Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-09.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
A study of job stress, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in display manufacturing workers: a cross-sectional study
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Ann Occup Environ Med > Volume 32; 2020 > Article
Research Article A study of job stress, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in display manufacturing workers: a cross-sectional study
Seung-hwan Ahnorcid, Yong-Jin Leeorcid, Eun-Chul Jangorcid, Soon-Chan Kwonorcid, Young-Sun Minorcid, Seung-Hoon Ryuorcid
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2020;32:e16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e16
Published online: June 2, 2020

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea.

Correspondence: Yong-Jin Lee. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, 31 Suncheonhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31151, Korea. regina94@schmc.ac.kr
• Received: March 10, 2020   • Accepted: May 20, 2020

Copyright © 2020 Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 60 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
  • 4 Scopus
prev next
  • Background
    This study aimed to investigate the association between job stress and suicide ideation/attempts among display manufacturing workers.
  • Methods
    Data were collected from 836 workers in a display manufacturing company who participated in health screenings from May 22 to June 16, 2017. The data included general characteristics, night work, job tenure, previous physician-diagnosed chronic diseases, suicidal ideation/suicide attempts, and job stress. We investigated suicidal ideation/suicide attempts that covered the past year by using a self-reported questionnaire. Job stress was measured using the 43-item Korean Occupational Stress Scale. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. The mediator effect of depression on suicidal ideation/suicide attempts was tested using a series of logistic regression by applying Baron and Kenny's mediation method.
  • Results
    In the model adjusting for variables (e.g., age, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, shift work, job tenure, chronic disease and depression), physical environment (OR: 3.60, 95% CI: 1.08–12.02), lack of reward (OR: 5.31, 95% CI: 1.54–18.34), and occupation climate (OR: 7.36, 95% CI: 2.28–23.72) were correlated with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in women. However, all subscales of job stress were not significantly correlated with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in men. In mediation analysis, job instability and occupational climate were correlated with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts and were mediated by depression in men workers.
  • Conclusions
    In women workers, the experiences of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts were significantly correlated with the physical environment, lack of reward, and occupational climate that were subscales of job stress. In men workers, depression rather than job stress was correlated with experiences of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts.
World widely, nearly 800,000 people die each year from suicide, and many more people attempt to commit suicide [1]. In Korea, suicide was the fourth leading cause of death in 2017, accounting for 24.3 deaths per 100,000 people [2]. The same report stated that among Korean people aged 20 to 39 years, suicide is the first leading cause of death [2].
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health defines job stress as the “harmful physical and emotional responses that occur when the requirements of the job do not match the capabilities, resources, or needs of the worker” [3]. A study conducted in Korea showed that increased occupational stress increases depressive symptoms, and that reduced occupational stress decreases depressive symptoms [4]. In a study of Norwegian police officers, the lack of support and work injuries, among the subscales of job stress, are shown to be associated with depression [5]. Major depression is known to be one of the most important risk factors for suicide [6,7].
Numerous personal factors, such as young age, being a woman, unmarried status, underweight, and low education level, are reported as risk factors for suicidal ideation [8,9,10,11]. Factors related to the work environment, including precarious employment, high workplace stress, long working hours, night or shift work, bullying behaviors, and burnout, are also reported as risk factors for suicide [12,13,14,15,16].
Several previous studies have reported that job stress is associated with suicidal ideation in specific occupations. High emotional demands correlated with increased suicidal ideation in Korean service and sales workers [17]. Insufficient job control and lack of reward correlated with increased suicidal ideation among Korean subway drivers [18]. Job stress correlated with increased suicidal ideation in Taiwanese female nurses [19]. A recent degrading experience or harassment at work correlated with recent suicidal ideation in Swedish surgeons [20]. However, no study has explored the relation between job stress and suicide ideation/attempts in display manufacturing workers. This study aimed to investigate the relation between job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts among Korean display manufacturing workers.
Participants
This study adopted a cross-sectional design. The participants were 19 to 39-year-old workers in a display manufacturing company who participated in a health checkup and agreed to fill out a questionnaire at a university hospital in Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, between May 22 and June 16, 2017. A total of 838 participants were enrolled; 2 were excluded for providing insufficient response. Data from the final 836 participants were used in the study.
Assessment of occupational stress
The Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS) was developed to assess job stress in the working population in Korea [21]. KOSS consists of 43 items in 8 subscales: physical environment, job demand, insufficient job control, interpersonal conflict, job insecurity, organizational system, lack of reward, and occupational climate. Each item is scored using a 4-point Likert scale. Total job stress score of KOSS and 8 subscale scores were calculated using a 100-point system. In a study that assessed the reliability and validity of KOSS, KOSS showed high validity and correlation with the Mental Fatigue Scale, short form of the Psychosocial Wellbeing Index, and Job Content Questionnaire. The internal reliability of the subscale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and scored from 0.512 to 0.822 [21]. We divided the participants into high- and low-occupational stress groups depending on whether they scored above or below the 75th percentile of the KOSS reference value (top 25% of Korean workers' scores).
Assessment of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts
Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were assessed using the self-reported questions “Have you ever thought of dying in the last year?” and “Have you ever attempted suicide in the last year?”, respectively. The response was reported as either “Yes” or “No.” Participants who answered yes to either question were classified as having suicidal ideation/suicide attempts.
Assessment of depression
We assessed depression and severity using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Rating Scale for Depression (CES-D). CES-D consists of 20 items related to the characteristic symptoms of depression. Each item is scored using a 4-point Likert scale. An outcome of 21 points or more was classified as a depression [22].
Other variables
A self-reported questionnaire was used to collect the following information: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), exercise, smoking, alcohol consumption, shift work history, job tenure, previous physician-diagnosed chronic diseases (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, stroke, heart disease). BMI was classified as “≥ 25 kg/m2” and “< 25 kg/m2.” Alcohol consumption was classified as “non-drinker,” “1–2 times per week,” and “3 times or more per week.” Smoking was classified as “current smoker,” “past smoker,” and “non-smoker.” Exercise was classified as “do not exercise,” “1–2 times every week,” “3 times or more per week.” Shift work was classified as “not do shift work” and “do shift work.” Job tenure was classified as “less than 5 years,” “5 years or more but less than 10,” “10 years or more but less than 15,” and “15 years or more.” Chronic diseases were classified as having one or more of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, stroke, and heart disease diagnosed by a doctor.
Statistical analyses
According to the experience of suicidal ideation/suicide attempt, the participants were classified into 2 groups. Characteristics of participants were analyzed using χ2 test and Fisher's exact/Fisher–Freeman–Halton test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the relation between job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. In a crude model, data for job stress were entered as an independent variable, and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts as a dependent variable. In model 1, general characteristics (age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise), and chronic diseases were adjusted by entering covariates. In model 2, general characteristics (age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise), occupational characteristics (shift work, job tenure) and chronic diseases were adjusted by entering covariates. In model 3, general characteristics (age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise), occupational characteristics (shift work, job tenure), chronic diseases, and CES-D were adjusted by entering covariates. Sex differences have been found in the relation between job stress and suicidal ideation [23,24,25,26]. Therefore, in all our regression models, all data were stratified by sex. The mediator effect of depression on suicidal ideation/suicide attempts was tested using a series of logistic regression by applying Baron and Kenny's mediation method. A mediator effect of depression was tested when there is a significant relation between subscale of job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts and a significant relation between depression and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. In the first step, suicidal ideation/suicide attempts (the dependent variable) was regressed on subscale of job stress (the independent variable). In the second step, depression (the mediator variable) was regressed on subscale of job stress (the independent variable). In the third step, suicidal ideation/suicide attempts (the dependent variable) was regressed on the depression (the mediator variable). In the final step, suicidal ideation/suicide attempts (the dependent variable) was regressed on depression (the mediator variable) and subscale of job stress (the independent variable). A mediator effect of depression is supported when the significant association between the subscale of job stress (the independent variable) and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts (the dependent variable) becomes less significant or nonsignificant when both subscale of job stress (the independent variable) and depression (the mediator variable) are entered in the regression model. Results were presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Ethics statement
This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Cheonan (IRB No. 2019-01-013-002), and informed consent was waived.
Table 1 shows the differences in suicidal ideation/suicide attempts by general characteristics, occupational characteristics, chronic diseases, and depression. Experience of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts was 3.90% in men and 9.47% in women. In men only, the proportion of CES-D ≥ 21 was significantly higher in the suicidal ideation/suicide attempts group. Meanwhile, we found no statistically significant results in the other variables.
Table 1

