Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Ki-Hun Kim 2 Articles
Case Report
Multiple chemical sensitivity triggered by an automobile mechanic's indirect exposure to volatile organic compounds in the Republic of Korea: a case report
Dong-Hoon Cheon, Yoon-Ji Kim, Dongmug Kang, Youngki Kim, Eun-Soo Lee, Ki-Hun Kim, Se-Yeong Kim
Ann Occup Environ Med 2026;38:e7.   Published online February 26, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2026.38.e7
AbstractAbstract AbstractAbstract in Korean PDF
Background
Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) lacks definitive biomarkers, making differential diagnosis reliant on exclusion and symptom reproducibility. In automobile repair shops, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from cleaning agents pose risks not only to primary users but also to co-workers via indirect exposure. We report a case of MCS suspected to be triggered solely by bystander VOC exposure, highlighting the clinical significance of uncaptured peak exposures in Korea.
Case presentation
A 23-year-old mechanic experienced recurrent headaches, throat irritation, and nausea immediately after co-workers used aerosolized cleaners in a poorly ventilated workspace. Symptoms consistently improved when he was away from work. Routine clinical evaluations were unremarkable. Although the patient underwent surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis, the symptoms persisted specifically upon re-exposure, effectively ruling out structural otorhinolaryngologic causes. Mental health screening indicated only mild depressive symptoms, insufficient to account for the severity of the physical symptoms. The Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI) scores were in the "suggestive" range for MCS. While routine workplace monitoring (8-hour time-weighted average [TWA]) showed non-detectable solvent levels, the nature of aerosol application suggested uncaptured short-term peak exposures. Based on the distinct temporal relationship, the patient was placed under medical observation and assessed as fit for work with restrictions on solvent exposure.
Conclusions
This case highlights the role of indirect VOC exposure as a trigger for MCS symptoms even when routine TWA monitoring indicates minimal concentrations. The discrepancy likely stems from the brief peak exposures triggering central sensitization, underscoring the limitations of standard monitoring. Management strategies must focus on peak-exposure control and fitness-for-work assessments that mandate strict avoidance of organic solvents, regardless of average ambient concentrations.
국내 자동차 정비사의 휘발성 유기화합물 간접 노출에 의해 유발된 다중화학물질과민증: 증례 보고
배경
다중화학물질과민증(Multiple Chemical Sensitivity, MCS)은 명확한 바이오마커가 부족하여 배제 진단과 증상의 재현성에 의존하여 진단된다. 자동차 정비 현장에서 발생하는 휘발성 유기화합물(VOCs)은 직접 사용자뿐만 아니라 간접 노출되는 주변 작업자에게도 건강상의 위험을 초래한다. 본 저자들은 한국의 일반적인 작업환경측정 체계에서 포착되지 않는 단기 피크 노출(peak exposure)의 임상적 중요성을 강조하며, 간접 노출에 의해 유발된 MCS 사례를 보고하고자 한다.
증례
보고: 23세 남성 정비사가 환기가 불충분한 작업장에서 동료들이 에어로졸 세정제를 사용할 때마다 반복적인 두통, 인후 자극 및 오심을 경험하였다. 증상은 작업장을 벗어났을 때 일관되게 호전되는 양상을 보였다. 일반적인 임상 검사 결과는 정상 범위였으며, 만성 비부비동염 수술 후에도 유기용제 재노출 시 증상이 지속되어 이비인후과적 구조적 원인은 배제되었다. 정신건강 스크리닝 결과는 경미한 우울 증상만을 보였으며, 이는 신체 증상의 심각성을 설명하기에 불충분하였다. 한국판 QEESI(Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory) 설문 결과 MCS '시사(Suggestive)' 범위에 해당하였다. 작업환경측정 결과(8시간 시간가중평균, TWA)는 유기용제 불검출 수준이었으나, 에어로졸 사용 특성상 측정되지 않은 단기 피크 노출이 의심되었다. 뚜렷한 시간적 인과관계를 바탕으로 환자는 의학적 관찰 대상이 되었으며, 유기용제 노출 제한을 조건으로 '조건부 작업 적합' 판정을 받았다.
결론
본 증례는 통상적인 TWA 측정치가 낮음에도 불구하고 간접적인 VOC 노출이 MCS 증상의 트리거가 될 수 있음을 시사한다. 이러한 불일치는 단기 피크 노출이 중추 감작(central sensitization)을 유발하기 때문으로 보이며, 이는 표준 측정 방식의 한계를 보여준다. MCS의 관리는 평균 노출 농도와 관계없이 피크 노출 제어 및 엄격한 유기용제 노출 회피를 포함하는 업무적합성 평가에 초점을 맞추어야 한다.
  • 1,265 View
  • 61 Download
Close layer
Original Article
Construction of a musculoskeletal job-exposure matrix in Korea
Myong-Hwan Kim, Eun-Soo Lee, Dongmug Kang, Ki-Hun Kim, Youngki Kim
Ann Occup Environ Med 2026;e21.   Published online June 18, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2026.38.e21    [Accepted]
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Background
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a major occupational health issue in Korea; however, a standardized job-exposure matrix (JEM) has not been established. This study aimed to develop an MSD-specific JEM using data from the Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS) to evaluate the exposure time proportion by job category and body segment.
Methods
Data from the 2nd to 6th KWCS (2006–2020), covering 210,500 workers, were analyzed. The jobs of the subjects were reclassified based on the unit groups of the 7th Korean Standard Classification of Occupations. Exposure time proportion for key MSD risk factors—repetitive movements, awkward postures, heavy lifting, and prolonged standing—was categorized as high, moderate, or low based on self-reported responses. Validity was assessed through expert review and statistical analysis, including Cohen’s kappa coefficients and logistic regression.
Results
Duration-based exposure to musculoskeletal (MS) risk factors was estimated for each occupation. The JEM classified exposure time proportion for three body regions: upper extremity and neck, lower back, and lower extremity. Expert review showed high agreement for the upper extremity and neck and for the lower back (kappa > 0.8), whereas agreement was lower for the lower extremity. Logistic regression analysis indicated an exposure–response relationship between JEM-derived exposure time proportion and MS symptoms for the upper extremity and neck and the lower back.
Conclusions
This study developed Korea’s first MS-specific JEM, providing a standardized framework for occupational MSD risk assessment. The JEM demonstrated strong validity for most body regions and can be a valuable tool for research, workplace risk evaluation, and policy development. Further refinements incorporating detailed job classifications and ergonomic factors are recommended to enhance its applicability.

  • 134 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Close layer
TOP