KSOEM
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > Ann Occup Environ Med > Volume 29; 2017 > Article
- Review Estimations of the lethal and exposure doses for representative methanol symptoms in humans
- Chan-Seok Moon
-
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2017;29:44.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-017-0197-5
Published online: October 2, 2017
Department of Industrial Health, Catholic University of Pusan, #57, Oryundae-ro, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, 46252 South Korea 
• Received: February 13, 2017 • Accepted: September 7, 2017
© The Author(s). 2017
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Abstract
-
Background The aim of this review was to estimate the lethal and exposure doses of a representative symptom (blindness) of methanol exposure in humans by reviewing data from previous articles.
-
Methods Available articles published from 1970 to 2016 that investigated the dose-response relationship for methanol exposure (i.e., the exposure concentration and the biological markers/clinical symptoms) were evaluated; the MEDLINE and RISS (Korean search engine) databases were searched. The available data from these articles were carefully selected to estimate the range and median of a lethal human dose. The regression equation and correlation coefficient (between the exposure level and urinary methanol concentration as a biological exposure marker) were assumed from the previous data.
-
Results The lethal human dose of pure methanol was estimated at 15.8–474 g/person as a range and as 56.2 g/person as the median. The dose-response relationship between methanol vapor in ambient air and urinary methanol concentrations was thought to be correlated. An oral intake of 3.16–11.85 g/person of pure methanol could cause blindness. The lethal dose from respiratory intake was reported to be 4000–13,000 mg/l. The initial concentration of optic neuritis and blindness were shown to be 228.5 and 1103 mg/l, respectively, for a 12-h exposure.
-
Conclusion The concentration of biological exposure indices and clinical symptoms for methanol exposure might have a dose-response relationship according to previous articles. Even a low dose of pure methanol through oral or respiratory exposure might be lethal or result in blindness as a clinical symptom.
Background
Methanol (CH3OH) is a clear chemical, with a boiling point of 65 °C, a vapor pressure of 96 Torr, and a weak odor; it is a well-known volatile organic compound (VOC). It is used as a solvent for nitrocellulose, ethyl cellulose, various natural or synthetic resins, ethanol denaturant, manufacture of methyl derivative and in daily living environments. It is also a component of coating materials, cleaners (e.g., windshield wiper fluid and car wash liquid), automotive antifreeze, craft adhesives, automotive fuel and combustion, gas and cigarette smoke [1, 2]. Human blood, urine and saliva can contain methanol as a trace element absorbed from the human living environment. Methanol can be easily absorbed during exposure through respiration, skin, and the gastrointestinal tract. The respiratory route is the primary exposure route in workshops and laboratories. At the end of a work shift, pulmonary methanol exposure is approximately 56–82% of the total respiratory intake. After indoor air exposure at a 200 mg/L concentration of methanol, the methanol concentration in the serum reaches the highest value after 4 h of exposure [3].
In human metabolism of methanol, given its physical and chemical properties, high skin absorption is expected. Methanol penetration is predicted at 2.0 mg/cm2/h (logP = −0.77). Skin absorption of methanol vapor is another primary exposure route in terms of respiratory exposure [3]. Of the total exposed methanol in the human body, elimination can occur via exhaling or urination for approximately 10% of unmetabolized methanol from methanol exposure. In the body, 70–80% of the methanol absorbed is metabolized as formaldehyde through alcohol dehydrogenase and then transformed into free radicals and formic acid in the liver and red blood cells, resulting in the final products of carbon dioxide and water through formyl tetrahydrofolate synthetase [1].
The characteristics of methanol poisoning are central nervous system problems, metabolic acidosis, vision loss, and gastrointestinal symptoms [4–6]. Bio-toxicity due to methanol exposure is caused by the metabolites rather than the methanol itself. The severity of the toxicity is related to the degree of metabolic acidosis rather than the concentration of the methanol. Ocular damage might be caused by the toxicity of formic acid from the acidosis of formate. The acidosis is suspected to accelerate the ocular damage [7, 8]. The accumulation of formate fully accounts for the increase in the anion gap and the decrease in plasma bicarbonate. Formate accumulation is the primary or only reason for acidosis in the stages of methanol metabolism [9].
Methanol exposure usually causes acute poisoning rather than chronic poisoning. The main characteristics of acute poisoning are symptoms of metabolic acidosis, ocular toxicity, and nervous system toxicity, and it can cause blindness, narcosis and death, in severe cases. In different species, these toxicities differ in terms of the removal rate of formic acid. If simultaneously exposed to ethanol, it is possible to demonstrate a protective effect on the oxidative competition with alcohols, which can then competitively inhibit the formation of formic acid, as an antagonistic effect of methanol poisoning [10]. As indicated above, methanol poisoning is usually caused by an exposure accident, in most cases through drinking or misuse. Few cases of exposure through the respiration of methanol vapor have been reported [10, 11], such as from the semiconductor cleaning process or methanol poisoning of workers through the manufacturing of mobile phone ports (CNC process). In these workers, symptoms of blindness, vomiting, mental fog, and optic nerve damage are the typical symptoms of methanol poisoning that have been confirmed from exposure to high concentrations of methanol vapor [12, 13].
