Violence at work: determinants & prevalence among health care workers, northwest Ethiopia: an institutional based cross sectional study

Dawit Getachew Yenealem; Manay Kifle Woldegebriel; Ararso Tafese Olana; Tesfaye Hambisa Mekonnen

doi:10.1186/s40557-019-0288-6

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Ann Occup Environ Med > Volume 31; 2019 > Article

Research Article Violence at work: determinants & prevalence among health care workers, northwest Ethiopia: an institutional based cross sectional study: Dawit Getachew Yenealem¹, Manay Kifle Woldegebriel², Ararso Tafese Olana³, Tesfaye Hambisa Mekonnen¹; Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2019;31:8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-019-0288-6
Published online: April 3, 2019

¹⁰⁰00 0000 8539 4635grid.59547.3aDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia

^2grid.448640.aDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science and Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Aksum University, Axum, Ethiopia

^3grid.427581.dDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

• Received: October 19, 2018 • Accepted: February 17, 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

82 Views
1 Download
42 Web of Science
42 Crossref
47 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
Background
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
References
Notes
Notes

Abstract

Background
Workplace violence is the intentional use of power, threatened or actual, against another person or against a group, in work-related circumstances, that either results in or has a high degree of likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, mal development, or deprivation. The aim of this study is to assess magnitude and predictors of workplace violence among healthcare workers in health facilities of Gondar city.
Methods
Institutional based cross sectional study design was employed to conduct this study. The study conducted in Gondar town from February 21 to march 21, 2016. Five hundred fifty three health care workers selected from health facilities of Gondar City administration. A stratified sampling technique was used for selecting the study subjects through simple random sampling. Data was collected by structured self administered questionnaire which is adapted from ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI after it is pretested & prepared in Amharic. The data was coded and entered in to EPI info version 7 and exported to SPSS version 20 software for analysis. The degree of association for variables was assessed using odds ratios with 95% confidence interval and p-value ≤0.05.
Results
The prevalence of workplace violence was found to be 58.2% with [95% confidence interval (CI): (53.7, 62.3)] in which verbal abuse 282(53.1%) followed by physical attack 117(22.0%) and 38(7.2%) sexual harassment. Working at emergency departments [AOR = 3.99,95% CI:(1.49,10.73)], working at shifts [AOR = 1.98,95%, CI: (1.28,3.03)],short experiences [AOR = 3.09,95% CI: (1.20,7.98)], being nurse or midwife [AOR = 4.06, 95% CI: (1.20,13.74)] were positively associated with workplace violence. The main sources of violence are visitors/patient relatives followed by colleagues and patients.
Conclusion
workplace violence is major public health problem across health facilities and the Ministry of Health should incorporate interventions in its different health sector development & management safety initiative.
Keywords:
Keywords
Health facilities; Health care workers; Workplace violence; Gondar

Background

Workplace violence is the intentional use of power, threatened or actual, against another person or against a group, in work-related circumstances, that either results in or has a high degree of likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, mal development, or deprivation [1]. It has become an alarming phenomenon worldwide and one of the largest public health problem [2]. Even though workplace violence occurred on both private & public HCWs South African study shows public HCWs are more exposed than their private counterparts [3]. The rate of assaults on health workers is higher than that of other occupations-eight assaults per 10,000 workers compared with two per 10,000 for the general workplace [4].

Workplace violence causes ill health [5]. A longitudinal study on nurses demonstrates those who exposed to workplace violence develops higher somatic & musculoskeletal disorder symptoms than the comparison groups [5]. A global review of 150,000 nurses shows that third of have been physically assaulted, bullied, or injured, while around two-thirds have experienced nonphysical assault [4]. A retrospective database review among United States nurses about cost of workplace violence find annual workplace violence charges for the 2.1%of nurses reporting injuries were $94,156 ($78,924 for treatment and $15,232 for indemnity) [6].

In Ethiopia Most of healthcare workers are women in which they are exposed for both domestic & workplace violence which is a double burden [7]. Even though workplace violence studies mostly focuses on psychiatric and emergency department settings it is significantly prevalent in general healthcare workers [2].

Healthcare workers who exposed to workplace violence result to enormous consequences [8]. A systematic review of literature comes up with seven types of consequences namely: physical, psychological, emotional, work functioning, relationship with patients/quality of care, social/general, and financial. Psychological (e.g., posttraumatic stress, depression) and emotional (e.g., anger, fear) consequences and impact on work functioning (e.g., sick leave, job satisfaction) [9]. The most frequent and important effects of workplace violence as Longitudinal study from Finland shows physical violence lead to increment on intention of physician to leave while job satisfaction is affected by both bulling & physical violence [10]. In musculoskeletal studies WPV especially physical violence shows a significant role in predisposing to acute & chronic low back pain in study in Iran [11]. The consequences workplace violence extends beyond economic burden to be matter of quality of life [12].

In Ethiopia Very little information is available about workplace violence among healthcare workers. Considering large number of work force in health care sector in which majority of them are women. Currently government concern & intervention is limited domestic violence. But violence is not limited to house hold level and tackling demands comprehensive knowledge & focusing its effect on healthcare delivery as well. This study will provided a comprehensive baseline of workplace violence in healthcare workers which helps concerned bodies to initiates & start to shape strategies.

