactical vests” OR “bulletproof vests” OR “protective clothing”)AND(“Police”[Mesh] OR “Military Personnel”[Mesh] OR “Military Science”[Mesh] OR “Military Medicine”[Mesh] OR military OR soldier OR officer OR police OR law enforcement OR Army OR Navy OR naval OR “Armed Forces” OR security OR Guard* OR tactic* OR combat OR “special forces” OR “special operations” or defense OR defence)AND(“Exercise”[Mesh] OR “Physical Exertion”[Mesh] OR “Physical Fitness”[Mesh] OR “Work Performance”[Mesh] OR “Task Performance and Analysis”[Mesh] OR “Biomechanical Phenomena”[Mesh] OR exercise OR exertion OR performance OR biomechanic* OR endurance OR fitness OR strength OR conditioning OR “movement analysis” OR kinematic* OR mechanic* OR task* OR training)
    CINAHL(armour OR armor OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bulletproof vest” “ballistic vests” OR “tactical vests” OR “bulletproof vests” OR “protective clothing”)AND((MH “Police”) OR (MH “Military Personnel”) OR (MH “Military Recruits”) OR (MH “Research, Military”) OR (MH “Military Training”) OR (MH “Military Services”) OR (MH “Military Medicine”) OR military OR soldier OR officer OR police OR law enforcement OR Army OR Navy OR “Armed Forces” OR security OR Guard* OR tactic* OR combat OR “special forces” OR “special operations” or defense OR defence))AND((MH “Exercise”) OR (MH “Resistance Training”) OR (MH “Physical Fitness”) OR performance OR tactic* OR biomechanic* OR exertion OR endurance OR fitness OR strength OR conditioning OR “movement analysis” OR kinematic* OR mechanic* OR task* OR training)
    SPORTDiscus(armour OR armor OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bulletproof vest” OR “ballistic vests” OR “tactical vests” OR “bulletproof vests” OR “protective clothing”)AND(military OR soldier OR officer OR police OR law enforcement OR Army OR Navy OR naval OR “Armed Forces” OR security OR Guard* OR tactic* OR combat OR ”special forces” OR “special operations” or defense OR defence)AND(exercise OR exertion OR performance OR biomechanic* OR endurance OR fitness OR strength OR conditioning OR “movement analysis” OR kinematic* OR mechanic* OR task* OR training)
    EMBASE(‘body armor’/exp OR armour OR armor OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bullet proof vest” OR “ballistic vest” OR “tactical vest” OR “bulletproof vest” OR “protective clothing”)AND(‘military phenomena’/exp OR ‘police’/exp OR military OR soldier OR officer OR police OR law enforcement OR Army OR Navy OR naval OR “Armed Forces” OR security OR Guard* OR tactic* OR combat OR “special forces” OR “special operations” or defense OR defence)AND(‘exercise’/exp OR ‘physical performance’/exp OR ‘athletic performance’/exp OR ‘biomechanics’/exp OR ‘kinematics’/exp OR ‘training’/exp OR exercise OR exertion OR performance OR biomechanic* OR endurance OR fitness OR strength OR conditioning OR “movement analysis” OR kinematic* OR mechanic* OR task* OR training)
    Title/AuthorParticipantsEquipmentVariablesInterventionMain FindingsCAS a (%)
    Caldwell, et. al. 2011 [33]
    The interaction of body armour, low-intensity exercise, and hot-humid conditions on physiological strain and cognitive function    		 n = 9
    Mean ± SD Age: 27.3 ± 5.43 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 180.3 ± 5.11 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 79.4 ± 11.3 kg
    Healthy, Active Male University students (AU b)    		AU standard issue kevlar vest with ceramic plate inserts (6.07 kg)
    Rabintex industries ballistic helmet (1.29 kg)    		IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, environmental conditions (Hot-Humid)
    DEP e: Body temp, HR k, RPEf, vigilance, reaction time    		2.5 h simulated patrol in hot-humid conditions• Loaded condition did not induce heat illness (no core temp. >39.5 °C)
    • Progressive divergence between loaded and unloaded cardiovascular strain (p = 0.01)
    • Armour significantly increases RPE f (p = 0.02)
    • No significant change in cognitive function between loaded &unloaded conditions (p > 0.05)    		67.9
