Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-09.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Use of Screening Dose to Evaluate the Work-relatedness of Cancers Occurring among Korean Radiation Workers
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Ann Occup Environ Med > Volume 19(3); 2007 > Article
Original Article Use of Screening Dose to Evaluate the Work-relatedness of Cancers Occurring among Korean Radiation Workers
Meeseon Jeong, Young Woo Jin, Hyun Sul Lim, Chong Soon Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/kjoem.2007.19.3.196
Published online: September 30, 2007
1Radiation Health Research Institute, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., Korea. ywjin@khnp.co.kr
2Department of Preventive Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Korea.
3Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Korea.
  • 23 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 4 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

OBJECTIVES
To propose a screening dose based on the probability of causation (PC) to simplify the evaluation procedure for the work-relatedness of the cancers occurring among Korean radiation workers.
METHODS
Under the PC uncertainty distribution, the screening dose was defined in which the maximum PC is equivalent to 50% for single exposure to radiation, after which the values were calculated according to three significance levels: 90%, 95%, and 99%. By using the screening doses for each cancer, we also predicted the number of compensations for the occupational cancers among the current Korean radiation workers to determine a reasonable criterion for the significance level.
RESULTS
If the cumulative dose received by a radiation worker with cancer is less than the screening dose, then PC can not be greater than 50%, i.e., the case can not be awarded as an occupational disease. The numbers of compensation cases for a future decade were predicted to be 3-5, 4-6, and 6-10 at the significance levels of 90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The procedure to evaluate the occupational disease was greatly simplified by using the screening dose for evaluation. A criterion of 95% was recommended as the PC upper limit following consideration for the results of the predicted cases for compensation and the economic circumstances in Korea.


Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Close layer
TOP