Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Mass screening"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Research Article
Participation inequality in the National General Health Examination based on enterprise size
Young Joong Kang, Jong Heun Park, Huisu Eom, Bohwa Choi, Seyoung Lee, Ji-Won Lee, Jun-Pyo Myong
Ann Occup Environ Med 2017;29:3.   Published online February 22, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-017-0159-y
AbstractAbstract PDFPubReaderePub
Background

Health examinations are performed so that diseases can be identified and treated earlier. Several studies have evaluated the determinants of participation in health examinations including cancer screening, but few have evaluated the relationship between the size of the enterprise and their participation in Workers’ General Health Examinations (WGHE). The aim of the present study was to estimate the association of WGHE participation with the size of the enterprise and the type of policyholder.

Methods

The eligible population from 2006 through 2013 was extracted from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database. The population size ranged from 14–17 million. After adjustment for age and gender, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the odds ratios of participating in the WGHE (by age group) based on the type of policyholder (reference: public officers) and the size of the enterprise (reference: enterprise size ≥300 employees), respectively.

Results

Workers employed at enterprises with <50 persons were less likely to participate in WGHEs than those employed at enterprises with ≥300 persons. After policyholders were stratified by type (non-office workers vs. public officers), a disparity in the WGHE participation rate was found between the different types of policyholders at enterprises with <50 employees (reference: those employed at enterprises with ≥300 employees); the odds ratios for subjects in their 40s and 50s were 0.2–0.3 for non-office workers vs. 0.8–2.0 for public officers.

Conclusion

Workplace policyholders at small enterprises comprised a vulnerable group less likely to participate in WGHEs. Efforts should be made to raise the WGHE participation rate among the vulnerable employees belonging to small enterprises, as well as among their dependents.


Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Income-based inequality in nationwide general health checkup participation in Japan
    A. Shimoda, Y. Saito, C. Ooe, N. Kondo
    Public Health.2021; 195: 112.     CrossRef
  • Employment conditions and use of gastric cancer screening services in Korea: a nationwide survey
    Hye-Young Shim, Jae Kwan Jun, Ji-Yeon Shin
    BMC Public Health.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors Associated with General Health Screening Participation among Married Immigrant Women in Korea
    Jinhee Jeong, Yunhee Lee, Sung Hee Kwon, Jun-Pyo Myong
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(20): 3971.     CrossRef
  • Healthcare consumers’ sensitivity to costs: a reflection on behavioural economics from an emerging market
    Quan-Hoang Vuong, Tung-Manh Ho, Hong-Kong Nguyen, Thu-Trang Vuong
    Palgrave Communications.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The roles of doctors, nurses, and industrial hygienists in the healthcare management services in Korea: a comparison of the opinions of specialized health management institutions and entrusted enterprises
    Bo-Young Jang, Dong-Mug Kang, Young-Ki Kim, Se-Young Kim, Kyung-Sun Ko
    Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 63 View
  • 2 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer
Original Article
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mass Screening for Diabetes Mellitus
Kyung Eun Lee, Byung Yeol Chun, Sin Kam, Jae Yong Park
Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1995;7(2):269-281.   Published online October 31, 1995
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/kjoem.1995.7.2.269
AbstractAbstract PDF
To evaluate the efficiency of the diabetes mellitus screening program, the records of screening examinations for general workers and official workers at a general hospital in Taegu city were analysed. Six alternatives of the diabetes mellitus screening program were compared in terms of cost-effectiveness. The screening program I which was already used in the examination for general workers, screening program II for official workers, alternative program (A) which was the same method as screening program I without urine sugar test for the second examination in a hospital, a1ternative program (B) with the test for fasting blood sugar (FBS) in a worksite, alternative program (C) with the test for postprandial blood sugar (PPBS) in a worksite, alternative program (D) with the first test for FBS and the second test for PPBS of negatives for FBS test in a worksite, alternative program (E) with the first test for PPBS and the second test for FBS of negatives for PPBS test, and alternative program (F) with the test for urine sugar in a worksite. To compare the cost-effectiveness between alternatives, the cost (Won) per positive detected for diabetes mellitus (cost-effectiveness ratio) was calculated. The cost per positive detected was 37,767 Won for screening program I, 50,441 for screening program II, 37,433 for alternative program (A) , 27,645 for alternative program (B), and if it was assumed that the positive rate for negatives of FBS would be 2.0 %, 28,541 for alternative program (C) , 35,458 for alternative program (D) , 38,488 for alternative program (E) . However, that for alternative program (F) was varied with the positive predictive value (PPV) of urine sugar test for diabetes. The cost per positive detected was lowest(18,689 Won) when PPV was 93 %, whereas, highest (88,106) when PPV was 20 %. The critical value of PPV was 64 %. The alternative program (F) was most efficient when PPV was 64% or more. Considering the prevalence for diabetes mellitus, PPV for urine suger test, and feasibility of screening examination, alternative program (B) will be proved as the most efficient screening program. In conclusion, either program (B) or program (F) will be the most efficient method for screening a large population depending on the positive predictive value of fasting urine suger test.

  • 19 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Original Article
A Study of the Utility of Mahalanobis Distance for Decision of the Results of Health Examination
Byung Mann Cho, Don Kyoun Kim
Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1994;6(2):270-275.   Published online September 30, 1994
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/kjoem.1994.6.2.270
AbstractAbstract PDF
In the field of industrial health, it is important to establish the efficient system for health management of workers. The management of health information of workers using data base will contribute to such a system. In this context, the utility of method using Mahalanobis distance(D(2)), the general probability distance in multivariate analysis, for decision of the results of health examination was evaluated. Six items of test among the health examination data of 278 prospective employee was used to calculate D(2). Sensitively and specificity of decision method using D(2) with 99% normal range was 95.8% and 90.2% respectively as compared with decision by doctor. This finding suggests the utility of method using D2 for decision of the results of mass screening for industrial workers.

  • 21 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Ann Occup Environ Med : Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Close layer
TOP