Recently, methanol exposure from the domestic manufacturing industry has become a major health focus in Korea, for the general population and hazardous material workers. However, few reports have performed systemic evaluations of the clear exposure sources for methanol or examined the exposure level and dose-response relationship between methanol exposure and toxicities in the human body. Therefore, this literature review investigated the relationship between the concentration of methanol exposure and the clinical symptoms and biological exposure markers.
Methods
Research reports of methanol exposure published in MEDLINE and RISS from 1980 to 2016 were examined in this study. To investigate methanol exposure, the clinical symptoms, toxicities and biological monitoring data from a total of 1768 papers were identified in searches using the keywords ‘methanol’ and ‘exposure’. Among the papers, 29 papers from MEDLINE (from SCI grade medical science journals) and 3 papers in RISS (for Korean journals) were available articles for this study after peer review. The 32 available papers (29 from MEDLINE and 3 from RISS) were examined for data on the exposure source, route and toxicities and biological monitoring of human exposure. Other references included reports from international and domestic authorized public institutions. From the published articles, the human lethal methanol doses were collected, and compared to the data; the, the range of human lethal doses and the median were estimated. From the relationship between the biological exposure indices and exposure concentration levels of methanol, correlation and regression equations and clinical symptoms for methanol exposure levels were recalculated.
Results and discussion
Methanol exposure in the general population primarily occurs through oral intake of meat or vegetables. Fruit and vegetable juice (average 140 mg/L, range 12–640 mg/L), fermented beverages (1500 mg/L or more), and beverages such as soft drinks also provide a considerable amount of methanol. In addition, local traditional liquor, Korean wine, whiskey, and vodka contain a considerable amount of methanol [10]. Smoking a cigarette provides methanol during the vapor phase (approximately 180 μg methanol). Approximately 10% of aspartame, an artificial sweetener, is converted (when hydrolyzed) into methanol in the human body [1].
Background monitoring of a Japanese population revealed that the concentration of methanol in the urine is less than 2 mg/L in most cases and less than 5 mg/L at the 95th percentile [14]. The arithmetic mean value of methanol in urine has been reported as 1.9 mg/L, and the geometric mean value has been reported as 1.7 mg/L [14]. The following values for urinary methanol have been reported in Brazil: 2.26 ± 1.26 mg/L (the arithmetic mean and standard deviation), 2.10 mg/L (the geometric mean), with a range from 0.50–4.78 mg/L [15]. In South Korea, in terms of the exposure concentration and biological monitoring of the general population, few reports are available, unfortunately. It is possible that not more than 2 mg/L of methanol is found in urine, in alignment with the Japanese and Brazilian reports.
Linear regression analysis of urinary methanol levels at the end of a work shift revealed a methanol concentration of 5500 mg/L of in ambient air [14]. In another study, there was a correlation between blood and urinary methanol concentrations of 500 mg/L and 1100 mg/L (650 and 1430 mg/m3), respectively, from methanol vapor [16]. Table 1 shows the methanol concentration of workroom air and urinary concentrations. The urinary methanol level in male employees was 21.8 ± 20.0 mg/L on average (19.2 mg/L, median and 0.6–57.3 mg/L, range) in exposed groups at the end of a work shift and 1.1 ± 0.9 mg/L on average (0.6–2.9 mg/L, range) in a non-exposed group. It has been estimated that a median urinary methanol concentration of 19.2 mg/L corresponds to a breathing concentration geometric mean of 93 mg/L in the workers’ atmosphere. In reports of exposure to methanol concentrations of 200 mg/L for 8 h, approximate levels of 40 mg/L [17], 42 mg/L (Kawai et al.), and 26 mg/L (arithmetic mean, Yasugi et al.) have been reported for urinary methanol concentrations correlated with workroom air concentrations [18].