Methods

Study design, sample size determination, sampling technique

Institutional based quantitative cross sectional study was conducted in Gondar city in march 2016. Gondar is one of tourist destination city in Ethiopia, which is 747 km from Addis Abeba and 170 km from regional capital Bahir Dar. According to CSA 2014 projection Gondar has 323,875 populations reside in it. There are one university hospital 8 health centres. In addition 1 medium hospital, 13 specialty clinics, 15 medium clinics & 11 primary clinics according to Gondar city administration health department. About 994 health care workers employed at all level of health facilities. Sample size was determined by using single population proportion formula, taking 29.9% [13] prevalence of workplace violence from previous study in Hawassa.95% confidence interval margin of error of 4%. The final sample size was 553.

Stratified sampling techniques were used for selecting the study subjects. First of all healthcare workers were stratified in to private & government then further classified according to their type or level. Proportional numbers of health care workers were selected from each strata of health facility by simple random sampling technique.

Data collection tools and procedures

Data were collected by structured self administered questionnaire which is adapted to fit with this research objective from [ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI] [14] after it is pretested & prepared in Amharic. The questionnaire was divided in to four parts. The first part was socio-demographic & occupational characteristics like gender, age, educational status, profession, type of facility, working hour, working section and marital status. The second, third & fourth section contains physical violence, verbal abuse & sexual harassment respectively with relevant related questions. Four environmental and occupational health professionals working in the city was used to collect the data from. Two environmental health professional from Gondar university student services were assigned to supervise the data collection process. Both data collectors and supervisors was given a one day training on aim of study procedures of collection & exercise it. The questionnaire was discussed thoroughly question by question. The study participants were made to fill the questionnaire in their respective health facility.

Data processing and analysis

All the questionnaires were checked manually, coded and entered in to EPI info version 7.1.5.2 and exported to SPSS version 20 software for analysis of potentially explanatory variables. Descriptive analyses were performed to describe variables using summery measure, frequencies, figures & tables. 12 month WPV was evaluated by running bivirate logistic regression. Then variables with the P-value ≤0.2 analyzed in multivariable regression. The degree of association between dependant & independent variables was assessed using odds ratios within 95% confidence interval p-value ≤0.05. workplace violence is ascertained when the study respondents experienced at least one type of workplace violence (i.e. physical violence, verbal abuse or sexual harassment) in circumstances related to their work in the past 12 months.

Results

Socio demographic characteristics of respondents

The response rate was 96.02% (N = 531).Among respondents 361(68.0%) were from government & private hospitals and the rest were from private clinics and health centres. In addition 255(48.0%) were males and 276(52.0%) were females. The median age was 27, IQR = 7 years with the range of 20 to 56. Majority 289(54.4%) of healthcare workers are between the age group of 26–35 years. Among total participants majorities 415(78.2%) are belong to government health facilities while the rest work at private facilities116 (21.8%).In respect to educational status 405(76.3%) of HCWs have degree & above qualifications in their professions (Table 1).

Table 1

Socio demographic characteristics of health care workers working at health facility at Gondar city administration, March 2016(n = 531)

Variables	Frequency	Percentage
Sex
Male	255	48.0
Female	276	52.0
Age
≤ 25	76	14.3
26–35	289	54.4
≥ 36	166	31.3
Religion
Orthodox	454	85.5
Muslim	56	10.5
Others	21	4.0
Educational status
Diploma	126	23.7
Degree	361	68.0
Masters	31	5.8
Specialty	13	2.4
Marital status
Married	245	46.1
Divorced	10	1.9
Single	276	52
Profession
Nurse/midwife	339	63.8
HO	34	6.4
Pharmacy/laboratory	111	20.9
Other HCWs	24	4.5
GP	23	4.3
Facility ownership
Private	116	21.8
Government	415	78.2

NB: Others: Protestant/catholic/Adventist

Prevalence of workplace violence

More than half (58.2%) [95% CI: (53.7, 62.3)] of health care workers experienced at least one of manifestation of workplace violence (physical, verbal & sexual) in the past 12 months. Health care workers mostly encountered verbal abuse 282(53.1%) followed by physical attack 117(22.0%) and 38(7.2%) sexual harassment. Among all one third (33.0%) of health care workers were a victim of two forms of workplace violence of the study while only 4.2% of participant reported they were experience all forms. Over one third (37.9%) had witnessed physical violence on colleagues on their working environment. Females are most exposed in all forms of workplace violence: verbal abuse 161(57.1%), physical attack 69(59.0%) & sexual harassment 38(100%) than men.

Workplace characteristics of healthcare workers

Two third 363(68.4%) of respondents reveal that unavailability of workplace violence reporting procedures in their health facility. Inpatient departments are places where one third 168(31.6%) of the health care workers spent their time in the health facility. More than half of all health care workers have short experiences of less than six years (Table 2).

Table 2

Organizational and workplace characteristics of healthcare workers working at health facilities of Gondar city administration, March 2016, (n = 531)

Variables	Frequency	Percentage
Facility type
Hospital	361	68.0
Health center	92	17.3
Private clinics	78	14.7
Violence Reporting procedure
Available	168	31.6
Unavailable	363	68.4
Department
Inpatient departments	188	35.4
Pharmacy/laboratory	108	20.3
Emergency departments	46	8.7
Other departments	25	4.7
OPD	164	30.9
Experiences(in years)
1–5	308	58.1
6–10	151	28.4
11–15	15	2.8
16–38	57	10.7
Job position
Staff/service provider	484	91.2
Ward/clinic head	40	7.5
Coordinator	7	1.3
Shift work
Yes	336	63.3
No	195	36.7

Associations between exposure to types of violence and organizational and workplace characteristics

Higher risk of physical violence was related to working at shift, in inpatient department, govermet facilities and having lower years of experience. A total of 54.7% of health care workers with fewer than 5 years of experience reported physical violence, which decrease & increase with increase in experience. Physical violence was mostly reported in government workers (86.3%) compared with privately owned facilities. There is no any association is observed between all forms of violence in relation to job position & availability of reporting procedure. Verbal abuse showed stronger relationship similar to physical violence with stronger risk in facility ownership. Sexual harassment demonstrated lower relationship with organizational & workplace characteristics, which is limited with working department & ownership of the facility (Table 3).

