-
Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey
-
Maro Choi, Chunhui Suh, Seong Pil Choi, Chae Kwan Lee, Byung Chul Son
-
Ann Occup Environ Med 2020;32:e27. Published online July 16, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e27
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the 3-item version of the Work Engagement Scale (WES-3), which is based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model and was used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS). MethodsThis study used data from the 5th KWCS (n = 50,205), which was conducted in 2017 with a sample of the Korean working population. The survey gathered comprehensive information on working conditions to define workforce changes and the quality of work and life. The reliability and internal consistency of the WES-3 were assessed using the corrected item-total correlation and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the construct validity of work engagement. The convergent validity was assessed using the correlation with the WHO-5 well-being index. Correlations between work engagement and JD-R factors were also calculated. ResultsThe Cronbach's alpha for work engagement was 0.776, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The model comprising 3 work engagement and 2 burnout items showed an excellent fit (χ2: 382.05, Tucker-Lewis index: 0.984, comparative fit index: 0.994, root mean square error of approximation: 0.043). The convergent validity was significant (correlation coefficient: 0.42). Correlations with burnout and job demands were negligible, whereas correlations with job resources and job satisfaction were weakly positive. ConclusionsThe results of our study confirm that the WES-3 has acceptable reliability and validity.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Association between constant connectivity to work during leisure time and insomnia: does work engagement matter?
Seong-Uk Baek, Jin-Ha Yoon, Jong-Uk Won Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.2024; 59(4): 657. CrossRef - Revisitando la Medición del Engagement en el Trabajo: Análisis de las Propiedades Psicométricas del UWES-3
Clara González-Seda, Ramón Rodríguez-Montalbán, Miguel E. Martínez-Lugo Revista Caribeña de Psicología.2024; : e7843. CrossRef - TÜKETİCİLERİN DOĞAL BAL ALGISI VE SATINALMA DAVRANIŞLARINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA
Fatih Bilici Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi.2024; 24(1): 93. CrossRef - Linking job crafting to work engagement: the mediating role of organizational happiness
Mohammed Yasin Ghadi Management Research Review.2024; 47(6): 943. CrossRef - The association of job training duration and risk of depression among wage workers: an analysis of the mediating factors
Dong Geon Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Kiook Baek Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Leadership styles as predictors of employee engagement at a selected tertiary institution
Genevieve Southgate, John K. Aderibigbe, Tolulope V. Balogun, Bright Mahembe SA Journal of Human Resource Management.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Association between high emotional demand at work, burnout symptoms, and sleep disturbance among Korean workers: a cross-sectional mediation analysis
Seong-Uk Baek, Jin-Ha Yoon, Jong-Uk Won Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Validation of the ultra‐short scale for measuring work engagement among social workers in Chinese contexts
Xuebing Su, Victor Wong, Charlie Yip International Journal of Social Welfare.2023; 32(2): 241. CrossRef - The Association between Working Hours Flexibility and Well-Being Prior to and during COVID-19 in South Korea
Nataliya Nerobkova, Yu Shin Park, Eun-Cheol Park, Suk-Yong Jang International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(14): 8438. CrossRef - How Does the Involuntary Choice of Self-Employment Affect Subjective Well-Being in Small-Sized Business Workers? A Cross-Sectional Study from the Fifth Korean Working Conditions Survey
SangJin Park, Chulyong Park, Joo Hyun Sung International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(2): 1011. CrossRef - Structural Equation Model of Work Situation and Work–Family Conflict on Depression and Work Engagement in Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) Drivers
Dong-Seok Shin, Byung-Yong Jeong Applied Sciences.2021; 11(13): 5822. CrossRef - The relationship between self-leadership, the future of human resource management, and work engagement
Cecilia M. Schultz SA Journal of Human Resource Management.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
-
76
View
-
0
Download
-
11
Web of Science
-
12
Crossref
-
Korean translation and validation of the Workplace Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment (PERMA)-Profiler
-
Seong Pil Choi, Chunhui Suh, Jae Won Yang, Byung Jin Ye, Chae Kwan Lee, Byung Chul Son, Maro Choi
-
Ann Occup Environ Med 2019;31:e17. Published online August 13, 2019
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2019.31.e17
-
-
Abstract
PDFPubReaderePub
- Background
