Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Review

Factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders using machine learning approaches: a systematic review: Muhammad Irfan Mohd Sallehhuddin, Siti Munira Yasin, Mohamad Rodi Isa, Tajul Rosli Razak, Muhamad Syazni Mohamad Asraff, Nur Adilla Che Rameli, Muhammad Muaz Shahriman-Teruna, Muhammad Muzzammil Mohamad Salleh, Mohamad Zuhair Mohamed Yusoff, Muhammad Hariz Ammar Khebir; Ann Occup Environ Med 2026;e10. Published online March 19, 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2026.38.e10 [Accepted]

Abstract PDF: Background
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) remain a major cause of occupational disability and productivity loss worldwide. Traditional statistical methods have identified numerous associated factors; however, they often struggle to capture complex non-linear relationships and interactions across multiple domains of risk. Machine learning (ML) offers an alternative analytical approach for modelling such multidimensional relationships.
Methods
Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420250605234), literature searches were conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed for studies published between 2020 and 2025. Eligible studies applied ML methods to identify factors associated with WRMSDs using cross-sectional study designs. Included studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.
Results
Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, representing workers from healthcare, transport, manufacturing, and service sectors across Asia, Africa, and Europe. Frequently applied ML algorithms included random forest, support vector machine, and artificial neural networks, demonstrating strong internal discriminative performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.80–0.99), although the absence of external validation in several studies suggests a potential risk of overfitting. Commonly identified factors included age, sex, awkward posture, vibration exposure, prolonged working hours, stress, and burnout. Psychosocial factors, including post-traumatic stress disorder, job stress, and depression, were ranked among the most influential predictors within ML models.
Conclusions
ML models demonstrate strong capability in discriminating WRMSDs risk and identifying multidimensional risk factors compared with traditional statistical approaches. These models highlight complex interrelationships between ergonomic and psychosocial exposures. Future research should incorporate external validation, objective exposure measurements, and standardized ML reporting frameworks to enhance methodological transparency and generalizability.

58 View
1 Download

Opinion

The use of ChatGPT in occupational medicine: opportunities and threats: Chayma Sridi, Salem Brigui; Ann Occup Environ Med 2023;35:e42. Published online October 23, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e42

ChatGPT has the potential to revolutionize occupational medicine by providing a powerful tool for analyzing data, improving communication, and increasing efficiency. It can help identify patterns and trends in workplace health and safety, act as a virtual assistant for workers, employers, and occupational health professionals, and automate certain tasks. However, caution is required due to ethical concerns, the need to maintain confidentiality, and the risk of inconsistent or inaccurate results. ChatGPT cannot replace the crucial role of the occupational health professional in the medical surveillance of workers and the analysis of data on workers’ health.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Improving Construction Site Safety with Large Language Models: A Performance Analysis
Concetta Manuela La Fata, Gianfranco Barone, Marco Cammarata
Information.2026; 17(2): 210. CrossRef
Assessing the Accuracy of ChatGPT in Answering Questions About Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness
Sergio Bagnato, Cristina Boccagni, Jacopo Bonavita
Brain Sciences.2025; 15(4): 392. CrossRef
ChatGPT as a rising force: Can AI bridge information gaps in Occupational Risk Prevention?
Alejandro García-Rudolph, David Sanchez-Pinsach, Javier Remacha, Sheila Patricio, Eloy Opisso
WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation.2025; 82(4): 940. CrossRef
Correspondence on “The use of ChatGPT in occupational medicine: opportunities and threats”
Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Status of ChatGPT Use in Medical Education: Potentials, Challenges, and Strategies
Tianhui Xu, Huiting Weng, Fang Liu, Li Yang, Yuanyuan Luo, Ziwei Ding, Qin Wang
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2024; 26: e57896. CrossRef
ChatGPT in Occupational Medicine: A Comparative Study with Human Experts
Martina Padovan, Bianca Cosci, Armando Petillo, Gianluca Nerli, Francesco Porciatti, Sergio Scarinci, Francesco Carlucci, Letizia Dell’Amico, Niccolò Meliani, Gabriele Necciari, Vincenzo Carmelo Lucisano, Riccardo Marino, Rudy Foddis, Alessandro Palla
Bioengineering.2024; 11(1): 57. CrossRef
ERG-AI: enhancing occupational ergonomics with uncertainty-aware ML and LLM feedback
Sagar Sen, Victor Gonzalez, Erik Johannes Husom, Simeon Tverdal, Shukun Tokas, Svein O Tjøsvoll
Applied Intelligence.2024; 54(23): 12128. CrossRef
Regulatory and Ethical Considerations on Artificial Intelligence for Occupational Medicine
Antonio Baldassarre, Martina Padovan
La Medicina del Lavoro.2024; 115(2): e2024013. CrossRef

2,748 View
44 Download
8 Web of Science
8 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search