Table 3

Organizational and workplace characteristics of healthcare workers working at health facilities of Gondar city administration with type of violence, March 2016, (n = 531)

Variable	Physical violence		Verbal abuse		Sexual harassment
	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no
	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)
Job position
Staff/service provider	107(22.1)	377(77.9)	231(47.7)	253(52.3)	37(7.6)	447(92.4)
Ward/clinic head	9(22.5)	31(77.5)	24(60.0)	16(40.0)	1(2.5)	39(97.5)
Coordinator	1(14.3)	6(85.7)	5(71.4)	2(28.6)	0(0.0%	7(100.0)
Shift work
Yes	96(28.6)**	240(71.4)	209 (62.2)**	127 (37.8)	29 (8.6)	307 (91.4)
No	21(10.8)	174(89.2)	73 (37.4)	122 (62.6)	9 (4.6)	186 (95.4)
Experiences(in years)
1–5	225(54.3)*	83(70.9)	184(65.2)*	124(49.8)	37(97.4)	271(55.0)
6–10	130(31.4)	21(17.9)	67(23.8)	84(33.7)	0(0.0)	151(30.6)
11–15	14(3.4)	1(0.9)	6(2.1)	9(3.6)	0(0.0)	15(3.0)
16–38	45(10.9)	12(10.3)	25(8.9)	32(12.9)	1(2.6)	56(11.4)
Department
Inpatient departments	64(54.7)**	124(30.0)	119(42.2)**	69(27.7)	20(52.6)*	168(34.1)
Pharmacy/laboratory	6(5.1)	102(24.6)	53(18.8)	55(22.1)	3(7.9)	105(21.3)
Emergency departments	22(18.8)	24(5.8)	34(12.1)	12(4.8)	6(15.8)	40(8.1)
Other departments	3(2.6)	22(5.3)	7(2.5)	18(7.2)	2(5.3)	23(4.7)
OPD	22(18.8)	142(34.3)	69(24.5)	95(38.2)	7(18.4)	157(31.8)
Ownership
Private	16(13.7)*	100(24.2)	44(15.6) **	72(28.9)	3(7.9) *	113(22.9)
Government	101(86.3)	314(75.8)	238(84.4)	177(71.1)	35(92.1)	180(77.1)
Violence Reporting procedure
Available	37(31.6)	131(31.6)	44(15.6)	72(28.9)	10(26.3)	158(32.0)
Unavailable	80(68.4)	283(68.4)	238(84.4)	137(71.1)	28(73.7)	335(68.0)

NB: statically significant at * = p < 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.0001

Factors associated with workplace violence

In univarate analysis profession, level of facility, experience, department, age, Employment status, health facility ownership, shifts work becomes significantly associated with workplace violence. In fitting these variables in to multivariate analysis only, department, profession, shift work and experience remain significant.

Occupational setting of health care workers demonstrated that the odds of violence against health care workers were nearly about four times higher among emergency department workers than those served in outpatient department (AOR = 3.99, 95% CI: (1.49,10.73)). Working at shifts revealed that it exposed to violence two times compared to those who worked at day shifts (AOR = 1.98, 95% CI: (1.28,3.03)).Health care providers of 1–5 years of experiences are three times at risk of encountering violence at work in contrast to 16+ year served colleagues (AOR = 3.09, 95% CI: (1.20,7.98)). Working as nurse & midwife in the health care facilities is four times more likely to experience violence than the general practitioners (AOR = 4.06, 95% CI: (1.20,13.74)) (Table 4).

Table 4

Univariate & multivariate logistic regression of factors associated with workplace violence among health care workers working at health facilities in Gondar, March 2016(n = 531)

Variables	Workplace violence		COR(95% CI)	AOR(95% CI)
Variables	Yes	no	COR(95% CI)	AOR(95% CI)
Working department
Emergency	40	6	7.71(3.10,19.20)*******	3.99(1.49,10.73)**
Inpatient	131	57	2.66(1.71,4.11)	1.41(0.78,2.55)
Other^a	8	17	0.54(0.22,1.33)	0.42(0.16,1.11)
Pharmacy/laboratory	54	54	1.15(0.71,1.88)	0.91(0.24,3.47)
OPD	76	88	1	1
Shift work
Yes	227	109	2.87(1.99,4.13)*******	1.98(1.28,3.03)**
No	82	113	1	1
Years of experiences
1–5	206	102	2.40(1.35,4.26)**	3.09(1.20,7.98)*
6–10	71	80	1.05(0.57,1.95)	1.38(0.55,3.51)
11–15	6	9	0.79(0.25,2.52)	1.47(0.36,6.01)
16+	26	31	1	1
Occupation
Nurse/ Midwife	221	118	6.74(2.44,18.62)*******	4.06(1.20,13.74)*
HO	13	21	2.23(0.66,7.46)	2.49(0.61,10.06)
Pharmacist/Laboratory	56	55	3.66(1.27,10.56)	3.63(0.60,21.88)
Other^b	14	10	5.04(1.40,18.14)	4.06(0.91,18.11)
GP	5	18	1	1
Ownership
Private	49	67	1	1
Government	260	155	2.29(1.50,3.49)*******	1.22(0.56,2.66)
Type of facility
Hospitals	231	130	3.35(2.00,5.61)*******	1.20(0.48,3.03)
Health center	51	41	2.35(1.26,4.37)	1.23(0.44,3.43)
Private clinics	27	51	1	1
Age(in years)
≤ 25	36	40	0.55(0.32,0.95)*	1.69(0.69,4.14)
26–35	170	119	0.87(0.59,1.29)	1.38(0.86,2.25)
≥ 36	103	63	1	1
Employment
Full timer	296	201	1	1
Contract	13	21	0.42(0.20,0.85)*	1.10(0.42,2.87)