Distribution of workers with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts by characteristics (n = 836)

Characteristics Men (n = 667) Women (n = 169)
Without SI/SA With SI/SA p-value Without SI/SA With SI/SA p-value
Age (years) 0.753 0.581
< 25 26 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 43 (91.5) 4 (8.5)
25–29 19 (95.0) 1 (5.0) 37 (88.1) 5 (11.9)
30–34 195 (96.5) 7 (3.5) 44 (88.0) 6 (12.0)
35–39 401 (95.7) 18 (4.3) 29 (90.5) 1 (9.5)
BMI (kg/m2) 0.167 0.749
< 25 335 (97.1) 10 (2.9) 121 (91.0) 12 (9.0)
≥ 25 306 (95.0) 16 (5.0) 32 (88.9) 4 (11.1)
Regular exercise (times/week) 0.439 0.241
0 211 (95.0) 11 (5.0) 70 (86.4) 11 (13.6)
1–2 299 (96.1) 12 (3.9) 56 (94.9) 3 (5.1)
≥ 3 131 (97.8) 3 (2.2) 27 (93.1) 2 (6.9)
Smoking 0.180 0.204
Non-smoker 247 (94.6) 14 (5.4) 146 (91.3) 14 (8.8)
Past smoker 135 (95.7) 6 (4.3) 2 (66.7) 1 (33.3)
Current smoker 259 (97.7) 6 (2.3) 5 (83.3) 1 (16.7)
Alcohol consumption (times/week) 0.812 0.467
0 108 (96.4) 4 (3.6) 58 (87.9) 8 (12.1)
1–2 397 (95.7) 18 (4.3) 82 (93.2) 6 (6.8)
≥ 3 136 (97.1) 4 (2.9) 13 (86.7) 2 (13.3)
Chronic disease 0.586 1.000
No 545 (96.3) 21 (3.7) 146 (90.1) 16 (9.9)
Yes 98 (95.1) 5 (4.9) 7 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
Job tenure 0.388 1.000
< 5 33 (97.1) 1 (2.9) 23 (92.0) 2 (8.0)
5–9 154 (93.9) 10 (6.1) 70 (89.7) 8 (10.3)
10–14 421 (96.8) 14 (3.2) 56 (90.3) 6 (9.7)
≥ 15 33 (97.1) 1 (2.9) 4 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
Shift work 0.687 0.413
No 247 (96.5) 9 (3.5) 64 (92.8) 5 (7.2)
Yes 394 (95.9) 17 (4.1) 89 (89.0) 11 (11.0)
CES-D (score) < 0.001a 0.156
0–20 630 (97.1) 19 (2.9) 141 (91.6) 13 (8.4)
21–60 11 (61.1) 7 (38.9) 12 (80.0) 3 (20.0)
Values are presented as number (%).
SI: suicidal ideation; SA: suicide attempt; BMI: body mass index; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Rating Scale for Depression.
The p-value by χ2 or Fisher's exact test/Fisher–Freeman–Halton test; a p <0.05.
Table 2 lists the KOSS score, KOSS reference value (75th percentile), and the number and proportion of participants classified as high risk. The total job stress score of KOSS was 53.33 ± 8.55 in men and 55.63 ± 8.31 in women. In men, insufficient job control scored 67.29 ± 11.36. Insufficient job control was reported by 68.1% of the men participants classified as high risk, the highest among the other subscales. In women, interpersonal conflict scored 54.97 ± 16.00. Interpersonal conflict was reported by 78.1% of women participants classified as high risk, the highest among the other subscales.
Table 2