Table 1
Exposure dose and effects of urinary biological indices of methanol
| Methanol in respiratory air (mg/L) | Urinary methanol concentration (mg/L) | References |
|---|---|---|
| Occupational exposure | ||
| 66.6 | 23 | [18] |
| 70 | 21.8 | [17] |
| 152 | 40 | [17] |
| 181.4 | 74 | [37] |
| 200 | 40 | [17] |
| 200 | 42 | [14] |
| 200 | 26 | [18] |
| Background exposure | ||
| 0.06–0.32 (μg/l) | 0.73 | [1] |
| - | 1.1 | [17] (as control group) |
As shown in Table 1, methanol exposure doses from ambient air and the response to urinary methanol concentrations could allow for the following regression equation. The regression equation showed 0.21117 for a and 4.69191 for b for Y = aX + b. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.792. The equation showed a linearity between the concentration of methanol in the atmosphere (X) and the urinary methanol concentration (Y). The equation confirmed a dose-response relationship between the inhalation level (X) and urinary concentration of methanol (Y) [19].
The lethal dose of methanol in human beings has not yet been clearly reported (Table 2). If medically untreated, the lethal dose was approximately 1000 mg/kg (oral intake) if there was no simultaneous ingestion of ethanol. Serious intoxication appeared when the blood formate level was 500 mg/L or more for 10 h of exposure. In an IPCS report, the human lethal dose through oral ingestion is approximately 300–1000 mg/kg [1]. In the OHS report, the lethal dose was reported as 60 ~ 240 ml in a case where a human drank pure methanol. The lowest lethal dose in the report was 10 mg/kg for women, in some cases [20]. In case reports, acute methanol poisoning (60 ~ 600 ml of pure methanol) caused acute metabolic acidosis in 28 young men in Papua New Guinea in 1977. These young men had serious visual impairment and acute pancreatitis 8–36 h after drinking methanol. Four of them died within 72 h after admission, but 16 of the 24 people did not experience symptoms, six were visually impaired, two people demonstrated speech defects and visual impairment [1]. According to the autopsy reports, 6 people died with an 840–5430 mg/L blood methanol concentration and a formic acid concentration of 640 ~ 1100 mg/L [21]. Therefore, using 300 mg/kg, which has been reported as the minimum lethal dose, and assuming the average Korean weight of 65 kg, then 19,500 mg can be calculated as the lethal dose. If a lethal dose of 1000 mg/kg is used, as previously reported, a lethal dose of 65,000 mg can be calculated. Therefore, the lethal dose ranges from 19,500–65,000 mg in humans. In grams (g), the final volume can be estimated as 19.5–65 g per person for a lethal dose. Mass is multiplied by 0.79 for the specific gravity of methanol (calculated as 15.8–189.6 g), and 47.4–474 g/per person is the lethal dose range (based on reports of 20–240 ml from OHS MSDS and 60–600 ml from IPCS), therefore, a small amount of methanol taken orally might be a lethal dose. Therefore, the median lethal dose is estimated as a representative value (56.2 g/per person) based on data using the lethal dose of pure methanol.
In case reports of respiratory exposure through vapor, women died at levels of 4000–13,000 mg/L after 12 h of methanol exposure with limited ventilation in a closed space [22].
Intoxication by exposure level initially manifests as temporary sickness and drowsiness similar to ethanol poisoning. In most cases, methanol intoxication has a latent period of 6 to 30 h. Then, metabolites from methanol can cause vomiting, dizziness, abdominal pain, diarrhea, difficulty breathing, acidosis (Kussmaul breathing), blurred vision, hyperemia of the optic nerve head, blindness, optic disc congestion, manic excitement, manic disorder, delirium, and brain edema [23, 24].
Permanent blindness has been reported to be induced by oral ingestion at levels of 4 ~ 10 ml or 15 ml. However, even after ingesting 500 to 600 ml of methanol, one patient recovered; individual differences appear to be related to whether there is simultaneous exposure to ethanol [25]. With oral exposure, abdominal discomfort and abdominal colic frequently occur, and nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea appear in approximately 50% of cases. Acute pancreatitis, accompanied by amylase viremia and high amylase urine disease, could occur following abdominal pain [23, 26]. Headache and breathing changes appeared at doses of 429 mg/kg dose (from drinking) [20]. Eyes were affected when the subjects drunk 3429 mg/kg of methanol. Changes in circulation, vomiting and dyspnea appeared when subjects ingested 6422 mg/kg of methanol [20, 27, 28]. If these data were converted to 65 kg body weight, the lethal dose range would be 27.8–417 g/person. In these oral intake cases, the exposure was not to pure methanol but rather ethanol. Reportedly, there is not a great difference between the exposure levels that trigger a lethal dose and clinical symptoms (Table 3).