    Carbone, et. al. 2014 [5]
    The impact of load carriage on the marksmanship of the tactical police officer: a pilot study    		 n = 6
    Mean ± SD Age: 33.3 ± 4.13 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 177.0 ± 11.8 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 89.2 ± 13.2 kg
    Mean ± SD years of experience in the police force: 10.9 ± 5.1 year
    Active male officers of a police Tactical Operations Unit (AU b)    		Body armour, helmet, primary (M4) and secondary (9 mm Glock) weapons
    (22.8 ± 1.8 kg)    		IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
    DEP e: Marksmanship accuracy    		Police marksmanship test: one static shoot, and one tactical mobile shoot• No significant difference in shooting results between loaded and unloaded conditions (p > 0.05)71.4
    Carlton, et. al. 2014 [14]
    The Impact of Occupational Load Carriage on the Mobility of the Tactical Police Officer    		 n = 6
    Mean ± SD Age: 33.3 ± 4.13 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 177.0 ± 11.8 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 89.2 ± 13.2 kg
    Mean ± SD years of experience in the police force: 10.9 ± 5.1 year
    Active male officers of a police Tactical Operations Unit (AU b)    		Body armour, helmet, primary (M4) and secondary (9 mm Glock) weapons
    (22.8 ± 1.8 kg)    		IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
    DEP e: Speed and mobility during test course    		10 m in line sprint
    25 m simulated patrol
    Two 10 m dummy (70 kg) drags    		• Time to complete the tactical movement task increased with load (mean ± SD time unloaded = 18.59 ± 2.44 s: loaded = 19.89 ± 1.61 s) and officers were significantly slower (p < 0.01) during the dummy drag mobility task when loaded (mean ± SD time unloaded = 9.29 ± 0.53 s: loaded = 10.25 ± 0.77 s)71.4
    Dempsey, et. al. 2013 [3]
    Impact of police body armour and equipment on mobility    		 n = 52
    Mean ± SD Age: 37 ± 9.16 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 180.68 ± 6.12 years
    Mean ± SD Weight: 90.21 ± 11.59
    Mean ± SD BMI v: 27.61 SD 3.09
    Healthy Male Police Officers (NZ c)    		Fitted stab-resistant body armour and simulated duty gear (7.65 ± 0.73 kg)IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, fatigued or unfatigued state
    DEP e: Balance, grappling, functional mobility task performance, chin up repetitions    		Timed stabilometer balance task
    Simulated vehicle exit/sprint
    Grappling bag exercise
    Max rep. Of chin-ups    		• Time off balance increased 2.42 s on average when loaded (p < 0.001)
    • Average acceleration time increased 0.28 s on average when loaded (p < 0.001)
    • Average TTC h for grappling bag exercise increased 1.89 s on average when loaded (p < 0.001)
    • 2.86 Fewer chin-ups were completed when loaded (p < 0.001)    		78.6
    Dempsey, et.al 2014 [36]
    Body Armour: the effect of load exercise and distraction on landing forces    		 n = 52
    Mean ± SD Age: 37 ± 9.16 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 180.68 ± 6.12 years
    Mean ± SD Weight: 90.21 ± 11.59
    Mean ± SD BMI v: 27.61 SD 3.09
    Healthy Male Police Officers (NZ c)    		Fitted stab-resistant body armour and simulated duty gear (7.65 ± 0.73 kg)IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, fatigued or unfatigued state
    DEP e: Ground reaction force, jump height    		Fatigued and non-fatigued force plate measurements of a max vertical jump, drop landing, predictable and unpredictable jump tasks following drop landing• Jump height reduced when loaded (p < 0.001)
    • GRF increased when loaded (p < 0.001)
    • Fatigue contributes additional GRF and jump height loss (p < 0.001)    		85.7
    Larsen, et. al. 2012 [34]
    Body Armour, Performance, and Physiology During Repeated High-Intensity Work Tasks    		 n = 11
    Mean ± SD Age: 22 ± 2 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 185 ± 10 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 77 ± 14 kg
    Healthy, recreationally active males University Students (US p)    		Protective chest plate with integral extremity protection (16.98 ± 1 kg)