Job stress levels of the participants (n = 836)

Subscales Men (n = 667) Women (n = 169)
Mean ± SD Referencea High risk participants Mean ± SD Referencea High risk participants
Physical environment 45.26 ± 14.67 66.7 69 (10.3) 42.38 ± 13.90 55.6 33 (19.5)
Job demand 42.01 ± 11.47 58.4 64 (9.6) 43.09 ± 12.73 62.6 12 (7.1)
Insufficient job control 67.29 ± 11.36 60.1 454 (68.1) 73.07 ± 10.65 66.7 123 (72.8)
Interpersonal conflict 53.89 ± 14.82 50.1 328 (49.2) 54.97 ± 16.00 41.7 132 (78.1)
Job insecurity 57.51 ± 10.00 61.2 268 (40.2) 58.32 ± 10.21 55.6 98 (58.0)
Organizational system 64.45 ± 14.45 62.0 369 (55.3) 68.64 ± 14.29 62.0 118 (69.8)
Lack of reward 58.37 ± 14.05 77.8 62 (9.3) 63.63 ± 13.37 77.8 27 (16.0)
Occupational climate 37.90 ± 12.69 50.1 87 (13.0) 40.92 ± 15.47 50.1 34 (20.1)
Total job stress score 53.33 ± 8.55 56.6 240 (36.0) 55.63 ± 8.31 56.7 80 (57.3)
Values are presented as number (%).
SD: standard deviation.
aKorean Occupational Stress Scale reference value (75th percentile).
Tables 3 and 4 show the relation between job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in men and women, respectively. In the crude model, job insecurity (OR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.29–6.69) and occupational climate (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.33–7.51) correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in men, whereas physical environment (OR: 3.80, 95% CI: 1.30–11.12), lack of reward (OR: 5.17, 95% CI: 1.73–15.44), and occupational climate (OR: 6.58, 95% CI: 2.24–19.32) correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in women.
Table 3

ORs and 95% CIs for suicidal ideation/suicide attempts according to job stress in men (n = 667)

Subscales Crude Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
Physical environment 2.15 0.78–5.89 0.138 2.22 0.79–6.24 0.131 2.27 0.79–6.48 0.127 1.39 0.42–4.61 0.594
Job demand 1.76 0.59–5.28 0.313 1.47 0.47–4.61 0.507 1.89 0.58–6.17 0.291 0.73 0.17–3.24 0.682
Insufficient job control 1.60 0.63–4.02 0.327 1.60 0.63–4.09 0.326 1.48 0.54–4.04 0.446 1.14 0.39–3.32 0.805
Interpersonal conflict 2.00 0.88–4.56 0.098 1.79 0.78–4.12 0.171 1.82 0.79–4.22 0.161 1.30 0.53–3.20 0.567
Job insecurity 2.94 1.29–6.69 0.010a 2.85 1.24–6.53 0.014a 3.07 1.32–7.13 0.009a 2.35 0.96–5.74 0.061
Organizational system 1.55 0.68–3.53 0.296 1.40 0.61–3.24 0.427 1.42 0.61–3.31 0.413 0.96 0.39–2.41 0.936
Lack of reward 2.44 0.89–6.72 0.084 2.38 0.85–6.72 0.100 2.49 0.88–7.06 0.087 0.68 0.16–2.92 0.600
Occupational climate 3.16 1.33–7.51 0.009a 2.89 1.19–7.00 0.019a 3.14 1.28–7.72 0.013a 2.00 0.72–5.51 0.183
Crude: unadjusted; Model 1: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease; Model 2: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease, shift work, job tenure; Model 3: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease, shift work, job tenure, CES-D.
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Rating Scale for Depression.
ap < 0.05.
Table 4

ORs and 95% CIs for suicidal ideation/suicide attempts according to job stress in women (n = 169)

Subscales Crude Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
Physical environment 3.80 1.30–11.12 0.015a 3.57 1.15–11.10 0.028a 3.74 1.13–12.36 0.031a 3.60 1.08–12.02 0.037a
Job demand 3.69 0.89–15.35 0.072 3.44 0.78–15.08 0.102 3.68 0.81–16.64 0.091 3.23 0.67–15.61 0.145
Insufficient job control 2.83 0.62–12.95 0.181 2.72 0.53–13.98 0.232 2.75 0.50–15.11 0.245 2.45 0.44–13.81 0.309
Interpersonal conflict 2.08 0.45–9.58 0.349 1.92 0.40–9.11 0.414 1.94 0.41–9.28 0.405 1.83 0.38–8.85 0.451
Job insecurity 1.67 0.55–5.04 0.363 1.89 0.60–5.92 0.278 1.88 0.60–5.91 0.278 1.74 0.54–5.58 0.350
Organizational system 3.30 0.72–15.08 0.124 3.61 0.75–17.30 0.108 3.62 0.75–17.61 0.111 3.41 0.69–16.86 0.133
Lack of reward 5.17 1.73–15.44 0.003a 5.47 1.71–17.52 0.004a 5.43 1.68–17.56 0.005a 5.31 1.54–18.34 0.008a
Occupational climate 6.58 2.24–19.32 0.001a 7.55 2.37–23.99 0.001a 7.64 2.39–24.38 0.001a 7.36 2.28–23.72 0.001a
Crude: unadjusted; Model 1: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease; Model 2: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease, shift work, job tenure; Model 3: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease, shift work, job tenure, CES-D.
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Rating Scale for Depression.
ap < 0.05.
In model 1, after adjusting for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, and chronic diseases, job insecurity (OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.24–6.53) and occupational climate (OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.19–7.00) correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in men, whereas physical environment (OR: 3.57, 95% CI: 1.15–11.10), lack of reward (OR: 5.47, 95% CI: 1.71–17.52), and occupational climate (OR: 7.55, 95% CI: 2.37–23.99) correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in women.
In model 2, after adjusting for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, shift work, job tenure, and chronic diseases, job insecurity (OR: 3.07, 95% CI: 1.32–7.13) and occupational climate (OR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.28–7.72) correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in men, whereas physical environment (OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 1.13–12.36), lack of reward (OR: 5.43, 95% CI: 1.68–17.56), and occupational climate (OR: 7.64, 95% CI: 2.39–24.38) correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in women.
In model 3, after adjusting by adding CES-D to the model 2 variables, no statistically significant variables were seen in men, but in women, physical environment (OR: 3.60, 95% CI: 1.08–12.02), lack of reward (OR: 5.31, 95% CI: 1.54–18.34), and occupation climate (OR: 7.36, 95% CI: 2.28–23.72) still correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts.
Table 5 shows the results of mediation analysis to confirm that depression acts as a mediator in the relationship between subscales of job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. Job insecurity and occupational climate among the subscales of job stress in men workers were included as independent variables in the mediation analysis. In step 1, job insecurity (OR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.29–6.69) and occupational climate (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.33–7.51) correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. In step 2, job insecurity (OR: 5.44, 95% CI: 1.77–16.72) and occupational climate (OR: 5.77, 95% CI: 2.21–15.06) correlated with depression. In step 3, depression climate (OR: 21.10, 95% CI: 7.37–60.40) correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. In step 4, job insecurity and occupational climate showed no significant relationship with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts whereas depression still showed significant relationship with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts, thus demonstrating a mediator role for depression.
Table 5