Table 3
Symptoms from oral intake of methanol
| Exposure level | Estimation from recalculation (g/person) | Symptoms | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 429 mg/kg | 27.8 | Headache and respiratory change | [20] |
| 3429 mg/kg | 222.9 | Affects vision | [27] |
| 6422 mg/kg | 417 | Breathing difficulty, nausea, vomiting, circulatory system changes | [28] |
| 4–15 ml | 3.16–11.85 | Blindness | [20] |
In patients who were treated in the intensive care unit for serious methanol poisoning, one study reported using hemodialysis treatment in cases of >200 mg/L of blood methanol concentrations from deliberate drinking; the study also reported metabolic acidosis and vision abnormalities [29]. Permanent blindness appeared when the formate blood concentration was 3220 mg/L for 20 h or more from the inhibition of cytochrome oxidase (cytochrome oxidase) in the mitochondria and oxidative phosphorylation process [22]. In a case report of a 4-year-old girl who was hospitalized with nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain in the emergency room, her blood methanol concentrations was 790 mg/L [30]. In a 1978 study of Swedish alcoholism, a cleaning liquid containing up to 80% methanol was ingested. Since 1978, the cleaning liquid methanol has reportedly limit the amount of methanol to less than 5%. The misuse of cleaning solution for alcohol intoxication has been frequently reported, and the methanol concentration in the blood ranged from 1000 to 2000 mg/ from 1 to 2 weeks of exposure [31]. Women 26 years of age undergoing pregnancy care at gestational week 38 consumed 250–500 ml of methanol. Five hours after ingestion, they demonstrated light acidosis, 2300 mg/L of serum methanol, and 336 mg/L of formic acid concentration. Frenia and Schauben [32] have reported toluene (43.8%), methanol (22.3%), methylene chloride (20.5%) and propane (12.5%) in the vapor of a liquid carburetor cleaner. Blood methanol levels from inhalation exposure ranged from 504 to 1286 mg/L, and blood formic acid levels of 120, 193, and 480 μg/ml resulted in altered vision according to eye examinations [32].
Amblyopia from vapor inhalation in occupational exposure to methanol (visually impaired) and approximately 100 deaths were reported until 1912 [1, 33]. Most patients had been exposed to methanol vapor (300 mg/L) [34, 35]. Wood heel manufacturing industry workers were exposed to a concentration of methanol vapor ranging from 160 to 780 mg/L. However, the workers did not show any health symptoms [22]. Workers repeatedly exposed to 200–375 mg/L methanol vapor report recurrent headaches [27]. Chronic intoxication occurs when individuals are exposed to a concentration of 800 ~ 3000 mg/L in ambient air through inhalation from occupational exposure [16]. In the case of chronic intoxication through inhalation, it is possible to experience the first signs of visual impairment. For instance, light blurred vision, diminished visual field and permanent blindness could occur. In repeated or long-term respiration exposure, clinical symptoms can occur that are similar to those reported in acute toxicity cases from oral intake. The signs and symptoms from repeated exposure at levels of 365–3080 mg/L were headache, dizziness, vomiting, severe upper abdominal pain, low back pain, breathing difficulties, cloudy view and diarrhea [22]. In a patient who inhaled 3000 mg/L of methanol, bradycardia, visual changes and headache were reported [20]. Workers exposed to methanol concentrations of 1200 ~ 8000 mg/L for 4 years demonstrated diminished visual field and liver expansion [20]. The 23 workers exposed to a poor working environment (power failure prevention work during wartime) at a concentration of approximately 8300 mg/L showed symptoms of temporary blindness (Table 4) [22].
Table 4
Respiratory intake symptoms and exposure limit level of methanol
| Exposure level (mg/L) | Symptoms | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| 160–780 | Health symptoms | [22] |
| 200–375 | Recurrent headaches | [27] |
| 200 | – | [38] |
| 250 | – | [38] |
| 228.5–417.7 | Optic neuritis, Unconsciousness, Vomiting | [36] |
| 300 | Amblyopia | [34]; [35] |
| 365–3080 | Blurred vision, Headache, Dizziness, Nausea, Shortness of breath, Severe upper abdominal pain, Back pain, Difficulty breathing, Diarrhea, Bradycardia | [22] |
| 800–3000 | Chronic intoxication | [16] |
| 1103–2220 | Blindness, Optic neuritis, Loss of pupillary reflex, Amblyopia, Metabolic encephalopathy, Vomiting, Unconsciousness | [36] |
| 3000 | Visual changes, Headache, Respiratory changes | [20] |
| 1200–8000 | Symptoms of reduced vision, Chronic poisoning | [20] |
| 8300 | Temporary blindness | [22] |
In a recent methanol addiction accident in Korea, close attention should be directed toward the exposure level of methanol and the initial exposure concentration range. Symptoms of optic neuritis were supposed to appear at an initial concentration of 228.5 mg/L; however, a methanol exposure concentration range of 228.5 to 417.7 mg/L is a somewhat narrow range. Blindness was supposed to occur at an initial exposure concentration of 1103 mg/L, ranging from 1103 to 2220 mg/L, according to the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, 2016. These initial exposure concentrations for optic neuritis and blindness were the lowest exposure concentrations reported in recent studies of methanol exposure [36].