    Military helmet (0.5 kg)    		IND d: Armoured or unarmoured condition
    DEP e: Shooting accuracy, vaulting, crawling, box lifting, body temperature    		Timed trial of military task circuit course• Body Temperature increased in the armoured condition (0.50 ± 0.41 °C) (p = 0.02)
    • RPE f was 1 ± 0 higher in the armoured condition (p < 0.01)
    • No other test variables reached statistical significance (p > 0.05)    		75.0
    Lenton, et. al. 2015 [35]
    The effects of military body armour on trunk and hip kinematics during performance of manual handling tasks    		 n = 16
    Mean ± SD Age: 22 ± 1
    Mean ± SD Height: 180 ± 8 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 74.9 ± 7.5 kg
    Healthy, active male University students (AU b)    		Modular Combat Armour System (8.6 kg)
    Tiered Body Armour System 1(7.0 kg)
    Tiered Body Armour System 2(7.3 kg)
    Tiered Body Armour System 3(6.4 kg)    		IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, body armour configuration worn
    DEP e: Average flexion angle, trunk rotation ROM w     		Ammunition box lift and place
    Ammunition box Lower and place
    Sandbag lift and place
    Each task assessed with a 12 camera motion capture system    		• No significant differences between armour configuration (p > 0.05)
    • Any loaded condition significantly decreased trunk rotation ROM w (p < 0.001)
    • Any loaded condition increased flexion (p < 0.001)    		60.7
    Majchrzycka, et. al. 2013 [28]
    Ergonomics Assessment of Composite Ballistic Inserts for Bullet- and Fragment-Proof Vests    		 n = 10
    Mean ± SD Age: 32.07 ± 2.1 year
    Mean ± SD Height: 183.0 ± 6.8 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 85.5 ± 9.8 kg
    Healthy, military males (Poland)    		One of three front ballistic plate inserts only within a standard tactical vest
    Plate WKP x 112(2.10 kg)
    Plate WKP x 14(3.18 kg)
    Standard Plate (2.40 kg)    		IND d: Which of 3 unique ballistic plates was being worn
    DEP e: Subjective ergonomics, Grandjean scale, attention/perceptiveness, complex reaction time    		Battery of questions, assessment of cognitive function, completion of functional tasks• Although inconclusive, the lightest plate was rated the highest in subjective scoring
    • No conclusive changes in cognitive function across the tested plates    		75
    Majumdar, et. al. 1997 [37]
    Physiological Effects of Wearing Body Armour on Male Soldiers    		Studies I, II:
    n = 6
    Mean ± SD Age: 29.3 ± 4.08 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 166 ± 5.9 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 58.5 ± 6.92 kg
    Healthy male Soldiers (India)
    Study III:
    n = 16
    Mean ± SD Age: 31.5 ± 5.24 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 167.9 ± 6.15 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 62.8 ± 6.92
    Healthy male Soldiers (India)    		11.0 kg metallic plate vest with foam backing (Indian Standard Issue)IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
    DEP e: Treadmill test performance, hot-humid exposure step test performance and pulmonary function    		2.22 m/s, 10 m flat treadmill walk
    20 m resting followed by 40 m light exercise in 34 °C, 60% humidity conditions
    Measurement of FE j, FVC g and max voluntary ventilation    		• Physiological values of HR k, and VO2 l all showed significantly greater exertion in the loaded state (p < 0.01)
    • Pulmonary function deteriorated in the loaded condition (p < 0.001)    		71.4
    Phillips, et. al. 2015 [31]
    The Effects of Military Body Armour on the Lower Back and Knee Kinematics During Toe-Touch and Two-Legged Squat Tasks    		Males: n = 12
    Mean ± SD Age: 26.67 ± 5.47 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 179 ± 5 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 78.77 ± 9.41 kg
    Females: n = 12
    Mean ± SD Age: 24 ± 5.02
    Mean ± SD Height: 166 ± 10 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 61.54 ± 7.38 kg