NB: statically significant at * = p < 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.006, *** = p ≤ 0.0001

^aliaison, central supply, physiotherapy, anaesthesia, x-ray, card room, triage

^bphysiotherapist, anthesist, optometrists, psychiatrists, radiographers

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge this research is the first comprehensive research of workplace violence on health care both in profession & type of health facilities covered in Ethiopia. Being nurse/midwife by profession, working in emergency department, shift work and having short experiences are significantly associated with workplace violence.

The study finds out 58.2% of respondents encounter WPV. This is higher than what is reported by WHO. The overall 12 month prevalence of workplace violence among healthcare workers is in line with study findings in South Africa (61.9) [3], Thailand (54.1) [15] and Turkey(57.5%) [16]. This may be due to the methodological similarities employed in the studies. And it is lower than study in Nigeria (69.4) [17] and Oromiya, Ethiopia (88.0) [18] as it may be the fact that both studies doesn’t include private sectors which relatively have low prevalence than government counterparts. Even the Ethiopian study is only on hospitals & nurses in which known for their higher prevalence of workplace violence.

Workings in emergency departments have positive association with workplace violence. Those who work in clinical setting of emergency are four times exposed to workplace violence than OPD workers. An emergency working setting is where peoples are come in panic, with serious injuries that make them to be aggressive at health care providers. This is a place where life threatening health conditions and death make visitors & patient relatives to be violent. All these fuelled by nervousness of HCWs which attributed to high workload & stress. This finding is similar with study conducted in Hawassa, Ethiopia [13]. Similar emergency service delivery system, violence handling & security condition may account for the similarity of results. In addition despite of target population difference those who work in emergency departments mostly are nurses. A more higher risk reported from Italian [19] study on both physical violence & threats. This disagreement happens since healthcare workers from developed nation will report incidents more frankly & correctly as their system responds proactively for employees safety.

Shift work appears to be an exacerbating factor for the encountering of workplace violence among health care workers. Those working at shifts are more likely to experience workplace violence than their colleagues of day shift. This finding is supported study from China [2]. Working in shift implies low level of security in the institution, fewer staff in the department and decreased work performance between staffs initiate conditions favourable for violence. Even limited or no presence of hospital administration also can be attributed. While a study from Turkey [20] shows lower association than our research. This might be due that higher workplace violence prevention interventions are provided in such developed country than this study setting.

Year of experience in health facilities have positive association with the occurrence of workplace violence. Those who have less than 6 years of experience 3 fold more likely victimized by violence than their seniors with more than 16 years of experience in the health care facilities. This may be health care workers with short experience and mostly young are lacking the skills of managing violent conditions which can be acquired through experiences. The result is less than a study in Hawassa [13]. The difference may be due the difference in study subjects by profession. As Hawassa study is only on the nurses, who are deemed the most vulnerable while our study comprises all health professionals. The Congolese [21] study come up with a nearly no association results. The inconsistency can be by difference in sample size as the Congolese one is a nationwide study & it doesn’t includes violence arising from co-workers which leads to a normality across all experience categories.

Practicing a specific profession is a significant factor that exhibits visible association with workplace violence. Being a nurse or midwife had increased encountering workplace 4 times than working as physician. This is supported by research from Saudi [22]. This can be reason out since nurses are the front liners in giving service in health facilities in which patients & patient’s relatives spent more of their health facility times with them. Lower risk is reported from Brazil [23] & Serbia [24]. This observable difference may be the difference of healthcare system in which professionals exposed to patients & other potential sources of violence. In addition the proportion of nurses or midwifes & physicians involved in these studies are not as large as this study involves which decrease the risk of exposure.

In this study Respondents rated long waiting time for the service and lack of security condition as the primary causes that facilitate occurrence of workplace violence. This claim of HCWs supported by researches from the Middle East countries [22, 25].when patient/client wait for long time to get service they become irritated & dissatisfied which results to quarrelling with HCWs and even assaulting verbally & physically. Addressing long waiting time is also matter of improving the quality of service that ministry of health strives.

The study clearly shows that policy & working strategies should steer towards reducing factors aggravating workplace violence: such as log waiting time. In addition result related to absence of violence reporting procedure significantly related to having effective prevention of workplace violence.

The study will come with possible limitations like Recall bias which emanates as respondents expected to remember the past 12 month exposure. Having wider study subject coverage by profession & Inclusion of both government and private facilities will be considered as strength since it will give a picture of all health care workers.

Conclusions

Workplace violence appears to be major occupational hazard & public health problem despite it is neglected both by victims and health facilities. Short experiences, working in emergency department, shift work & being nurse/midwife has positive association with workplace violence.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the University of Gondar for the technical and financial support. We would also like to thank the Gondar city health administration & all health facilities for their collaboration and guidance while conducting this study. We would also thank the participants of the study for their time to involvement in the study.

Funding

University of Gondar provides fund for the research without any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All the necessary data is included in the manuscript document.