In 2016, the methanol exposure limit for workers in ACGIH were shown to be 200 mg/L for TWA and 250 mg/L for STEL. These exposure limit levels were thought to be high because health symptoms can appear at 160 mg/L, recurrent headaches at 200 mg/L and optic neuritis, unconsciousness and vomiting at 228.5 mg/L for the initial exposure concentration (Table 4) [36].
Toxicity through the skin occurs in animals and humans. When the skin comes in contact with methanol liquid, there is a possibility of skin irritation and skin absorption [1, 22]. Metabolic acidosis can result in adverse effects in the eyes and central nervous system. Chronic and repeated continuous contact with methanol can cause erythema, degreasing of the skin, squama, eczema, and dermatitis. For chronic absorption, metabolic acidosis can demonstrate the same symptoms described for acute ingestion [22]. Repeated prolonged contact can cause conjunctivitis, which accumulates a high concentration of methanol when exposed daily to methanol vapor [1].
Conclusion
From the reported data from methanol exposure in human beings, the dose response is related to methanol exposure dose and urinary methanol concentration. The relationship between the level of oral/respiration exposure and clinical symptoms was reviewed in previous reports. The lethal dose of pure methanol in humans is estimated at 15.8–474 g/person as the range and 56.2 g/person as the median. Oral intake of 3.16–11.85 g/person of pure methanol could cause blindness. Even at low dose levels, pure methanol (oral and respiration exposure) might result in a lethal dose or result in blindness as a clinical symptom. Careful attention is necessary.
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by 2015 RESEARCH FUND offered from Catholic University of Pusan.
Not applicable.
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Author contributions
The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The author declare that there are no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- 1. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc196.htm.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12. http://nodong.org/?module=file&act=procFileDownload&file_srl=7062398&sid=473476d187c474d4dd4fc7d62085fdc4&module_srl=900104.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15. Passarelli MM, Paolielo MM, Matsuo T, Turin CA, Nascimento ES. Methanol reference values in urine from inhabitants of Brazil. Sci Total Environ 1999;243-244:349–352. 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00359-9. 10635604.ArticlePubMed
- 16. Leaf F, Zatman LJ. A study of the conditions under which methanol may exert a toxic hazard in industry. Br J Ind Med 1952;9:19–31. 14895799.ArticlePubMedPMC
- 17. Heinrich R, Angerer J. Occupational chronic exposure to organic solvents. X. Biological monitoring parameters for methanol exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1982;50(4):341–349. 10.1007/BF00377830. 7174119.PubMed
- 18. Yasugi T, Kawai T, Mizunuma K, Horiguchi S, Iwami O, Iguchi H, Ikeda M. Formic acid excretion in comparison with methanol excretion in urine of workers occupationally exposed to methanol. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1992;64(5):329–337. 10.1007/BF00379542. 1487329.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 19. Sedivec V, Mráz M, Flek J. Biological monitoring of persons exposed to methanol vapours. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1981;48(3):257–271. 10.1007/BF00405613. 7251180.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 20. http://www.nifds.go.kr/toxinfo/Index.
- 21. Wallage HR, Watterson JH. Formic acid and methanol concentrations in death investigations. J Anal Toxicol 2008;32(3):241–247. 10.1093/jat/32.3.241. 18397576.ArticlePubMed
- 22.
- 23.
- 24. Kim HJ, Na JY, Lee YJ, Park JT, Kim HS. An autopsy case of methanol induced intracranial hemorrhage. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8(10):13643–13646. 26722590.PubMedPMC
- 25. Kruse JA. Methanol poisoning. Intensive Care Med 1992;18:391–397. 10.1007/BF01694340. 1469176.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 26.
- 27. Jacobsen D, Jansen H, Wiik-Larsen E, Bredesen JE, Halvorsen S. Studies on methanol poisoning. Acta Med Scand 1982;212(1–2):5–10. 7124461.ArticlePubMed
- 28.