Logistic regression results by steps in the mediation analysis (n = 667)

Independent variables Dependent variable B SE OR 95% CI p-value
Independent variables: job insecurity (in men)
Step 1 Job insecurity Suicidal ideation/suicide attempts 1.077 0.420 2.94 1.29–6.69 0.010a
Step 2 Job insecurity Depression 1.694 0.573 5.44 1.77–16.72 0.003a
Step 3 Depression Suicidal ideation/suicide attempts 3.049 0.537 21.10 7.37–60.40 < 0.001a
Step 4 Job insecurity Suicidal ideation/suicide attempts 0.787 0.442 2.20 0.92–5.23 0.075
Depression 2.802 0.552 16.47 5.58–48.65 < 0.001a
Independent variables: occupational climate (in men)
Step 1 Occupational climate Suicidal ideation/suicide attempts 1.151 0.442 3.16 1.33–7.51 0.009a
Step 2 Occupational climate Depression 1.753 0.489 5.77 2.21–15.06 < 0.001a
Step 3 Depression Suicidal ideation/suicide attempts 3.049 0.537 21.10 7.37–60.40 < 0.001a
Step 4 Occupational climate Suicidal ideation/suicide attempts 0.722 0.493 2.06 0.78–5.41 0.143
Depression 1.834 0.554 6.26 2.12–18.53 < 0.001a
B: unstandardized beta coefficients; SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
ap < 0.05.
We examined the differences in suicidal ideation/suicide attempts by general characteristics, occupational characteristics, chronic diseases, and depression among display manufacturing workers, and the correlation between suicidal ideation/suicide attempts and the subscales of job stress.
Our study found that 5.02% of the total, 3.90% of the men, and 9.47% of the women display manufacturing workers experienced suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. In a study of the general population in Korea in 2018, 3.6% of individuals aged 19 to 29 years and 3.8% of individuals aged 30 to 39 years had suicidal ideation within the past year [27]. The experience of suicidal ideation in our study was higher than these results. Meanwhile, several studies have reported a higher prevalence of suicidal ideation and attempts in women [24,25,26]. These results are consistent with our finding that women had more experiences of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts than men.
In a study of surgeons in Korea, the total job stress score of KOSS was 50.0 ± 8.0 in men and 55.3 ± 10.1 in women [28]. Although direct comparisons are difficult given the differences in age distribution, our results showed that manufacturing workers have higher total job stress, measured by KOSS, compared with surgeons. Indeed, several studies have reported that job stress is associated with suicidal ideation in specific occupational groups. High emotional demands (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.14–3.45 in men; OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.26–2.73 in women) are associated with suicidal ideation in Korean service and sales workers [17]. Insufficient job control (OR: 2.215, 95% CI: 1.017–4.736) and lack of reward (OR: 2.236, 95% CI: 1.021–5.153) are associated with suicidal ideation among Korean subway drivers [18]. Job stress (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 2.2–3.3), personal burnout (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 3.1–4.6), and client-related burnout (OR 3.9, 95% CI: 3.1–5.0) are associated with suicidal ideation in Taiwanese female nurses [19]. Among work-related factors, a recent degrading experience or harassment at work (OR 2.83, 95% CI: 1.13–7.09) is related to recent suicidal ideation in Swedish surgeons [20]. As such, the factors of job stress affecting suicidal ideation are different across occupation groups.
In our study, job instability and occupational climate correlated with increased risk of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in men workers in the crude model, model 1 and model 2. However, we found no correlation between job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in model 3, which adjusted model 2 with the addition of CES-D. Mediation analysis confirmed that job instability and occupational climate increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in men workers and were mediated by depression. In women workers, the physical environment, lack of reward, and occupational climate increased the risk of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in the crude model, model 1, model 2 and model 3. These results suggested that the physical environment, lack of reward, and occupational climate directly affected suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in women workers. In women workers, insufficient job control, interpersonal conflict, job insecurity, and organizational system scored higher than the KOSS reference (75th percentile), but did not correlate with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. The overall stress level in these subscales of job stress was high, so the difference in job stress level between the high-risk group and the low-risk group may be small. Hence, the 2 groups may have homogeneous characteristics. Physical environment, lack of reward, and occupational climate showed relatively low job stress scores, but correlated with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts. This may be due to the relatively large gap of job stress level between the high-risk group and the low-risk group, thereby the 2 groups may have different characteristics.
In a hospital cohort study of Korean employees using the Korean Occupational Stress Scale-Short Form, job stress is reported as increasing the risk of suicidal ideation [29]. In young men aged 18 to 35 years, high job demands (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05–1.41), lack of reward (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.12–1.59), and discomfort in the organizational climate (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16–1.56) are associated with suicidal ideation. In young women aged 18 to 35 years, organizational injustice (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01–1.58), and discomfort in the organizational climate (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.18–1.70) are associated with suicidal ideation [29]. The finding that discomfort in the organizational climate increases the risk of suicidal ideation in young women workers is consistent with our results. However, the relation between suicidal ideation and the subscales of job stress, except for discomfort in the organizational climate, was inconsistent with our results. This may be caused by differences in the participants' occupational characteristics, adjusted variables, and statistical analysis methods.