Abbreviations

ART

Anti retroviral therapy

EPI-info

Epidemiological Information

General Practitioner

HCW

Health Care Worker

ICN

International Council of Nurses

ICU

Intensive care unit

ILO

International Labor Organization

IQR

Inter quartile range

MCH

Maternal and child health

OPD

Outpatient department

PSI

Public Service International

SPSS

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

Tuberculosis

WHO

World Health Organization

WPV

Workplace Violence

References

1. Workplace violence in the health sector-State of the. Geneva: ILO. www.who.int/entity/violence_injury_prevention/injury/en/WVstateart.pdf.
2. Liu H, et al. Extent, nature, and risk factors of workplace violence in public tertiary hospitals in China: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12(6):6801–6817. 10.3390/ijerph120606801. 26086703.Article PubMed PMC
3. : South. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/interpersonal/en/WVcountrystudysouthafrica.pdf. Accessed 10 may 2017.
4. Nelson R. Tackling violence against health-care workers. Lancet 2014;383(9926):1373–1374. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60658-9. 24765658.Article PubMed
5. Yang L-Q, et al. Psychosocial precursors and physical consequences of workplace violence towards nurses: a longitudinal examination with naturally occurring groups in hospital settings. Int J Nurs Stud 2012;49(9):1091–1102. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.03.006. 22546849.Article PubMed
6. Speroni KG, et al. Incidence and cost of nurse workplace violence perpetrated by hospital patients or patient visitors. J Emerg Nurs 2014;40(3):218–228. 10.1016/j.jen.2013.05.014. 24054728.Article PubMed
7. Semahegn A, Mengistie B. Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia; systematic review. Reprod Health 2015;12:1–12. 10.1186/s12978-015-0072-1. 25561377.Article PubMed PMC PDF
8. Newman CJ, et al. Workplace violence and gender discrimination in Rwanda's health workforce: increasing safety and gender equality. Hum Resour Health 2011;9:1–13. 10.1186/1478-4491-9-19. 21223546.Article PubMed PMC PDF
9. Lanctôt N, Guay S. The aftermath of workplace violence among healthcare workers: a systematic literature review of the consequences. Aggress Violent Behav 2014;19(5):492–501. 10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.010.Article
10. Heponiemi T, et al. The prospective effects of workplace violence on physicians’ job satisfaction and turnover intentions: the buffering effect of job control. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14(1):1–8. 10.1186/1472-6963-14-19. 24382312.Article PDF
11. Karahan A, et al. Low back pain: prevalence and associated risk factors among hospital staff. J Adv Nurs 2009;65(3):516–524. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04905.x. 19222649.Article PubMed
12. Lin WQ, et al. Workplace violence and job performance among community healthcare Workers in China: the mediator role of quality of life. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12(11):14872–14886. 10.3390/ijerph121114872. 26610538.Article PubMed PMC
13. Fute M, et al. High prevalence of workplace violence among nurses working at public health facilities in southern Ethiopia. BMC Nurs 2015;14:1–5. 10.1186/s12912-015-0062-1. 25598706.Article PubMed PMC PDF
14. workplace violence in the health sector country case. reasearch instruments,survey questionnaire.. www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/.../en/WVquestionnaire.pdf. Accessed 20 may 2017.
15. ..
16. Aytac S, Dursun S, Akalp G. Workplace violence and effects on turnover intention and job commitment: a pilot study among healthcare workers in Turkey. Eur Sci J, ESJ 2016;12(10):458–465.
17. Abodunrin O, et al. Prevalence and forms of violence against health care professionals in a South-Western city, Nigeria. Sky J Med Med Sci 2014;2(8):67–72.
18. Jira C. Assessment of the prevalence and predictors of workplace violence against nurses working in referral hospitals of Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. JIMS8M: J Indian Manag Strateg 2015;20(1):61–64.Article
19. Magnavita N, Heponiemi T. Violence towards health care workers in a public health Care Facility in Italy: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12(1):1. 10.1186/1472-6963-12-108. 22214259.Article PubMed PMC PDF
20.
21. Muzembo BA, et al. Workplace violence towards Congolese health care workers: a survey of 436 healthcare facilities in Katanga province, Democratic Republic of Congo. J Occup Health 2015;57(1):69–80. 10.1539/joh.14-0111-OA. 25476862.Article PubMed PDF
22. Algwaiz WM, Alghanim SA. Violence exposure among health care professionals in Saudi public hospitals. A preliminary investigation. Saudi Med J 2012;33(1):76–82. 22273653.PubMed
23. Workplace violence in the health sector. Country case study-Brazil..
24. Fisekovic MB, et al. Does workplace violence exist in primary health care? Evidence from Serbia. Eur J Pub Health 2015;25(4):693–698. 10.1093/eurpub/cku247. 25644138.Article PubMed
25. El-Gilany AH, El-Wehady A, Amr M. Violence against primary health care workers in Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia. J Interpers Violence 2010;25(4):716–734. 10.1177/0886260509334395. 19494243.Article PubMed PDF