- 29. Hantson P, Haufroid V, Wallemacq P. Formate kinetics in methanol poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol 2005;24(2):55–59. 10.1191/0960327105ht503oa. 15850279.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 30. Türkmen N, Eren B, Cetin G. Fatal methanol ingestion in a child: case report. Acta Med (Hradec Kralove) 2009;52(3):125–127. 10.14712/18059694.2016.117.Article
- 31. Heath A. Methanol poisoning. Lancet 1983;1(8337):1339–1340. 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92453-4. 6134129.ArticlePubMed
- 32. Frenia ML, Schauben JL. Methanol inhalation toxicity. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22(12):1919–1923. 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)80424-X. 8239117.ArticlePubMed
- 33. Bang JS, Yang HS, Rho SS, Chang Y-H. A case of toxic amblyopia caused by methanol intoxication. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2007;48(12):1731–1735. 10.3341/jkos.2007.48.12.1731.Article
- 34. Becker CE. Methanol poisoning. J Emerg Med 1983;1(1):51–58. 10.1016/0736-4679(83)90009-4. 6386968.ArticlePubMed
- 35. Frederick LJ, Schulte PA, Apol A. Investigation and control of occupational hazards associated with the use of spirit duplicators. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1984;45(1):51–55. 10.1080/15298668491399361. 6702599.ArticlePubMed
- 36.
- 37. Batterman SA, Franzblau A, Darcy JB, et al. Breath, urine and blood measurements as biological exposure indices of short-term inhalation exposure to methanol. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1998;71:325–335. 10.1007/s004200050288. 9749971.ArticlePubMedPDF
- 38.
References
Figure & Data
REFERENCES
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Simultaneous Analysis of Formaldehyde and Methanol Emissions During Curing Reactions of Polyester-melamine Coatings
Elias Rippatha, Clemens Schwarzinger
Chromatographia.2024; 87(5): 275. CrossRef - Eco-efficient coatings for healthy indoors: Ozone deposition velocities, primary and secondary emissions
Alessandra Ranesi, Paulina Faria, M. Rosário Veiga, Elliott T. Gall
Building and Environment.2024; 254: 111306. CrossRef - The Experimental Investigation of the Effects on the Combustion, Performance, and Emission Characteristics of an RCCI Engine Using Methanol/Diesel Fuel
Mustafa Temur, Cenk Sayin, Ilker Turgut Yilmaz
Energies.2024; 17(6): 1436. CrossRef - Turkish validity and reliability study of the falsified hand sanitizer identification scale
Fatma Nur Karaçorlu, Edibe Pirinçci
Archives of Current Medical Research.2024; 5(2): 84. CrossRef - Detection of Ethanol and Methanol in Hand Sanitizers used in Public Places in Delhi during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Neha Afaria, Rohit Kanojia, A. K. Jaiswal, Sudhir K. Gupta, T. Millo
Toxicology International.2024; : 257. CrossRef - Substances of health concern in home-distilled and commercial alcohols from Texas
Coady Lapierre, Laura Weiser Erlandson, Randy Stoneroad II, Andrew Rhiner, Renae Gosnell, John Barber, Linh Pham
Heliyon.2024; 10(11): e32317. CrossRef - Is methanol a clean, efficient, healthy and safe cooking solution for Africa? Experiences of benefits, challenges and prospects for diffusion
David Kimemia, Ashley Van Niekerk
Energy for Sustainable Development.2024; 81: 101498. CrossRef - Male- and female-specific microRNA expression patterns in a mouse model of methanol poisoning
Nurullah Günay, Serpil Taheri, Mehmet Memiş, Zeynep Yilmaz Şükranli, Taner Şahin, Şeniz Demiryürek, Nahide Ekici Günay, Yusuf Ertugrul Aslan, Abdullah Tuncay Demiryürek
Food and Chemical Toxicology.2023; 174: 113666. CrossRef - Tertiary referral hospital experience of methanol poisoning in the COVID-19 era: a cross-sectional study in Northwestern Iran
Ali Jafarizadeh, Navid Sobhi, Mirsaeed Abdollahi, Zhila Khamnian, Farideh Mousavi, Saba Jabbari, Hossein Jabbari
Bulletin of the National Research Centre.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Exploitations of Schiff’s test and iodoform test for an effective quality assessment of alcohol-based hand sanitizers
Chirapha Prakobdi, Duangjai Nacapricha, Thanthapatra Bunchuay, Phoonthawee Saetear
Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy.2023; 302: 123076. CrossRef - Case Reports Study on Methanol Poisoning in King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia
Ghadi I. Alqurashi, Fahad S. Alqurashi, Khalid M. Alhusayni, Alaa H. Falemban, Yosra Z. Alhindi, Safaa M. Alsanosi, Abdullah R. Alzahrani, Saeed S. Al-Ghamdi, Nahla Ayoub
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(13): 4282. CrossRef - Metal–Phenolic Film Coated Quartz Crystal Microbalance as a Selective Sensor for Methanol Detection in Alcoholic Beverages
Karekin D. Esmeryan, Yuliyan Lazarov, Teodor Grakov, Yulian I. Fedchenko, Lazar G. Vergov, Stefan Staykov
Micromachines.2023; 14(6): 1274. CrossRef - Severe methanol intoxication with atypical symptoms and imaging changes: a fatal case report
Jiaqi Chen
British Journal of Neurosurgery.2023; 37(3): 370. CrossRef - Awareness raising and dealing with methanol poisoning based on effective strategies
Ali Jangjou, Mostafa Moqadas, Leila Mohsenian, Hesam Kamyab, Shreeshivadasan Chelliapan, Sultan Alshehery, Mohammed Azam Ali, Farbod Dehbozorgi, Krishna Kumar Yadav, Masoud Khorami, Najmeh Zarei Jelyani
Environmental Research.2023; 228: 115886. CrossRef - Setting limits for N-nitrosamines in drugs: A defined approach based on read-across and structure-activity relationship for N-nitrosopiperazine impurities
Carlos E. Matos dos Santos, Daniel Junqueira Dorta, Danielle Palma de Oliveira
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.2022; 136: 105288. CrossRef - The nature of gas production patterns associated with methanol degradation in natural aquifer sediments: A microcosm study
Cole J.C. Van De Ven, Laura Laurenzi, Ashley C. Arnold, Steven J. Hallam, K. Ulrich Mayer
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology.2022; 247: 103988. CrossRef - Toxic and Nutritional Optic Neuropathies—An Updated Mini-Review
Jacek Baj, Alicja Forma, Joanna Kobak, Magdalena Tyczyńska, Iga Dudek, Amr Maani, Grzegorz Teresiński, Grzegorz Buszewicz, Jacek Januszewski, Jolanta Flieger
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(5): 3092. CrossRef - Biochemical mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy and other diabetic complications in humans: the methanol-formaldehyde-formic acid hypothesis
Bao Ting Zhu
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica.2022; 54(4): 415. CrossRef - Inexpensive Portable Infrared Device to Detect and Quantify Alcohols in Hand Sanitizers for Public Health and Safety
Jee Kwan Ng, Feng Huai Tay, Patrick Steven Wray, Siti Syazana Mohd Saberi, Kenny Kai Ken Ting, Sook Mei Khor, Ka Lung Andrew Chan
Analytical Chemistry.2021; 93(45): 15015. CrossRef - Fluorometric trace methanol detection in ethanol and isopropanol in a water medium for application in alcoholic beverages and hand sanitizers
Snigdha Roy, Sanju Das, Ambarish Ray, Partha Pratim Parui
RSC Advances.2021; 11(48): 30093. CrossRef - Investigating the epidemiology of methanol poisoning outbreaks: a scoping review protocol
Mehrdad Askarian, Mahasti Khakpour, Mohammad Hossein Taghrir, Hossein Akbarialiabad, Roham Borazjani
JBI Evidence Synthesis.2021; 19(6): 1388. CrossRef - Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Nutritional Value of Hibiscus sabdariffa Calyces as Revealed by NMR Metabolomics
Sengnolotha Marak, Elena Shumilina, Nutan Kaushik, Eva Falch, Alexander Dikiy
Molecules.2021; 26(6): 1675. CrossRef - Manufacturing and characterization of craft beers with leaves from Ocimum selloi Benth
Raul Cremonezi Piva, Maria Helena Verdan, Maria do Socorro Mascarenhas Santos, Margareth Batistote, Claudia Andrea Lima Cardoso
Journal of Food Science and Technology.2021; 58(11): 4403. CrossRef - Biological Denitrification of Water Intended for Human Consumption
Alexandru Matei, Gabriel Racoviţeanu, Elena Vulpaşu
Modelling in Civil Environmental Engineering.2021; 16(4): 34. CrossRef - Evaporation of Methanol Solution for a Methanol Steam Reforming System
Ngoc Van Trinh, Younghyeon Kim, Hongjip Kim, Sangseok Yu
Energies.2021; 14(16): 4862. CrossRef - Sequential electrodeposition of Cu–Pt bimetallic nanocatalysts on boron-doped diamond electrodes for the simple and rapid detection of methanol
Surinya Traipop, Abdulhadee Yakoh, Sakda Jampasa, Sudkate Chaiyo, Yuttanant Boonyongmaneerat, Joongjai Panpranot, Piyasan Praserthdam, Orawon Chailapakul
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Methanolintoxikation: ein Kollateralschaden der COVID-19-Pandemie
Bianca Wuchty, Julian Perneczky, Johann Sellner
psychopraxis. neuropraxis.2021; 24(4): 238. CrossRef - Diroximel Fumarate in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