    Healthy University Students (US p)    		10.81 kg armour setup consisting of front and back ceramic plates only in a military vestIND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, fatigued or non-fatigued state
    DEP e: Lower back and Knee kinematics    		Kinematic motion capture examinations of Toe-touch and 2-legged squat tasks both before and after 45 m treadmill walking at 1.65 m/sPre Exercise:
    • duration of self-paced motion capture tests increased (p ≤ 0.02)
    • Increased time spent in flexion at both joints (p ≤ 0.02)
    Post-Exercise:
    • Small but significant effects on duration of motion capture tests (p = 0.03)
    • Increased time spent in flexion at both joints (p ≤ 0.04)    		78.6
    Phillips, et. al. 2016 [32]
    The Effects of Military Body Armour on the Lower Back and Knee Mechanics During Box Drop and Prone to Standing Tasks    		Males: n = 12
    Mean ± SD Age: 26.67 ± 5.47 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 179 ± 5 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 78.77 ± 9.41 kg
    Females: n = 12
    Mean ± SD Age: 24 ± 5.02
    Mean ± SD Height: 166 ± 10 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 61.54 ± 7.38 kg    		10.81 kg armour setup consisting of front and back ceramic plates only in a military vestIND d: Loaded or unloaded condition, fatigued or non-fatigued state
    DEP e: Lower back and Knee kinematics    		Kinematic motion capture examinations of box drop and prone-to-standing tasks both before and after 45 m treadmill walking at 1.65 m/sPre-Exercise:
    • The loaded state increased GRF i, time to completion and time spent in flexion (p ≤ 0.02)
    Post-Exercise:
    • Thorax posture was at an increased angle for females and a reduced angle for males (p = 0.05)    		78.6
    Ricciardi, et. al. 2007 [28]
    Effects of Gender and Body Adiposity on Physiological Responses to Physical Work While Wearing Body Armour    		Males: n = 17
    Mean ± SD Age: 31.9 ± 4.1 year
    Mean ± SD Height: 173.6 ± 4.8 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 78.5 ± 14.9 kg
    Females: n = 17
    Mean ± SD Age: 30.4 ± 4.8 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 163.8 ± 5.1 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 62.1 ± 9.4 kg
    Healthy, active, military personnel (US p)    		Interceptor Outer Tactical Vest (7.8–11 kg)IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
    DEP e: Graded treadmill test performance, blood lactate levels, physical performance battery outcome    		Measurement of physiological metrics and recorded perceived exertion of each subject when performing a graded treadmill & military PT m test• All subjects showed decreased performance and increased physiological strain when equipped with body armour (p ≤ 0.04)
    • No significant effect of gender on physiological parameters (p > 0.05)
    • Women reported a higher RPE f than men (p = 0.018)    		64.3
    Ricciardi, et. al. 2008 [23]
    Metabolic Demands of Body Armour on Physical Performance in Simulated Stress Conditions    		Males: n = 17
    Mean ± SD Age: 31.9 ± 4.1 year
    Mean ± SD Height: 173.6 ± 4.8 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 78.5 ± 14.9 kg
    Females: n = 17
    Mean ± SD Age: 30.4 ± 4.8 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 163.8 ± 5.1 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 62.1 ± 9.4 kg
    Healthy, active, military personnel (US p)    		Interceptor Outer Tactical Vest (7.8–11 kg)IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
    DEP e: Treadmill test performance, hand grip strength, stair step test performance and pull-ups/hang-time    		Subjects participated in 2 test sessions, either with or without body armour and completed the physical performance battery• Significantly increased physiological strain during treadmill testing (p < 0.001)
    • Stair stepping and pull-ups/hang time were decreased in the loaded state (p < .0025), and no change in handgrip strength was noted    		75.0
    Roberts, et. al. 2013 [39]