Women report more fatigue than men [30,31]. Chua et al. [32] found that when workers feel uncomfortable in their physical environment, they tend to be tired and stressed easily, leading to unethical behavior. This explanation may be applied to our findings that the job stress from the physical environment raised the risk of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in women display manufacturing workers. In this display manufacturing company, both men and women workers carried out glass transportation, glass cutting, and placement of 40 kg films. These physical tasks may have caused more fatigue for women than for men. Thus, women may be more vulnerable than men to the effects of job stress arising from the work environment on suicidal ideation/suicide attempts.
Moreover, high effort reward imbalance in women is associated with increased risk of suicidal ideation, but not in men [33]. This result was similar to our findings. A previous study suggested the following possible explanation for the findings: the differences in the level of effort and reward in women are larger compared with men [33]. Women may experience various unmeasured pressures, such as multiple tasks outside work, and social discrimination, which may interact with the effort reward imbalance and influence the occurrence of suicidal ideation [33]. A study of men subway workers in Korea has reported that the lack of reward increases the risk of suicidal ideation [18]. This result was inconsistent with our findings. This mismatch might be caused by differences in the working environment of the 2 groups. The display manufacturing company in the present study used a performance-based salary system in which a higher position means a higher salary and a higher rate of pay for performance. Owing to the gap in job tenure after women use parental leave, men are more likely to be promoted than women, which may lead to wage gaps. This gap might explain women's job stress the lack of reward.
In the women workers in the present study, the finding that occupational climate, which is subscale of job stress, increased the risk of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts could be explained in the context of the Korean working culture. In such a culture, discomfort in the occupational climate can be reflected in the post-work dinners, non-standard or inconsistent work order, authoritative and vertical atmosphere, and gender discrimination. The characteristics of the occupational climate, such as the Korean collectivist culture, irrational communication system, and informal workplace culture can act as stressors [21]. Compared with Western organizations, Korean companies may have a more hierarchical and authoritarian atmosphere under the influence of collectivism and Confucianism [34,35]. Workers may feel so pressured as to experience suicidal ideation if personality, rationality, and gender equality are ignored in the workplace [29]. In the display manufacturing company in the present study, when workers produce LCD glass substrates, the alkali component should not enter the glass substrate to avoid problems in the stability of the panel [36]. Therefore, workers are expected to perform precise work. In addition, workers must wear personal protective equipment for safety, as they may be exposed to various chemicals at work. Because of the high level of technology used in the production of displays, workers must also take steps to prevent the leakage of technology. These several measures are extremely important and must be performed. Thus, in the course of carrying out these measures, a rigorous work atmosphere may be formed, which may affect suicidal ideation/suicide attempts.
This study has several strengths. First, it is the first study on job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts among young display manufacturing workers. This study identified the subscales of job stress that influenced suicidal ideation/suicide attempts in young display manufacturing workers, which have hardly been investigated. Second, depression, one of the most important risk factors of suicide, was adjusted in this study. Third, this study analyzed data stratified by sex, thereby revealing sex differences in the relation between job stress and suicidal ideation/suicide attempts.
As for limitations, the present study had the following. First, because we used a cross-sectional design, we could not establish the causality of association between job stress and suicide ideation/suicide attempts in display manufacturing workers. Second, this study used only self-reported data, and as such, response bias could have distorted the results. Although standardized self-reported health data can be used as valid measures of health in epidemiologic research and population health monitoring, responses may change because of respondents' personal circumstances or methodological processes [37,38]. Third, missing variables might have skewed our results. As the data were based on health screening data, other risk factors for suicidal ideation/suicide attempts, such as marital status, education level, income level, employment status, working hours, and burnout, were not investigated [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,39]. Thus, the possibility of residual confounding effects cannot be ruled out.
The experiences of suicidal ideation/suicide attempts were correlated with not only depression but also job stress in young display manufacturing workers aged 19 to 39 years. In women workers, these experiences were significantly correlated with the physical environment, lack of reward, and occupational climate, which are subscales of job stress. In men workers, depressive symptoms correlated with increased suicidal ideation/suicide attempts, and job stress did not affect suicidal ideation/suicide attempts.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials: Data will not be shared to ensure the protection of personal information.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Ahn SH.

  • Data curation: Ahn SH, Ryu SH, Lee YJ, Jang EC, Kwon SC, Min YS.

  • Formal analysis: Ahn SH, Ryu SH, Lee YJ, Jang EC, Kwon SC, Min YS.

  • Investigation: Ahn SH, Ryu SH.

  • Writing - original draft: Ahn SH.

  • Writing - review & editing: Lee YJ.