Elise Jonasson, Tobias Sejbaek
Neurodegenerative Disease Management.2020; 10(5): 267. CrossRef - Carcinogenic, ethanol, acetaldehyde and noncarcinogenic higher alcohols, esters, and methanol compounds found in traditional alcoholic beverages. A risk assessment approach
Manolis Kokkinakis, Ioannis Tsakiris, Manolis Tzatzarakis, Elena Vakonaki, Athanasios Alegakis, Stella Papachristou, Vasiliki Karzi, Aikaterini Kokkinaki, Marina Goumenou, Manolis Kallionakis, Alexandra Kalogeraki
Toxicology Reports.2020; 7: 1057. CrossRef - Photoluminescent properties of ZnO nanorods films used to detect methanol contamination in tequila
J.A. Maldonado-Arriola, R. Sánchez-Zeferino, M.E. Álvarez-Ramos
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical.2020; 312: 112142. CrossRef - Valorization of Zante currant side‐streams for the production of phenolic‐rich extract and bacterial cellulose: a novel biorefinery concept
Erminda Tsouko, Aikaterini Papadaki, Harris Papapostolou, Dimitris Ladakis, Aikaterini Natsia, Apostolis Koutinas, Adamantia Kampioti, Effimia Eriotou, Nikolaos Kopsahelis
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology.2020; 95(2): 427. CrossRef - Improving the Gastrointestinal Tolerability of Fumaric Acid Esters: Early Findings on Gastrointestinal Events with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis from the Phase 3, Open-Label EVOLVE-MS-1 Study
Michael J. Palte, Angela Wehr, Mark Tawa, Kristopher Perkin, Richard Leigh-Pemberton, Jerome Hanna, Catherine Miller, Natasha Penner
Advances in Therapy.2019; 36(11): 3154. CrossRef - Redox titration on foldable paper-based analytical devices for the visual determination of alcohol content in whiskey samples
Sandro A. Nogueira, Adriano D. Lemes, Adriana C. Chagas, Maurício L. Vieira, Márcio Talhavini, Pedro A.O. Morais, Wendell K.T. Coltro
Talanta.2019; 194: 363. CrossRef
PubReader
ePub Link
Cite
XML DownloadEstimations of the lethal and exposure doses for representative methanol symptoms in humans
Estimations of the lethal and exposure doses for representative methanol symptoms in humans
| Methanol in respiratory air (mg/L) | Urinary methanol concentration (mg/L) | References |
|---|---|---|
| Occupational exposure | ||
| 66.6 | 23 | [18] |
| 70 | 21.8 | [17] |
| 152 | 40 | [17] |
| 181.4 | 74 | [37] |
| 200 | 40 | [17] |
| 200 | 42 | [14] |
| 200 | 26 | [18] |
| Background exposure | ||
| 0.06–0.32 (μg/l) | 0.73 | [1] |
| - | 1.1 | [17] (as control group) |
| Dose | Estimation from recalculation (g/person) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Oral administration | ||
| 300–1000 (mg/Kg) | 19.5–65 | [1] |
| 1000 (mg/kg) | 65 | [22] |
| 20–240 (ml) | 15.8–189.6 | OHS MSDS |
| 60–600 (ml) | 47.4–474 | [1] |
| Respiratory administration | ||
| 4000–13,000 mg/L | [22], 12 h exposure | |
| Exposure level | Estimation from recalculation (g/person) | Symptoms | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 429 mg/kg | 27.8 | Headache and respiratory change | [20] |
| 3429 mg/kg | 222.9 | Affects vision | [27] |
| 6422 mg/kg | 417 | Breathing difficulty, nausea, vomiting, circulatory system changes | [28] |
| 4–15 ml | 3.16–11.85 | Blindness | [20] |
| Exposure level (mg/L) | Symptoms | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| 160–780 | Health symptoms | [22] |
| 200–375 | Recurrent headaches | [27] |
| 200 | – | [38] |
| 250 | – | [38] |
| 228.5–417.7 | Optic neuritis, Unconsciousness, Vomiting | [36] |
| 300 | Amblyopia | [34]; [35] |
| 365–3080 | Blurred vision, Headache, Dizziness, Nausea, Shortness of breath, Severe upper abdominal pain, Back pain, Difficulty breathing, Diarrhea, Bradycardia | [22] |
| 800–3000 | Chronic intoxication | [16] |
| 1103–2220 | Blindness, Optic neuritis, Loss of pupillary reflex, Amblyopia, Metabolic encephalopathy, Vomiting, Unconsciousness | [36] |
| 3000 | Visual changes, Headache, Respiratory changes | [20] |
| 1200–8000 | Symptoms of reduced vision, Chronic poisoning | [20] |
| 8300 | Temporary blindness | [22] |
Table 1 Exposure dose and effects of urinary biological indices of methanol
The exposure period was 8 h following the end of a work shift for occupational exposure and 24-h exposure for environmental exposure
Table 2 Lethal dose of methanol
Table 3 Symptoms from oral intake of methanol
Table 4 Respiratory intake symptoms and exposure limit level of methanol