No tool is available for the multidimensional measurement of workplace well-being among Korean workers. In this study, the Workplace Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment (PERMA)-Profiler, a multidimensional workplace well-being measure, was translated into Korean, and its validity and reliability were assessed. MethodsThe Workplace PERMA-Profiler, including the positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment domains, was translated according to international guidelines. The questionnaires included the Workplace PERMA-Profiler, Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey, Psychosocial Well-being Index-Short Form, and Korean Occupational Stress Scale-Short Form. A total of 316 Korean workers completed a web-based survey with adequate response. Cronbach's alpha values were calculated to assess scale reliability, and correlational and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess validity. ResultsCronbach's alpha values for the Korean Workplace PERMA-Profiler ranged from 0.70 to 0.95. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 5-factor model had a marginally acceptable fit [χ2(80) = 383.04, comparative fit index = 0.909, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.881, root mean square error of approximation = 0.110, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.054]. The 5-factor PERMA domains were correlated positively with work engagement and mental well-being in life, and negatively with burnout, occupational stressors, and stress responses. These results showed that the Workplace PERMA-Profiler has good convergent and divergent validity. ConclusionsThe Korean version of the Workplace PERMA-Profiler had good reliability and validity. It might be used as an indicator or evaluation tool for positive mental health interventions in the workplace.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- The validation of Chinese version of workplace PERMA-profiler and the association between workplace well-being and fatigue
Chen–Cheng Yang, Hsiang-Tai Chen, Kuei-Hau Luo, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Hung-Yi Chuang, Chih-Wei Wu, Chia–Yen Dai, Chao-Hung Kuo, Norito Kawakami BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Psychometric validation of the PERMA-profiler for well-being in Chinese adults
Yi-Zi Nie, Xu Zhang, Ning-Wei Hong, Chao Zhou, Qian-Qian Huang, Shu-Yan Cao, Chen Wang Acta Psychologica.2024; 246: 104248. CrossRef - PERMA to PERMA+4 building blocks of well-being: A systematic review of the empirical literature
Victoria Cabrera, Stewart I. Donaldson The Journal of Positive Psychology.2024; 19(3): 510. CrossRef - Does Changing a Scale’s Context Impact Its Psychometric Properties? A Comparison Using the PERMA-Profiler and the Workplace PERMA-Profiler
Sean P. M. Rice Merits.2024; 4(2): 109. CrossRef - Sources of Joy in Medical Educators as Described by the PERMA Model
Madeline Lagina, Cyril Grum, Gurjit Sandhu, Allison L. Ruff Teaching and Learning in Medicine.2024; 36(1): 53. CrossRef - A study on the construction and validation of pathways to the sustainable well-being of Chinese vocational students in the post-epidemic era
Jian-Hong Ye, Yu-Tai Wu, Yu-Feng Wu, Mei-Yen Chen, Weiguaju Nong, Yi-Sang Lee Current Psychology.2024; 43(8): 7511. CrossRef - The efficacy of employee strengths interventions on desirable workplace outcomes
Alexandra J. Bratty, Nicole C. Dennis Current Psychology.2024; 43(18): 16514. CrossRef - Modifying the PERMA profiler to assess student well-being
Kah Loong Chue, Amelia Yeo, Youyan Nie, Lee Chin Chew Current Psychology.2024; 43(4): 3749. CrossRef - Subjective Representations of the Health of Preschool Teachers
E.N. Volkova, N.A. Rudnova, A.M. Kalimullin Social Psychology and Society.2023; 14(2): 103. CrossRef - Flourishing in the Brazilian context: Evidence of the validity of the PERMA-profiler scale
Thainá Ferraz de Carvalho, Sibele Dias de Aquino, Jean Carlos Natividade Current Psychology.2023; 42(3): 1828. CrossRef - A magyar nyelvű PERMA Jóllét Profil kérdőív megbízhatóságának és érvényességének vizsgálata
Balázs András Varga, Attila Oláh, András Vargha Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika.2022; 23(1): 33. CrossRef - The Associations Between Job Strain, Workplace PERMA Profiler, and Work Engagement
Chen-Cheng Yang, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Norito Kawakami Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine.2022; 64(5): 409. CrossRef - Factors of Psychological Well-being in Russian Youth
O.M. Isaeva, A.Y. Akimova, E.N. Volkova Psychological Science and Education.2022; 27(4): 24. CrossRef - An Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the PERMA Well-Being Scale for Adult Undergraduate Students in an Open and Distance Learning Context
Ishmael Magare, Marien Alet Graham, Irma Eloff International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(24): 16886. CrossRef - PERMA-Profiler: the Approbation of the Russian Version
O.M. Isaeva, A.Y. Akimova, E.N. Volkova Social Psychology and Society.2022; 13(3): 116. CrossRef - Toward a More PERMA(nent) Conceptualization of Worker Well-Being?
William P. Jimenez, Xiaoxiao Hu, Rebecca Garden, Xiaofei Xie Journal of Personnel Psychology.2022; 21(2): 94. CrossRef
-
92
View
-
0
Download
-
15
Web of Science
-
16
Crossref
|