BMI

body mass index

CES-D

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Rating Scale for Depression

CI

confidence interval

HR

hazard ratio

KOSS

Korean Occupational Stress Scale

OR

odds ratio

SD

standard deviation
  • 1. World Health Organization. Suicide data. Accessed 11 Oct 2019]. https://www.who.int/mental_health/suicide-prevention/en/.
  • 2. Korean Statistical Information Service. Suicide rates. Accessed 19 Oct 2019]. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1B34E07&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=D11&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=E1.
  • 3. Sauter S, Murphy L, Colligan M, Swanson N, Hurrell J, Scharf F, et al. STRESS... At work. Washington, D.C.: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); 1999, 1–25.
  • 4. Jung J, Jeong I, Lee KJ, Won G, Park JB. Effects of changes in occupational stress on the depressive symptoms of Korean workers in a large company: a longitudinal survey. Ann Occup Environ Med 2018;30(1):39. 29977567.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 5. Berg AM, Hem E, Lau B, Ekeberg Ø. An exploration of job stress and health in the Norwegian police service: a cross sectional study. J Occup Med Toxicol 2006;1:26. 17156489.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 6. Isometsä ET, Henriksson MM, Aro HM, Heikkinen ME, Kuoppasalmi KI, Lönnqvist JK. Suicide in major depression. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151(4):530–536. 8147450.Article
  • 7. Oliffe JL, Ogrodniczuk JS, Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Hoyak K. “You feel like you can't live anymore”: suicide from the perspectives of Canadian men who experience depression. Soc Sci Med 2012;74(4):506–514. 20541308.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Kim KK, Lee KR, Suh HS, Ko KD, Hwang IC. Association between shift work and suicidal ideation: data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2008–2016). Scand J Work Environ Health 2019;45(5):458–464. 30829378.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Kim H, Jeon HJ, Bae JN, Cho MJ, Cho SJ, Lee H, et al. Association of body mass index with suicide behaviors, perceived stress, and life dissatisfaction in the Korean general population. Psychiatry Investig 2018;15(3):272–278.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 10. Min KB, Park SG, Hwang SH, Min JY. Precarious employment and the risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Prev Med 2015;71:72–76. 25532676.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Gunnell D, Harbord R, Singleton N, Jenkins R, Lewis G. Factors influencing the development and amelioration of suicidal thoughts in the general population. Cohort study. Br J Psychiatry 2004;185(5):385–393. 15516546.ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Massie FS, Power DV, Eacker A, Harper W, et al. Burnout and suicidal ideation among U.S. medical students. Ann Intern Med 2008;149(5):334–341. 18765703.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Takada M, Suzuki A, Shima S, Inoue K, Kazukawa S, Hojoh M. Associations between lifestyle factors, working environment, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation: a large-scale study in Japan. Ind Health 2009;47(6):649–655. 19996541.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Yoon JH, Jung PK, Roh J, Seok H, Won JU. Relationship between long working hours and suicidal thoughts: nationwide data from the 4th and 5th Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One 2015;10(6):e0129142. 26080022.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 15. Leach LS, Poyser C, Butterworth P. Workplace bullying and the association with suicidal ideation/thoughts and behaviour: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2017;74(1):72–79. 27663985.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Nielsen MB, Einarsen S, Notelaers G, Nielsen GH. Does exposure to bullying behaviors at the workplace contribute to later suicidal ideation? A three-wave longitudinal study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2016;42(3):246–250. 27135593.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Yoon JH, Jeung D, Chang SJ. Does high emotional demand with low job control relate to suicidal ideation among service and sales workers in Korea? J Korean Med Sci 2016;31(7):1042–1048. 27366000.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 18. Byun J, Kim HR, Lee HE, Kim SE, Lee J. Factors associated with suicide ideation among subway drivers in Korea. Ann Occup Environ Med 2016;28(1):31. 27486516.Article
  • 19. Chin WS, Chen YC, Ho JJ, Cheng NY, Wu HC, Shiao JS. Psychological work environment and suicidal ideation among nurses in Taiwan. J Nurs Scholarsh 2019;51(1):106–113. 30466180.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 20. Wall M, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Minucci D, Sendén MG, Løvseth LT, Fridner A. Suicidal ideation among surgeons in Italy and Sweden - a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol 2014;2:53. 25520811.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 21. Chang SJ, Koh SB, Kang D, Kim SA, Kang MG, Lee CG, et al. Developing an occupational stress scale for Korean employees. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2005;17(4):297–317.
  • 22. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in Korea. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998;186(5):304–310. 9612448.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Kim SY, Shin DW, Oh KS, Kim EJ, Park YR, Shin YC, et al. Gender differences of occupational stress associated with suicidal ideation among South Korean employees: the Kangbuk Samsung Health Study. Psychiatry Investig 2018;15(2):156–163.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 24. Swahn MH, Palmier JB, Braunstein SM. Prevalence and gender differences in suicide ideation of youth: a cross-national comparison of 19 countries and cities. place unknown: International Household Survey Network; 2012.
  • 25. Xu H, Zhang W, Wang X, Yuan J, Tang X, Yin Y, et al. Prevalence and influence factors of suicidal ideation among females and males in Northwestern urban China: a population-based epidemiological study. BMC Public Health 2015;15:961. 26404535.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 26. Iribarren C, Sidney S, Jacobs DR Jr, Weisner C. Hospitalization for suicide attempt and completed suicide: epidemiological features in a managed care population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000;35(7):288–296. 11016523.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 27. Seoul National University College of Medicine. Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR). 2018 national survey on suicide. Accessed 6 Feb 2020]. http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/modules/viewHtmlConv.jsp?BOARD_ID=320&CONT_SEQ=350956&FILE_SEQ=270114.
  • 28. Kang SH, Boo YJ, Lee JS, Ji WB, Yoo BE, You JY. Analysis of the occupational stress of Korean surgeons: a pilot study. J Korean Surg Soc 2013;84(5):261–266. 23646310.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 29. Kim SY, Shin YC, Oh KS, Shin DW, Lim WJ, Cho SJ, et al. Association between work stress and risk of suicidal ideation: a cohort study among Korean employees examining gender and age differences. Scand J Work Environ Health 2020;46(2):198–208. 31539082.Article
  • 30. Pugliesi K. Gender and work stress: differential exposure and vulnerability. J Gend Cult Health 1999;4(2):97–117.
  • 31. Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H. Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci Med 1996;42(4):617–624. 8643986.ArticlePubMed
  • 32. Chua SJ, Ali AS, Lim ME. Physical environment comfort impacts on office employee's performance. MATEC Web Conf 2016;66:00124.Article
  • 33. Zhuo LB, Yao W, Yan Z, Giron MS, Pei JJ, Wang HX. Impact of effort reward imbalance at work on suicidal ideation in ten European countries: the role of depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 2020;260:214–221. 31505399.ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Cho JJ, Kim JY, Chang SJ, Fiedler N, Koh SB, Crabtree BF, et al. Occupational stress and depression in Korean employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008;82(4):47–57. 18301911.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 35. Park SG, Min KB, Chang SJ, Kim HC, Min JY. Job stress and depressive symptoms among Korean employees: the effects of culture on work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009;82(3):397–405. 18622624.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 36. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. LCD glass substrate. Accessed 22 Oct 2019]. http://www.sgh.kr/?module=file&act=procFileDownload&file_srl=1060&sid=1f80f632984c7c4b478034faca29252d.
  • 37. Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, Oja P, Pasanen M, Urponen H. Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50(5):517–528. 9180644.ArticlePubMed
  • 38. Del Boca FK, Noll JA. Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction 2000;95 Suppl 3:S347–S360. 11132362.PubMed
  • 39. Lorant V, Kunst AE, Huisman M, Costa G, Mackenbach J. EU Working Group on Socio-Economic Inequalities in Health. Socio-economic inequalities in suicide: a European comparative study. Br J Psychiatry 2005;187(1):49–54. 15994571.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Relationship between job stress and impaired fasting glucose in male steel industry workers: a cross-sectional study
      Hyun-Kyo Lee, Inho Lee, Jisuk Yun, Yong-Jin Lee, Eun-Chul Jang, Young-Sun Min, Soon-Chan Kwon
      Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • General work stress and suicide cognitions in health-care workers: mediating effect of hopelessness and job satisfaction
      Abdulselami Sarigül, Alican Kaya, Izaddin Ahmad Aziz, Murat Yıldırım, Halil Ibrahim Özok, Francesco Chirico, Salvatore Zaffina
      Frontiers in Public Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Overview of the suicidal phenomenon in twenty-years autopsies at the Legal Medicine Unit of Pavia
      G. Belli, V. Bolcato, J. Quaiotti, D. Cassinari, L. Tarchi, L. Tronconi, S. Damiani, N. Brondino, P. Politi, M. Moretti
      Ethics, Medicine and Public Health.2022; 21: 100756.     CrossRef