Notes

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Fear of violence and working department influences physical aggression level among nurses in northwest Ethiopia government health facilities
Dawit Getachew Yenealem, Avier Mesfin Mengistu
Heliyon.2024; 10(6): e27536. CrossRef
Prevalence, risk factors and psychological consequences of workplace violence among health workers in the Greater Accra region, Ghana: a cross-sectional study
Philip Apraku Tawiah, Emmanuel Appiah-Brempong, Paul Okyere, Geoffrey Adu-Fosu, Mary Eyram Ashinyo
BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Workplace violence and its associated factors among nurses working in university teaching hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: a mixed approach
Bereket Hegeno Anose, Adem Esmael Roba, Zegeye Regassa Gemechu, Asnakech Zekiwos Heliso, Segni Begna Negassa, Teshale Belayneh Ashamo
Frontiers in Environmental Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Workplace violence against female healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
May-Elizabeth Pere-ere Ajuwa, Clair-Antoine Veyrier, Lorraine Cousin Cabrolier, Olivier Chassany, Fabienne Marcellin, Issifou Yaya, Martin Duracinsky
BMJ Open.2024; 14(8): e079396. CrossRef
Health service providers experience of psycho-emotional violence and associated factors among urban hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Abebe Tolera, Adisu Birhanu Weldesenbet, Lemma Demissie Regassa, Biruk Shalmeno Tusa, Bedasa Taye Merga, Mandaras Tariku, Abera Cheru, Daniel Birhanie Enyew, Assefa Tola Gemeda
Frontiers in Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Workplace violence against nurses in rural governmental hospitals in Jordan
Mohammad M. Alnaeem, Mohammad A. Abu Sabra, Raid Abu Jebbeh, Khaled Suleiman
Collegian.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Impact of Resilience on Workplace Violence Experienced by Mental Health Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Survey
Atallah Alenezi, Lesley Barr
Journal of Nursing Management.2024; 2024: 1. CrossRef
The effect of multiple types of workplace violence on burnout risk, sleep quality, and leaving intention among nurses
Li-Chung Pien, Yawen Cheng, Fang-Chun Lee, Wan-Ju Cheng
Annals of Work Exposures and Health.2024; 68(7): 678. CrossRef
Acil Servis Çalışanlarının Şiddet Maruziyeti ve İş Bırakma Niyetinin İncelenmesi: Tanımlayıcı ve Kesitsel Bir Çalışma
Soner Telli, Merve Çayır Yılmaz
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi.2024; 9(1): 32. CrossRef
Development and Validation of Questionnaires to Assess Workplace Violence Risk Factors (QAWRF): A Tripartite Perspective of Worksite-Specific Determinants in Healthcare Settings
Faizul Haris Mohd Hatta, Ely Zarina Samsudin, Nazim Aimran, Zaliha Ismail
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy.2023; Volume 16: 1229. CrossRef
Sexual workplace violence in the health sector in Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional study
Aseel Khaled AlHassan, Reem Tarik AlSaqat, Fahad Saleh Al Sweleh
BMC Health Services Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Magnitude and Impact of Workplace Violence Against Obstetric Healthcare Personnel: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study
Smriti Agrawal, Khushbu Pandey, Vartika Mishra, Pallavi Gupta, Nikhil Srivastava
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India.2023; 73(S1): 69. CrossRef
Nurse‐to‐nurse horizontal violence during the covid‐19 pandemic and its impact on turnover intention: A cross‐sectional study
Hossein Habibzadeh, Farideh Namadi, Masoumeh Mahdi‐Akhgar
Nursing Open.2023; 10(4): 2631. CrossRef
Violence against women and associated factors among female construction workers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Kidist Asratie Asegu, Anteneh Mengist Dessie, Tizita Degifie Tilahun, Gizachew Worku Dagnew, Denekew Tenaw Anley
BMC Psychiatry.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Prevalence and forms of workplace violence against nurses
Chalachew Adugna Wubneh, Bikis liyew, Tilahun Kassew
International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences.2023; 19: 100620. CrossRef
Physical workplace violence in the health sector in Saudi Arabia
Aseel Khaled Alhassan, Reem Tarik Alsaqat, Fahad Saleh Al Sweleh
Medicine.2023; 102(29): e34094. CrossRef
Factors influencing midwives’ professional belongingness in northwest Ethiopia: Multicenter study
Eshetu Tsegaye Fenta, Wubedle Zelalem Temesgan, Mengstu Melkamu Asaye
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health.2023; 20: 101232. CrossRef
An exploratory study on the prevalence of workplace violence: the case of Algerian hospitals
Yamina Heddar, Mébarek Djebabra, Saadia Saadi
Employee Relations: The International Journal.2022; 44(5): 1127. CrossRef
Prevalence and determinants of workplace violence among nurses in the South‐East Asian and Western Pacific Regions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abin Varghese, Jaison Joseph, V. R. Vijay, Deepika C Khakha, Manju Dhandapani, George Gigini, Raveesh Kaimal
Journal of Clinical Nursing.2022; 31(7-8): 798. CrossRef
Mapping of Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence From a National Population Survey
Muluken Dessalegn Muluneh, Lyn Francis, Kingsley Agho, Virginia Stulz
Journal of Interpersonal Violence.2022; 37(13-14): NP12328. CrossRef
Overlooking workplace violence in health workforce planning in sub‐Saharan Africa
Paulo Ferrinho, Mohsin Sidat, António Pedro Delgado, Eva Pascoal
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management.2022; 37(1): 568. CrossRef
Factors contributing to work-related violence: A systematic review and systems perspective
Dianne M. Sheppard, Sharon Newnam, Renée M. St. Louis, Mark S. Perrett
Safety Science.2022; 154: 105859. CrossRef
Are Health Caregivers safe from workplace violence? A cross sectional study on workplace safety from Tertiary Care Hospital of Uttarakhand
Shaili Vyas, Ravinder Singh Saini, Jayanti Semwal, Neha Sharma, Manish Chaturvedi, Mohd. Waseem Faraz Ansari
Indian Journal of Community Health.2022; 34(4): 469. CrossRef
Sexual Harassment and Associated Factors Among Female Nurses: The Case of Addis Ababa Public Hospitals
Habtamu Weldesenbet, Jemberu Yibeltie, Tsega Hagos
Psychology Research and Behavior Management.2022; Volume 15: 3053. CrossRef
Factors associated with workplace violence among healthcare workers in an academic medical center
Janet K. Otachi, Heather Robertson, Chizimuzo T. C. Okoli
Perspectives in Psychiatric Care.2022; 58(4): 2383. CrossRef
Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zhian Salah Ramzi, Proosha Warzer Fatah, Asghar Dalvandi
Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring Experiences of Workplace Violence and Attempts to Address Violence Among Mental Health Nurses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Seham Mansour Alyousef, Sami Abdulrahman Alhamidi
SAGE Open Nursing.2022; 8: 237796082211427. CrossRef
Workplace violence among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic in a Jordanian governmental hospital: the tip of the iceberg
Nanees S. Ghareeb, Dalia A. El-Shafei, Afaf M. Eladl
Environmental Science and Pollution Research.2021; 28(43): 61441. CrossRef
Perception and experiences of sexual harassment among women working in hospitality workplaces of Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study
Mulugeta Dile Worke, Zewdie Birhanu Koricha, Gurmesa Tura Debelew
BMC Public Health.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Working in labor and delivery unit increases the odds of work place violence in Amhara region referral hospitals: Cross-sectional study
Eyaya Habtie Dagnaw, Abrham Walelign Bayabil, Tigist seid Yimer, Tewodros Seyoum Nigussie, Nicola Ramacciati
PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0254962. CrossRef
Geographic variation and determinants of help seeking behaviour among married women subjected to intimate partner violence: evidence from national population survey
Muluken Dessalegn Muluneh, Yeshemebet Worku Alemu, Maereg Wagnew Meazaw
International Journal for Equity in Health.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Identifying aggression of hospitalized patients towards nurses by means of measuring tools
Zuzana Kadlčková, Martina Tomagová
Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century.2021; 20(4): 226. CrossRef
Coping strategies and perceived barriers of women hospitality workplace employees to sexual harassment in Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia: a grounded theory approach
Mulugeta Dile Worke, Zewdie Birhanu Koricha, Gurmesa Tura Debelew
BMC Psychology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Exposure to Occupational Hazards among Health Care Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review
Rajni Rai, Sonia El-Zaemey, Nidup Dorji, Bir Doj Rai, Lin Fritschi
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(5): 2603. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Negative Work Behavior: Toward an Integrated Definition
Cokkie M. Verschuren, Maria Tims, Annet H. de Lange
Frontiers in Psychology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Associated Factors of Gender-Based Violence against Women in Sub-Saharan Africa
Muluken Dessalegn Muluneh, Lyn Francis, Kingsley Agho, Virginia Stulz
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(9): 4407. CrossRef
The magnitude and determinants of violence against healthcare workers in Pakistan
Shiraz Shaikh, Lubna Ansari Baig, Ibrahim Hashmi, Mirwais Khan, Seemin Jamali, Muhammad Naseem Khan, Munir Akhtar Saleemi, Komal Zulfiqar, Sumera Ehsan, Iram Yasir, Zia ul Haq, Lubna Mazharullah, Samina Zaib
BMJ Global Health.2020; 5(4): e002112. CrossRef
Gender Based Violence against Women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies
Muluken Dessalegn Muluneh, Virginia Stulz, Lyn Francis, Kingsley Agho
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(3): 903. CrossRef
Prevalence of sexual violence in Ethiopian workplaces: systematic review and meta-analysis
Mulugeta Dile Worke, Zewdie Birhanu Koricha, Gurmesa Tura Debelew
Reproductive Health.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Violence against Health-Care Workers in Governmental Health Facilities in Arar City, Saudi Arabia
Ruqayyah B. Al Anazi, Saeed M. AlQahtani, Amal E. Mohamad, Sabry M. Hammad, Hossam Khleif
The Scientific World Journal.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Work place violence (WPV) against healthcare workers in Africa: A systematic review
Stanley Njaka, Oswald C. Edeogu, Constance Chioma Oko, Mohammad Dauda Goni, Ndidi Nkadi
Heliyon.2020; 6(9): e04800. CrossRef
Using Simulation Training to Promote Nurses’ Effective Handling of Workplace Violence: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Jin-Lain Ming, Hui-Mei Huang, Shiao-Pei Hung, Ching-I Chang, Yueh-Shuang Hsu, Yuann-Meei Tzeng, Hsin-Yi Huang, Teh-Fu Hsu
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(19): 3648. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Violence at work: determinants & prevalence among health care workers, northwest Ethiopia: an institutional based cross sectional study

