Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Type of computer"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Article
Effects of computer familiarity and computer type on the performance of Korean computerized neurobehavioral test
Nak Joon Baek, Gun Il Park, Young Seok Byun, Man Joong Jeon, Joon Sakong
Ann Occup Environ Med 2016;28:44.   Published online September 9, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-016-0129-9
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background

It is thought that computer familiarity has increased significantly since 2004 as well as the use of computers. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of computer familiarity and types of keyboard and computer on the performance of the Korean computerized neurobehavioral test (KCNT), and to identify which parameters of KCNT were affected by aforementioned factors.

Methods

A total of 85 subjects were classified into three groups of computer familiarity by Korean typing speed. Their age, gender and the level of education were also collected. The parameters of KCNT included simple reaction time, choice reaction time, addition, symbol digit, and finger tapping speed. The test was conducted using three types of computers: a laptop computer, a laptop computer with a simplified keyboard, and a desktop computer with a simplified keyboard.

Results

Parameters including the simple reaction time, choice reaction time, addition, and symbol digit, and the finger tapping speed of non-dominant hand showed no significant differences in the results among the three groups by computer familiarity after age and educational years were controlled as covariates. The mean reaction time of the simple reaction time and the choice reaction time with a simplified keyboard was significantly shorter compared to that with a typical keyboard. With regard to type of computer, the mean reaction time of the simple reaction time and the choice reaction time was significantly reduced when performed with the desktop computer with a simplified keyboard.

Conclusions

Unlike previous study results, the choice reaction time, the addition, and the finger tapping speed of dominant hand were the only parameters affected by the computer familiarity. Both the type of keyboard and the type of computer significantly influenced the simple reaction time and the choice reaction time. Therefore, it is recommended to use a desktop computer with a simplified keyboard for such parameters.


Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Participation and engagement in online cognitive testing
    Daniel Radosław Sokołowski, Jasmine Pani, Tor Ivar Hansen, Asta Kristine Håberg
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Performance assessment on the Korean Computerized Neurobehavioral Test using a mobile device and a conventional computer: an experimental study
    Young Seok Byun, Sung Kyu Park, Joon Sakong, Man Joong Jeon
    Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 153 View
  • 2 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
Effect of the Type of Computer on Computerized Neurobehavioral Performance Tests
Gyu Tae Kim, Chang Yoon Kim, Joon Sakong
Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2004;16(3):276-286.   Published online September 30, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/kjoem.2004.16.3.276
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
It is difficult to carry and set up a large numbers of computers when computerized neurobehavioral tests are performed to many subjects. There are difficulties in mobilizing and resetting desktop computers and so, the use of desktop computers will decrease due to the recent increasing popularity of laptop computers. However, it is essential that there is no difference between the tests performed on a laptop and on a desktop computer. This study was conducted to estimate the effect that the type of computer has on computerized neurobehavioral performance tests.
METHODS
Three types of computers were applied. Type 1 was a normal laptop computer. Type 2 was a laptop computer that was remodeled and equipped with a modified keyboard. A common desktop computer with a remodeled keyboard as type 3. The computerized tests included Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time, Symbol Digit, and Finger Tapping Speed. A total of 60 subjects were examined by the identical tester in the same testing conditions. The computers were randomly allocated, which were used in the test and let examinees take tests with the separate computers.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences among the computers for the results of the Simple Reaction Time and Finger Tapping Speed tests. The mean reaction time, error number of Choice Reaction Time and mean reaction time, correct mean reaction time, error number of Symbol Digit produced significantly different results among the three types of computers.
CONCLUSION
This study indicates that with only a laptop computer the Simple Reaction Time test using the space bar was useful. But with the laptop computer, the Choice Reaction Time test using the four-direction key and the Symbol Digit test using the upper end number key were unsuitable. The keyboard should be developed further for the Choice Reaction Time and Symbol Digit tests. Among the three computers, we recommend the use of the desktop computer with the remodeled keyboard which the examinees are familiar with and the laptop computer with the remodeled keyboard.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance assessment on the Korean Computerized Neurobehavioral Test using a mobile device and a conventional computer: an experimental study
    Young Seok Byun, Sung Kyu Park, Joon Sakong, Man Joong Jeon
    Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of computer familiarity and computer type on the performance of Korean computerized neurobehavioral test
    Nak Joon Baek, Gun Il Park, Young Seok Byun, Man Joong Jeon, Joon Sakong
    Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 59 View
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
Close layer

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Close layer
TOP