    • PubReader PubReader
    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      A study of job stress, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in display manufacturing workers: a cross-sectional study
      Ann Occup Environ Med. 2020;32:e16  Published online June 2, 2020
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Related articles
    A study of job stress, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in display manufacturing workers: a cross-sectional study
    A study of job stress, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in display manufacturing workers: a cross-sectional study
    CharacteristicsMen (n = 667)Women (n = 169)
    Without SI/SAWith SI/SAp-valueWithout SI/SAWith SI/SAp-value
    Age (years)0.7530.581
    < 2526 (100.0)0 (0.0)43 (91.5)4 (8.5)
    25–2919 (95.0)1 (5.0)37 (88.1)5 (11.9)
    30–34195 (96.5)7 (3.5)44 (88.0)6 (12.0)
    35–39401 (95.7)18 (4.3)29 (90.5)1 (9.5)
    BMI (kg/m2)0.1670.749
    < 25335 (97.1)10 (2.9)121 (91.0)12 (9.0)
    ≥ 25306 (95.0)16 (5.0)32 (88.9)4 (11.1)
    Regular exercise (times/week)0.4390.241
    0211 (95.0)11 (5.0)70 (86.4)11 (13.6)
    1–2299 (96.1)12 (3.9)56 (94.9)3 (5.1)
    ≥ 3131 (97.8)3 (2.2)27 (93.1)2 (6.9)
    Smoking0.1800.204
    Non-smoker247 (94.6)14 (5.4)146 (91.3)14 (8.8)
    Past smoker135 (95.7)6 (4.3)2 (66.7)1 (33.3)
    Current smoker259 (97.7)6 (2.3)5 (83.3)1 (16.7)
    Alcohol consumption (times/week)0.8120.467
    0108 (96.4)4 (3.6)58 (87.9)8 (12.1)
    1–2397 (95.7)18 (4.3)82 (93.2)6 (6.8)
    ≥ 3136 (97.1)4 (2.9)13 (86.7)2 (13.3)
    Chronic disease0.5861.000
    No545 (96.3)21 (3.7)146 (90.1)16 (9.9)
    Yes98 (95.1)5 (4.9)7 (100.0)0 (0.0)
    Job tenure0.3881.000
    < 533 (97.1)1 (2.9)23 (92.0)2 (8.0)
    5–9154 (93.9)10 (6.1)70 (89.7)8 (10.3)
    10–14421 (96.8)14 (3.2)56 (90.3)6 (9.7)
    ≥ 1533 (97.1)1 (2.9)4 (100.0)0 (0.0)
    Shift work0.6870.413
    No247 (96.5)9 (3.5)64 (92.8)5 (7.2)
    Yes394 (95.9)17 (4.1)89 (89.0)11 (11.0)
    CES-D (score)< 0.001a0.156
    0–20630 (97.1)19 (2.9)141 (91.6)13 (8.4)
    21–6011 (61.1)7 (38.9)12 (80.0)3 (20.0)
    SubscalesMen (n = 667)Women (n = 169)
    Mean ± SDReferenceaHigh risk participantsMean ± SDReferenceaHigh risk participants
    Physical environment45.26 ± 14.6766.769 (10.3)42.38 ± 13.9055.633 (19.5)
    Job demand42.01 ± 11.4758.464 (9.6)43.09 ± 12.7362.612 (7.1)
    Insufficient job control67.29 ± 11.3660.1454 (68.1)73.07 ± 10.6566.7123 (72.8)
    Interpersonal conflict53.89 ± 14.8250.1328 (49.2)54.97 ± 16.0041.7132 (78.1)
    Job insecurity57.51 ± 10.0061.2268 (40.2)58.32 ± 10.2155.698 (58.0)
    Organizational system64.45 ± 14.4562.0369 (55.3)68.64 ± 14.2962.0118 (69.8)
    Lack of reward58.37 ± 14.0577.862 (9.3)63.63 ± 13.3777.827 (16.0)
    Occupational climate37.90 ± 12.6950.187 (13.0)40.92 ± 15.4750.134 (20.1)
    Total job stress score53.33 ± 8.5556.6240 (36.0)55.63 ± 8.3156.780 (57.3)
    SubscalesCrudeModel 1Model 2Model 3
    OR95% CIp-valueOR95% CIp-valueOR95% CIp-valueOR95% CIp-value
    Physical environment2.150.78–5.890.1382.220.79–6.240.1312.270.79–6.480.1271.390.42–4.610.594
    Job demand1.760.59–5.280.3131.470.47–4.610.5071.890.58–6.170.2910.730.17–3.240.682
    Insufficient job control1.600.63–4.020.3271.600.63–4.090.3261.480.54–4.040.4461.140.39–3.320.805
    Interpersonal conflict2.000.88–4.560.0981.790.78–4.120.1711.820.79–4.220.1611.300.53–3.200.567
    Job insecurity2.941.29–6.690.010a2.851.24–6.530.014a3.071.32–7.130.009a2.350.96–5.740.061
    Organizational system1.550.68–3.530.2961.400.61–3.240.4271.420.61–3.310.4130.960.39–2.410.936
    Lack of reward2.440.89–6.720.0842.380.85–6.720.1002.490.88–7.060.0870.680.16–2.920.600
    Occupational climate3.161.33–7.510.009a2.891.19–7.000.019a3.141.28–7.720.013a2.000.72–5.510.183
    SubscalesCrudeModel 1Model 2Model 3
    OR95% CIp-valueOR95% CIp-valueOR95% CIp-valueOR95% CIp-value
    Physical environment3.801.30–11.120.015a3.571.15–11.100.028a3.741.13–12.360.031a3.601.08–12.020.037a
    Job demand3.690.89–15.350.0723.440.78–15.080.1023.680.81–16.640.0913.230.67–15.610.145
    Insufficient job control2.830.62–12.950.1812.720.53–13.980.2322.750.50–15.110.2452.450.44–13.810.309
    Interpersonal conflict2.080.45–9.580.3491.920.40–9.110.4141.940.41–9.280.4051.830.38–8.850.451
    Job insecurity1.670.55–5.040.3631.890.60–5.920.2781.880.60–5.910.2781.740.54–5.580.350
    Organizational system3.300.72–15.080.1243.610.75–17.300.1083.620.75–17.610.1113.410.69–16.860.133
    Lack of reward5.171.73–15.440.003a5.471.71–17.520.004a5.431.68–17.560.005a5.311.54–18.340.008a
    Occupational climate6.582.24–19.320.001a7.552.37–23.990.001a7.642.39–24.380.001a7.362.28–23.720.001a
    Independent variablesDependent variableBSEOR95% CIp-value
    Independent variables: job insecurity (in men)
    Step 1Job insecuritySuicidal ideation/suicide attempts1.0770.4202.941.29–6.690.010a
    Step 2Job insecurityDepression1.6940.5735.441.77–16.720.003a
    Step 3DepressionSuicidal ideation/suicide attempts3.0490.53721.107.37–60.40< 0.001a
    Step 4Job insecuritySuicidal ideation/suicide attempts0.7870.4422.200.92–5.230.075
    Depression2.8020.55216.475.58–48.65< 0.001a
    Independent variables: occupational climate (in men)
    Step 1Occupational climateSuicidal ideation/suicide attempts1.1510.4423.161.33–7.510.009a
    Step 2Occupational climateDepression1.7530.4895.772.21–15.06< 0.001a
    Step 3DepressionSuicidal ideation/suicide attempts3.0490.53721.107.37–60.40< 0.001a
    Step 4Occupational climateSuicidal ideation/suicide attempts0.7220.4932.060.78–5.410.143
    Depression1.8340.5546.262.12–18.53< 0.001a
    Table 1 Distribution of workers with suicidal ideation/suicide attempts by characteristics (n = 836)