Ann Occup Environ Med. 2019;31:8 Published online April 3, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-019-0288-6

XML Download

Violence at work: determinants & prevalence among health care workers, northwest Ethiopia: an institutional based cross sectional study

Variables	Frequency	Percentage
Sex
Male	255	48.0
Female	276	52.0
Age
≤ 25	76	14.3
26–35	289	54.4
≥ 36	166	31.3
Religion
Orthodox	454	85.5
Muslim	56	10.5
Others	21	4.0
Educational status
Diploma	126	23.7
Degree	361	68.0
Masters	31	5.8
Specialty	13	2.4
Marital status
Married	245	46.1
Divorced	10	1.9
Single	276	52
Profession
Nurse/midwife	339	63.8
HO	34	6.4
Pharmacy/laboratory	111	20.9
Other HCWs	24	4.5
GP	23	4.3
Facility ownership
Private	116	21.8
Government	415	78.2

Variables	Frequency	Percentage
Facility type
Hospital	361	68.0
Health center	92	17.3
Private clinics	78	14.7
Violence Reporting procedure
Available	168	31.6
Unavailable	363	68.4
Department
Inpatient departments	188	35.4
Pharmacy/laboratory	108	20.3
Emergency departments	46	8.7
Other departments	25	4.7
OPD	164	30.9
Experiences(in years)
1–5	308	58.1
6–10	151	28.4
11–15	15	2.8
16–38	57	10.7
Job position
Staff/service provider	484	91.2
Ward/clinic head	40	7.5
Coordinator	7	1.3
Shift work
Yes	336	63.3
No	195	36.7