    The Effect of Exercise and Body Armour on Cognitive Function in Healthy Volunteers    		Study 1:
    n = 40
    Mean ± SD Age: 20.8 ± 1.7 years
    Healthy male University Students (US p)
    Study 2:
    n = 20
    Mean ± SD Age: 26.6 ± 6.2 years
    Healthy male University students (US p)    		S203 Tactical Vest
    F6 PASGT n Helmet    		IND d: Brief or extended exercise, loaded or unloaded condition
    DEP e: Heart rate, oral temp, cognitive function    		Study 1: Determine the level of exercise necessary to observe a change in cognitive function
    Study 2: Physiological variables and cognitive function    		• No effect on oral temperature
    • Loaded condition significantly increased HR k (p < 0.05)
    • Time, but not loaded condition affected cognitive performance (p < 0.05)    		64.3
    Sell, et. al. 2013 [30]
    The Addition of Body Armour Diminishes Dynamic Postural Stability in Military Soldiers    		 n = 36 (4 females, 32 males)
    Mean ± SD Age: 29 ± 6.6 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 174.49 ± 8.84 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 82.38 ± 13.93 kg
    Healthy, active Airborne Infantry Soldiers (US p)    		Standard US Army ACU q Uniform
    Standard issue US Army Body Armour (Mean ± SD weight 12.47 ± 2.56 kg)    		IND d: Loaded or unloaded condition
    DEP e: Dynamic postural stability    		Force plate analysis of a single leg jumping task• The loaded condition resulted in significantly less dynamic postural stability (p < 0.001)71.4
    Swain, et. al. 2010 [29]
    Effects of Training on Physical Performance Wearing Personal Protective Equipment    		Vest Group:
    n = 17 (9 females, 8 males)
    Mean ± SD Age: 22.8 ± 2.5 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 171 ± 7 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 72.6 ± 12.9
    Mean ± SD BMI: 24.7 ± 3.6
    Healthy, active, male university students (US p)
    Control Group:
    n = 20 (9 females 11 males)
    Mean ± SD Age: 21.9 ± 2.4 years
    Mean ± SD Height: 174 ± 8 cm
    Mean ± SD Weight: 74.8 ± 14.2 kg
    Mean ± SD BMI: 24.6 ± 3.4
    Healthy, active female university students (US p)    		Small, medium or large ballistic vest with inserts (US p standard issue)
    US p standard issue ballistic helmet
    Total ensemble mean ± SD mass: 11.7 ± 2.8 kg    		IND d: Training with or without the ballistic vest/helmet
    DEP e: FEV j, VO2max s, RER t, HRmax u, USMC r PRT o values    		6 week USMC r-styled physical training regimen either with or without armour• HRmax u decreased slightly but significantly (p = 0.01) in both groups
    • VO2max s increased ~2× for the vest group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.16)
    • No changes in FEV j
    • Slight but significant (p = 0.01) decrease in RER t in both groups
    • Both groups significantly improved PRT scores (push-ups, sit-ups, pull-ups, and 3-mile run) following training (p < 0.001)    		82.1
    Table 1 Keywords, subject headings and arrangement of terms searched by database

    Table 2 Summary of critically reviewed literature by author and title

    Legend by order of appearance

    a CAS: Critical Appraisal Score

    b AU: Australia

    c NZ: New Zealand

    d IND: Independent

    e DEP: Dependent

    f RPE: Rating of Perceived Exertion

    g FVC: Forced Vital Capacity

    h TTC: Time to Completion

    i GRF: Ground Reaction Forces

    j FEV: Forced Expiratory Volume

    k HR: Heart Rate

    l VO2: Volume of Oxygen

    m PT: Physical Training

    n PASGT: Personnel Armour System for Ground Troops

    o PRT: Physical Readiness Test

    p US: United States of America

    q ACU: Army Combat Uniform

    r USMC: United States Marine Corps

    s VO2max: Maximal Volume of Oxygen

    t RER: Respiratory Exchange Ratio

    u HRmax: Heart Rate Maximum

    v BMI: Body Mass Index

    w ROM: Range of Motion

    x WKP: A brand of ballistic armour inserts

    Table 1

    Table 2

    Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
    © Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine.
    Close layer
    TOP