    Values are presented as number (%).

    SI: suicidal ideation; SA: suicide attempt; BMI: body mass index; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Rating Scale for Depression.

    The p-value by χ2 or Fisher's exact test/Fisher–Freeman–Halton test; a p <0.05.

    Table 2 Job stress levels of the participants (n = 836)

    Values are presented as number (%).

    SD: standard deviation.

    aKorean Occupational Stress Scale reference value (75th percentile).

    Table 3 ORs and 95% CIs for suicidal ideation/suicide attempts according to job stress in men (n = 667)

    Crude: unadjusted; Model 1: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease; Model 2: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease, shift work, job tenure; Model 3: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease, shift work, job tenure, CES-D.

    OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Rating Scale for Depression.

    ap < 0.05.

    Table 4 ORs and 95% CIs for suicidal ideation/suicide attempts according to job stress in women (n = 169)

    Crude: unadjusted; Model 1: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease; Model 2: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease, shift work, job tenure; Model 3: adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, chronic disease, shift work, job tenure, CES-D.

    OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Rating Scale for Depression.

    ap < 0.05.

    Table 5 Logistic regression results by steps in the mediation analysis (n = 667)

    B: unstandardized beta coefficients; SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

    ap < 0.05.


    Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
    Close layer
    TOP