Variable	Physical violence		Verbal abuse		Sexual harassment
	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no
	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)	n (%)
Job position
Staff/service provider	107(22.1)	377(77.9)	231(47.7)	253(52.3)	37(7.6)	447(92.4)
Ward/clinic head	9(22.5)	31(77.5)	24(60.0)	16(40.0)	1(2.5)	39(97.5)
Coordinator	1(14.3)	6(85.7)	5(71.4)	2(28.6)	0(0.0%	7(100.0)
Shift work
Yes	96(28.6)**	240(71.4)	209 (62.2)**	127 (37.8)	29 (8.6)	307 (91.4)
No	21(10.8)	174(89.2)	73 (37.4)	122 (62.6)	9 (4.6)	186 (95.4)
Experiences(in years)
1–5	225(54.3)*	83(70.9)	184(65.2)*	124(49.8)	37(97.4)	271(55.0)
6–10	130(31.4)	21(17.9)	67(23.8)	84(33.7)	0(0.0)	151(30.6)
11–15	14(3.4)	1(0.9)	6(2.1)	9(3.6)	0(0.0)	15(3.0)
16–38	45(10.9)	12(10.3)	25(8.9)	32(12.9)	1(2.6)	56(11.4)
Department
Inpatient departments	64(54.7)**	124(30.0)	119(42.2)**	69(27.7)	20(52.6)*	168(34.1)
Pharmacy/laboratory	6(5.1)	102(24.6)	53(18.8)	55(22.1)	3(7.9)	105(21.3)
Emergency departments	22(18.8)	24(5.8)	34(12.1)	12(4.8)	6(15.8)	40(8.1)
Other departments	3(2.6)	22(5.3)	7(2.5)	18(7.2)	2(5.3)	23(4.7)
OPD	22(18.8)	142(34.3)	69(24.5)	95(38.2)	7(18.4)	157(31.8)
Ownership
Private	16(13.7)*	100(24.2)	44(15.6) **	72(28.9)	3(7.9) *	113(22.9)
Government	101(86.3)	314(75.8)	238(84.4)	177(71.1)	35(92.1)	180(77.1)
Violence Reporting procedure
Available	37(31.6)	131(31.6)	44(15.6)	72(28.9)	10(26.3)	158(32.0)
Unavailable	80(68.4)	283(68.4)	238(84.4)	137(71.1)	28(73.7)	335(68.0)

Variables	Workplace violence		COR(95% CI)	AOR(95% CI)
Variables	Yes	no	COR(95% CI)	AOR(95% CI)
Working department
Emergency	40	6	7.71(3.10,19.20)*******	3.99(1.49,10.73)**
Inpatient	131	57	2.66(1.71,4.11)	1.41(0.78,2.55)
Other^a	8	17	0.54(0.22,1.33)	0.42(0.16,1.11)
Pharmacy/laboratory	54	54	1.15(0.71,1.88)	0.91(0.24,3.47)
OPD	76	88	1	1
Shift work
Yes	227	109	2.87(1.99,4.13)*******	1.98(1.28,3.03)**
No	82	113	1	1
Years of experiences
1–5	206	102	2.40(1.35,4.26)**	3.09(1.20,7.98)*
6–10	71	80	1.05(0.57,1.95)	1.38(0.55,3.51)
11–15	6	9	0.79(0.25,2.52)	1.47(0.36,6.01)
16+	26	31	1	1
Occupation
Nurse/ Midwife	221	118	6.74(2.44,18.62)*******	4.06(1.20,13.74)*
HO	13	21	2.23(0.66,7.46)	2.49(0.61,10.06)
Pharmacist/Laboratory	56	55	3.66(1.27,10.56)	3.63(0.60,21.88)
Other^b	14	10	5.04(1.40,18.14)	4.06(0.91,18.11)
GP	5	18	1	1
Ownership
Private	49	67	1	1
Government	260	155	2.29(1.50,3.49)*******	1.22(0.56,2.66)
Type of facility
Hospitals	231	130	3.35(2.00,5.61)*******	1.20(0.48,3.03)
Health center	51	41	2.35(1.26,4.37)	1.23(0.44,3.43)
Private clinics	27	51	1	1
Age(in years)
≤ 25	36	40	0.55(0.32,0.95)*	1.69(0.69,4.14)
26–35	170	119	0.87(0.59,1.29)	1.38(0.86,2.25)
≥ 36	103	63	1	1
Employment
Full timer	296	201	1	1
Contract	13	21	0.42(0.20,0.85)*	1.10(0.42,2.87)

Table 1 Socio demographic characteristics of health care workers working at health facility at Gondar city administration, March 2016(n = 531)

NB: Others: Protestant/catholic/Adventist

Table 2 Organizational and workplace characteristics of healthcare workers working at health facilities of Gondar city administration, March 2016, (n = 531)

Table 3 Organizational and workplace characteristics of healthcare workers working at health facilities of Gondar city administration with type of violence, March 2016, (n = 531)

NB: statically significant at * = p < 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.0001

Table 4 Univariate & multivariate logistic regression of factors associated with workplace violence among health care workers working at health facilities in Gondar, March 2016(n = 531)

NB: statically significant at * = p < 0.05, ** = p ≤ 0.006, *** = p ≤ 0.0001

Articles

Abstract

Keywords

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Abbreviations

References

Notes

Notes

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4