OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to investigate if the measurement of range of motion(ROM) could be applied in the diagnosis of Myofascial Pain Syndrome(MPS) and to determine the severity by analyzing ROM in MPS patients. METHODS The study subjects were 476 female telephone number information service workers. Southampton Protocol and Pittsburgh Protocol were used to diagnose MPS and to measure ROM. ROMs were measured by 2 inclinometers exercising each shoulder passively and actively in 5 directions ; abduction, forward flexion, extension, external rotation, and internal rotation. RESULTS Compared to the normal group (n=147), the mean of right side ROM in the subjects (n=270) with same side MPS was 2.1 degrees(SD=11.5) lesser in active extension and 1.7 degrees(SD=10.4) lesser in passive extension. Compared to the mild group (n=210), the mean of right side ROM in the patients with same side severe MPS (n=58) was lesser in all directions. Especially in active forward flexion, passive forward flexion, active extension, passive extension and active external rotation, ROM in the subjects with severe MPS was lesser by 6.5 degrees(SD=13.1), 5.1 degrees(SD=12.8), 5.9 degrees(SD=11.8), 5.0 degrees(SD=10.6) and 3.9 degrees(SD=9.8), respectively, than those of the subjects with mild MPS. Compared to the subjects with left side mild MPS(n=172), ROM in the subjects with left side severe MPS (n=59) was 5.3 degrees(SD=13.3) lesser in active forward flexion. CONCLUSIONS In this study, ROMs in the subjects with severe MPS tended to be lesser than those in mild patients. This tendency was more prominent in the right side than the left, active range of motion than passive and forward flexion and extension than others. The results of this study are expected to help diagnose shoulder MPS and determine severity.
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to examine the electromyographic activities of the erector spinae muscle of the back and the rectus femoris muscle of the thigh, and to measure the angles of the spinal and knee flexions in order to determine the effect of wearing a back belt. METHODS Fifteen healthy males participated in the study. Surface electromyography was used to measure the level of muscle activities at the two muscle groups. The Simi system, utilizing two-dimensional analysis of movement, was used to examine the range of motion of the back and low extremity. RESULTS Firstly, the angle of the spinal flexion was significantly less in the back-belt-wearing group than in the control, and that of the knee flexion was significantly increased in the back-belt-wearing group. Secondly, there was no significant change in the electromyographic signals of the erector spinae muscle of the back and the rectus femoris muscle of the thigh. CONCLUSIONS The use of back belts helps workers to correct their posture when lifting boxes. It can therefore protect workers from acute back injuries.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Difference of muscle activity and muscle contraction onset time of the trunk and lower extremity according to object weights and leg length discrepancy during lifting tasks Hyeon Nam Ryu, Sung Jun Han, Jin Tae Han The Journal of Korean Academy of Physical Therapy Science.2024; 31(2): 30. CrossRef
Correlation among Functional Leg Length Discrepancy, Muscle Activity, Muscle Contraction Onset Time and Vertical Ground Reaction Force during Simple Lifting Task Ha Young Jin, Jin Tae Han The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy.2022; 34(4): 175. CrossRef
Designing a Snow-removing Tool Through Ergonomic Approach Kwang Tae Jung, Jung Min Nam Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea.2016; 35(5): 439. CrossRef
Effects of low-frequency electrical stimulation on cumulative fatigue and muscle tone of the erector spinae Da-Haeng Kang, Jae-Keun Jeon, Joon-Hee Lee Journal of Physical Therapy Science.2015; 27(1): 105. CrossRef
Effect of Pelvic Tilting and the Back-belt on Electromyographic Activity of Erector Spinae During Lifting Hyung-Ki Park, Tack-Hoon Kim The Journal of the Korea Contents Association.2009; 9(3): 296. CrossRef